AlgoPGx: Comparison of Standard Opioid Prescription Versus Prescription Guided by Pharmacogenetic Analysis in Patients With Non-cancerous Chronic Pain.

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03498014
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
2
17
4.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that opioid prescription guided by patient pharmacogenetic profile will diminish opioid-associated undesirable effects by 50% and improve medication compliance.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Pharmacogenetic analysis allowing personalized opioid prescription
  • Other: Standard opioid prescription
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Standard Opioid Prescription Versus Prescription Guided by Pharmacogenetic Analysis in Patients With Non-cancerous Chronic Pain.
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Prescription as standard

Other: Standard opioid prescription
Opioid prescription made without reference to patient genetic profile (tramadol, codeine or oxycodone)

Experimental: Pharmacogenetic-guided prescription

Other: Pharmacogenetic analysis allowing personalized opioid prescription
Genotypic of patient to determine optimal opioid treatment (tramadol, codeine or oxycodone)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined list [Month 1]

    Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol

  2. Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined list [Month 2]

    Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol

  3. Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups from predefined list [Month 3]

    Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in Annex 17.5 of the protocol

  4. Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 1]

    Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

  5. Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 2]

    Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

  6. Compare presence/absence undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 3]

    Presence/absence of at least one undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 1]

    Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in protocol

  2. Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 2]

    Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in protocol

  3. Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 3]

    Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to list in protocol

  4. Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 1]

    Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

  5. Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 2]

    Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

  6. Number of undesirable events associated to opioid between groups [Month 3]

    Total number of undesirable event of at least grade 3 according to Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

  7. Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groups [Month 1]

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7

  8. Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groups [Month 2]

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7

  9. Compare clinical therapeutic efficacy between groups [Month 3]

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score; value between 1-7

  10. Compare patient-reported pain between groups [Day 0]

    Visual analog scare 1-10

  11. Compare patient-reported pain between groups [Week 2]

    Visual analog scare 1-10

  12. Compare patient-reported pain between groups [Month 1]

    Visual analog scare 1-10

  13. Compare patient-reported pain between groups [Month 2]

    Visual analog scare 1-10

  14. Compare patient-reported pain between groups [Month 3]

    Visual analog scare 1-10

  15. Compare neuropathic pain between groups [Day 0]

    DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10

  16. Compare neuropathic pain between groups [Month 1]

    DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10

  17. Compare neuropathic pain between groups [Month 2]

    DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10

  18. Compare neuropathic pain between groups [Month 3]

    DN4 score (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions); score between 0-10

  19. Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groups [Month 1]

    Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32

  20. Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groups [Month 2]

    Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32

  21. Compare benefit/risk ratio of treatment between groups [Month 3]

    Overall Benefit of Analgesics Score (OBAS); score between 0-32

  22. Compare quality of life between patients in each group [Day 0]

    Quality of life Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire; score between 0-100

  23. Compare quality of life between patients in each group [Month 3]

    Quality of life Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire; score between 0-100

  24. Compare medication compliance between groups [Month 1]

    Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)

  25. Compare medication compliance between groups [Month 2]

    Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)

  26. Compare medication compliance between groups [Month 3]

    Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)

  27. Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groups [Month 1]

    Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum

  28. Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groups [Month 2]

    Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum

  29. Qualitive comparison of medication compliance between groups [Month 3]

    Presence/absence of opioids or metabolites in serum

  30. Serum concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) [Day 0]

    Opioids Risk Tool (ORT): scores of 0-3 (low risk), 4-7 (moderate risk), or ≥ 8 (high risk)

  31. Compare observed medication misuse between groups [Month 1]

    Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI)

  32. Compare observed medication misuse between groups [Month 2]

    Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI)

  33. Compare observed medication misuse between groups [Month 3]

    Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI)

  34. Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratios [Month 1]

    Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS)

  35. Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratios [Month 2]

    Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS)

  36. Correlation between predicted phenotype and observed metabolic ratios [Month 3]

    Products/substrate ratio measured by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS)

  37. Metabolic profile of patients [Month 1]

    Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7

  38. Metabolic profile of patients [Month 2]

    Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7

  39. Metabolic profile of patients [Month 3]

    Extensive Metaboliser, Intermediate Metaboliser, Poor Metaboliser or Ultra-rapid Metaboliser according to CYP2D6 phenotype and polymorphism of the glucuronyl transferase gene UGT2B7

  40. Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioids [Month 1]

    Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)

  41. Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioids [Month 2]

    Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)

  42. Correlation between saliva and plasma concentration of opioids [Month 3]

    Concentration of tramadol, codeine or oxycodone and their metabolites by Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form

  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan

  • The patient is at least 18 years old

  • The patient will be available for all visits

  • Patients suffer from non-cancerous chronic pain according to HAS criteria

  • Patient not having taking opioids in previous 2 months

  • Patient indicated for prescription of opioids (oxycodone, codeine or tramadol) or patient not responding to first line treatment

Exclusion Criteria:
  • The subject is participating in an category I interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study

  • The subject refuses to sign the consent

  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information

  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship

  • The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding

  • The patient is likely to procreate and does not use an effective method of contraception (contraceptive ring, surgical contraception, implant, patch, contraceptive pill, male and female condoms, IUD)

  • There is a contra-indication for opioid use

  • Patient with an addiction risk (score ≥ 8 on ORT scale).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU Nimes Nîmes France 30029

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Christophe Boyer, CHU Nimes

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03498014
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NIMAO/2017-02/JCB-01
First Posted:
Apr 13, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jan 25, 2022
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 25, 2022