Clinical Performance of Low Technique Sensitive Self Cured Universal Adhesive Vrs Light Cured Universal Adhesive in Patients With (NCCLs): 18 m RCT
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of self-cured adhesive versus light cured universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) resin composite restorations after 18 month
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Light cure universal bond light cured 3m single bond universal |
Other: light cure 3m single bond universal bond
light -cure universal bond
|
Active Comparator: self cure universal bond self-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan) |
Other: Self-cure universal bond (Palfique, Tokuyama, Japan)
Self-cure universal bond with no light cure
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Number of fracture restoration [18 month]
Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss .followed by tactile inspection using fdi prob for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention
- number of restoration with retention loss [18-month]
Frist visual evaluation to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Number of restoration with change in colour or texture [18 month]
Evaluation will be done visually following FDI criteria to ensure no change in colour or texture of the restoration
- Number of restoration caused biological harm [18 month]
Evaluation will be done following FDI criteria using FDI prob to ensure no change in restoration that caused any harm to the health of biological strucure
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
particepant with age rang 18-55
-
particepant with non carious cervical lesion
Exclusion Criteria:
-
particepant outside age rang
-
particepant with periodontal problem that might affect the teeth to be treated
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Aya Gamal ashour
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- gsda.1986.2