Efficacy of TAK-438 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Sponsor
Takeda (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01474369
Collaborator
(none)
827
52
3
14.1
15.9
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the superiority of efficacy of TAK-438, once daily (QD), to placebo in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
827 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Control, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK- 438 (10 and 20 mg Once-Daily) in Patients With Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: TAK-438 10 mg QD

Drug: TAK-438
TAK-438 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 4 weeks. Thereafter, TAK-438 placebo tablets, orally, once daily for 1 week.

Experimental: TAK-438 20 mg QD

Drug: TAK-438
TAK-438 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 4 weeks. Thereafter, TAK-438 placebo tablets, orally, once daily for 1 week.

Placebo Comparator: Placebo QD

Drug: Placebo
TAK-438 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for 5 weeks.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of symptom-free days of heartburn symptoms [Week 4]

    Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.

  2. Cumulative symptom improvement rate of heartburn symptoms [Week 4]

    Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.

  3. Severity of heartburn symptoms [Week 4]

    Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Heartburn symptoms stratified by response (improvement or non-improvement) at Week 2 [Week 4]

    Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate, and severity of heartburn symptoms are evaluation parameters.

  2. Heartburn Symptoms Stratified by Baseline Endoscopic Findings (Grade N or M) [Week 4]

    Heartburn symptoms collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate and severity of heartburn symptoms=evaluation parameters. Participants with Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease divided into Grade N (endoscopically normal) and M (minimal change) by modified Los Angeles Classification System. Grade definitions: Grade N (endoscopically normal), M (minimal change), A (Mucosal break <5 mm) B (Mucosal break ≥5 mm) C (Mucosal break continuous between 2 or more folds and <75% of circumference) and D (Mucosal break ≥75% of circumference).

  3. Heartburn symptoms stratified by combination of response at Week 2 and baseline endoscopic findings (improvement and grade N, improvement and grade M, non-improvement and grade N, non-improvement and grade M.) [Week 4]

    Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate, and severity of heartburn symptoms are evaluation parameters.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Participants with grade N or M in the modified LA classification system confirmed by endoscopy at initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1).

  2. Participants with repeated acid reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) for 2 days or more in one week in the 3 weeks before initiation of initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1).

  3. Participants with severity* of moderate or higher for acid reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) in the 3 weeks before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1)

  • Severity: No symptoms, very mild (symptoms present but often forgotten), mild (not so painful), moderate (rather painful), severe (painful) and very severe (painful enough to affect night time sleep or daily activities)
  1. Outpatients (hospitalization for testing possible)
Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Participants with an esophagus-related complication [Barrett's esophagus (3 cm or more, LSBE), eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal varices, scleroderma, viral or fungal infections, esophageal stenosis, etc.], or a history of radiotherapy or cryotherapy of the esophagus, a caustic or physiochemical trauma (esophageal sclerotherapy, etc.). However, participants with Barrett's esophagus (less than 3 cm, SSBE) or Schatzki's ring (mucosal tissue ring around inferior esophageal sphincter) are allowed to be included.

  2. Participants who have received surgery or treatment affecting gastroesophageal reflux (cardioplasty, dilation of esophageal stenosis [excluding Schatzki's ring], etc.), or who have a history of surgery of stomach or duodenum (excluding removal of benign polyp under endoscopy)

  3. Participants who have acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric ulcers (mucosal defects associated with white coating) or duodenal ulcers (mucosal defect with white coating) within 30 days before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1) However, participants with gastric or duodenal erosions are allowed to be included.

  4. Participants with acute gastritis or acute exacerbation of chronic gastritis as a complication

  5. Participants with a previous or current history of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other gastric acid hypersecretion disorders

  6. Participants with a history of chest pain due to heart disease or with chest pains suspected of being caused by heart disease within one year before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Nagoya-shi Aichi Japan
2 Abiko-shi Chiba Japan
3 Kashiwa-shi Chiba Japan
4 Noda-shi Chiba Japan
5 Yachiyo-shi Chiba Japan
6 Saijo-shi Ehime Japan
7 Fukuoka-shi Fukuoka Japan
8 Itoshima-shi Fukuoka Japan
9 Kasuya-gun Fukuoka Japan
10 Onga-gun Fukuoka Japan
11 Kouriyama-shi Fukushima Japan
12 Gifu-shi Gifu Japan
13 Takayama-shi Gifu Japan
14 Annaka-shi Gunma Japan
15 Hiroshima-shi Hiroshima Japan
16 Asahikawa-shi Hokkaido Japan
17 Sapporo-shi Hokkaido Japan
18 Amagasaki-shi Hyogo Japan
19 Kobe-shi Hyogo Japan
20 Nishinomiya-shi Hyogo Japan
21 Takarazuka-shi Hyogo Japan
22 Sagamihara-shi Kanagawa Japan
23 Yokohama-shi Kanagawa Japan
24 Kochi-shi Kochi Japan
25 Suzaki-shi Kochi Japan
26 Kumamoto-shi Kumamoto Japan
27 Kyoto-shi Kyoto Japan
28 Sendai-shi Miyagi Japan
29 Nagasaki-shi Nagasaki Japan
30 Oita-shi Oita Japan
31 Okayama-shi Okayama Japan
32 Osaka-shi Osaka Japan
33 Takatsuki-shi Osaka Japan
34 Saga-shi Saga Japan
35 Kumagaya-shi Saitama Japan
36 Saitama-shi Saitama Japan
37 Tokorozawa-shi Saitama Japan
38 Otawara-shi Tochigi Japan
39 Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan
40 Chiyoda-ku Tokyo Japan
41 Chuo-ku Tokyo Japan
42 Hachioji-shi Tokyo Japan
43 Kokubunji-shi Tokyo Japan
44 Nakano-ku Tokyo Japan
45 Oota-ku Tokyo Japan
46 Setagaya-ku Tokyo Japan
47 Shibuya-ku Tokyo Japan
48 Shinjuku-ku Tokyo Japan
49 Shimonoseki-shi Yamaguchi Japan
50 Kofu-shi Yamanashi Japan
51 Turu-shi Yamanashi Japan
52 Yamagata-shi Ymagata Japan

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Takeda

Investigators

  • Study Director: Senior Manager, Takeda

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Takeda
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01474369
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TAK-438/CCT-201
  • U1111-1125-1115
  • JapicCTI-111663
First Posted:
Nov 18, 2011
Last Update Posted:
Jul 3, 2013
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2013
Keywords provided by Takeda
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 3, 2013