Muscle Energy Technique Versus Maitland Mobilization on Shoulder Pain and Disability

Sponsor
Cairo University (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT06010381
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
22.4
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of muscle energy technique versus Maitland's mobilization on shoulder pain and disability after neck dissection surgeries.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Muscle energy technique
  • Other: Maitland mobilization
  • Other: Traditional shoulder exercise
N/A

Detailed Description

Thirty patients with shoulder pain and limited ROM post-neck dissection surgeries participated in this study. Patients were subdivided into two groups, fifteen patients in each group. Group A received the muscle energy technique and group B received Maitland's mobilization.

Data obtained from both groups regarding Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and shoulder flexion, abduction, and external ROM were statistically analyzed and compared.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients were subdivided into two groups, fifteen patients in each group. Group A received the muscle energy technique and group B received Maitland's mobilization.Patients were subdivided into two groups, fifteen patients in each group. Group A received the muscle energy technique and group B received Maitland's mobilization.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Muscle Energy Technique Versus Maitland Mobilization on Shoulder Pain and Disability After Neck Dissection Surgeries.
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 13, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Muscle energy technique

This group includes 15 patients who received muscle energy technique post-surgery in addition to traditional shoulder exercise, 3 sessions/week for four weeks.

Other: Muscle energy technique
It was applied on the shoulder flexion and the external rotation. An isometric contraction of the agonist muscle (the muscle which requires stretching) for 7 seconds with gentle muscle contraction to avoid the risk of increasing the muscle tone. This contraction started just short of the restrictive barrier. After that, the patient is asked to relax for 2-3 seconds and then the therapist stretches the contracted muscle in the opposite direction for 30 seconds. This is repeated three repetitions for each muscle.

Other: Traditional shoulder exercise
Traditional shoulder exercises in the form of shoulder range of motion exercises, stretching exercises and, scapular stabilization.

Active Comparator: Maitland mobilization

This group includes 15 patients who received mobilization in addition to traditional shoulder exercise, 3 sessions/week for four weeks.

Other: Maitland mobilization
At the start of each session, the physical therapist examined the patient's ROM in all directions to obtain information about the end-range position and the end feel of the glenohumeral joint. Start with rhythmic mid-range mobilization with the patient in a supine position. The therapist's hands are placed close to the glenohumeral joint, and the humerus is brought into a position of maximal flexion in the sagittal plane. After 10 to 15 repetitions of intensive mobilization techniques in this end-range position, the direction of mobilization will be altered by varying the plane of elevation or by varying the degree of rotation. When alternating the direction of mobilization, other movements such as gliding techniques and distraction in that joint position were (inferior gliding, anterior gliding, and posterior gliding).

Other: Traditional shoulder exercise
Traditional shoulder exercises in the form of shoulder range of motion exercises, stretching exercises and, scapular stabilization.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual analogue scale (VAS) [Change from baseline at four weeks after the intervention]

    A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is one of the pain rating scales used for the first time in 1921 by Hayes and Patterson. It is often used in epidemiology and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms.

  2. The SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) [Change from baseline at four weeks after the intervention]

    It is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 13 items divided in two parts: pain and disability sub-scale.

  3. Shoulder active range of motion [Change from baseline at four weeks after the intervention]

    Through using the universal goniometer to measure the shoulder flexion, abduction and, external rotation.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
25 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age range between 25-70 years.

  • Male and female patients participated in the study.

  • All patients had shoulder pain following different NDS

  • All patients had no previous shoulder pain.

  • All patients enrolled in the study had their informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Previous shoulder pain from any other causes.

  • Pregnancy.

  • Epileptics.

  • Radiotherapy.

  • Chemotherapy.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Shaimaa Mohamed Ahmed El Sayeh Cairo Egypt 02

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Cairo University

Investigators

  • Study Director: Shaimaa MA El Sayeh, PhD, Lecturer at Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Shaimaa Mohamed Ahmed Elsayeh, Lecturer of Physical Therapy, Cairo University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT06010381
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • P.T.REC/012/003370
First Posted:
Aug 24, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Aug 24, 2023
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Shaimaa Mohamed Ahmed Elsayeh, Lecturer of Physical Therapy, Cairo University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 24, 2023