Aprepitant vs. Desloratadine in EGFR-TKIs Related Pruritus Treatment

Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02646020
Collaborator
(none)
138
1
2
60
2.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Study hypothesis is that aprepitant is more effective than desloratadine in relieving pruritus caused by EGFR TKIs. Primary endpoint is the effective rate of pruritus, effective treatment defined as visual analogue scale (VAS) decrease ≥ 50% after treatment compared to baseline score. 130 NSCLC patients undertaken EGFR-TKI and suffer from moderate or severe pruritus (VAS score ≥ 4) will be enrolled in this study, and stratified (gender, VAS 4-6 or 7-10, and 2nd generation TKI or non 2nd generation) randomized (1:1) into aprepitant or desloratadine treatment. VAS investigation will be taken once a week to treatment end (4 weeks).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized control, double-blinded, phase II clinical trial. Study hypothesis is that aprepitant is more effective than desloratadine in relieving pruritus caused by EGFR TKIs. Primary endpoint is the effective rate of pruritus, effective treatment defined as visual analogue scale (VAS) decrease ≥ 50% after treatment (1 week) compared to baseline score. The VAS inquiry will be taken once a week for 4 weeks. Quality of life investigation will be performed at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks after treatment using SKINDEX-16 questionnaire. 130 NSCLC patients undertaken EGFR-TKI and suffer from moderate or severe pruritus (VAS score ≥ 4) will be enrolled in this study, and stratified (gender,and VAS 4-6 or 7-10, and 2nd generation TKI or non 2nd generation) randomized (1:1) into aprepitant or desloratadine treatment. Aprepitant arm will be administrated aprepitant 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5, along with placebo 5mg d1-d28; desloratadine arm will be administrated placebo 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5, along with desloratadine 5mg d1-d28. Tolerance evaluation will be taken according to National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) For Adverse Events (AE) V4.03.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
138 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Aprepitant vs. Desloratadine in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Related Pruritus: A Prospective, Randomized Control, Double-blinded, Phase II Clinical Trial
Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Aprepitant and placebo

aprepitant 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5, along with placebo 5mg d1-d28;

Drug: Aprepitant
aprepitant 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
Other Names:
  • Treatment arm: Aprepitant administration
  • Drug: Placebo of desloratadine
    Placebo of desloratadine 5mg d1-d28; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
    Other Names:
  • Comparative arm: Placebo of Desloratadine administration
  • Active Comparator: desloratadine and placebo

    placebo 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5, along with desloratadine 5mg d1-d28

    Drug: Desloratadine
    Desloratadine 5mg d1-d28; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
    Other Names:
  • Treatment arm: Desloratadine administration
  • Drug: Placebo of aprepitant
    Placebo of aprepitant 125mg d1, 80mg d3 and d5; until pruritus recurrence or discontinuation of EGFR-TKI or safely issues (SAE etc.)
    Other Names:
  • Comparative arm: Placebo of aprepitant administration
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. effective rate of pruritus relieving [day 28 at the treatment ends]

      effective treatment of pruritus relieving defined as visual analogue scale (VAS) decrease ≥ 50% after treatment compared to baseline score

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. duration of pruritus relieving [12 weeks at the follow-up end]

      the time from pruritus effective relief to VAS score increase ≥ baseline level, the VAS inquiry will be taken once a week.

    2. Change from baseline quality of life assessment at treatment ends [baseline, 28 days at the treatment ends]

      using SKINDEX-16 questionnaire to assess patients quality of life

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer

    • Undertaken EGFR TKIs treatment (gefitinib, erlotinib, icotinib, afatinib, etc)

    • 18 years old

    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2

    • Moderate or severe pruritus (VAS score ≥ 4) first occur after EGFR TKIs treatment

    • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months

    • Orally drug administration with no difficulty

    • pregnancy test negative in 7 days for women of child-bearing age; willing to take contraception measures.

    • Signed informed consent form (ICF)

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Systemically treatment with Neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor inhibitors, antihistamines drugs, antibiotics, cortical hormone therapy, antiepileptic drugs, immunosuppressive agents or other drugs might affect treatment in 4 weeks; or locally used of these drug in 2 weeks.

    • Existing skin lesions not EGFR TKIs related, such as skin infection, chronic dermatitis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), lymphoma or other diseases.

    • Total bilirubin ≥ 1.5 Upper Limit Of Normal (ULN)

    • Serum creatinine ≥mg/dl

    • AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 ULN without liver metastasis; or ≥ 5 ULN with liver metastasis.

    • Residual toxicity event ≥ CTC-AE grade 2, except peripheral neurotoxicities.

    • Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis or spinal compression; except no symptoms and with no cortical hormonotherapy in 4 weeks.

    • Clinical evidence of interstitial lung disease

    • Any severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases judged by investigators.

    • Any contraindication of Neurokinin-1 receptor inhibitors and desloratadine.

    Discontinuation Criteria

    • Invalid subject after randomization

    • Major protocol violations judged by investigators.

    • Poor compliance

    • Intolerable adverse events

    • Subject withdraw ICF

    • Any pregnancy events

    • No clinical benefits due to clinical adverse events, laboratory abnormalities or other medical conditions

    • Other reasons of treatment discontinuation judged by investigators.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Cancer Center of Sun-Yat Sen University (CCSYSU) GuangZhou Guangdong China 510060

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Sun Yat-sen University

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Li Zhang, professor, Sun Yat-sen University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Li Zhang, MD, M.D. Professor, Sun Yat-sen University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02646020
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • TAPE001
    First Posted:
    Jan 5, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    May 18, 2021
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Li Zhang, MD, M.D. Professor, Sun Yat-sen University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 18, 2021