A Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin With Treatment of Physician's Choice in Subjects With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study, comparing efficacy and safety of eribulin with TPC in subjects with advanced and disease progression following at least two prior regimens for advanced disease, which should have included a platinum-based regimen.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Arm A
|
Drug: Eribulin
Administration of eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. over 2 to 5 minutes on Days 1 and Day 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days.
|
Active Comparator: Arm B
|
Drug: TPC -Vinorelbine,Gemcitabine,Docetaxel, and Pemetrexed
Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1, every 7 days
Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 every 21 days
Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 every 21 days (nonsquamous histology only).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Overall Survival (OS) [Randomization (Day 1) until date of death from any cause, or 37 months]
The OS was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participants were censored either at the date that participant was last known to be alive or the date of study cut-off, whichever was earlier. The two treatment arms were compared using the log-rank test, stratified by histology, TPC option, and geographic region; and the treatment difference between eribulin mesylate and TPC was tested at a significance level of 0.05 (2-sided). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival probabilities for each arm were plotted over time. The treatment effect was estimated by fitting a Cox Proportional Hazards model to the OS times including treatment arm as a factor and histology, TPC option and geographic region as strata.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) [Randomization (Day 1) until date of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), or 37 months]
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first. The difference in PFS (based on the tumor response evaluation as determined by the investigator) between eribulin mesylate and TPC was evaluated using the log rank test, stratified by histology, TPC option, and geographic region, tested at an alpha level of 0.05 (2-sided). PFS censoring rules will be defined in the SAP and follow Federal Department of Agriculture (FDA) guidance.
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) [Randomization (Day 1) to CR or PR]
The ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST criteria. The ORR was estimated by study arm based on the tumor response evaluation as determined by the investigator, according to RECIST 1.1. Participants with unknown response were treated as non-responders. The statistical difference in ORR between treatment arms was evaluated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi-square test with histology, TPC option, and geographic region as strata, tested at an alpha level of 0.05 (2-sided). The 95 percent confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper Pearson method.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion:
Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be included in this study:
-
Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC.
-
Documented evidence of advanced NSCLC not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy.
-
Confirmation of the presence or absence of EGFR mutations prior to study enrolment in all subjects.
-
Subjects must have received at least two prior regimens for advanced NSCLC, which should have included a platinum-based regimen and, in all subjects with tumors harbouring EGFR mutations, an EGFR TKI.
-
Radiographic evidence of disease progression on, or after, the last anti-cancer regimen prior to study entry.
-
Presence of measurable disease.
-
ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2.
-
Adequate bone marrow
-
Adequate renal function.
-
Adequate liver function.
-
Female subjects of child-bearing potential must agree to use two forms of highly effective contraception.
-
Male subjects and their female partners who are of child-bearing potential must agree to use two forms of highly effective contraception.
-
Voluntary agreement to provide written informed consent and the willingness and ability to comply with all aspects of the protocol.
-
Males or females aged at least 18 years (or any age greater than 18 years as determined by country legislation) at the time of informed consent.
Exclusion:
Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from this study:
-
Subjects who have received any anti-cancer therapy within 14 days, or five half-lives of the drug (whichever is longer), prior to randomization.
-
Subjects who have not recovered from toxicities as a result of prior anti-cancer therapy to less than Grade 2.
-
Subjects who have previously been treated, or participated in a study with eribulin, whether treated with eribulin or not. The TPC option must not include the same agent which the subject received in a prior regimen.
-
Peripheral neuropathy more than CTCAE Grade 2.
-
Significant cardiovascular impairment.
-
Subjects with a high probability of Long QT Syndrome, or QTc interval >500 ms.
-
Subjects with brain or subdural metastases are not eligible, unless the metastases are asymptomatic and do not require treatment or have been adequately treated by local therapy.
-
Any serious concomitant illness.
-
Known HIV positive, or have an infection requiring treatment.
-
Any malignancy that required treatment, or has shown evidence of recurrence (except for NSCLC, non-melanoma skin cancer, or histologically confirmed complete excision of carcinoma in-situ) during the 5 years prior to study entry.
-
Female subjects must not be pregnant, and must not be breastfeeding.
-
Hypersensitivity to either HalB or HalB chemical derivatives or both, or to any of the excipients of the eribulin formulation.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Los Angeles | California | United States | ||
2 | Pleasant Hill | California | United States | ||
3 | San Diego | California | United States | ||
4 | Aurora | Colorado | United States | ||
5 | Washington | District of Columbia | United States | ||
6 | Port Saint Lucie | Florida | United States | ||
7 | Decatur | Illinois | United States | ||
8 | Southfield | Michigan | United States | ||
9 | Lebanon | New Hampshire | United States | ||
10 | Lake Success | New York | United States | ||
11 | Portland | Oregon | United States | ||
12 | Spokane | Washington | United States | ||
13 | Madison | Wisconsin | United States | ||
14 | Herston | Queensland | Australia | ||
15 | Frankston | Victoria | Australia | ||
16 | Strasbourg | Bas Rhin | France | ||
17 | Marseille Cedex 20 | Bouches-du-Rhone | France | ||
18 | Marseille Cedex 9 | Bouches-duRhone | France | ||
19 | Bordeaux | Gironde | France | ||
20 | Toulouse Cedex 9 | Haute Garonne | France | ||
21 | Limoges | Haute Vienne | France | ||
22 | Rennes Cedex 9 | Ille Et Vilaine | France | ||
23 | Saint Herblain | Loire Atlantique | France | ||
24 | Lille | Nord | France | ||
25 | Paris Cedex 12 | Paris | France | ||
26 | Pierre Benite cedex | Rhone | France | ||
27 | Villejuif cedex | Val De Marne | France | ||
28 | Aschaffenburg | Bayern | Germany | ||
29 | Gauting | Bayern | Germany | ||
30 | Muenchen | Bayern | Germany | ||
31 | Essen | Nordrhein Westfalen | Germany | ||
32 | Koeln | Nordrhein Westfalen | Germany | ||
33 | Recklinghausen | Nordrhein Westfalen | Germany | ||
34 | Mainz | Rheinland Pfalz | Germany | ||
35 | Halle | Sachsen Anhalt | Germany | ||
36 | Hong Kong | Hong Kong | |||
37 | Lido di Camaiore | Lucca | Italy | ||
38 | Monza | Milano | Italy | ||
39 | Aviano | Pordenone | Italy | ||
40 | Cremona | Italy | |||
41 | Milano | Italy | |||
42 | Siena | Italy | |||
43 | Nagoya-shi | Aichi-Ken | Japan | ||
44 | Kashiwa-shi | Chiba-Ken | Japan | ||
45 | Fukuoka-shi | Fukuoka-Ken | Japan | ||
46 | Hiroshima-shi | Hiroshima-Ken | Japan | ||
47 | Sapporo-shi | Hokkaido | Japan | ||
48 | Kobe-shi | Hygo-Ken | Japan | ||
49 | Akashi-shi | Hyogo-ken | Japan | ||
50 | Sendai-shi | Miyagi-Ken | Japan | ||
51 | Nigata-shi | Nigata-Ken | Japan | ||
52 | Kurashiki-shi | Okayama-Ken | Japan | ||
53 | Habinko-shi | Osaka-Fu | Japan | ||
54 | Osaka-shi | Osaka-Fu | Japan | ||
55 | Osakasayama-shi | Osaka-Fu | Japan | ||
56 | Sunto-gun | Shizuoka-Ken | Japan | ||
57 | Chuo-ku | Tokyo-to | Japan | ||
58 | Koto-ku | Tokyo-To | Japan | ||
59 | Ube-shi | Yamaguchi-Ken | Japan | ||
60 | Kitaadachi-gun | Japan | |||
61 | Seongnam-si | Gyeonggi-do | Korea, Republic of | ||
62 | Suwon | Gyeonggi-do | Korea, Republic of | ||
63 | Seoul | Korea | Korea, Republic of | ||
64 | Gdansk | Poland | |||
65 | Mrozy | Poland | |||
66 | Otwock | Poland | |||
67 | Sczedin | Poland | |||
68 | Warsazawa | Poland | |||
69 | Barnaul | Russian Federation | |||
70 | Novosibirsk | Russian Federation | |||
71 | Saint Petersburg | Russian Federation | |||
72 | Singapore | Singapore | |||
73 | Sabadell | Barcelona | Spain | ||
74 | Terrassa | Barcelona | Spain | ||
75 | Pamplona | Navarra | Spain | ||
76 | Barcelona | Spain | |||
77 | Madrid | Spain | |||
78 | Taichung | Taiwan | |||
79 | Tainan | Taiwan | |||
80 | Taipei City | Taiwan | |||
81 | Taipei | Taiwan | |||
82 | London | Greater London | United Kingdom | ||
83 | Manchester | Greater Manchester | United Kingdom | ||
84 | Sutton | Surrey | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Eisai Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- E7389-G000-302
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | A total of 735 participants were screened. Of these, 195 screen failed due to failure to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria, adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or other reason and were not randomized into the study. A total of 540 participants were randomized into the study. Of these, 3 were discontinued prior to treatment. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eribulin mesylate (1.4 milligram per square meter [mg/m^2]) was administered intravenously (IV) over 2 to 5 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days. | Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC): Vinorelbine (30 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 7 days, Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days (or 1000 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days), Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days, or Pemetrexed (500 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days (nonsquamous histology only). |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 270 | 270 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 270 | 270 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m^2) was administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days. | TPC: Vinorelbine (30 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 7 days, Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days (or 1000 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days), Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days, or Pemetrexed (500 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days (nonsquamous histology only). | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 270 | 270 | 540 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
61.4
(9.62)
|
60.8
(9.32)
|
61.1
(9.47)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
107
39.6%
|
101
37.4%
|
208
38.5%
|
Male |
163
60.4%
|
169
62.6%
|
332
61.5%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Overall Survival (OS) |
---|---|
Description | The OS was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of death, regardless of cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participants were censored either at the date that participant was last known to be alive or the date of study cut-off, whichever was earlier. The two treatment arms were compared using the log-rank test, stratified by histology, TPC option, and geographic region; and the treatment difference between eribulin mesylate and TPC was tested at a significance level of 0.05 (2-sided). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival probabilities for each arm were plotted over time. The treatment effect was estimated by fitting a Cox Proportional Hazards model to the OS times including treatment arm as a factor and histology, TPC option and geographic region as strata. |
Time Frame | Randomization (Day 1) until date of death from any cause, or 37 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set included all randomized participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m^2) was administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days. | TPC: Vinorelbine (30 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 7 days, Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days (or 1000 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days), Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days, or Pemetrexed (500 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days (nonsquamous histology only). |
Measure Participants | 270 | 270 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
9.5
|
9.5
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate, Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed |
---|---|---|
Comments | OS was compared between eribulin and TPC testing the following null hypothesis: H0: OS in Arm A (eribulin) is equal to OS in Arm B (TPC) against the alternative: H1: OS in Arm A (eribulin) is not equal to OS in Arm B (TPC). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1343 |
Comments | P-value was calculated from a 2-sided long-rank test stratified by histology, TPC option, and geographic region. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.16 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.95 to 1.41 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Hazard Ratio was based on a Cox regression model including treatment as covariate, and histology, TPC option and geographic region as strata. |
Title | Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) |
---|---|
Description | PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression, or date of death, whichever occurred first. The difference in PFS (based on the tumor response evaluation as determined by the investigator) between eribulin mesylate and TPC was evaluated using the log rank test, stratified by histology, TPC option, and geographic region, tested at an alpha level of 0.05 (2-sided). PFS censoring rules will be defined in the SAP and follow Federal Department of Agriculture (FDA) guidance. |
Time Frame | Randomization (Day 1) until date of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), or 37 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set included all randomized participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m^2) was administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days. | TPC: Vinorelbine (30 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 7 days, Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days (or 1000 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days), Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days, or Pemetrexed (500 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days (nonsquamous histology only). |
Measure Participants | 270 | 270 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
3.0
|
2.8
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate, Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed |
---|---|---|
Comments | OS was compared between eribulin and TPC testing the following null hypothesis: H0: OS in Arm A (eribulin) is equal to OS in Arm B (TPC) against the alternative: H1: OS in Arm A (eribulin) is not equal to OS in Arm B (TPC). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3946 |
Comments | P-value was calculated from a 2-sided long-rank test stratified by histology, TPC option, and geographic region. | |
Method | Log Rank | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.09 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.90 to 1.32 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | The hazard ratio was based on a Cox regression model including treatment as covariate, and histology, TPC option, and geographic region as strata. |
Title | Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
---|---|
Description | The ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST criteria. The ORR was estimated by study arm based on the tumor response evaluation as determined by the investigator, according to RECIST 1.1. Participants with unknown response were treated as non-responders. The statistical difference in ORR between treatment arms was evaluated using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi-square test with histology, TPC option, and geographic region as strata, tested at an alpha level of 0.05 (2-sided). The 95 percent confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper Pearson method. |
Time Frame | Randomization (Day 1) to CR or PR |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set included all randomized participants. |
Arm/Group Title | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m^2) was administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days. | TPC: Vinorelbine (30 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 7 days, Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days (or 1000 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days), Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days, or Pemetrexed (500 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days (nonsquamous histology only). |
Measure Participants | 270 | 270 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
12.2
4.5%
|
15.2
5.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate, Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed |
---|---|---|
Comments | OS was compared between eribulin and TPC testing the following null hypothesis: H0: OS in Arm A (eribulin) is equal to OS in Arm B (TPC) against the alternative: H1: OS in Arm A (eribulin) is not equal to OS in Arm B (TPC). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3034 |
Comments | The P-value was stratified by histology, TPC option, and geographic region. | |
Method | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | |
Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from the first dose of study treatment to thirty days after final dose of study medication. Participants were followed for approximately 37 months. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. AEs were graded on a 5-point scale according to Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. All AEs graded 4 or 5 were considered serious. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed | ||
Arm/Group Description | Eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m^2) was administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days. | TPC: Vinorelbine (30 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 7 days, Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days (or 1000 mg/m^2 IV on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days), Docetaxel (75 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days, or Pemetrexed (500 mg/m^2) was administered IV on Day 1 every 21 days (nonsquamous histology only). | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 28/269 (10.4%) | 21/268 (7.8%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 96/269 (35.7%) | 86/268 (32.1%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 2/269 (0.7%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Febrile bone marrow aplasia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Febrile neutropenia | 3/269 (1.1%) | 7/268 (2.6%) | ||
Leukocytosis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Leukopenia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Neutropenia | 4/269 (1.5%) | 3/268 (1.1%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Acute coronary syndrome | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Angina unstable | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Cardiac failure | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Coronary artery thrombosis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Myocardial ischaemia | 2/269 (0.7%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Supraventricular tachycardia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Cataract | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 1/269 (0.4%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Constipation | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 2/269 (0.7%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Dysphagia | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Gastric ulcer | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Gastritis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Ileus | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Intestinal obstruction | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Large intestinal obstruction | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Nausea | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Oesophageal stenosis | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Oesophageal varices haemorrhage | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Stomatitis | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Vomiting | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 2/269 (0.7%) | 3/268 (1.1%) | ||
Chest pain | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Device failure | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Face oedema | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Fatigue | 0/269 (0%) | 3/268 (1.1%) | ||
General physical health deterioration | 13/269 (4.8%) | 12/268 (4.5%) | ||
Non-cardiac chest pain | 2/269 (0.7%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Pain | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pyrexia | 3/269 (1.1%) | 3/268 (1.1%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Hepatic cirrhosis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Immune system disorders | ||||
Hypersensitivity | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Bronchitis | 0/269 (0%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Bronchopneumonia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Cellulitis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Escherichia sepsis | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Gastroenteritis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Herpes zoster | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Lower respiratory tract infection | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Lung abscess | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Lung infection | 2/269 (0.7%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Neutropenic sepsis | 2/269 (0.7%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Oral candidiasis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pneumonia | 12/269 (4.5%) | 5/268 (1.9%) | ||
Pseudomembranous colitis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Respiratory tract infection | 2/269 (0.7%) | 3/268 (1.1%) | ||
Sepsis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Septic shock | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Staphylococcal sepsis | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Wound infection fungal | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Cervical vertebral fracture | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Ilium fracture | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Lumbar vertebral fracture | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Toxicity to various agents | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Blood phosphorus decreased | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Neutrophil count decreased | 1/269 (0.4%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
White blood cell count decreased | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 1/269 (0.4%) | 3/268 (1.1%) | ||
Diabetic ketoacidosis | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Hypercalcaemia | 4/269 (1.5%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Hyponatraemia | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Polydipsia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Dehydration | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Back pain | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Bone pain | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Flank pain | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Muscular weakness | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Musculoskeletal pain | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Pain in extremity | 0/269 (0%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Pathological fracture | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Cancer pain | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Malignant ascites | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Malignant neoplasm progression | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Malignant pleural effusion | 1/269 (0.4%) | 4/268 (1.5%) | ||
Metastases to central nervous system | 2/269 (0.7%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Metastases to meninges | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Metastatic pain | 2/269 (0.7%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Brain oedema | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Cerebral infarction | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Cerebrovascular accident | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Coma | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Seizure | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Dizziness | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Embolic cerebral infarction | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Headache | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Hypoaesthesia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Monoplegia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Syncope | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Transient ischaemic attack | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Hydrocephalus | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Confusional state | 2/269 (0.7%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Fear | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Haematuria | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Acute kidney injury | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Pelvic pain | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Acute respiratory distress syndrome | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 2/269 (0.7%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Cough | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 9/269 (3.3%) | 10/268 (3.7%) | ||
Dyspnoea exertional | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Haemoptysis | 2/269 (0.7%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Hypoxia | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pharyngeal inflammation | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pleural effusion | 2/269 (0.7%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Pneumonitis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pneumothorax | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Pulmonary embolism | 2/269 (0.7%) | 6/268 (2.2%) | ||
Pulmonary hypertension | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Respiratory disorder | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Respiratory distress | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Respiratory failure | 1/269 (0.4%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Deep vein thrombosis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Hypotension | 0/269 (0%) | 1/268 (0.4%) | ||
Jugular vein thrombosis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Superior vena cava syndrome | 0/269 (0%) | 2/268 (0.7%) | ||
Superior vena cava stenosis | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Venous thrombosis limb | 1/269 (0.4%) | 0/268 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Arm A: Eribulin Mesylate | Arm B: Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, or Pemetrexed | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 254/269 (94.4%) | 261/268 (97.4%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 59/269 (21.9%) | 72/268 (26.9%) | ||
Leukopenia | 27/269 (10%) | 28/268 (10.4%) | ||
Neutropenia | 92/269 (34.2%) | 74/268 (27.6%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal Pain | 13/269 (4.8%) | 19/268 (7.1%) | ||
Abdominal Pain Upper | 17/269 (6.3%) | 17/268 (6.3%) | ||
Constipation | 63/269 (23.4%) | 63/268 (23.5%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 38/269 (14.1%) | 45/268 (16.8%) | ||
Nausea | 73/269 (27.1%) | 78/268 (29.1%) | ||
Stomatitis | 43/269 (16%) | 34/268 (12.7%) | ||
Vomiting | 29/269 (10.8%) | 38/268 (14.2%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 59/269 (21.9%) | 56/268 (20.9%) | ||
Fatigue | 66/269 (24.5%) | 62/268 (23.1%) | ||
Malaise | 22/269 (8.2%) | 29/268 (10.8%) | ||
Oedema peripheral | 40/269 (14.9%) | 31/268 (11.6%) | ||
Pyrexia | 47/269 (17.5%) | 50/268 (18.7%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 13/269 (4.8%) | 14/268 (5.2%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 19/269 (7.1%) | 23/268 (8.6%) | ||
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 17/269 (6.3%) | 17/268 (6.3%) | ||
Neutrophil count decreased | 60/269 (22.3%) | 58/268 (21.6%) | ||
Weight decreased | 20/269 (7.4%) | 15/268 (5.6%) | ||
White blood cell count decreased | 55/269 (20.4%) | 57/268 (21.3%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 98/269 (36.4%) | 68/268 (25.4%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 15/269 (5.6%) | 18/268 (6.7%) | ||
Back pain | 24/269 (8.9%) | 21/268 (7.8%) | ||
Muscle Spasms | 14/269 (5.2%) | 7/268 (2.6%) | ||
Muscular Weakness | 14/269 (5.2%) | 9/268 (3.4%) | ||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 19/269 (7.1%) | 24/268 (9%) | ||
Musculoskeletal pain | 22/269 (8.2%) | 14/268 (5.2%) | ||
Myalgia | 28/269 (10.4%) | 26/268 (9.7%) | ||
Pain in extremity | 13/269 (4.8%) | 14/268 (5.2%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Dizziness | 14/269 (5.2%) | 19/268 (7.1%) | ||
Dysgeusia | 25/269 (9.3%) | 16/268 (6%) | ||
Headache | 35/269 (13%) | 21/268 (7.8%) | ||
Paraesthesia | 21/269 (7.8%) | 6/268 (2.2%) | ||
Peripheral sensory neuropathy | 44/269 (16.4%) | 24/268 (9%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Insomnia | 16/269 (5.9%) | 20/268 (7.5%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Cough | 42/269 (15.6%) | 42/268 (15.7%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 57/269 (21.2%) | 52/268 (19.4%) | ||
Haemoptysis | 19/269 (7.1%) | 20/268 (7.5%) | ||
Productive cough | 16/269 (5.9%) | 14/268 (5.2%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Alopecia | 81/269 (30.1%) | 42/268 (15.7%) | ||
Rash | 17/269 (6.3%) | 24/268 (9%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Eisai Medical Information |
---|---|
Organization | Eisai Inc. |
Phone | 1-888-274-2378 |
esi_oncmedinfo@eisai.com |
- E7389-G000-302