The Effectiveness of Nasal Corticosteroids Versus Placebo in Nasal Obstruction in Patients With Nasal Septal Deviation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this project is to determine if intranasal corticosteroids have an effect on nasal obstruction in patients with nasal septal deviation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
Participants were identified at their initial visit to the Stanford Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, an academic referral center, in consultation for nasal obstruction. If eligible and interested in participating, patients provided written informed consent prior to randomization.
Eligible participants were patients over the age of 18 years of age with the presence of nasal septal deviation as identified by physical examination, as well as a baseline NOSE score of 35 or greater. Exclusion criteria included a history of nasal or septal surgery, use of intranasal steroids in the three months preceding enrollment, use of systemic steroids in the six months preceding enrollment, and pregnancy or active breastfeeding at the time of enrollment. In order to maximize generalizability of the study, no medications other than systemic and intranasal steroids were used as exclusion criteria.
All study participants received 6 weeks of therapy with an intranasal steroid spray, Nasacort (Chattem Inc), which consists of the steroid triamcinolone acetonide, as well as 6 weeks of placebo with Ayr saline spray (B.F. Ascher). These two study drugs were packaged identically by a local pharmacist and labelled Drug A and Drug B. Nasacort was selected as the intranasal steroid following pharmacist consultation, as this intranasal steroid is less scented than others and therefore was less likely to be distinguishable from the placebo to participants. Participants were instructed to use both drugs as follows: 1 spray per nostril twice a day. Researchers, statistical analysts, and study participants were blinded to the identity of the two drugs until the conclusion of the study. A duration of 6 weeks per drug was selected based on the most commonly observed insurance requirements seen in our practice. Following unblinding, it was determined that Drug A was the placebo, the saline spray, and Drug B was the test drug, the nasal steroid.
Following completion of both study drugs, patients were offered surgical intervention. If interested and medically cleared for surgery, patients underwent surgery. All surgeries were performed by the senior author and included open septorhinoplasty to address septal deviation, with repair of nasal valve stenosis and inferior turbinate reduction performed in some patients as deemed necessary by the senior author.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Triamcinolone acetonide then Ayr spray This study arm will start with 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with a placebo, with a two week washout period in between treatments. |
Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide
2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days.
Other Names:
Drug: Ayr saline nasal mist
110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days.
|
Active Comparator: Ayr spray then triamcinolone acetonide This study arm will start with 6 weeks of placebo, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, with a two week washout period in between treatments. |
Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide
2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days.
Other Names:
Drug: Ayr saline nasal mist
110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Nasal Obstruction as Measured by Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scores Following Therapy With Treatment (Triamcinolone Acetonide) and Placebo (Ayr Saline Spray) [Pre-spray NOSE score - 6 weeks Post spray NOSE score- 2 weeks washout - Pre spray Pre-spray NOSE score - 6 weeks Post spray NOSE score]
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale: A quality of life (QOL) instrument developed to assess nasal obstruction symptoms in patients undergoing septoplasty. It consists of a 5-item questionnaire, scored on a 5-point (0-4) Likert scale. The raw score ranges from 0-20, which is scaled to a score of 0-100 by multiplying the raw score by 5, where '0' represents 'no problem' and, and '100' represent 'worst problem.'
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score Following Surgery in Subset of Patients Who Elect to Undergo Surgery. [Postoperative time interval (months): 1-2 , 3-5 , 6-9, 9-12, >12.]
Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale: A quality of life (QOL) instrument developed to assess nasal obstruction symptoms in patients undergoing septoplasty. It consists of a 5-item questionnaire, scored on a 5-point (0-4) Likert scale. The raw score ranges from 0-20, which is scaled to a score of 0-100 by multiplying the raw score by 5, where '0' represents 'no problem' and, and '100' represent 'worst problem.'
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age greater than 18
-
NOSE score greater than 55
-
Nasal septal deviation on exam
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Intranasal steroid use within the last three months
-
Current systemic steroid use
-
Prior septal surgery
-
Individuals who are pregnant or actively breastfeeding
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Stanford Hospital and Clinics | Stanford | California | United States | 94305 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Stanford University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sam P Most, MD, Stanford University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
- Lipan MJ, Most SP. Development of a severity classification system for subjective nasal obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;15(5):358-61. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.344.
- Sedaghat AR, Busaba NY, Cunningham MJ, Kieff DA. Clinical assessment is an accurate predictor of which patients will need septoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):48-52. doi: 10.1002/lary.23683. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
- Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Feb;130(2):157-63.
- Teti VP, Akdagli S, Most SP. Cost-effectiveness of Corticosteroid Nasal Spray vs Surgical Therapy in Patients With Severe to Extreme Anatomical Nasal Obstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016 May 1;18(3):165-70. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.2039.
- IRB-36535
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Triamcinolone Acetonide Then Ayr Spray | Ayr Spray Then Triamcinolone Acetonide |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This study arm will start with 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with a placebo, with a two week washout period in between treatments. Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. Ayr saline nasal mist: 110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. | This study arm will start with 6 weeks of placebo, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, with a two week washout period in between treatments. Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. Ayr saline nasal mist: 110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 22 | 20 |
COMPLETED | 22 | 20 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Triamcinolone Acetonide Then Ayr Spray | Ayr Spray Then Triamcinolone Acetonide | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This study arm will start with 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with a placebo, with a two week washout period in between treatments. Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. Ayr saline nasal mist: 110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. | This study arm will start with 6 weeks of placebo, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, with a two week washout period in between treatments. Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. Ayr saline nasal mist: 110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 22 | 20 | 42 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
21
95.5%
|
20
100%
|
41
97.6%
|
>=65 years |
1
4.5%
|
0
0%
|
1
2.4%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
32.5
(10.1)
|
33.7
(14.4)
|
33.0
(12.2)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
11
50%
|
5
25%
|
16
38.1%
|
Male |
11
50%
|
15
75%
|
26
61.9%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |||
Count of Participants [Participants] |
0
0%
|
||
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
22
100%
|
20
100%
|
42
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Nasal Obstruction as Measured by Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scores Following Therapy With Treatment (Triamcinolone Acetonide) and Placebo (Ayr Saline Spray) |
---|---|
Description | Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale: A quality of life (QOL) instrument developed to assess nasal obstruction symptoms in patients undergoing septoplasty. It consists of a 5-item questionnaire, scored on a 5-point (0-4) Likert scale. The raw score ranges from 0-20, which is scaled to a score of 0-100 by multiplying the raw score by 5, where '0' represents 'no problem' and, and '100' represent 'worst problem.' |
Time Frame | Pre-spray NOSE score - 6 weeks Post spray NOSE score- 2 weeks washout - Pre spray Pre-spray NOSE score - 6 weeks Post spray NOSE score |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Patients requiring nasal surgery for nasal breathing complaints, nasal cosmesis or both. |
Arm/Group Title | Triamcinolone Acetonide Then Ayr Spray | Ayr Spray Then Triamcinolone Acetonide |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | This study arm will start with 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with a placebo, with a two week washout period in between treatments. Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. Ayr saline nasal mist: 110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. | This study arm will start with 6 weeks of placebo, followed by 6 weeks of therapy with the intranasal steroid, with a two week washout period in between treatments. Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. Ayr saline nasal mist: 110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. |
Measure Participants | 22 | 20 |
Baseline: Pre - spray 1 NOSE score |
69.1
(20.4)
|
68.5
(18)
|
Post - spray 1 / pre- spray 2 NOSE score |
65.2
(20.7)
|
65.8
(20.2)
|
Post - spray 2 NOSE score |
64.1
(20.6)
|
61.5
(21.8)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triamcinolone Acetonide Then Ayr Spray, Ayr Spray Then Triamcinolone Acetonide |
---|---|---|
Comments | 1) H0: mean change in NOSE score from baseline after in study group 1 = mean change in NOSE score from baseline in study group 2 Power calculation: To detect a 20% difference in NOSE scores with 80% power and a 2-sided alpha level of 0.05 required 20 participants per study group, for a total of 40 participants. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7 |
Comments | Statistical Tests: Independent t-test to assess differences in mean change in NOSE scores when comparing the two study groups, and p<0.05 deemed statistically significant | |
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | 1.5 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -6.0 to 8.9 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Change in Mean NOSE score from baseline to post saline versus change in NOSE score from baseline to post intranasal steroid. |
Title | Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score Following Surgery in Subset of Patients Who Elect to Undergo Surgery. |
---|---|
Description | Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale: A quality of life (QOL) instrument developed to assess nasal obstruction symptoms in patients undergoing septoplasty. It consists of a 5-item questionnaire, scored on a 5-point (0-4) Likert scale. The raw score ranges from 0-20, which is scaled to a score of 0-100 by multiplying the raw score by 5, where '0' represents 'no problem' and, and '100' represent 'worst problem.' |
Time Frame | Postoperative time interval (months): 1-2 , 3-5 , 6-9, 9-12, >12. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Pooled analysis of 35 participants who underwent surgery. Paired t-tests were used to assess differences in mean change in NOSE scores at five post-operative time points compared to baseline NOSE scores. |
Arm/Group Title | Surgery Patients |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants who underwent surgery |
Measure Participants | 35 |
Baseline NOSE score |
70
(18.9)
|
Postoperative period: 1-2 months |
16.2
(20.5)
|
Postoperative period:3-5 months |
17.6
(16.5)
|
Postoperative period:6-9 months |
17.2
(19.8)
|
Postoperative period: 9-12 months |
22.2
(24.9)
|
Postoperative period: >12 months |
20
(18.8)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Triamcinolone Acetonide Then Ayr Spray |
---|---|---|
Comments | H0: Mean pre- treatment baseline patient NOSE score = Mean post- treatment baseline patient NOSE score. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.001 |
Comments | Paired t-tests to assess differences in mean NOSE score when the treatment groups were combined (saline arm+ steroid arm) at five post-operative time intervals compared to the combined preoperative baseline scores. Significance at p<0.05. | |
Method | Paired t-test | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -50 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) % to |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Deviation Value: 27.6 |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 6 weeks after start of treatment (after drug spray 1). 14 weeks after start of treatment (after drug spray 2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | No adverse events to report | |||
Arm/Group Title | Triamcinolone Acetonide | Ayr Spray | ||
Arm/Group Description | Triamcinolone Acetonide: 2 sprays sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. | Ayr saline nasal mist: 110mcg (2 sprays) sprayed to both nostrils daily for 42 days. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Triamcinolone Acetonide | Ayr Spray | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/22 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Triamcinolone Acetonide | Ayr Spray | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/22 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Triamcinolone Acetonide | Ayr Spray | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/22 (0%) | 0/20 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Sam P. Most MD |
---|---|
Organization | Stanford Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery |
Phone | 650-736-3223 |
smost@stanford.edu |
- IRB-36535