Neurophysiologic Correlates of Movement Planning During Complex Jump Landing Tasks and the Role of Cognitive Function
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To examine the long-term effects of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and reconstructions (after successful rehabilitation) on cortical processes of motor planning during complex jump landing tasks and the relevance of cognitive performance measures for landing stability, respectively knee injury risk.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
Particularly, in the context of ball sports ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are among the most frequent injuries. However, the ACL tear does not only result in a loss of mechanical stability in the knee joint: the tear of the ligament and the subsequent reconstructive surgery lead to a massive damage of so-called mechanoreceptors (proprioceptors). These small sensors provide the brain with precise information on the tension of the cruciate ligament and the position of the knee joint. Due to this feedback, it is possible for humans to adjust the activity of the stabilizing muscles to various situations in sports and daily life and to protect the knee from injuries. Thus, coordination deficits are common consequences after ACL-rupture and reconstruction due to the poorer sensory feedback.
New findings provide evidence that the injury-induced damage of the mechanoreceptors also causes persistent, neuronal reorganisations in the brain (injury induced neuroplasticity). These relate in particular to the motor cortex by which voluntary movements are controlled. According to the results of imaging (eg. functional magnetic resonance tomography; MRI) and electrophysiological studies (eg. Electroencephalography; EEG), these neurologic adaptation appear to persist far beyond the resumption of daily, sporting or competitive activities. Researchers suggest that these adaptations of the central nervous system might be the underlying cause of the frequently observed, persistent motor control and functional deficits (eg. muscle strength and muscle activation deficits), the relatively high re-injury, low return to sports rates and small proportions returning to their initial performance level after ACL tears and reconstruction. A pure restoration of the neuromuscular function without the elimination of the neuroplastic changes in the brain does therefore not appear sufficient.
In recent studies the effects of ACL trauma on brain activity have been investigated exclusively during unspecific, sport- and injury-unrelated tests (eg. simple flexion and extension movements and angular reproduction tasks of the knee). Often, injuries to the ACL occur under unpredictable conditions, especially in complex, dynamic movements such as changes of direction, jumps and landings. Here, the brain has to process information from the receptors of the ACL as quickly as possible to initiate an adequate motor response to protect the knee.
Against the background of the above described findings, this cross-sectional case-control study will firstly investigate the effects of completely healed ACL tears and reconstruction (side symmetry of neuromuscular performance measures above 85%) on movement planning related cortical activity (via Electroencephalography) measures during complex jump-landing tasks: The study participants perform counter-movement jumps (n=80; CMJ, flight time approximately 500 ms) followed by single leg landings. While under an anticipated condition (n=40), the individuals receive the visual information (presented on a screen) on which leg/ foot (left, right) they are required to land before self-initiated CMJs, the individuals will receive this information under the non-anticipated condition (n=40) only after take-off (approximately 400 ms before ground contact). The measurement of the landing stability is standardized by means of selected biomechanical parameters (capacitive force platform). Injury-relevant, cognitive characteristics (e.g., reaction, information processing speed and working memory) are detected by computer and paper-based clinical cognition tests.
The investigators hypothesize that the injury-related neurological adjustments in the motor cortex lead to a more intensive motor action planning before movement initiation (compensation of sensory deficits). The increased use of neuronal capacities for movement planning could subsequently lead to a slower or to unprecise motor responses to unforeseen/ non-anticipated events and subsequently cause greater landing instability, or increase the knee injury risk, respectively. It is also assumed that a lower cognitive information processing is associated with a more instable landing, or a higher risk of injury or higher injury incidence rate, respectively.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Healthy Control Age matched healthy subjects. Inclusion criteria for healthy controls are: male (18 - 40 years, right-handed); sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer); no acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases; no medication |
Diagnostic Test: Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing Task
The study participants perform counter-movement jumps (CMJ, flight time approximately 500 ms) followed by single leg landings. While under an anticipated condition, the individuals receive the visual information (presented on a screen) on which leg/ foot (left, right) they are required to land before self-initiated CMJs, the individuals will receive this information under the non-anticipated condition only after take-off (approximately 400 ms before ground contact).
|
| Subjects with ACL reconstruction Unilateral, primary anterior cruciate ligament tear and reconstruction (1 to 10 years ago); no serious concomitant injuries, e.g. "unhappy triad"); no kinesiophobia; symmetric single leg jump performance (>85 %); male (18 - 40 years, right-handed); sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer); no acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases; no medication |
Diagnostic Test: Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing Task
The study participants perform counter-movement jumps (CMJ, flight time approximately 500 ms) followed by single leg landings. While under an anticipated condition, the individuals receive the visual information (presented on a screen) on which leg/ foot (left, right) they are required to land before self-initiated CMJs, the individuals will receive this information under the non-anticipated condition only after take-off (approximately 400 ms before ground contact).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Bereitschaftspotential - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day]
Determined via Electroencephalography as amplitude in microvolt [μV] and latency in milliseconds [ms] before initiation of jump movement
- Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)/ low beta-band power - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day]
Determined via Electroencephalography in microvolt^2 [μV²]
- Frontal theta-band power - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, SMR/ low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day]
Determined via Electroencephalography in microvolt^2 [μV²]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Peak ground reaction force - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings [Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)]
Determined via capacitive force platform: Biomechanical outcome measure of single leg jump-landing (Newton [N])
- Time to stabilisation - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings [Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)]
Determined via capacitive force platform: Biomechanical outcome measure of single leg jump-landing (seconds [s])
- Center of pressure sway - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings [Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)]
Determined via capacitive force platform: Biomechanical outcome measure of single leg jump-landing (in millimeter [mm])^2 [μV²])
- Visual perceptual ability - Lower cognitive function [Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)]
Determined via pen and paper tests: Trail Making Test A (Time for task completion in seconds [s])
- Reaction time/ processing speed - Lower cognitive function [Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 10 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)]
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test (mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses in milliseconds [ms])
- Working memory - Higher cognitive function [Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 10 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)]
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test (One card learning test: Speed of performance (mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses) and Accuracy of performance (arcsine transformation of the square root of the proportion of correct responses); Digit Span Task: Number of correct reproduced digits)
- Cognitive flexibility - Higher cognitive function [Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)]
Determined via pen and paper test: Trail-Making-Test B vs. A (time for task completion in seconds [s])
- Inhibitory control - Higher cognitive function [Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 15 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)]
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test: Stop-Signal-Task (Stop signal reaction time in milliseconds [ms])
- Interference control - Higher cognitive function [Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)]
Determined via pen and paper test: Stroop-Test (Time for task completion in seconds [s])
- Kinesiophobia (subjective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via questionnaire (Tampa scale)
- Self-reported knee function (subjective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via questionnaire (Lysholm knee score)
- Physical activities (subjective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via questionnaire (IPAQ)
- Sport activities (current and past; subjective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via questionnaire
- Risk behaviour (subjective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via questionnaire (DOSPERT scale)
- Musculoskeletal injuries (current and past; subjective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via questionnaire
- Single and both legs jump performance (objective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via motor testing (in centimeter [cm])
- Single leg jump symmetry (objective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via motor testing (in percent [%])
- Static postural control (objective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via motor testing (in millimeter [mm])
- Visuomotor reaction time (objective measure) - Potential confounder [Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)]
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test (in milliseconds [ms])
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
male (18 - 40 years, right-handed)
-
sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer)
Only cases:
-
unilateral, primary anterior cruciate ligament tear and reconstruction (1-10yrs ago)
-
no serious concomitant injuries (e.g. "unhappy triad")
-
no kinesiophobia
-
symmetric single leg jump performance (>85 %)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases
-
any medication
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goethe University Department of Sports Medicine | Frankfurt am Main | Hessen | Germany | 60487 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Goethe University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Winfried Banzer, Prof, Head of Department; Goethe University Department of Sports Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- SpM2016-006