SMTDNLBP: The Effect of Combining Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling in Individuals With Low Back Pain

Sponsor
University of Utah (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05802901
Collaborator
(none)
99
1
3
33.3
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to enroll and randomize 99 participants with non-specific low back pain into a multimodal strategy of treatment consisting of a combination of dry needling (DN) and spinal manipulation therapy (SMT), DN only, and SMT only, followed by an at home exercise program. All groups will receive their respective treatment twice a week for 2 weeks followed by a 2-week home exercise program. Primary outcomes include clinical subjective (Oswestry Disability Index, numeric pain intensity rating) and mechanistic (lumbar multifidus, erector spinae, and gluteus medius muscle activation) measures assessed at baseline, 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Timepoints at 2-weeks and 4-weeks will be compared to baseline measures to determine effectiveness of the combination group against the other single treatment groups. Exercise compliance will be measured by participants self-reporting adherence to the program by selecting average number of days per week the exercises are completed.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Spinal manipulation
  • Procedure: Dry needling
  • Procedure: Spinal manipulation and dry needling
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
99 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Three groups of participants receive one of three different interventions. One group receives spinal manipulation only, another group receives dry needling only, and the last group receives the combination of spinal manipulation and dry needling. Participants in each group receive their respective treatment in parallel with the other groups.Three groups of participants receive one of three different interventions. One group receives spinal manipulation only, another group receives dry needling only, and the last group receives the combination of spinal manipulation and dry needling. Participants in each group receive their respective treatment in parallel with the other groups.
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
The Effect of Combining Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling in Individuals With Non-specific Low Back
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 28, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 10, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 10, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Spinal manipulation

Spinal manipulation of the lumbar spine only group.

Procedure: Spinal manipulation
Spinal manipulation of the lumbar spine only to be performed in the spinal manipulation arm/group.

Active Comparator: Dry needling

Dry needling of the symptomatic side of the lumbar spine only group.

Procedure: Dry needling
Dry needling of the lumbar erector spinae, multifidus, and gluteus medius on the symptomatic side performed in the dry needling arm/group.

Active Comparator: Spinal manipulation and dry needling

Combination of spinal manipulation and dry needling of the lumbar spine group

Procedure: Spinal manipulation and dry needling
The spinal manipulation and dry needling arm/group receive both spinal manipulation and dry needling as outlined in the other groups.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Numeric pain rating scale at Baseline [Baseline]

    Participants were asked to make separate ratings of current pain intensity and the best and worst intensity over the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale ("0" no pain and "10" worst imaginable pain). The mean of the three ratings was used to represent pain intensity.

  2. Low back pain Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire at Baseline [Baseline]

    The ODI score is derived from the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, resulting in a score ranging from 0-100 with higher numbers indicating a greater level of disability.

  3. Numeric pain rating scale at 1-week [1-week]

    Participants were asked to make separate ratings of current pain intensity and the best and worst intensity over the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale ("0" no pain and "10" worst imaginable pain). The mean of the three ratings was used to represent pain intensity.

  4. Low back pain Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire at 1-week [1-week]

    The ODI score is derived from the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, resulting in a score ranging from 0-100 with higher numbers indicating a greater level of disability.

  5. Numeric pain rating scale at 2-weeks [2-weeks]

    Participants were asked to make separate ratings of current pain intensity and the best and worst intensity over the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale ("0" no pain and "10" worst imaginable pain). The mean of the three ratings was used to represent pain intensity.

  6. Low back pain Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire at 2-weeks [2-weeks]

    The ODI score is derived from the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, resulting in a score ranging from 0-100 with higher numbers indicating a greater level of disability.

  7. Numeric pain rating scale at 4-weeks [4-weeks]

    Participants were asked to make separate ratings of current pain intensity and the best and worst intensity over the past 24 hours on a 0-10 scale ("0" no pain and "10" worst imaginable pain). The mean of the three ratings was used to represent pain intensity.

  8. Low back pain Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire at 4-weeks [4-weeks]

    The ODI score is derived from the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, resulting in a score ranging from 0-100 with higher numbers indicating a greater level of disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Lumbar multifidus muscle change in thickness at Baseline [Baseline]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  2. Erector spinae muscle change in thickness at Baseline [Baseline]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  3. Gluteus medius muscle change in thickness at Baseline [Baseline]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  4. Lumbar multifidus muscle change in thickness at 2-weeks [2-weeks]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  5. Erector spinae muscle change in thickness at 2-weeks [2-weeks]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  6. Gluteus medius muscle change in thickness at 2-weeks [2-weeks]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  7. Lumbar multifidus muscle change in thickness at 4-weeks [4-weeks]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  8. Erector spinae muscle change in thickness at 4-weeks [4-weeks]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

  9. Gluteus medius muscle change in thickness at 4-weeks [4-weeks]

    Muscle activation measured by changes in contraction thickness at rest and sub-maximal isometric contraction utilizing diagnostic ultrasound.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Presence of nonspecific low back pain defined as pain between the twelfth rib and buttocks with or without symptoms into one or both legs

  • Current patient-reported pain rating score greater than 3 based on the numeric pain rating score 0-10 scale

  • Oswestry Disability Index > 20%

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Prior surgery to the lumbosacral spine

  • Pregnancy

  • Currently receiving mind-body or exercise treatment for low back pain with a healthcare provider (e.g., chiropractic, physical therapy, massage therapy, etc.)

  • Signs of neurogenic low back pain arising from clinical examination (e.g., positive straight leg raise test, diminished muscle stretch reflex, etc.)

  • Evidence of significant spinal pathology (e.g., spinal fracture, infection, etc.).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah United States 84112

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Utah

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jedidiah Farley, PhD, University of Utah

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Jedidiah Farley, Research Fellow, University of Utah
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05802901
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 144339
First Posted:
Apr 7, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Apr 7, 2023
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2023
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Jedidiah Farley, Research Fellow, University of Utah
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 7, 2023