Mindful SensoriMotor Therapy With Brain Modulation in Highly Impaired Extremities
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Brief summary: This single-arm, pilot clinical investigation aims to evaluate Mindful SensoriMotor Therapy (MSMT) enhanced with brain modulation as a treatment of pain due to sensorimotor impairment, such as Phantom Limb Pain (PLP). MSMT consists of consciously retraining the motor and sensory networks used by the missing limb via myoelectric pattern recognition and haptic feedback. In this trial, we further enhance the effect of MSMT by brain modulation, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
People with upper or lower limb disarticulation (amputation at joint level) or nerve injury will participate in this study. It is a single-arm study in which all participants receive the same intervention. Each participant attends a screening visit, up to 5 baseline assessments, 15 interventions, and 3 follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last intervention. Brain imaging will be performed pre- and post-treatment.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Mindful SensoriMotor Therapy Enhanced with Brain Modulation The participant can choose between one, two, or five interventions per week depending on their availability. Steps of each intervention: Pain Evaluation: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Functional Assessments (1st, 5th, 10th, and last sessions) Preparation: Locate participant in a comfortable position for training (comfortable chair, about a meter distance to the screen, pleasant arm position) Placement of the surface electrodes Positioning of the feedback wearable device over the affected body part Placement of the brain modulation cap Treatment modalities: Motor training Sensory training Sensorimotor training Assessments Step 4 is repeated for different phantom movements, initially one at a time, progressing to several joints simultaneously. A treatment session lasts 2 hours. |
Device: Mindful SensoriMotor Therapy Enhanced with Brain Modulation
Hardware and software for myoelectric pattern recognition and sensory training developed at the Center for Bionics and Pain Research.
tES by Neuroelectrics
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The change in Pain Rating Index (PRI) over the treatment duration [Pain Rating Index registered at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. [ Time Frame: 28-40 weeks, depending on the frequency of the sessions.]]
The Pain Rating Index (PRI) is calculated as the sum of 15 descriptors presented to the participant at the end of each intervention session. Descriptors are rated from 0 (no pain) to 3 (maximum pain) and therefore, the PRI is a number between 0 and 45. The higher PRI number, the greater pain the person feels
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The change in Pain Disability Index (PDI) between the first and the last treatment session. [PDI assessed at the beginning the end of the treatment. [ Time Frame: 28-40 weeks, depending on the frequency of the sessions.]]
The Pain Disability Index (PDI) measures the impact of the pain on the ability of a person to participate in essential life activities. The PDI is the sum of 7 categories and each of the category rates between 0 and 10. Therefore, the index is comprised between 0 and 70. The higher the index the greater the person's disability due to pain is.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria
-
The participant has given written informed consent to participate.
-
The participant must have chronic neuropathic pain due to sensorimotor impairment (example PLP).
-
At least six months should be passed since the date of injury (acute pain cases should not be included in the study).
-
If the participant is under pharmacological treatments, there must be no variations on the medication dosages (steady consumption) for at least 1 month before the screening visit.
-
If the participant has previously been treated for neuropathic pain, the last session of that treatment(s) must be at least 3 months before the screening visit.
-
Any pain reduction potentially correlated to previous neuropathic pain treatments must have been observed at least 3 months prior to the screening visit, as reported by the participant.
-
In the case of having a prosthesis, the participant must be in a stable prosthetic situation (i.e. satisfied with the fitting of the prosthesis or not using a prosthesis).
-
Participants must have enough contact surface at the site of the amputation or the injured nerves for the system to work, in the researcher's opinion.
-
Participants must be able to perceive the haptic stimulation at the time of the screening visit.
-
Participants must not experience painful sensations from haptic stimulation in the stump (i.e. allodynia).
-
The participant has a sufficient understanding of both Swedish and English to be able to participate in all study assessments, in the researcher's opinion.
-
Participants should not have any other condition or symptoms that can prevent them from participating in the study, in the researcher's opinion.
-
No mental inability, reluctance, or language difficulties that result in difficulty understanding the meaning of study participation, in the researcher's opinion.
-
The participant should not have any condition associated with the risk of poor protocol compliance, in the researcher's opinion.
Exclusion criteria
- The potential participant will be excluded from the study if the person does not meet at least one of the inclusion criteria.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Center for Bionics and Pain Research, CBPR | Mölndal | Västra Götaland | Sweden | 431 80 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Chalmers University of Technology
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Max Ortiz Catalan, PhD, Associate Professor
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Lendaro E, Hermansson L, Burger H, Van der Sluis CK, McGuire BE, Pilch M, Bunketorp-Käll L, Kulbacka-Ortiz K, Rignér I, Stockselius A, Gudmundson L, Widehammar C, Hill W, Geers S, Ortiz-Catalan M. Phantom motor execution as a treatment for phantom limb pain: protocol of an international, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 16;8(7):e021039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021039.
- Ortiz-Catalan M, Guðmundsdóttir RA, Kristoffersen MB, Zepeda-Echavarria A, Caine-Winterberger K, Kulbacka-Ortiz K, Widehammar C, Eriksson K, Stockselius A, Ragnö C, Pihlar Z, Burger H, Hermansson L. Phantom motor execution facilitated by machine learning and augmented reality as treatment for phantom limb pain: a single group, clinical trial in patients with chronic intractable phantom limb pain. Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2885-2894. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31598-7. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
- Ortiz-Catalan M. The Stochastic Entanglement and Phantom Motor Execution Hypotheses: A Theoretical Framework for the Origin and Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain. Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 6;9:748. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00748. eCollection 2018.
- 2020-07147