The Effectiveness of Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Nerve-Related Leg Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims to verify if patients with nerve-related leg pain benefits from neurodynamic treatment over two weeks.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Nerve-related leg pain (NRLP) although less prevalent than low back pain itself, is associated with higher economic and social burden, and has been considered a predictor of chronicity and disability among subjects with low back pain.
Numerous approaches are proposed for its management; however, evidence regarding the best therapeutic approach is lacking. Neurodynamic techniques are proposed to be effective to manage NRLP.
Thus, this study aims to verify, through a randomized controlled trial, the effectiveness of a two-week program of neurodynamic techniques on pain and disability in individuals with NRLP.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Neurodynamic group Patients allocated to this group will receive three different neurodynamic techniques: a lumbar foramen dynamic opener; a side-lying slider and a slider in the slump position. Patients will be asked to perform home exercises (a slider and a tensioner technique). Treatment will receive four treatments during two weeks (two sessions/week). |
Procedure: Neurodynamic Group
All techniques will be executed in a pain-free way (grade III). Mild discomfort will be accepted, but it must subside as soon as the technique ends.
In the dynamic opener technique, patient will be positioned in side-lying, with the affected side upwards. The therapist will then perform grade III oscillations aiming to open the lumbar foramen;
In the side-lying slider, the patient will be in side-lying with the affected side upwards. A combination of knee and hip flexion and extension movements will produce sliding in the neural structures;
In the slump slider, the patient will be seated in slump position. Combinations between neck and knee movements will produce greater nerve excursion than the side-lying slider. Patients will perform the slump slider in a pain-free manner.
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Control Group Patients allocated to Control Group (CG) will receive no intervention and will be advised according to the best evidence available; i.e, advice to remain active and to resume activities of daily living Upon trial completion, treatment will be offered. |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Leg Pain Intensity [Two weeks after randomization]
Leg Pain will be measured by a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (Pain NRS)
- Disability [Two weeks after randomization]
Disability will be measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Leg pain Intensity [Four weeks after randomization]
Leg Pain will me measured by a 0-10 Pain NRS
- Disability [Four weeks after randomization]
Disability will be measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
- Back pain intensity [Two weeks after randomization]
Back Pain will me measured by an 0-10 Pain NRS
- Back pain intensity [Four weeks after randomization]
Back Pain will me measured by an 0-10 Pain NRS
- Distribution of Symptoms [Two weeks, Four weeks after randomization]
Distribution of symptoms will me measured by a body diagram
- Function [Two weeks, Four weeks after randomization]
Function will be measured by the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
- Global Perceived Effect [Two weeks, Four weeks after randomization]
Global Perceived Effect will be measured by an 11-point (-5 to +5) Global Perceived Effect Scale
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
-
unilateral leg pain (Intensity ≥ 3)
-
Pain distal to the buttocks
-
Reproduction of symptoms and change in symptoms with structural differentiation (cervical return to neutral position or ankle dorsiflexion) with slump test;
Exclusion criteria:
-
cauda equina syndrome;
-
bilateral leg pain;
-
crossed Lasègue sign;
-
previous surgery in the lumbar spine;
-
inflammatory arthropathies;
-
malignancy
-
being in litigation or in work-compensation due to back and/or leg pain
-
being receiving physiotherapy treatment at the time of baseline assessment
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande do sul | Brazil | 90050-170 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Investigators
- Study Chair: Marcelo F Silva, PhD, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- UFCSPA