BIBW 2992 (Afatinib) Versus Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment in NSCLC With EGFR Mutation

Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00949650
Collaborator
(none)
345
133
2
91
2.6
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This randomised, open label phase III trial will be performed in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung with tumours harbouring an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor activating mutation. The objectives of the trial are to compare the efficacy of single agent BIBW 2992, Arm A, with Pemetrexed/Cisplatin chemotherapy, Arm B, as first line treatment for this group of patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
345 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomised, Open-label, Phase III Study of BIBW 2992 Versus Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment for Patients With Stage IIIB or IV Adenocarcinoma of the Lung Harbouring an EGFR Activating Mutation
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 14, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 9, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 16, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: BIBW 2992

BIBW 2992 tablet once daily until progression

Drug: BIBW 2992
BIBW 2992 once daily until progression

Active Comparator: Cisplatin/Pemetrexed

Cisplatin and Pemetrexed IV once every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles

Drug: Pemetrexed
Pemetrexed IV given once every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles

Drug: Cisplatin
Cisplatin IV given once every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time [Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression]

    PFS was defined as time from randomisation to disease progression or death whichever occured first. Assessed by central independent review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1). Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of Patients With Objective Response (OR) [Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression]

    OR was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Assessed by central independent review according to RECIST 1.1.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) [Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression]

    DC was defined as a patient with OR or Stable Disease (SD). Assessed by central independent review according to the RECIST 1.1.

  3. Overall Survival (OS) Time [From randomisation to cut-off date (17MAR2017).]

    OS was defined as time from randomisation to death.

  4. Tumour Shrinkage [Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression]

    Tumour shrinkage was calculated as the minimum Sum of Diameters (SoD) of target lesions from all post-baseline tumour assessments, as read by the central independent review. The mean of these minimum values were presented after adjusting for baseline SoD, EGFR mutation group and race.

  5. Change From Baseline in Body Weight [Baseline and throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks), up to 28 months.]

    Because the PFS was longer for patients in the Afatinib arm than for patients in the chemotherapy arm, the period of data collection for ECOG status and body weight continued for a longer time in the Afatinib arm.

  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) [Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks), up to 28 months.]

    ECOG PS measured on 6 point scale to assess participant's performance status. 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction. Restricted in physically strenuous activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work. Ambulatory (>50 percent of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities. Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50 percent of waking hours. Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair. Dead.

  7. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration in Coughing [Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).]

    HRQOL was measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer specific module LC13 (QLQ-LC13). Analysis for cough is based on QLQ-LC13 question 1. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.

  8. HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Dyspnoea [Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).]

    HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for dyspnoea is based on composite of QLQ-LC13 questions 3-5. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.

  9. HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Pain [Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).]

    HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for pain is based on composite of QLQ-C30 questions 9 and 19. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.

  10. Trough Plasma Concentrations of Afatinib at Day 22 [Day 22.]

    Trough plasma concentrations of Afatinib at Day 22 (course 2, visit 1) after multiple daily dosing of 40 mg Afatinib and after dose escalation to 50 mg or dose reduction to 30 mg or 20 mg.

  11. Trough Plasma Concentrations of Afatinib at Day 29 [Day 29.]

    Trough plasma concentrations of Afatinib at day 29 (course 2, visit 2) after multiple daily dosing of 40 mg Afatinib and after dose escalation to 50 mg or dose reduction to 30 mg or 20 mg.

  12. Trough Plasma Concentrations of Afatinib at Day 43 [Day 43.]

    Trough plasma concentrations of Afatinib at Day 43 (course 3, visit 1) after multiple daily dosing of 40 mg Afatinib and after dose escalation to 50 mg or dose reduction to 30 mg or 20 mg.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion criteria:
  • Pathologically confirmed diagnosis of Stage IIIB (with cytologically proven pleural effusion or pericardial effusion) or Stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung. Patients with mixed histology are eligible if adenocarcinoma is the predominant histology.

  • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mutation detected by central laboratory analysis of tumour biopsy material.

  • Measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1.

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1.

  • Age >/= 18 years.

  • Life expectancy of at least three months.

  • Written informed consent that is consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Exclusion criteria:
  • Prior chemotherapy for relapsed and/or metastatic NSCLC. Neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy is permitted if at least 12 months has elapsed between the end of chemotherapy and randomisation.

  • Prior treatment with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor targeting small molecules or antibodies.

  • Radiotherapy or surgery (other than biopsy) within 4 weeks prior to randomisation.

  • Active brain metastases

  • Any other current malignancy or malignancy diagnosed within the past five years

  • Known pre-existing interstitial lung disease.

  • Significant or recent acute gastrointestinal disorders with diarrhoea as a major symptom.

  • History or presence of clinically relevant cardiovascular abnormalities.

  • Any other concomitant serious illness or organ system dysfunction.

  • Adequate absolute neutrophil count and platelet count

  • Adequate liver and kidney function

  • Active hepatitis B infection, active hepatitis C infection or known HIV carrier.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Highlands Oncology Group Fayetteville Arkansas United States 72703
2 Clinical Trials and Research Associates Inc Montebello California United States 90640
3 Innovative Medical Research of South Florida Miami Florida United States 33179
4 Crescent City Research Consortiom Marrero Louisiana United States 70072
5 Interlakes Foundation, Incorporated Rochester New York United States 14623
6 Lehigh Valley Hospital / Lehigh Valley Health Network Allentown Pennsylvania United States 18103
7 South Texas Institute of Cancer, Northwest Cancer Center Corpus Christi Texas United States 78410
8 Instituto de Medicina Nuclear de Bahía Blanca Bahía Blanca Argentina B8000FJI
9 Hospital Alemán Capital Federal Argentina C1118AAT
10 Imcaba S.R.L. Capital Federal Argentina C1185AAT
11 IMAI Research Capital Federal Argentina C1425AWC
12 Instituto Alexander Fleming Capital Federal Argentina C1426ANZ
13 Hospital Militar Central Capital Federal Argentina C1426BOR
14 PALIAR Capital Federal Argentina C1430ERF
15 Centro Oncológico de Rosario Rosario Argentina S2000KZE
16 Lifehouse Camperdown New South Wales Australia 2050
17 Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards New South Wales Australia 2065
18 Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital Waratah New South Wales Australia 2298
19 The Prince Charles Hospital Chermside Queensland Australia 4032
20 Flinders Medical Centre Bedford Park South Australia Australia 5042
21 The Burnside War Memorial Hospital Toorak Gardens South Australia Australia 5065
22 Box Hill Hospital Box Hill Victoria Australia 3128
23 St. Vincents Hospital (MEL) Fitzroy Victoria Australia 3065
24 Mount Medical Centre Perth Western Australia Australia 6000
25 KH d. Elisabethinen Linz Linz Austria 4010
26 Klinikum Wels - Grieskirchen GmbH Wels Austria 4600
27 SMZ Baumgartner Hoehe Otto Wagner Spital Wien Austria 1140
28 Brussels - UNIV St-Pierre Bruxelles Belgium 1000
29 UNIV UZ Gent Gent Belgium 9000
30 Brussels - UNIV UZ Brussel Jette Belgium 1090
31 UZ Leuven Leuven Belgium 3000
32 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liège Belgium 4000
33 Centro de Pesquisa do Hospital Lifecenter Belo Horizonte Brazil
34 Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas em Oncología Cachoeiro de Itapemirim Brazil 29308-014
35 Insituto de Oncologia do Paraná Curitiba Brazil 80530-010
36 Hospital São Lucas da Pontifícia Universidade Católica Porto Alegre Brazil 90610-000
37 UNIFESP Departamento de Medicina de Pneumologia Sao Paulo Brazil 04023-900
38 Tom Baker Cancer Centre Calgary Alberta Canada T2N 4N2
39 Cross Cancer Institute (University of Alberta) Edmonton Alberta Canada T6G 1Z2
40 Charles LeMoyne Hospital Greenfield Park Migration Data Canada J4V 2H1
41 Hematologiste et oncologue medical CHUM - Hopital Notre-Dame Montreal Migration Data Canada H2L 4M1
42 McGill University, Department of Oncology Montreal Migration Data Canada H2W 1S6
43 Hospital Dirección de Previsión de Carabineros Los Condes Chile 760-0746
44 Instituto Oncológico Limitada Viña del Mar Reñaca Chile 2540364
45 Instituto Clínico Oncológico del Sur - ICOS Temuco Chile
46 HOP d'Angers Angers France 49933
47 HOP Côte de Nacre Caen Cedex 5 France 14033
48 HOP Nord Michallon La Tronche France 38700
49 HOP Croix Rousse, Pneumo, Lyon Lyon Cedex 4 France 69317
50 INS Curie Paris Cedex 05 France 75248
51 CTR René Gauducheau Saint Herblain France 44805
52 HOP Sud-Réunion, Pneumo, Saint Pierre Saint Pierre - La Réunion France 97448
53 HOP - HIA Sainte Anne Toulon France 83041
54 HOP, Pneumo, Villefranche sur Saône Villefranche Sur Saône France 69655
55 Universitätsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Berlin Berlin Germany 12200
56 Ruhrlandklinik, Westdeutsches Lungenzentrum am Universitätsklinikum Essen gGmbH Essen Germany 45122
57 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover Germany 30625
58 Lungenklinik Hemer Hemer Germany 58675
59 Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Mainz Germany 55101
60 Universitätsklinikum Münster Münster Germany 48149
61 Pius-Hospital, Oldenburg Oldenburg Germany 26121
62 National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei Germany 100
63 Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong
64 Prince of Wales Hospital Shatin Hong Kong
65 Szent György Hospital, Szekesfehervar Szekesfehervar Hungary 8000
66 Markusovszky County Hospital, Szombathely Szombathely Hungary 9700
67 Zala County Hospital, Zalaegerszeg Zalaegerszeg Hungary 8900
68 St James's Hospital Dublin 8 Ireland
69 Ospedale San Donato di Arezzo Arezzo Italy 52100
70 Az. USL 4 di Prato Prato Italy 59100
71 Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea-Università di Roma La Sapienza Roma Italy 00189
72 Osp. Silvestrin Sant'Andrea Delle Fratte (PG) Italy 06132
73 National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center Aichi, Nagoya Japan 460-0001
74 Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Aichi, Nagoya Japan 464-8681
75 National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba, Kashiwa Japan 277-8577
76 National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center Ehime, Matsuyama Japan 791-0280
77 National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center Fukuoka, Fukuoka Japan 811-1395
78 Hokkaido University Hospital Hokkaido, Sapporo Japan 060-8648
79 Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation Hospital Hyogo, Kobe Japan 650-0047
80 Kanazawa University Hospital Ishikawa, Kanazawa Japan 920-8641
81 Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Kanagawa, Yokohama Japan 236-0051
82 Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata, Niigata Japan 951-8566
83 Kurashiki Central Hospital Okayama, Kurashiki Japan 710-8602
84 Okayama University Hospital Okayama, Okayama Japan 700-8558
85 Kindai University Hospital Osaka, Osaka-Sayama Japan 589-8511
86 Osaka City Hospital Organization Osaka City General Hospital Osaka, Osaka Japan 534-0021
87 National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center Sakai, Osaka Japan 591-8555
88 Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka, Sunto-gun Japan 411-8777
89 Chungbuk National University Hospital Cheongju Korea, Republic of 361-771
90 Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital Hwasun Korea, Republic of 519-763
91 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam Korea, Republic of 13620
92 Asan Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of 138-736
93 Ulsan University Hospital Ulsan Korea, Republic of 682-714
94 Hospital Pulau Pinang Palau Pinang Malaysia 10990
95 Pusat Perubatan University Kebangsaan Malaysia Wilayah Persekutuan Malaysia 5600
96 University Malaya Medical Centre Wilayah Persekutuan Malaysia 59100
97 Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen La Victoria Peru
98 Clínica Anglo Americana San Isidro Peru 27
99 Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas Surquillo Peru 34
100 Perpetual Succour Hospital (Cebu) Cebu City Philippines 6000
101 Makati Medical Center Makati City Philippines 1229
102 St. Luke Medical Centre Quezon Philippines 1102
103 Institutul Oncologic "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta" Cluj Napoca Romania 400015
104 ONCOLAB SRL, Craiova Craiova Romania 200535
105 Republic Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Dept. Chemotherapy Kazan Russian Federation 420029
106 FSBSI "N.N Blokhin Medical Research Center of Oncology" Moscow Russian Federation 115478
107 Medical Radiology Science Centre Obninsk Russian Federation 249020
108 First Pavlov State Medical University Saint Petersburg St. Petersburg Russian Federation 197022
109 SPb SBIH "City Clinical Oncological Dispensary" St. Petersburg Russian Federation 197022
110 FSBI "N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology" of MoH of RF St. Petersburg Russian Federation 197758
111 Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan 807
112 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Kaohsiung Taiwan 833
113 China Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan 40447
114 Taichung Veterans General Hospital Taichung Taiwan 40705
115 NCKUH Tainan Taiwan 704
116 Taipe Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan 112
117 Tri-Service General Hospital Taipei Taiwan 114
118 Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(TaoYuan) Taoyuan Taiwan 33305
119 Ramathibodi Hospital Bangkok Thailand 10400
120 Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital Chiang Mai Thailand 50200
121 Srinagarind Hospital Khonkaen Thailand 40002
122 Songklanagarind Hospital Songkla Thailand 90110
123 City Clinical Hospital #4, Dnipropetrovsk State Medical Academy Dnipropetrovsk Ukraine 49102
124 Donetsk Regional Antitumor Centre Donetsk Ukraine 83000
125 Kharkiv Regional Clinical Oncology Center Kharkiv Ukraine 16070
126 Lviv State Oncological Regional Treatment & Diagnostic CTR Lviv Ukraine 79031
127 Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Exeter United Kingdom EX2 5DW
128 Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford United Kingdom GU2 7XX
129 The Royal Marsden Hospital London United Kingdom SW3 6JJ
130 Maidstone Hospital, Kent Oncology Centre Maidstone United Kingdom ME16 9QQ
131 Scunthorpe General Hospital, Oncology Scunthorpe United Kingdom DN15 7BH
132 The Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton United Kingdom SM2 5PT
133 Royal Cornwall Hospital Truro United Kingdom TR1 3LJ

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Boehringer Ingelheim

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim, Boehringer Ingelheim

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Boehringer Ingelheim
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00949650
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1200.32
  • 2008-005615-18
First Posted:
Jul 30, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Apr 6, 2018
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2018

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail Two-arm, randomised (2:1 ratio), open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group comparison. 345 patients were randomised, 5 patients were not treated: 4 patients were not eligible for treatment and 1 patient in the chemotherapy arm refused to take study medication.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 230 115
COMPLETED 0 0
NOT COMPLETED 230 115

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy Total
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 230 115 345
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
60.5
(10.1)
59.9
(10.0)
60.3
(10.1)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
147
63.9%
77
67%
224
64.9%
Male
83
36.1%
38
33%
121
35.1%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number]
Asian
166
72.2%
83
72.2%
249
72.2%
Non-Asian
64
27.8%
32
27.8%
96
27.8%
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation group (Number) [Number]
EGFR mutation category: L858R
91
39.6%
47
40.9%
138
40%
EGFR mutation category: Deletion Exon 19
112
48.7%
57
49.6%
169
49%
EGFR mutation category: Other
27
11.7%
11
9.6%
38
11%
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) (Number) [Number]
ECOG PS 0 (baseline)
92
40%
41
35.7%
133
38.6%
ECOG PS 1 (baseline)
138
60%
73
63.5%
211
61.2%
ECOG PS 2 (baseline)
0
0%
1
0.9%
1
0.3%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Time
Description PFS was defined as time from randomisation to disease progression or death whichever occured first. Assessed by central independent review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1). Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time Frame Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Randomised set (RS)
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 230 115
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months.]
11.17
6.90
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
Comments Two-sided p-value from log-rank test stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method Log Rank
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0002
Comments
Method Regression, Cox
Comments Cox Proportional Hazard (PH) regression stratified by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.576
Confidence Interval () 95%
0.426 to 0.778
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg versus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy.
2. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Patients With Objective Response (OR)
Description OR was defined as Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Assessed by central independent review according to RECIST 1.1.
Time Frame Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 230 115
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of patients with OR.]
56.5
22.6
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments Logistic regression stratified for EGFR mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 4.802
Confidence Interval () 95%
2.855 to 8.075
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg-Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy.
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC)
Description DC was defined as a patient with OR or Stable Disease (SD). Assessed by central independent review according to the RECIST 1.1.
Time Frame Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 230 115
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of participants with DC.]
90.4
39.3%
80.9
70.3%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0118
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments Logistic regression stratified for EGFR mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 2.288
Confidence Interval () 95%
1.202 to 4.356
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg-Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy.
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Overall Survival (OS) Time
Description OS was defined as time from randomisation to death.
Time Frame From randomisation to cut-off date (17MAR2017).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 230 115
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months.]
28.16
28.22
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7916
Comments Two-sided p-value from log-rank test stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method Log Rank
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3850
Comments
Method Regression, Cox
Comments Cox PH regression stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.880
Confidence Interval () 95%
0.660 to 1.174
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg-Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy.
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Tumour Shrinkage
Description Tumour shrinkage was calculated as the minimum Sum of Diameters (SoD) of target lesions from all post-baseline tumour assessments, as read by the central independent review. The mean of these minimum values were presented after adjusting for baseline SoD, EGFR mutation group and race.
Time Frame Tumour assessments were performed at Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and then every 12-18 weeks until disease progression

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS. There were only 203 patients in the Afatinib 40 mg arm and 101 patients in the Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy with tumour measurements.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 203 101
Mean (Standard Error) [mm.]
33.19
(1.12)
43.00
(1.59)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments Adjusted for baseline SoD, EGFR mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Mean Difference (Final Values)
Estimated Value -9.82
Confidence Interval () 95%
-13.64 to -5.99
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg-Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy.
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Description Because the PFS was longer for patients in the Afatinib arm than for patients in the chemotherapy arm, the period of data collection for ECOG status and body weight continued for a longer time in the Afatinib arm.
Time Frame Baseline and throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks), up to 28 months.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS. Only patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment were included.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 224 109
Change from baseline at lowest value
-3.95
(3.91)
-2.68
(2.90)
Change from baseline at last value
-1.19
(5.36)
-0.29
(4.02)
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)
Description ECOG PS measured on 6 point scale to assess participant's performance status. 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction. Restricted in physically strenuous activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work. Ambulatory (>50 percent of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities. Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50 percent of waking hours. Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair. Dead.
Time Frame Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks), up to 28 months.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS. Only patients with baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment were included.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 228 111
ECOG PS 0 (last value)
92
40%
41
35.7%
ECOG PS 1 (last value)
138
60%
73
63.5%
ECOG PS 2 (last value)
0
0%
1
0.9%
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time to Deterioration in Coughing
Description HRQOL was measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer specific module LC13 (QLQ-LC13). Analysis for cough is based on QLQ-LC13 question 1. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time Frame Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 230 115
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months.]
26.97
8.02
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0062
Comments Two-sided p-value from log-rank test stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method Log Rank
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2133
Comments
Method Regression, Cox
Comments Cox PH regression stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.589
Confidence Interval () 95%
0.401 to 0.866
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg vs. Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy, if HR<1 then favours Afatinib 40 mg.
9. Secondary Outcome
Title HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Dyspnoea
Description HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for dyspnoea is based on composite of QLQ-LC13 questions 3-5. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time Frame Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 230 115
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months.]
10.41
2.86
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0129
Comments Two-sided p-value from log-rank test stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method Log Rank
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0078
Comments
Method Regression, Cox
Comments Cox PH regression stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.680
Confidence Interval () 95%
0.499 to 0.927
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg vs. Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy, if HR<1 then favours Afatinib 40 mg.
10. Secondary Outcome
Title HRQOL: Time to Deterioration in Pain
Description HRQOL was measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and its lung cancer specific module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for pain is based on composite of QLQ-C30 questions 9 and 19. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increased (worsened) by at least 10 points from baseline (0-100 point scale). Patients were considered deteriorated at time of death. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time Frame Throughout the trial until progression (every 3 weeks).

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
RS.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
Measure Participants 230 115
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months.]
4.17
3.09
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1882
Comments Two-sided p-value from log-rank test stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method Log Rank
Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Afatinib 40 mg, Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Comments
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0427
Comments
Method Regression, Cox
Comments Cox PH regression stratified by EGFR mutation group and race.
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
Estimated Value 0.826
Confidence Interval () 95%
0.618 to 1.104
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments Afatinib 40 mg vs. Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy, if HR<1 then favours Afatinib 40 mg.
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Trough Plasma Concentrations of Afatinib at Day 22
Description Trough plasma concentrations of Afatinib at Day 22 (course 2, visit 1) after multiple daily dosing of 40 mg Afatinib and after dose escalation to 50 mg or dose reduction to 30 mg or 20 mg.
Time Frame Day 22.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Patients from the treated set with evaluable data and who had at least 1 valid Afatinib plasma concentration available on this time point.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 20 mg Afatinib 30 mg Afatinib 40 mg Afatinib 50 mg
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 20 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose reduction. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 30 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose reduction. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 50 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose escalation.
Measure Participants 0 11 165 3
Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [ng/mL.]
21.8
(36.6)
28.0
(85.0)
29.9
(46.1)
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Trough Plasma Concentrations of Afatinib at Day 29
Description Trough plasma concentrations of Afatinib at day 29 (course 2, visit 2) after multiple daily dosing of 40 mg Afatinib and after dose escalation to 50 mg or dose reduction to 30 mg or 20 mg.
Time Frame Day 29.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Patients from the treated set with evaluable data and who had at least 1 valid Afatinib plasma concentration available on this time point.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 20 mg Afatinib 30 mg Afatinib 40 mg Afatinib 50 mg
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 20 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose reduction. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 30 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose reduction. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 50 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose escalation.
Measure Participants 0 25 143 16
Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [ng/mL.]
28.0
(82.4)
25.8
(69.5)
29.6
(79.2)
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Trough Plasma Concentrations of Afatinib at Day 43
Description Trough plasma concentrations of Afatinib at Day 43 (course 3, visit 1) after multiple daily dosing of 40 mg Afatinib and after dose escalation to 50 mg or dose reduction to 30 mg or 20 mg.
Time Frame Day 43.

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Patients from the treated set with evaluable data and who had at least 1 valid Afatinib plasma concentration available on this time point.
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 20 mg Afatinib 30 mg Afatinib 40 mg Afatinib 50 mg
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 20 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose reduction. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 30 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose reduction. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 50 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily after a dose escalation.
Measure Participants 2 39 126 14
Geometric Mean (Geometric Coefficient of Variation) [ng/mL.]
24.4
(260)
24.7
(63.9)
23.5
(66.2)
27.5
(64.4)

Adverse Events

Time Frame First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication.
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Arm/Group Description Patients received Afatinib monotherapy 40 mg film-coated tablets orally once daily. Patients received Pemetrexed 500 mg/m^2 lyophilised powder as intravenous infusion after Cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 solution for infusion as intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment course up to 6 cycles.
All Cause Mortality
Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 72/229 (31.4%) 25/111 (22.5%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia 0/229 (0%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Thrombocytopenia 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Mitral valve incompetence 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Myocardial infarction 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Pericardial effusion 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Eye disorders
Cataract 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Abdominal pain upper 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Diarrhoea 15/229 (6.6%) 0/111 (0%)
Gastritis 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Haemorrhoids 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Nausea 0/229 (0%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Pancreatitis acute 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Stomatitis 1/229 (0.4%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Vomiting 11/229 (4.8%) 3/111 (2.7%)
General disorders
Abasia 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Asthenia 1/229 (0.4%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Death 2/229 (0.9%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Disease progression 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Fatigue 3/229 (1.3%) 1/111 (0.9%)
General physical health deterioration 1/229 (0.4%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Hernia 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Malaise 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Mucosal inflammation 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Pyrexia 2/229 (0.9%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Jaundice 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis 1/229 (0.4%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Device related infection 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Lower respiratory tract infection 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Lung infection 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Meningitis aseptic 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Meningoencephalitis herpetic 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Pneumonia 4/229 (1.7%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Sepsis 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Urinary tract infection 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Lower limb fracture 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Splenic rupture 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Synovial rupture 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Thoracic vertebral fracture 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Tibia fracture 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Aspartate aminotransferase increased 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Blood sodium decreased 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Liver function test abnormal 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Dehydration 3/229 (1.3%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Diabetes with hyperosmolarity 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Hypokalaemia 4/229 (1.7%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Hyponatraemia 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Bone pain 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Muscular weakness 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Pain in extremity 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant neoplasm progression 3/229 (1.3%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Metastases to central nervous system 3/229 (1.3%) 0/111 (0%)
Metastases to lung 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Metastases to meninges 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Neoplasm progression 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Depressed level of consciousness 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Epilepsy 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Headache 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Intracranial pressure increased 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Loss of consciousness 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Partial seizures 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Seizure 3/229 (1.3%) 0/111 (0%)
Syncope 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state 3/229 (1.3%) 0/111 (0%)
Schizophreniform disorder 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Acute prerenal failure 1/229 (0.4%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Renal failure 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Bronchospasm 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Dyspnoea 4/229 (1.7%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Epistaxis 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Haemoptysis 1/229 (0.4%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Interstitial lung disease 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Pleural effusion 2/229 (0.9%) 3/111 (2.7%)
Pneumothorax 1/229 (0.4%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Pulmonary artery thrombosis 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Pulmonary embolism 2/229 (0.9%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Respiratory arrest 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Respiratory failure 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis 2/229 (0.9%) 0/111 (0%)
Hypotension 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Superior vena cava syndrome 1/229 (0.4%) 0/111 (0%)
Thrombosis 0/229 (0%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Venous thrombosis 1/229 (0.4%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Afatinib 40 mg Pemetrexed/Cisplatin Chemotherapy
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 229/229 (100%) 108/111 (97.3%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia 19/229 (8.3%) 29/111 (26.1%)
Leukopenia 6/229 (2.6%) 21/111 (18.9%)
Neutropenia 4/229 (1.7%) 35/111 (31.5%)
Thrombocytopenia 1/229 (0.4%) 8/111 (7.2%)
Eye disorders
Dry eye 14/229 (6.1%) 0/111 (0%)
Vision blurred 12/229 (5.2%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain 13/229 (5.7%) 5/111 (4.5%)
Abdominal pain upper 15/229 (6.6%) 8/111 (7.2%)
Cheilitis 22/229 (9.6%) 0/111 (0%)
Constipation 37/229 (16.2%) 39/111 (35.1%)
Diarrhoea 216/229 (94.3%) 25/111 (22.5%)
Dyspepsia 21/229 (9.2%) 7/111 (6.3%)
Mouth ulceration 24/229 (10.5%) 3/111 (2.7%)
Nausea 65/229 (28.4%) 75/111 (67.6%)
Stomatitis 88/229 (38.4%) 10/111 (9%)
Vomiting 53/229 (23.1%) 50/111 (45%)
General disorders
Asthenia 16/229 (7%) 14/111 (12.6%)
Chest pain 16/229 (7%) 14/111 (12.6%)
Fatigue 45/229 (19.7%) 39/111 (35.1%)
Malaise 7/229 (3.1%) 6/111 (5.4%)
Mucosal inflammation 67/229 (29.3%) 5/111 (4.5%)
Oedema 7/229 (3.1%) 13/111 (11.7%)
Oedema peripheral 17/229 (7.4%) 8/111 (7.2%)
Pyrexia 28/229 (12.2%) 6/111 (5.4%)
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis 28/229 (12.2%) 3/111 (2.7%)
Cystitis 15/229 (6.6%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Folliculitis 12/229 (5.2%) 0/111 (0%)
Nasopharyngitis 39/229 (17%) 9/111 (8.1%)
Paronychia 132/229 (57.6%) 0/111 (0%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 29/229 (12.7%) 4/111 (3.6%)
Urinary tract infection 19/229 (8.3%) 5/111 (4.5%)
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased 27/229 (11.8%) 3/111 (2.7%)
Aspartate aminotransferase increased 22/229 (9.6%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Blood creatinine increased 5/229 (2.2%) 10/111 (9%)
Haemoglobin decreased 3/229 (1.3%) 13/111 (11.7%)
Neutrophil count decreased 1/229 (0.4%) 8/111 (7.2%)
Weight decreased 44/229 (19.2%) 16/111 (14.4%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite 70/229 (30.6%) 61/111 (55%)
Hypokalaemia 21/229 (9.2%) 4/111 (3.6%)
Hyponatraemia 4/229 (1.7%) 6/111 (5.4%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 21/229 (9.2%) 6/111 (5.4%)
Back pain 37/229 (16.2%) 13/111 (11.7%)
Muscle spasms 20/229 (8.7%) 0/111 (0%)
Musculoskeletal pain 21/229 (9.2%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Myalgia 12/229 (5.2%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Pain in extremity 20/229 (8.7%) 4/111 (3.6%)
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness 28/229 (12.2%) 12/111 (10.8%)
Dysgeusia 18/229 (7.9%) 9/111 (8.1%)
Headache 37/229 (16.2%) 19/111 (17.1%)
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia 37/229 (16.2%) 10/111 (9%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough 39/229 (17%) 21/111 (18.9%)
Dyspnoea 18/229 (7.9%) 12/111 (10.8%)
Epistaxis 41/229 (17.9%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Hiccups 5/229 (2.2%) 10/111 (9%)
Nasal inflammation 15/229 (6.6%) 0/111 (0%)
Oropharyngeal pain 13/229 (5.7%) 3/111 (2.7%)
Rhinorrhoea 16/229 (7%) 7/111 (6.3%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne 52/229 (22.7%) 0/111 (0%)
Alopecia 30/229 (13.1%) 20/111 (18%)
Dermatitis acneiform 32/229 (14%) 0/111 (0%)
Dry skin 72/229 (31.4%) 2/111 (1.8%)
Nail disorder 14/229 (6.1%) 0/111 (0%)
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome 19/229 (8.3%) 0/111 (0%)
Pruritus 50/229 (21.8%) 1/111 (0.9%)
Rash 145/229 (63.3%) 11/111 (9.9%)
Skin exfoliation 13/229 (5.7%) 0/111 (0%)
Skin fissures 16/229 (7%) 0/111 (0%)
Vascular disorders
Hypertension 14/229 (6.1%) 14/111 (12.6%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acknowledges that investigators have the right to publish the study results. Investigators shall provide BI with a copy of any publication or presentation for review prior to any submission. Such review will be done with regard to proprietary information, information related to patentable inventions, medical, scientific, and statistical accuracy within 60 days. BI may request a delay of the publication in order to protect BI's intellectual property rights.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center
Organization Boehringer Ingelheim
Phone 1-800-243-0127
Email clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com
Responsible Party:
Boehringer Ingelheim
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00949650
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1200.32
  • 2008-005615-18
First Posted:
Jul 30, 2009
Last Update Posted:
Apr 6, 2018
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2018