Treatment for Elderly Fit Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Aged Between 65 and 80 Years

Sponsor
PETHEMA Foundation (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03742297
Collaborator
(none)
300
65
3
156
4.6
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The study is designed as a randomized, controlled, open-label, assessor blind, multicenter superiority trial with three parallel groups, and primary endpoint of immunophenotypic complete responses at 18 months after randomization. Block randomization will be performed with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio.

Patients will be randomized up front to 3 arms. Patients will receive "standard" PETHEMA arm for fit elderly VMP x 9 + Rd x 9 (arm 1, control arm), a KRd regimen (arm 2a) (18 cycles) or a Carfilzomib-lenalidomida-dexametasona regimen combined with DARATUMUMAB (arm 2b) (18 cycles).

Detailed Description

After 18 cycles, patients not having received daratumumab before (arm 1 and 2a), will receive consolidation with 4 cycles of Lenalidomida-dexamethasone at low dose-DARATUMUMAB.

At this point (after 22 months on treatment for the VMP-Rd and KRd arm and after 18 months of the Carfilzomib-lenalidomida-dexametasona-DARATUMUMAB arm) patients will be stratified according MRD status by flow and in both MRD- and MRD+ groups, patients will be randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio to:

  1. no further treatment or

  2. continuous treatment with DARATUMUMAB-R (daratumumab plus lenalidomide up to 2 years and then lenalidomide continuous until progression).

Patients on no maintenance that show biological relapse will be rechallenged with DARATUMUMAB-R.

The translational part will be very robust with dysplasia monitoring (especially relevant for the Bortezomib-melfalán-prednisona + Lenalidomida-dexamethasone at low dose arm), clonal evolution/resistance follow up and immune reconstitution longitudinal follow up alongside with MRD status (at diagnosis, 9 months, 18 months, 22 months and treatment discontinuation).

The trial is designed as a two-stage study (induction, followed by consolidation and maintenance). The first stage is confirmatory and addresses the primary efficacy objective. The second stage is exploratory and addresses the secondary efficacy and safety objectives.

In the first stage, investigators will compare an optimized standard induction Bortezomib, talidomida and prednisone followed by Rd (18 cycles) versus KRd, that will be tested in this trial with or without daratumumab x 18 cycles. The main objective in this stage will be to compare the immunophenotypic complete response rate assessed by next generation flow at the end of induction.

The second stage is exploratory and includes the consolidation and maintenance phases. In this second stage, the main objectives are:

  1. To compare the above mentioned induction strategies in terms of PFS at the end of the different treatment phases (induction, consolidation and maintenance).

  2. To investigate the capacity of consolidation with daratumumab-lenalidomide to reduce MRD levels in patients treated in the control arm as well as those that received KRd without daratumumab. In addition we will explore if this short consolidation can abrogate the potential benefit of a prolonged induction with KRd+daratumumab

  3. To explore the value of maintenance therapy according to MRD status (positive or negative) to prolong PFS (after a second randomization to receive or not maintenance therapy with lenalidomide and daratumumab) In order to prevent a potential treatment deficiency for patients randomized to "no-maintenance" in both MRD+ and MRD- subgroups, they will be offered to be re-challenged with lenalidomide-daratumumab as soon as they have a biological progression and have been censored for PFS. Moreover, if 30% of the patients randomized to "no-maintenance" relapse or progress during the first year, the protocol will be amended so that all patients receive maintenance therapy.

Investigators consider that the here proposed multidrug sequential "intensive" approach designed to obtain the best possible and most durable response, assessed through the kinetics of MRD clearance, may have an impact in establishing future clinical practice in fit elderly patients. Moreover, in addition to the MRD analysis (based on next generation flow (NGF), NGS and CT-PET) comprehensive biological investigations, including immunoprofile, clonal selection, analysis of dysplastic features and circulating tumor cells, are planned in order to better understand the relationship between patients outcome and myeloma biology.

The overall treatment plan has been designed for NDMM patients not candidates to SCT strategies but fit enough to tolerate a relatively intensive therapeutic strategy. According to the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines as well as the results obtained in our GEM2010 trial for elderly patients, we have decided to restrict this trial to fit elderly patients aged between 65 and 80 years because in our experience patients older than 80 years usually intensive treatments are poorly tolerated [1].

Investigators will evaluate the frailty using a comprehensive health status assessment scale (Geriatric Assessment in Hematology, GAH scale, annex 11), already validated in patients with hematological diseases and preliminary results in multiple myeloma patients

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
300 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Induction Therapy With Bortezomib-melphalan and Prednisone (VMP) Followed by Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) Versus Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (KRd) Plus/Minus Daratumumab, 18 Cycles, Followed by Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy With Lenalidomide and Daratumumab: Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized Trial for Elderly Fit Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Aged Between 65 and 80 Years
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 22, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 22, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 22, 2031

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: VMP x 9 + Lenalidomida-dexamethasone x 9

Bortezomib-melfalán-prednisone. Melfalán: 9mg/m2D1-4. Prednisone: 60mg/m2D1-4. Bortezomib: 1.3mg/m2 One 6 week cycleD1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29 and 32; followed by eight4-week cycleD1, 8, 15 and 22 Lenalidomida-dexametasona at low dose

Drug: Lenalidomide.
Lenalidomide

Drug: Bortezomib
Bortezomib

Drug: Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone

Drug: Prednisone
Prednisone

Drug: Melphalan
Melphalan

Experimental: Carfilzomib-lenalidomida-dexamethasone regimen

carfilzomib: 1 st cycle: 20mg/m2 day 1 and 36 mg/m2 days 2, 8, 9 & 15, 16. 2nd cycle: 36 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 8, 9 & 15, 16. Cycles 3-18: 56 mg/m2 days 1, 8 & 15.Lenalidomida: 25 mg, d1-21 Dexamethasone : 40 mg, d1, 8, 15, 2218 28-day cycle

Drug: Lenalidomide.
Lenalidomide

Drug: Carfilzomib
Carfilzomib

Drug: Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone

Experimental: Carfilzomib-lenalidomida-dexamethason with daratumumab

Carfilzomib: 1 st cycle: 20mg/m2 day 1 and 36 mg/m2 days 2, 8, 9 & 15, 16. 2nd cycle: 36 mg/m2 days 1, 2, 8, 9 & 15, 16. Cycles 3-18: 56 mg/m2 days 1, 8 & 15. Lenalidomida: 25 mg, d1-21 Dexamethasone: 40 mg, d1, 8, 15, 22. Daratumumab 1800mg SC Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of cycles 1-2; Days 1 and 15 of cycles 3 and 4; Day 1 of cycles 5 to 18

Drug: Lenalidomide.
Lenalidomide

Drug: Carfilzomib
Carfilzomib

Drug: Daratumumab
Daratumumab

Drug: Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy in terms of numbers of compleat responses [18 months]

    Rate of immunophenotypic complete responses at 18 months, of the standard treatment in Spain for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not candidates to stem cell transplantation,

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who require start active treatment according to the IMWG published in 2014

  • Age between 65 and 80 years, both included

  • Fit patient assessed using the comprehensive health status assessment scale (Geriatric Assessment in Hematology, GAH scale, annex 11) (0-94 points GAH scale). Patients with a punctuation ≤42 will be included.

  • Signed informed consent

  • Patients must have measurable disease, defined as follows:

For secretory Multiple Myeloma, measurable disease is defined as the presence of quantifiable monoclonal component, ≥ 0.5 g/dL or, the urine light chains excretion is 200 mg/24h or higher.

For poor secretory or non secretory Multiple Myeloma, the level of the affected serum free light chain must be ≥ 10 mg/dL (≥ 100 mg/L, with an abnormal free light-chain ratio)

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status ≤2

  • Life expectancy more than 3 months

  • Adequate organ functions:

Platelet count ≥ 50000/mm3, hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dl and absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1000/mm3. Lower values are allowed only if they are due to BM infiltration.

Aspartate Transaminase (AST) and Alanine Transaminase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal.

Total bilirubin: ≤2 x Upper Limit of Normal. Serum creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dl. Calcium ≤14mg/dl or corrected serum calcium ≤14mg/dl in patients whose albumin level is out of range Left ventricle ejection fraction ≥ 40%

  • At the discretion of the investigator patient must be able to adhere to all study requirements.

  • Male patients that receives lenalidomide should commit to use of a condom while taking the study drug every time he has sexual contact with a pregnant female of female of childbearing potential even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy; or practice complete abstinence (when this is the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject); including during periods of dose interruptions and for at least 30 days after treatment completion. Also males under lenalidomide should commit not to donate semen or sperm during study drug treatment, including during periods of dose interruptions, and for at least 90 days after treatment completion.

NOTE: Given the age of patients to be included on this Clinical Trial (between 65 and 80 years, both included), there is no possibility of Females of Childbearing Potential (FCBP), therefore the Pregnancy Prevention Program (annex 12) has been modified accordingly.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients older than 81 years or younger than 65

  • Patients that do not qualify for fit according to the GAH scale (annex 11) (>43 points GAH scale)

  • Patients who have previously received treatment for multiple myeloma, except for steroid pulses in case of emergency, the administration of bisphosphonates or antialgesic radiotherapy or due to the presence of plasmacytomas requiring some emergency.

  • Men who does not agree to use a condom every time he has sexual contact with a pregnant female or female of childbearing potential, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy, or men who does not agree to practice complete abstinence (if this is the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject).

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <40% Prior history of malignancies, other than multiple myeloma (except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or the breast), unless the patient has been free of the disease for ≥ 5 years.

  • Other relevant diseases or adverse clinical conditions:

Myocardial infarction within the 6 months prior to inclusion in the clinical trial A NYHA functional class III-IV, heart failure, uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia or acute ischemia detected electrocardiographically or conduction system anomalies.

History of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders. Active infection. Significant non-neoplastic liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis, active chronic hepatitis).

Poorly controlled arterial hypertension. Any serious medical condition or psychiatric illness that would interfere in understanding of the informed consent form.

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, hepatitis B surface antigen-positive or active hepatitis C infection

  • Limitation of the patient's ability to comply with the treatment or follow-up protocol.

  • Uncontrolled endocrine diseases (i.e. diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism) (i.e. requiring relevant changes in medication within the last month, or hospital admission within the last 3 months).

  • Patients having a peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2 within the 14 days prior to inclusion.

  • Known hypersensibility to any of the study drugs or their excipients.

  • Patients treated with any investigational drug during the previous 30 days.

  • Patients with acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease and/or pericardial disease.

  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to undergo antithrombotic therapy.

  • Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma with forced expiratory volume in the first minute (FEVI) less than 50%.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña A Coruña Spain
2 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete Albacete Spain
3 Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Alicante Spain
4 Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (ICO Badalona) Badalona Spain
5 Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
6 Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
7 Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron Barcelona Spain
8 ICO L´Hospitalet Barcelona Spain
9 Hospital Universitario de Cruces Bilbao Spain
10 Hospital General de Ciudad Real Ciudad Real Spain
11 Complejo Hospitalario de Cáceres Cáceres Spain
12 Complejo Hospitalario Regional Reina Sofía Córdoba Spain
13 Hospital de Cabueñes Gijón Spain
14 Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta (ICO Girona) Girona Spain
15 Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves Granada Spain
16 Hospital de Especialidades de Jerez de la Frontera Jerez De La Frontera Spain
17 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín Las Palmas De Gran Canaria Spain
18 Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León León Spain
19 Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida Lleida Spain
20 Hospital San Pedro Logroño Spain
21 Complejo Hospitalario Lucus Augusti Lugo Spain
22 Hospital 12 de octubre MAdrid Spain
23 Hospital clínico San Carlos Madrid Spain
24 Hospital Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain
25 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain
26 Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada Madrid Spain
27 Hospital Universitario de la Princesa Madrid Spain
28 Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz Madrid Spain
29 Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain
30 Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid Spain
31 Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro Madrid Spain
32 HU Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
33 Hospital San Joan de Deu (Althaia) Manresa Spain
34 Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca Murcia Spain
35 Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer Murcia Spain
36 Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía Murcia Spain
37 Hospital Costa del Sol Málaga Spain
38 Hospital Virgen de la Victoria Málaga Spain
39 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense Ourense Spain
40 Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias Oviedo Spain
41 Complejo Asistencial de Palencia Palencia Spain
42 Hospital Son Llatzer Palma De Mallorca Spain
43 Hospital Universitario Son Espases Palma De Mallorca Spain
44 Clinica Universitaria de Navarra Pamplona Spain
45 Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra Pamplona Spain
46 Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra Pontevedra Spain
47 Hospital de Sabadell (Parc Taulí) Sabadell Spain
48 Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Salamanca Spain
49 Hospital Universitario de Donostia San Sebastián Spain
50 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria Santa Cruz De Tenerife Spain
51 Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla Santander Spain
52 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago Santiago De Compostela Spain
53 Hospital General de Segovia Segovia Spain
54 H. Universitario Virgen de Rocío Sevilla Spain
55 Hospital Nuestra Señona de Valme Sevilla Spain
56 Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona Tarragona Spain
57 Hospital Universitario de Canarias Tenerife Spain
58 Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo (Virgen de la Salud) Toledo Spain
59 Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia Valencia Spain
60 Hospital Universitari i Politecnic la Fe Valencia Spain
61 Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset Aleixandre Valencia Spain
62 Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo Vigo Spain
63 Hospital Txagorritxu Vitoria Spain
64 Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa Zaragoza Spain
65 Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet Zaragoza Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • PETHEMA Foundation

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jesús F San Miguel, Clínica Universidad de Navarra
  • Study Chair: Joan Blade, Dr, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Study Chair: Juan Jose Lahuerta, Dr, Hospital 12 de Octubre

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
PETHEMA Foundation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03742297
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • GEM2017FIT
First Posted:
Nov 15, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Mar 16, 2021
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 16, 2021