Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie

Sponsor
University of Iowa (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03003455
Collaborator
(none)
257
1
2
47
5.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal intubation over a bougie placed via a nasal trumpet will decrease nasal trauma when compared to the conventional technique of blind nasal endotracheal tube passage.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie
  • Procedure: Conventional Nasotracheal Intubation
N/A

Detailed Description

Conventional nasotracheal intubation techniques (or "Conventional Videolaryngoscopic Techniques," CVT) are known to be associated with significant trauma to the patient's nares and the endotracheal tube itself. The investigators propose an alternative technique (Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie placed via a subsequently removed nasal trumpet, or NIB) which involves using Seldinger technique over a bougie placed via a nasal trumpet which promises to not only be less traumatic to the patient and the endotracheal tube, but also to take less time to perform and have a higher first-attempt success rate than conventional methods. The investigators propose a randomized prospective interventional study comparing this new technique with conventional technique to see if a significant difference exists.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
257 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie Placed Via a Subsequently Removed Nasal Trumpet
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Nasotracheal Intubation (CVT)

Blind passage of an endotracheal tube via the nare followed by videolaryngoscopy-assisted passage through the glottis, with or without the aid of Magill forceps

Procedure: Conventional Nasotracheal Intubation
Blind passage of an endotracheal tube via the nare followed by videolaryngoscopy-assisted passage through the glottis, with or without the aid of Magill forceps
Other Names:
  • CVT
  • Experimental: Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie (NIB)

    Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie, placed with videolaryngoscopy assistance, via a nasopharyngeal airway with or without the aid of Magill forceps

    Procedure: Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie
    Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie, placed with videolaryngoscopy assistance, via a nasopharyngeal airway with or without the aid of Magill forceps
    Other Names:
  • Abrons technique for nasotracheal intubation
  • Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie placed via a subsequently removed nasal trumpet
  • NIB
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Nasal trauma [60-90 seconds post-intubation]

      Bleeding noted on nasopharyngeal exam by surgical resident

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Nasal trauma [5 minutes post-intubation]

      Bleeding noted on nasopharyngeal exam by surgical resident

    2. Time to intubation [Measured immediately post-intubation]

      Time from first entrance of ETT or bougie into the nare to the presence of end-tidal CO2 via nasotracheal ETT

    3. First attempt success rate [Measured immediately post-intubation]

      Whether or not there was successful nasotracheal intubation on the first attempt

    4. Need for Magill forceps [Measured Immediately post-intubation]

      Whether or not Magill forceps were used during airway management

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    8 Years to 99 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients scheduled for elective surgery with an anesthetic plan including asleep nasotracheal intubation
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients needing emergent airway protection

    • Patients undergoing emergency surgery

    • Patients whom are known to be pregnant

    • Patients whom are currently anticoagulated (including daily aspirin use)

    • Patients whose anesthetic includes the use of nitrous oxide

    • Patients whom are currently incarcerated

    • Patients 7 years of age or younger

    • Mentally incompetent adults

    • Patients whom refuse involvement in the study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa United States 52242

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Iowa

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Abrons, Ron O, Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03003455
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 201112757
    First Posted:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2016
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Abrons, Ron O, Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Dec 28, 2016