A RCT of Ondansetron and Promethazine in the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Emergency Department

Sponsor
University of New Mexico (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00429832
Collaborator
GlaxoSmithKline (Industry)
120
1
25
4.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This was a trial comparing two commonly used medications for nausea and vomiting, ondansetron and promethazine, in the Emergency Department.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Nausea and vomiting are common complaints in the emergency department (ED). There are many pharmacologic agents used for the treatment of these complaints. None are new nor experimental. Very little research has been done in the ED setting to determine which of these agents is most effective with the least adverse effects. Our own previous research found that droperidol but not prochlorperazine and metoclopramide is more effective than placebo. Because of the recent FDA black box warning added to droperidol, the use of this agent has suddenly ceased in many EDs. Promethazine remains a very commonly used antiemetic in many EDs but one recent study found it less effective than prochlorperazine which was in turn found no more effective than placebo in our own study. As a result many physicians have turned to ondansetron, a newer and more expensive agent. Experience among anesthesiologists and oncologists has shown ondansetron to be highly effective with a minimum of adverse effects. These patient populations, however, are very different from those found in the ED. It is our hypothesis that promethazine and ondansetron are equally effective for the ED treatment of unselected patients with nausea and vomiting with similar rates of adverse effects.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ondansetron and Promethazine in the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Emergency Department
Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2003
Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2005

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Reduction in nausea on a VAS. []

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in sedation on a VAS []

  2. Change in anxiety on a VAS []

  3. Need for rescue medication at 30 minutes []

  4. Patient satisfaction at follow-up []

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age 18 or older

  • Chief complaint of nausea or vomiting

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Age less than 18

  • unable to provide informed consent

  • rate nausea at < 40 mm on 100 mm VAS

  • received antiemetic within 24 hours

  • pregnant or possibly pregnant

  • reported allergy to either study medication

  • received more than 1 liter of intravenous fluids

  • their primary ED physician declined to have patient participate

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of New Mexico Hospital Emergency Department Albuquerque New Mexico United States 87131

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of New Mexico
  • GlaxoSmithKline

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Darren A Braude, MD, MPH, University of New Mexico

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00429832
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 03-006
First Posted:
Feb 1, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Feb 1, 2007
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2007
Keywords provided by , ,
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 1, 2007