DANCHEONG: Comparison of Sugammadex With Neostigmine as Reversal Agents for Rocuronium at Reappearance of T2 (Study P06101)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, multi-site, safety-assessor blinded study comparing sugammadex to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in Korean subjects undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia that require rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade. Study medication will be administered at reappearance of T2. Time to recovery will be measured from start of study medication administration to recovery of the T4/T1 ratio of 0.9. The primary hypothesis is that the time to recovery of the T4/T1 ratio of 0.9 is shorter with sugammadex than with neostigmine.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Sugammadex
|
Drug: sugammadex
sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg, single intravenous bolus dose administered within 10 seconds into a fast flowing venous infusion
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Neostigmine
|
Drug: neostigmine
neostigmine 50 mcg/kg (total dose not to exceed 5.0 mg) combined with glycopyrrolate 10 mcg/kg, single intravenous bolus dose administered within 10 seconds into a fast flowing venous infusion
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Time From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 [From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 (estimated from 2 minutes up to ~15 minutes)]
Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive Train-Of-Four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds & assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 & T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the 1st & 4th twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade. In this study, twitch responses were recorded until the T4/T1 Ratio reached >= 0.9, the minimum acceptable ratio that indicated complete recovery.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 1 or 2 or 3
-
=18 years of age and of either sex
-
scheduled for elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia requiring the use of rocuronium for endotracheal intubation and/or maintenance of neuromuscular blockade in a supine position allowing neuromuscular transmission monitoring and requiring reversal of neuromuscular blockade
-
Korean descent born in Korea, never emigrated out of Korea, and have a Korean home address
Exclusion Criteria:
-
expected difficult intubation due to anatomic malformations
-
expected transfer to intensive care unit after surgery
-
neuromuscular disorders affecting neuromuscular blockade
-
significant hepatic or renal dysfunction
-
require use of pneumatic tourniquet during surgery
-
(family) history of malignant hyperthermia
-
allergy to cyclodextrins (including sugammadex) or other medication(s) used during general anesthesia; use of toremifene or fusidic acid within 24 hours of study drug administration; contraindication to use of neostigmine or glycopyrrolate
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- P06101
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Sugammadex | Neostigmine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | sugammadex 2 mg/kg | neostigmine 50 mcg/kg |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 64 | 64 |
COMPLETED | 60 | 60 |
NOT COMPLETED | 4 | 4 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Sugammadex | Neostigmine | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | sugammadex 2 mg/kg | neostigmine 50 mcg/kg | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 60 | 60 | 120 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
41.3
(14.0)
|
42.6
(14.0)
|
42.0
(13.9)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
21
35%
|
23
38.3%
|
44
36.7%
|
Male |
39
65%
|
37
61.7%
|
76
63.3%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Time From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 |
---|---|
Description | Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive Train-Of-Four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds & assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 & T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the 1st & 4th twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade. In this study, twitch responses were recorded until the T4/T1 Ratio reached >= 0.9, the minimum acceptable ratio that indicated complete recovery. |
Time Frame | From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 (estimated from 2 minutes up to ~15 minutes) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full Analysis Set, defined as all participants who received randomized treatment and had at least one efficacy measurement. |
Arm/Group Title | Sugammadex | Neostigmine |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | sugammadex 2 mg/kg | neostigmine 50 mcg/kg |
Measure Participants | 59 | 59 |
Geometric Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [minutes] |
1.77
|
14.80
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Sugammadex, Neostigmine |
---|---|---|
Comments | To evaluate the efficacy of sugammadex compared to the efficacy of neostigmine, the ratio of the geometric means of time to recovery of the T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 was calculated using a 2-way ANOVA model adjusted for trial site. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 8.1 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 6.8 to 9.6 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Sugammadex | Neostigmine | ||
Arm/Group Description | sugammadex 2 mg/kg | neostigmine 50 mcg/kg | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Sugammadex | Neostigmine | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Sugammadex | Neostigmine | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 2/60 (3.3%) | 2/60 (3.3%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Post-operative abscess | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Intestinal anastomosis complication | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 | 0/60 (0%) | 0 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Metastases to bone | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Dysuria | 0/60 (0%) | 0 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Sugammadex | Neostigmine | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 36/60 (60%) | 42/60 (70%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 4/60 (6.7%) | 4 | 4/60 (6.7%) | 4 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Incision site pain | 7/60 (11.7%) | 9 | 12/60 (20%) | 16 |
Procedural hypotension | 4/60 (6.7%) | 6 | 1/60 (1.7%) | 2 |
Procedural pain | 20/60 (33.3%) | 22 | 18/60 (30%) | 19 |
Wound complication | 3/60 (5%) | 3 | 6/60 (10%) | 6 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 7/60 (11.7%) | 8 | 9/60 (15%) | 10 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The sponsor shall have the right to review and comment with respect to publications with regard to the following concerns: proprietary information; accuracy of the information; and to ensure that the presentation is fairly balanced and in compliance with FDA regulations. The investigator further agrees to provide to the sponsor 45 days prior to submission for publication or presentation, review copies of abstracts or manuscripts for publication that report any results of the trial.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development |
---|---|
Organization | Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. |
Phone | |
ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@merck.com |
- P06101