Mega-CHOEP: Conventional Chemo Vs HD Chemo Followed by Auto SCT in Younger Pts With Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
According to amendment 3 this study addresses the question if intensification of administration of rituximab in standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed aggressive B-Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL) and high risk (aaIPI 2 or 3) results in a better time to treatment failure (TTTF)
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
This study was primarily designed to compare aggressive conventional chemotherapy with a repetitive high-dose (HD) therapy program using identical, effective drugs at highest possible dose and dose intensity with/without addition of rituximab (initially 4 treatment arms). In 2004 the first amendment had to be added in order to close two treatment arms without rituximab due to recent data revealing a significant advantage for rituximab-treated patients with CD20+lymphoma.
A planned interim analysis in 2010 revealed inferiority of the high-dose treatment thus in the 2nd amendment the high-dose arm was closed and additionally the rituximab frequency was raised from 6 to 12 administrations as recent publications gave hint for advantage. The last amendment was added in 2010 to adjust for delayed recruitment mainly due to organisation problems.
As the high-dose arm was closed only CD20+ B-lymphoma were included past amendment 2.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: R-CHOEP14 with 12x Rituximab 8 cycles of standard CHOP with etoposide in 14-day intervals. Patients with CD20+ lymphoma receive 12 doses of Rituximab (day 0,1,4,8 of cycle 1, day 1 and 8 of cycle 2, day1 of cycle 3-8 ) |
Drug: R-CHOEP 14 with 12x Rituximab
after amendment 3 patients receive 4x 375mg/m2 in cycle 1 (day 0,1,4,8), 2x 375/m2 in cycle 2 (day1,8) and 1x 375mg/m2 cycle 3-8 (day 1 of each cycle)
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- time to treatment failure [3 years after study inclusion]
At 3 year follow up rate of treatments and time to treatment failure will be determined
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
18-60 years of age
-
Risk group International Prognostic Index (IPI) 2 and 3 (age adjusted)
-
Performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-3
-
Patient's written informed consent
-
Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with CD20+ histology
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Already initiated lymphoma therapy
-
Serious accompanying disorder or impaired organ function
-
Bone marrow involvement > 25%
-
Known hypersensibility to the medications to be used
-
Known HIV-positivity
-
Active hepatitis infection
-
Suspicion that patient compliance will be poor
-
Simultaneous participation in other trials
-
Prior chemo- or radiotherapy for previous disorder
-
Other concomitant tumour disease
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AK St. Georg | Hamburg | Germany | 20099 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group
- Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V., Bonn (Germany)
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Norbert Schmitz, Prof., German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- DSHNHL 2002-1