SUN1058: A Study In Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Testing If Erlotinib Plus SU011248 (Sunitinib) Is Better Than Erlotinib Alone

Sponsor
Pfizer (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00265317
Collaborator
(none)
162
32
2
67
5.1
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will test whether treatment with erlotinib plus SU011248 is better than erlotinib alone in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer who have received previous treatment with a platinum-based regimen

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
162 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study Of Erlotinib With Or Without SU011248 In The Treatment Of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2006
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2012

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: A

Drug: erlotinib
erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity

Drug: sunitinib
Sunitinib 37.5 mg daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity
Other Names:
  • Sutent
  • Active Comparator: B

    Drug: erlotinib
    erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity

    Drug: placebo
    Placebo daily by oral capsule in a continuous regimen plus erlotinib 150 mg daily by tablets in a continuous regimen, until progression or unacceptable toxicity

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS=time from randomization date to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD; defined as greater than or equal to [≥]20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since first dose or appearance of ≥1 new lesions) or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02. Used 7.02 days as it equals 365 days per year divided by 52 weeks per year.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      Objective Response Rate (ORR)=participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST,Version 1.0) based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

    2. Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to first documentation of PD based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    3. Duration of Response (DR) [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      DR was defined as time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DR was calculated as (first date of PD or death minus first date of CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    4. Overall Survival (OS) [From randomization until death (up to Month 17)]

      OS was defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, OS time was censored on last date that participants were known to be alive.

    5. Percentage of Participants Surviving at 1 Year [From randomization until death (up until Month 17)]

      Percentage of participants alive at 1 year after date of first administration of study medication.

    6. Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Erlotinib [Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

      AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of erlotinib

    7. AUC(0-24) of Sunitinib [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

      AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of sunitinib

    8. AUC(0-24) of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

      AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib)

    9. AUC(0-24) of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

      AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662)

    10. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Erlotinib [Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

    11. Cmax of Sunitinib [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

    12. Cmax of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

    13. Cmax of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

    14. Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUC0-inf) for Erlotinib [Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; predose on Days 22 and 23 (Cycle 1)]

      AUC (0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for erlotinib. It is obtained from AUC from time zero (pre-dose) to last quantifiable concentration(AUC[0-t]) plus AUC from time last quantifiable concentration extrapolated infinite time (AUC[t-inf])

    15. AUC(0-inf) for Sunitinib [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)]

      AUC (0 - inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for sunitinib. It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)

    16. AUC(0-inf) for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)]

      AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)

    17. AUC(0-inf) for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)]

      AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)

    18. Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Erlotinib [Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

      Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

    19. Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Sunitinib [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

      Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.

    20. Erlotinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F) [Day 15 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

    21. Sunitinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F) [Day 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

    22. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Erlotinib [Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose]

    23. Tmax for Sunitinib [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

    24. Tmax for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

    25. Tmax for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662) [Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose]

    26. Dose-Corrected Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) for Erlotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized) [predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)]

      Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    27. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Erlotinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized) [predose Day 15 (Cycle1); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)]

      Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    28. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized) [predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)]

      Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    29. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized) [predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)]

      Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    30. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized) [predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)]

      Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    31. Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized) [predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)]

      Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.

    32. Percentage of Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Using 0 Percent [%] Cutoff [Baseline]

      Percentage of participants with EGFR expression by IHC using a 0% cutoff; Reported as positive, negative, or unmeasured (where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR). Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    33. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 0% Cutoff) [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 0% cutoff where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    34. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Expression by IHC (Using 10% Cutoff) [Baseline]

      Percentage of participants with EGFR Expression by IHC using a 10% cutoff; Reported as positive (positive values were defined as being greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR), negative, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    35. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 10% Cutoff) [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 10% cutoff where positive was greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    36. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase [Baseline]

      The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The percentage of participants with EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase (defined as greater than 4 copies) was determined using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. Reported as yes, no or unmeasured.

    37. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene copy number increase (reported as yes, no, or unmeasured). The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined and an increase was defined as greater than 4 copies. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1)/7.02.

    38. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Amplification [Baseline]

      The percentage of participants with EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) was determined and reported as yes, no, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR gene amplification was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    39. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Amplification [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) and reported as no or unmeasured. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    40. Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Mutation [Baseline]

      Mutations in exons 18 through 21 of the EGFR gene were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with EGFR mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.

    41. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Mutation [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or to death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    42. Percentage of Participants With KRAS (V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog) Gene Mutations [Baseline]

      Mutations in exons 2-3 of the KRAS gene (including codons 12, 13, and 61) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with KRAS mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.

    43. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by KRAS Gene Mutation [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by KRAS gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    44. Percentage of Participants With Germline Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) Polymorphisms [Baseline]

      Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex reverse transcription (RT) analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline VEGFR2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, G/T, T/A, and G/A.

    45. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    46. Overall Survival (OS) in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms [From randomization until death (up to Month 17)]

      OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.

    47. Percentage of Participants With Germline Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Beta (PDGFRB) Polymorphisms [Baseline]

      Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex RT analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline PDGFRB SNPs was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, A/T, A/G, T/C, T/G, G/C, C/A and G/A.

    48. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    49. OS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.

    50. Percentage of Participants by Tumor VEGFR Mutation [Baseline]

      Percentage of participants with VEGFR mutations in DNA from tumor samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    51. Correlation of Polymorphisms in Stem Cell Factor Receptor (c-Kit), FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Receptor (FLT-3), and c-FMS With Blood Counts [Baseline (Day 1, Cycle 1)]

      A blood sample (6 mL) was collected before on-study treatment and was used to isolate DNA. These samples were not anonymized. Correlation was investigated by the percentage of participants with anemia (based on hemoglobin count), neutropenia (based on neutrophil count) and thrombocytopenia (based on platelet count) endpoints and genetic variation as measured by c-KIT, FLT-3, and c-FMS was to be analyzed.

    52. Percentage of Participants by Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Expression Profile [Baseline]

      Includes colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R), PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF C (VEGF-C), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR3), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), FLT-3, KIT (stem cell factor receptor), and RET (rearranged during transfection). Correlative analysis was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.

    53. PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by RNA Expression Profile [From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)]

      PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by RNA Gene expression (CSF-1R, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, VEGF, VEGF-C, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, FGF, FLT-3, KIT, and RET). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.

    54. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Score [Baseline (Cycle [C] 1, Day [D] 1) to Cycle 18, Day 1]

      EORTC QLQ-C30: self-administered questionnaire assessing global health status/quality of life (QoL), functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales/items (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, and diarrhea), and financial difficulties. Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4); global/QoL range: very poor (1) to excellent (7). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.

    55. EORTC-QLQ-C30 Lung Cancer Module (LC13) Score [Baseline (Cycle 1 [Day 1]) to Cycle 18 (Day 1)]

      The EORTC-QLQ-C30 LC13 is a self-administered questionnaire assessing specific lung cancer disease related symptoms (dyspnea, coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in the chest, arm/shoulder or other parts of the body). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.

    56. Number of Participants With Blood Pressure (BP) Greater Than 150/100 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg) [Randomization up until Month 17]

      Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.

    57. Number of Participants With BP Greater Than 200/110 mmHg [Randomization up until Month 17]

      Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.

    58. Number of Participants on Anti-hypertensive Medications [Randomization to Day 28 of Cycle 18]

      Number of participants with BP greater than 150/100 mmHg or 200/110 mmHg who were treated with anti-hypertensive medications.

    59. Plasma Concentration of VEGF-C at Baseline [Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)]

    60. Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-2 at Baseline [Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)]

    61. Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-3 at Baseline [Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)]

    62. Plasma Concentration of Soluble KIT (sKIT) at Baseline [Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)]

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. VEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint [Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)]

      Plasma VEGF-C concentration at each time point divided by VEGF-C concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)

    2. VEGFR-2 Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint [Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)]

      Plasma VEGFR-2 concentration at each time point divided by VEGFR-2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)

    3. VEGFR-3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint [Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)]

      Plasma VEGFR-3 concentration at each time point divided by VEGFR-3 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)

    4. sKIT Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint [Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)]

      Plasma sKIT concentration at each time point divided by sKIT concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

    • Prior treatment with no more than 2 chemotherapy regimens including a platinum-based regimen

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Prior treatment with any receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or other angiogenic inhibitors

    • History of or known brain metastases

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Pfizer Investigational Site Birmingham Alabama United States 35233
    2 Pfizer Investigational Site Birmingham Alabama United States 35294
    3 Pfizer Investigational Site Mobile Alabama United States 36604
    4 Pfizer Investigational Site Antioch California United States 94531
    5 Pfizer Investigational Site Palm Springs California United States 92262-4885
    6 Pfizer Investigational Site Pleasant Hill California United States 94523
    7 Pfizer Investigational Site San Leandro California United States 94578
    8 Pfizer Investigational Site Chicago Illinois United States 60612
    9 Pfizer Investigational Site Creve Coeur Missouri United States 63141
    10 Pfizer Investigational Site St. Louis Missouri United States 63110-1094
    11 Pfizer Investigational Site St. Louis Missouri United States 63110
    12 Pfizer Investigational Site St. Peters Missouri United States 63376
    13 Pfizer Investigational Site Chapel Hill North Carolina United States 27599-7600
    14 Pfizer Investigational Site Clinton North Carolina United States 28328
    15 Pfizer Investigational Site Goldsboro North Carolina United States 27534
    16 Pfizer Investigational Site Wilson North Carolina United States 27893
    17 Pfizer Investigational Site Cleveland Ohio United States 44106
    18 Pfizer Investigational Site Houston Texas United States 77030
    19 Pfizer Investigational Site Edmonton Alberta Canada T6G 1Z2
    20 Pfizer Investigational Site Hamilton Ontario Canada L8V 5C2
    21 Pfizer Investigational Site Budapest Hungary 1525
    22 Pfizer Investigational Site Torokbalint Hungary 2045
    23 Pfizer Investigational Site Genova Italy 16132
    24 Pfizer Investigational Site Monteforte Irpino, AV Italy 83024
    25 Pfizer Investigational Site Amsterdam Netherlands 1066 CX
    26 Pfizer Investigational Site Groningen Netherlands 9713 GZ
    27 Pfizer Investigational Site Bydgoszcz Poland 85-796
    28 Pfizer Investigational Site Gdansk Poland 80-952
    29 Pfizer Investigational Site Cluj-Napoca Cluj Romania 400015
    30 Pfizer Investigational Site Bucuresti Sector 2 Romania 022328
    31 Pfizer Investigational Site Bucuresti Romania 30171
    32 Pfizer Investigational Site Santander Cantabria Spain 39008

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Pfizer

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Pfizer
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00265317
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • A6181058
    First Posted:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 6, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2013

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-in) Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules once daily (QD) for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 2 (27 days) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 1 (35 days). Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1, Arm A or 13 days in Cycle 1, Arm B) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1, Arm A or 26 days in Cycle 1, Arm B) Sunitinib oral capsules, 37.5 mg QD in a continuous regimen, expressed in 4-week cycles and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Period Title: Lead-In
    STARTED 13 17 0 0
    COMPLETED 1 0 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 12 17 0 0
    Period Title: Lead-In
    STARTED 0 0 65 67
    COMPLETED 0 0 1 2
    NOT COMPLETED 0 0 64 65

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-in) Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo Total
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules once daily (QD) for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 2 (27 days) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 1 (35 days). Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1, Arm A or 13 days in Cycle 1, Arm B) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1, Arm A or 26 days in Cycle 1, Arm B) Sunitinib oral capsules, 37.5 mg QD in a continuous regimen, expressed in 4-week cycles and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 13 17 65 67 162
    Age, Customized (participants) [Number]
    Less than 65 years
    7
    53.8%
    10
    58.8%
    47
    72.3%
    43
    64.2%
    107
    66%
    Greater than or equal to 65 years
    6
    46.2%
    7
    41.2%
    17
    26.2%
    24
    35.8%
    54
    33.3%
    Unknown or Not Collected
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    1.5%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.6%
    Sex/Gender, Customized (participants) [Number]
    Female
    6
    46.2%
    6
    35.3%
    25
    38.5%
    22
    32.8%
    59
    36.4%
    Male
    7
    53.8%
    11
    64.7%
    39
    60%
    45
    67.2%
    102
    63%
    Unknown or Not Collected
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    1.5%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.6%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
    Description PFS=time from randomization date to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD; defined as greater than or equal to [≥]20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since first dose or appearance of ≥1 new lesions) or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02. Used 7.02 days as it equals 365 days per year divided by 52 weeks per year.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis Set (FA):all participants in randomized phase randomized with study medication assignment designated according to initial randomization, regardless of whether participants actually received study medication or received different medication from what they were randomized.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Weeks]
    12.3
    8.5
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Sample size for randomized portion of study determined based on these assumptions: median PFS (erlotinib)=10 weeks, accrual time=12 months. With 6 months follow-up, study was powered to detect a difference in PFS of 5 weeks. 1-sided log rank test comparing the 2 treatment groups with 115 events of PD or death among a target sample size of 126 participants (63 per group) achieved 80% power at a 10% significance level to detect a 50% improvement in PFS from 10 to 15 weeks.
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3206
    Comments Primary analysis was based on an unstratified 1-sided log rank test with alpha=0.1
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.898
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 80%
    0.575 to 1.404
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
    Description Objective Response Rate (ORR)=participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST,Version 1.0) based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [Percentage of Participants]
    4.62
    35.5%
    2.99
    17.6%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated based on f-distribution
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6251
    Comments
    Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Risk Ratio (RR)
    Estimated Value 1.546
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.267 to 8.954
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
    Description TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to first documentation of PD based on third party independent imaging review laboratory assessment. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Weeks]
    12.3
    10.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3732
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.921
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.572 to 1.485
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Duration of Response (DR)
    Description DR was defined as time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DR was calculated as (first date of PD or death minus first date of CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA subset of participants with a confirmed objective response were to be analyzed. As only 3 and 2 responses were observed, duration of response was not analyzed.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 0 0
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Survival (OS)
    Description OS was defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, OS time was censored on last date that participants were known to be alive.
    Time Frame From randomization until death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months]
    8.2
    7.6
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6171
    Comments p-value from 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.066
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.705 to 1.612
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Surviving at 1 Year
    Description Percentage of participants alive at 1 year after date of first administration of study medication.
    Time Frame From randomization until death (up until Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Number [Percentage of Participants]
    32
    246.2%
    42
    247.1%
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib
    Comments Percentage of participants surviving at 1 year in the Sunitinib + Erlotinib Treatment Group, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percentage
    Estimated Value 32
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    19.7 to 44.3
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Percentage of participants surviving at 1 year in the Erlotinib + Placebo Treatment Group, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value
    Comments
    Method
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Percentage
    Estimated Value 42
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    30.1 to 54.2
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours [AUC(0-24)] of Erlotinib
    Description AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of erlotinib
    Time Frame Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-in Cohort Arm A: participants received sunitinib QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and erlotinib QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1)
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm A)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1).
    Measure Participants 7
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    12.96
    (4.00)
    Cycle 1, Day 22
    11.87
    (4.35)
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title AUC(0-24) of Sunitinib
    Description AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of sunitinib
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B: participants received sunitinib for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and erlotinib QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1).
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib+Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    372.76
    (105.21)
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    231.61
    (69.42)
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title AUC(0-24) of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
    Description AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib)
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib+Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    50.06
    (22.76)
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    99.57
    (39.48)
    10. Secondary Outcome
    Title AUC(0-24) of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
    Description AUC0-24=Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours (0-24) of total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662)
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib+Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    422.93
    (123.29)
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    331.45
    (88.67)
    11. Secondary Outcome
    Title Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Erlotinib
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm A
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm A)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1).
    Measure Participants 7
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    0.99
    (0.48)
    Cycle 1, Day 22
    0.86
    (0.37)
    12. Secondary Outcome
    Title Cmax of Sunitinib
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib+Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    21.61
    (6.76)
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    13.59
    (5.88)
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Cmax of SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib+Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    3.09
    (1.33)
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    6.83
    (4.22)
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Cmax of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib+Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    24.51
    (7.72)
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    20.09
    (7.80)
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUC0-inf) for Erlotinib
    Description AUC (0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for erlotinib. It is obtained from AUC from time zero (pre-dose) to last quantifiable concentration(AUC[0-t]) plus AUC from time last quantifiable concentration extrapolated infinite time (AUC[t-inf])
    Time Frame Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose; predose on Days 22 and 23 (Cycle 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm A; Due to the long half-life of the drug and sample collection just up to 24 hours only, AUC(0-inf) could not be accurately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm A)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1).
    Measure Participants 0
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title AUC(0-inf) for Sunitinib
    Description AUC (0 - inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for sunitinib. It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B; Due to the long half-life of the drug and sample collection just up to 48 hours only, AUC(0-inf) could not be accurately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 0
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title AUC(0-inf) for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
    Description AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for SU-012662 (metabolite of sunitinib). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B; Due to the long half-life of the drug and sample collection just up to 48 hours only, AUC(0-inf) could not be accurately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 0
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title AUC(0-inf) for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
    Description AUC(0-inf) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0-inf) for total drug (sunitinib + SU-012662). It is obtained from AUC(0-t) plus AUC(t-inf)
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose; predose on Days 15, 16, and 17 (Cycle 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B; Due to the long half-life of the drug and sample collection just up to 48 hours only, AUC(0-inf) could not be accurately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 0
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Erlotinib
    Description Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
    Time Frame Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm A; Due to the long half-life of the drug and sample collection just up to 24 hours only, t1/2 could not be accurately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm A)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1).
    Measure Participants 0
    20. Secondary Outcome
    Title Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) of Sunitinib
    Description Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half.
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B; Due to the long half-life of the drug and sample collection just up to 48 hours only, t1/2 could not be accurately estimated.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 0
    21. Secondary Outcome
    Title Erlotinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)
    Description
    Time Frame Day 15 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants with calculable data in Original Lead-In; after protocol amendment 3, the study design was modified (steady-state versus single dose), due to the long half-life of the drug, sample collection just up to 24 hours was not sufficient for the calculation of CL/F for Amended Lead-In Arm A.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm A)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1). Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1).
    Measure Participants 8 0
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Liters (L)/hr]
    5.52
    (3.65)
    22. Secondary Outcome
    Title Sunitinib Clearance at Steady State After Oral Administration (CL/F)
    Description
    Time Frame Day 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants with calculable data in Original Lead-In Cohort; after protocol amendment 3, the study design was modified (steady-state versus single dose), due to the long half-life of the drug, sample collection just up to 48 hours was not sufficient for the calculation of CL/F for Amended Lead-In Arm B.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules once daily (QD) for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 2 (27 days)and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 1 (35 days). Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8 0
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [L/hr]
    63.28
    (13.50)
    23. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Erlotinib
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 22 (Cycle 1) at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm A
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm A)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1).
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    2.00
    Cycle 1, Day 22
    2.00
    24. Secondary Outcome
    Title Tmax for Sunitinib
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    6.00
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    6.00
    25. Secondary Outcome
    Title Tmax for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib)
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    4.00
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    4.00
    26. Secondary Outcome
    Title Tmax for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)
    Description
    Time Frame Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours postdose

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Amended Lead-In Cohort Arm B
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-In Arm B)
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (13 days in Cycle 1) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (26 days in Cycle 1)
    Measure Participants 8
    Cycle 1, Day 1
    6.00
    Cycle 1, Day 15
    5.00
    27. Secondary Outcome
    Title Dose-Corrected Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) for Erlotinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
    Description Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
    Time Frame predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants analyzed (N)=participants with observations above lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) in Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only); n=number of participants with observations above LLOQ for specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (All Combined)
    Arm/Group Description Combined Data from all participants in the Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), and Randomized Cohort
    Measure Participants 45
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=45)
    1.46
    (0.90)
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=44)
    1.07
    (0.76)
    Cycle 4, Day 1 (n=31)
    1.11
    (0.85)
    Cycle 5, Day 1 (n=22)
    1.00
    (0.93)
    Cycle 6, Day 1 (n=18)
    1.00
    (0.80)
    Cycle 7, Day 1 (n=15)
    1.16
    (1.30)
    Cycle 8, Day 1 (n=8)
    0.57
    (0.34)
    Cycle 9, Day 1 (n=10)
    0.90
    (0.68)
    Cycle 10, Day 1 (n=6)
    1.52
    (1.48)
    Cycle 11, Day 1 (n=6)
    1.94
    (3.67)
    Cycle 12, Day 1 (n=5)
    1.21
    (1.18)
    Cycle 13, Day 1 (n=3)
    0.75
    (0.43)
    28. Secondary Outcome
    Title Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Erlotinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
    Description Ctrough = plasma concentration of erlotinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
    Time Frame predose Day 15 (Cycle1); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants analyzed (N)=participants with observations above LLOQ in Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only); n=number of participants with observations above LLOQ for specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (All Combined)
    Arm/Group Description Combined Data from all participants in the Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), and Randomized Cohort
    Measure Participants 45
    Cycle 1, Day 15 (n=6)
    1.14
    (0.92)
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=45)
    1.46
    (0.90)
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=44)
    1.07
    (0.76)
    Cycle 4, Day 1 (n=20)
    0.99
    (0.71)
    Cycle 5, Day 1 (n=16)
    0.98
    (0.99)
    Cycle 6, Day 1 (n=12)
    1.09
    (0.85)
    Cycle 7, Day 1 (n=8)
    1.08
    (1.13)
    Cycle 8, Day 1 (n=3)
    0.80
    (0.36)
    Cycle 9, Day 1 (n=6)
    0.94
    (0.80)
    Cycle 10, Day 1 (n=4)
    1.71
    (1.73)
    Cycle 11, Day 1 (n=3)
    0.53
    (0.57)
    Cycle 12, Day 1 (n=4)
    1.31
    (1.34)
    Cycle 13, Day 1 (n=3)
    0.75
    (0.43)
    29. Secondary Outcome
    Title Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
    Description Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
    Time Frame predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants analyzed (N)=participants with observations above LLOQ in Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only); n=number of participants with observations above LLOQ for specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (All Combined)
    Arm/Group Description Combined Data from all participants in the Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), and Randomized Cohort
    Measure Participants 44
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=44)
    22.94
    (11.34)
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=43)
    21.48
    (9.62)
    Cycle 4, Day 1 (n=28)
    19.93
    (12.74)
    Cycle 5, Day 1 (n=22)
    18.58
    (10.47)
    Cycle 6, Day 1 (n=19)
    22.07
    (13.32)
    Cycle 7, Day 1 (n=15)
    24.85
    (12.12)
    Cycle 8, Day 1 (n=8)
    18.44
    (7.35)
    Cycle 9, Day 1 (n=9)
    14.81
    (7.56)
    Cycle 10, Day 1 (n=6)
    17.17
    (6.10)
    Cycle 11, Day 1 (n=6)
    21.42
    (19.10)
    Cycle 12, Day 1 (n=4)
    11.67
    (4.57)
    Cycle 13, Day 1 (n=3)
    19.79
    (13.47)
    30. Secondary Outcome
    Title Dose-Corrected Ctrough for Sunitinib on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
    Description Ctrough = plasma concentration of sunitinib prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
    Time Frame predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants analyzed (N)=participants with observations above LLOQ in Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only); n=number of participants with observations above LLOQ for specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (All Combined)
    Arm/Group Description Combined Data from all participants in the Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), and Randomized Cohort
    Measure Participants 44
    Cycle 1, Day 15 (n=7)
    18.80
    (4.27)
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=44)
    22.94
    (11.34)
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=43)
    21.48
    (9.62)
    Cycle 4, Day 1 (n=19)
    20.58
    (13.96)
    Cycle 5, Day 1 (n=16)
    17.26
    (9.79)
    Cycle 6, Day 1 (n=13)
    20.16
    (8.78)
    Cycle 7, Day 1 (n=8)
    21.97
    (10.21)
    Cycle 8, Day 1 (n=4)
    13.56
    (6.31)
    Cycle 9, Day 1 (n=6)
    15.17
    (7.71)
    Cycle 10, Day 1 (n=4)
    15.61
    (6.45)
    Cycle 11, Day 1 (n=3)
    15.24
    (6.65)
    Cycle 12, Day 1 (n=3)
    11.99
    (5.54)
    Cycle 13, Day 1 (n=3)
    19.79
    (13.47)
    31. Secondary Outcome
    Title Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 1 of Cycles 3-13 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
    Description Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original and Amended Lead-In (Arms A and B) Cohorts predose on Day 1 (Cycles 3-13) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
    Time Frame predose Day 1 (Cycles 3-13); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants analyzed (N)=participants with observations above LLOQ in Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only); n=number of participants with observations above LLOQ for specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (All Combined)
    Arm/Group Description Combined Data from all participants in the Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), and Randomized Cohort
    Measure Participants 44
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=44)
    21.02
    (8.75)
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=43)
    19.26
    (11.67)
    Cycle 4, Day 1 (n=28)
    15.74
    (7.88)
    Cycle 5, Day 1 (n=22)
    15.38
    (6.05)
    Cycle 6, Day 1 (n=19)
    15.04
    (6.18)
    Cycle 7, Day 1 (n=15)
    17.13
    (9.34)
    Cycle 8, Day 1 (n=8)
    12.50
    (3.76)
    Cycle 9, Day 1 (n=9)
    12.24
    (5.19)
    Cycle 10, Day 1 (n=6)
    14.29
    (8.84)
    Cycle 11, Day 1 (n=6)
    19.35
    (21.60)
    Cycle 12, Day 1 (n=4)
    11.58
    (1.82)
    Cycle 13, Day 1 (n=3)
    15.60
    (9.96)
    32. Secondary Outcome
    Title Dose-Corrected Ctrough for SU-012662 (Metabolite of Sunitinib) on Day 15 Cycle 1 (Original), Day 1 of Cycle 3 (Original and Amended, Arms A and B), and Day 1 of Cycles 1-18 (Randomized)
    Description Ctrough = plasma concentration of SU-012662 prior to study drug administration. Dose correction was made to the initial intended dose in Cycle 1. Assessed in the Original Cohort predose on Day 15 (Cycle 1, Time Zero) and Day 1 (Cycle 3), in the Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B) predose on Day 1 (Cycle 3) and in the Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only) predose on Day 1 of Cycles 1-18.
    Time Frame predose Day 15 (Cycle 1) and Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycle 3); predose Day 1 (Cycles 1-18)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Number of participants analyzed (N)=participants with observations above LLOQ in Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), Randomized Cohort (Sunitinib + Erlotinib treatment group only); n=number of participants with observations above LLOQ for specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (All Combined)
    Arm/Group Description Combined Data from all participants in the Original Lead-In Cohort, Amended Lead-In Cohort (Arms A and B), and Randomized Cohort
    Measure Participants 44
    Cycle 1, Day 15 (n=7)
    18.08
    (6.14)
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=44)
    21.02
    (8.75)
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=43)
    19.26
    (11.67)
    Cycle 4, Day 1 (n=19)
    16.41
    (7.74)
    Cycle 5, Day 1 (n=16)
    15.26
    (4.97)
    Cycle 6, Day 1 (n=13)
    15.05
    (4.95)
    Cycle 7, Day 1 (n=8)
    15.99
    (5.03)
    Cycle 8, Day 1 (n=4)
    12.80
    (3.94)
    Cycle 9, Day 1 (n=6)
    14.00
    (5.59)
    Cycle 10, Day 1 (n=4)
    16.44
    (10.57)
    Cycle 11, Day 1 (n=3)
    11.98
    (3.31)
    Cycle 12, Day 1 (n=3)
    11.26
    (2.08)
    Cycle 13, Day 1 (n=3)
    15.60
    (9.96)
    33. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Using 0 Percent [%] Cutoff
    Description Percentage of participants with EGFR expression by IHC using a 0% cutoff; Reported as positive, negative, or unmeasured (where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR). Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Positive
    35
    269.2%
    36
    211.8%
    Negative
    38
    292.3%
    36
    211.8%
    Unmeasured
    26
    200%
    28
    164.7%
    34. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 0% Cutoff)
    Description PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 0% cutoff where positive was greater than 0% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Positive
    16.0
    11.7
    Negative
    8.1
    8.5
    Unmeasured
    12.3
    8.4
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Positive EGFR Expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2247
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio, log
    Estimated Value 0.748
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.351 to 1.591
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Negative EGFR Expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6797
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.184
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.581 to 2.414
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Unmeasured EGFR Expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1693
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.632
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.245 to 1.627
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    35. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With EGFR Expression by IHC (Using 10% Cutoff)
    Description Percentage of participants with EGFR Expression by IHC using a 10% cutoff; Reported as positive (positive values were defined as being greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR), negative, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR expression was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Positive
    45
    346.2%
    54
    317.6%
    Negative
    29
    223.1%
    18
    105.9%
    Unmeasured
    26
    200%
    28
    164.7%
    36. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Expression (Using 10% Cutoff)
    Description PFS defined as time in weeks from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in the following subgroups: positive, negative, or unmeasured EGFR expression. EGFR expression was analyzed using a 10% cutoff where positive was greater than 10% of cells demonstrating membranous staining for EGFR. PFS calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Positive
    16.0
    10.4
    Negative
    8.1
    8.1
    Unmeasured
    12.3
    8.4
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Positive EGFR Expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3223
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.864
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.458 to 1.628
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Negative EGFR Expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4608
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.946
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.362 to 2.474
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Unmeasured EGFR Expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1693
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.632
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.245 to 1.627
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    37. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
    Description The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The percentage of participants with EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase (defined as greater than 4 copies) was determined using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. Reported as yes, no or unmeasured.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Yes
    0
    0%
    1
    5.9%
    No
    48
    369.2%
    42
    247.1%
    Unmeasured
    52
    400%
    57
    335.3%
    38. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
    Description PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene copy number increase (reported as yes, no, or unmeasured). The number of copies corresponding to exon 19 of the EGFR gene was determined and an increase was defined as greater than 4 copies. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1)/7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Yes
    NA
    NA
    No
    12.3
    8.8
    Unmeasured
    12.0
    8.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments No EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5526
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.049
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.542 to 2.031
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Unmeasured EGFR Gene Copy Number Increase
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1529
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.715
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.380 to 1.344
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    39. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Amplification
    Description The percentage of participants with EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) was determined and reported as yes, no, or unmeasured. Correlative analysis of EGFR gene amplification was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Yes
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    No
    48
    369.2%
    43
    252.9%
    Unmeasured
    52
    400%
    57
    335.3%
    40. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Amplification
    Description PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene amplification (defined as greater than 15) and reported as no or unmeasured. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    No
    12.3
    11.7
    Unmeasured
    12.0
    8.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments No EGFR Gene Amplification
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5839
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.078
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.557 to 2.085
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Unmeasured EGFR Gene Amplification
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1529
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.715
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.380 to 1.344
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    41. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With EGFR Gene Mutation
    Description Mutations in exons 18 through 21 of the EGFR gene were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with EGFR mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Mutated
    6
    46.2%
    1
    5.9%
    Wild Type
    32
    246.2%
    28
    164.7%
    Indeterminate
    62
    476.9%
    70
    411.8%
    42. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by EGFR Gene Mutation
    Description PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or to death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by EGFR gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Mutated
    19.1
    NA
    Wild Type
    9.0
    11.7
    Indeterminate
    12.0
    8.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Wild Type EGFR Gene Mutation
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6324
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.160
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.516 to 2.608
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate EGFR Gene Mutation
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2413
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.813
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.464 to 1.424
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    43. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With KRAS (V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog) Gene Mutations
    Description Mutations in exons 2-3 of the KRAS gene (including codons 12, 13, and 61) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography using DNA from tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable. The percentage of participants with KRAS mutations categorized as mutated, wild type or indeterminate was reported.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Mutated
    9
    69.2%
    6
    35.3%
    Wild Type
    34
    261.5%
    28
    164.7%
    Indeterminate
    57
    438.5%
    66
    388.2%
    44. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by KRAS Gene Mutation
    Description PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by KRAS gene mutation (reported as mutated, wild type, or indeterminate). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Mutated
    20.1
    7.5
    Wild Type
    9.5
    12.1
    Indeterminate
    12.3
    8.3
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Mutated KRAS Gene Mutation
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2077
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.481
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.079 to 2.910
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Wild Type KRAS Gene Mutation
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6439
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.162
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.534 to 2.531
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate KRAS Gene Mutation
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2664
    Comments
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.825
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.457 to 1.489
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    45. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Germline Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) Polymorphisms
    Description Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex reverse transcription (RT) analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline VEGFR2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, G/T, T/A, and G/A.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis - All Population: all participants from lead-in period and Phase 2 (randomized phase)
    Arm/Group Title All Participants
    Arm/Group Description All participants in all phases.
    Measure Participants 162
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs1531289; Genotype: C/C
    44.9
    345.4%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs1531289; Genotype: C/T
    45.6
    350.8%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs1531289; Genotype: T/T
    9.6
    73.8%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2305945; Genotype: G/G
    44.1
    339.2%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2305945; Genotype: G/T
    47.1
    362.3%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2305945; Genotype: T/T
    8.8
    67.7%
    Locus VEGFR2 / rs1870377; Genotype: T/T
    53.7
    413.1%
    Locus VEGFR2 / rs1870377; Genotype: T/A
    39.7
    305.4%
    Locus VEGFR2 / rs1870377; Genotype: A/A
    6.6
    50.8%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2305948; Genotype: C/C
    81.6
    627.7%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2305948; Genotype: C/T
    17.6
    135.4%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2305948; Genotype: T/T
    0.7
    5.4%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs7692791; Genotype: C/C
    19.9
    153.1%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs7692791; Genotype: C/T
    50.7
    390%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs7692791; Genotype: T/T
    29.4
    226.2%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs35636987; Genotype: C/C
    100
    769.2%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs7667298; Genotype: C/C
    27.2
    209.2%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs7667298; Genotype: C/T
    50.0
    384.6%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs7667298; Genotype: T/T
    22.8
    175.4%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs41408948; Genotype: G/A
    57.4
    441.5%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs41408948; Genotype: A/A
    36.0
    276.9%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs41408948; Genotype: G/G
    6.6
    50.8%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2071559; Genotype: G/G
    26.5
    203.8%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2071559; Genotype: G/A
    47.8
    367.7%
    Locus: VEGFR2 / rs2071559; Genotype: A/A
    25.7
    197.7%
    46. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms
    Description PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per Protocol Caucasian Population: all Caucasian participants in randomized phase who received at least 1 dose of study medication (either erlotinib or blinded medication), with treatment assignments designated according to actual study medication received
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 53 50
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/C
    9.00
    8.10
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/T
    17.00
    8.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: T/T
    NA
    13.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: G/G
    17.00
    12.30
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: G/T
    9.00
    7.80
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: T/T
    20.50
    NA
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: T/T
    8.10
    8.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: T/A
    17.00
    8.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: A/A
    NA
    20.40
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/C
    12.00
    8.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/T
    12.30
    8.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: T/T
    NA
    12.10
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/C
    12.00
    7.70
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/T
    9.00
    8.50
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: T/T
    16.00
    7.70
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs35636987 Genotype: C/C
    12.30
    8.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/C
    12.00
    8.05
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/T
    17.00
    7.80
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: T/T
    9.50
    12.80
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/G
    12.00
    11.70
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/A
    17.00
    7.75
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: A/A
    13.45
    13.60
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/G
    9.50
    12.80
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/A
    17.00
    7.80
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: A/A
    8.10
    8.00
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7423
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.130
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.541 to 2.360
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1570
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.598
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.290 to 1.236
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7954
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.794
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.131 to 4.819
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6210
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.833
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.401 to 1.732
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: G/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5268
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.794
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.385 to 1.640
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9753
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.011
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.504 to 2.027
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: T/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0141
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.378
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.168 to 0.850
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5596
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 2.236
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.139 to 35.90
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2788
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.738
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.422 to 1.288
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8971
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.075
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.352 to 3.286
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6559
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.775
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.251 to 2.388
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 12
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8563
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.939
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.466 to 1.889
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 13
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.668
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.382
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.130 to 1.120
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 14
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs35636987 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3681
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.800
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.488 to 1.309
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 15
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7520
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.860
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.331 to 2.237
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 16
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0833
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.551
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.276 to 1.098
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 17
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4772
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.564
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.444 to 5.506
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 18
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9235
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.034
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.522 to 2.048
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 19
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0845
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.501
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.223 to 1.126
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 20
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5493
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.724
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.284 to 10.47
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 21
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5210
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.400
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.492 to 3.987
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 22
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0854
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.538
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.261 to 1.108
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 23
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9198
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.953
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.365 to 2.489
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    47. Secondary Outcome
    Title Overall Survival (OS) in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline VEGFR2 Polymorphisms
    Description OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFR2 polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.
    Time Frame From randomization until death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per Protocol Caucasian Population
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 53 50
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/C
    8.20
    6.20
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/T
    6.40
    5.30
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: T/T
    11.60
    16.50
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: G/G
    8.00
    5.50
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: G/T
    6.25
    7.60
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: T/T
    NA
    NA
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: T/T
    6.40
    10.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: T/A
    8.00
    4.70
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: A/A
    NA
    NA
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/C
    8.40
    10.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/T
    5.80
    4.90
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: T/T
    NA
    NA
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/C
    6.40
    7.60
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/T
    9.30
    5.80
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: T/T
    6.30
    10.00
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs35636987 Genotype: C/C
    8.00
    6.80
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/C
    9.30
    13.40
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/T
    6.65
    4.90
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: T/T
    11.30
    9.60
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/G
    6.40
    8.40
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/A
    8.00
    4.40
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: A/A
    11.30
    9.55
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/G
    11.30
    8.60
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/A
    6.90
    4.90
    Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: A/A
    9.30
    13.40
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9486
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.977
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.473 to 2.014
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9084
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.961
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.487 to 1.897
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1531289 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2009
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 2.876
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.534 to 15.48
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305845 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7863
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.098
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.554 to 2.175
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: G/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5267
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.243
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.633 to 2.442
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305945 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6240
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.550
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.049 to 6.208
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEFR/rs1870377 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4882
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.254
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.660 to 2.384
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: T/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1307
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.587
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.290 to 1.189
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs1870377 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5596
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 2.236
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.139 to 35.90
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7966
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.073
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.628 to 1.833
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2305948 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9224
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.954
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.366 to 2.484
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 12
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9317
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.047
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.363 to 3.025
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 13
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8696
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.057
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.546 to 2.044
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 14
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7692791 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8694
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.075
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.453 to 2.554
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 15
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs3563987 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8708
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.039
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.654 to 1.652
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 16
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7667
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.157
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.442 to 3.026
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 17
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3822
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.755
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.401 to 1.422
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 18
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs7667298 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5089
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.419
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.498 to 4.040
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 19
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3944
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.326
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.691 to 2.544
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 20
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3103
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.692
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.339 to 1.416
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 21
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs41408948 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8942
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.857
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.089 to 8.294
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 22
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6650
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.240
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.466 to 3.304
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 23
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4415
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.779
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.412 to 1.475
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 24
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: VEGFR2/rs2071559 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4682
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.458
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.523 to 4.060
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    48. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Germline Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Beta (PDGFRB) Polymorphisms
    Description Blood samples were collected at baseline for multiplex RT analysis of genes expressing proteins that are targets of sunitinib or involved in angiogenesis or tumor growth to determine expression levels. Percentage of participants with germline PDGFRB SNPs was reported for the following genotype frequencies: homozygous C alleles (C/C), T alleles (T/T), G alleles (G/G), or A alleles (A/A), and the following heterozygous genotypes C/T, A/T, A/G, T/C, T/G, G/C, C/A and G/A.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis - All Population
    Arm/Group Title All Participants
    Arm/Group Description All participants in all phases
    Measure Participants 162
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304060 Genotype:C/C
    21.3
    163.8%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304060 Genotype: C/A
    52.9
    406.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304060 Genotype: A/A
    25.7
    197.7%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs17656204 Genotype: C/C
    48.5
    373.1%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs17656204 Genotype: C/T
    44.1
    339.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs17656204 Genotype: T/T
    7.4
    56.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304061 Genotype: G/G
    51.9
    399.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304061 Genotype: G/A
    44.4
    341.5%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304061 Genotype: A/A
    3.7
    28.5%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs1077724 Genotype: A/A
    43.4
    333.8%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs1077724 Genotype: A/T
    46.3
    356.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs1077724 Genotype: T/T
    10.3
    79.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs919751 Genotype: A/A
    46.3
    356.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs919751 Genotype: A/G
    39.0
    300%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs919751 Genotype: G/G
    14.7
    113.1%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304058 Genotype: G/G
    25.7
    197.7%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304058 Genotype: G/C
    49.3
    379.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2304058 Genotype: C/C
    25.0
    192.3%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs1864972 Genotype: G/G
    41.2
    316.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs1864972 Genotype: G/A
    41.9
    322.3%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs1864972 Genotype: A/A
    16.9
    130%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3733678 Genotype: G/G
    80.1
    616.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3733678 Genotype: G/A
    19.9
    153.1%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs246396 Genotype: T/T
    70.6
    543.1%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs246396 Genotype: T/C
    27.2
    209.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs246396 Genotype: C/C
    2.2
    16.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs34586048 Genotype: C/C
    100
    769.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs11740355 Genotype: T/T
    80.9
    622.3%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs11740355 Genotype: T/G
    18.4
    141.5%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs11740355 Genotype: G/G
    0.7
    5.4%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs740751 Genotype: C/C
    41.2
    316.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs740751 Genotype: C/T
    41.2
    316.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs740751 Genotype: T/T
    17.6
    135.4%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs4705415 Genotype: G/G
    36.0
    276.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs4705415 Genotype: G/A
    44.1
    339.2%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs4705415 Genotype: A/A
    19.9
    153.1%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3776075 Genotype: T/T
    22.8
    175.4%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3776075 Genotype: T/G
    56.6
    435.4%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3776075 Genotype: G/G
    20.6
    158.5%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs17708574 Genotype: G/G
    79.4
    610.8%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs17708574 Genotype: G/A
    17.6
    135.4%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs17708574 Genotype: A/A
    2.9
    22.3%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs10063714 Genotype: T/T
    76.5
    588.5%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs10063714 Genotype: T/A
    22.1
    170%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs10063714 Genotype: A/A
    1.5
    11.5%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3776081 Genotype: A/A
    39.0
    300%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3776081 Genotype: A/G
    47.1
    362.3%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs3776081 Genotype: G/G
    14.0
    107.7%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2007637 Genotype: G/G
    79.4
    610.8%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2007637 Genotype: G/A
    19.1
    146.9%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2007637 Genotype: A/A
    1.5
    11.5%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2302273 Genotype: G/G
    56.0
    430.8%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2302273 Genotype: G/A
    38.1
    293.1%
    Locus: PDGFRB / rs2302273 Genotype: A/A
    6.0
    46.2%
    49. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms
    Description PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per Protocol Caucasian Population
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 53 50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: C/C
    12.30
    19.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: C/A
    9.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: A/A
    12.00
    7.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/C
    16.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/T
    17.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: T/T
    8.65
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: G/G
    19.50
    7.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: G/A
    7.80
    8.10
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: A/A
    10.90
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/A
    12.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/T
    17.00
    7.85
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: T/T
    12.30
    19.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/A
    9.50
    11.70
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/G
    12.00
    7.85
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: G/G
    19.50
    7.70
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/G
    19.50
    6.35
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/C
    9.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: C/C
    12.30
    8.50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864975 Genotype: G/G
    20.10
    7.85
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864975 Genotype: G/A
    8.10
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864975 Genotype: A/A
    12.30
    8.10
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/G
    12.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/A
    20.50
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/T
    16.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/C
    7.80
    8.10
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: C/C
    12.30
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs34586048 Genotype: C/C
    12.30
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/T
    12.30
    8.50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/G
    16.00
    7.40
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: G/G
    7.80
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: C/C
    20.10
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: C/T
    8.10
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: T/T
    12.30
    8.10
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/G
    19.10
    11.70
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/A
    8.10
    7.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: A/A
    19.50
    7.70
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/T
    16.00
    7.50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/G
    12.00
    8.05
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: G/G
    NA
    10.10
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/G
    12.30
    8.05
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/A
    9.00
    7.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/T
    12.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/A
    20.50
    19.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/A
    19.50
    7.70
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/G
    12.00
    8.10
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: G/G
    NA
    10.10
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/G
    16.00
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/A
    12.30
    12.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: A/A
    4.30
    52.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/G
    19.50
    10.15
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/A
    9.50
    8.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: A/A
    NA
    10.10
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7301
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.289
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.304 to 5.470
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments PDGFRB/rs2304060 C/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5013
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.788
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.390 to 1.592
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3680
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.686
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.298 to 1.578
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3804
    Comments 2-sided, unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.738
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.371 to 1.467
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1507
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.570
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.261 to 1.247
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0772
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2149
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.660
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.339 to 1.284
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/RS2304061 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9491
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.026
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.466 to 2.260
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8114
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.917
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.447 to 1.881
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1379
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.577
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.273 to 1.221
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5341
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.859
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.256 to 13.51
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 12
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8564
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.932
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.431 to 2.014
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 13
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5766
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.797
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.355 to 1.788
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 14
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2043
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.467
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.140 to 1.557
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 15
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1626
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.531
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.214 to 1.317
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 16
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9680
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.986
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.484 to 2.006
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 17
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3587
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.573
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.171 to 1.920
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 18
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4635
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.742
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.331 to 1.662
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 19
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9834
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.992
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.476 to 2.069
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 20
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1764
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.353
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.072 to 1.725
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 21
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2018
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.715
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.422 to 1.209
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 22
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4592
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.850
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.354 to 9.673
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 23
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1593
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.665
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.373 to 1.184
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 24
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5897
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.327
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.469 to 3.755
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 25
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs34586048 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3681
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.800
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.488 to 1.309
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 26
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3235
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.752
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.423 to 1.336
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 27
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7463
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.845
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.303 to 2.355
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 28
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: rs740751 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4179
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.724
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.330 to 1.593
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 29
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9423
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.973
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.462 to 2.050
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 30
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs7407451 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1764
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.353
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.072 to 1.725
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 31
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2352
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.549
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.201 to 1.501
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 32
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9674
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.986
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.485 to 2.003
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 33
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3524
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.629
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.235 to 1.686
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 34
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6652
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.809
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.308 to 2.124
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 35
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5931
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.839
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.436 to 1.618
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 36
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2625
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.475
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.125 to 1.813
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 37
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2168
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.704
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.400 to 1.239
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 38
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9802
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.987
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.353 to 2.759
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 39
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1145
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.652
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.378 to 1.122
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 40
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7725
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.192
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.360 to 3.946
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 41
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3286
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.687
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.321 to 1.473
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 42
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9480
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.976
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.470 to 2.028
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 43
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3844
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.531
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.125 to 2.282
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 44
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1373
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.662
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.381 to 1.153
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 45
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8586
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.114
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.339 to 3.667
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 46
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8478
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.935
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.470 to 1.861
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 47
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2445
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.634
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.287 to 1.401
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 48
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9191
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.155
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.072 to 18.59
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    50. Secondary Outcome
    Title OS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Germline PDGFRB Polymorphisms
    Description OS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by PDGFRB polymorphisms. OS was calculated as (date of death minus date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per Protocol Caucasian Population
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 53 50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: C/C
    12.80
    9.60
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: C/A
    8.20
    6.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: A/A
    5.70
    5.60
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/C
    8.00
    5.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/T
    8.20
    7.60
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: T/T
    6.40
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: G/G
    6.65
    4.75
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: G/A
    8.40
    9.60
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: A/A
    9.00
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/A
    6.30
    5.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/T
    9.70
    6.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: T/T
    7.25
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/A
    8.00
    6.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/G
    8.20
    10.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: G/G
    6.40
    8.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/G
    6.05
    8.45
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/C
    8.20
    7.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: C/C
    12.05
    6.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: G/G
    6.65
    11.50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: G/A
    8.00
    6.35
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: A/A
    11.30
    7.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/G
    6.30
    7.00
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/A
    14.00
    5.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/T
    8.00
    5.40
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/C
    7.30
    14.95
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: C/C
    NA
    6.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs34586048 Genotype: C/C
    8.00
    6.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/T
    8.20
    6.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/G
    6.90
    14.40
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: G/G
    1.80
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: C/C
    6.65
    11.50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: C/T
    8.00
    6.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: T/T
    11.30
    7.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/G
    11.30
    6.70
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/A
    8.20
    6.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: A/A
    5.60
    8.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/T
    6.35
    14.35
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/G
    9.30
    7.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: G/G
    14.00
    4.70
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/G
    9.30
    6.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/A
    5.40
    6.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/T
    6.40
    7.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/A
    14.00
    5.90
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/A
    6.30
    12.95
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/G
    11.30
    6.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: G/G
    11.60
    4.80
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/G
    6.90
    5.40
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/A
    8.20
    13.40
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: A/A
    8.40
    NA
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/G
    7.55
    11.50
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/A
    11.30
    6.20
    Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: A/A
    4.80
    4.80
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8563
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.121
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.326 to 3.847
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304060 Genotype: C/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7375
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.111
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.599 to 2.064
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs234060 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8066
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.897
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.375 to 2.147
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6945
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.875
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.449 to 1.708
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8536
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.067
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.536 to 2.122
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17656204 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3657
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 2.732
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.283 to 26.42
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4657
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.793
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.424 to 1.483
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304061 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4168
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.364
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.641 to 2.900
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7836
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.908
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.456 to 1.809
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: A/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8531
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.938
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.472 to 1.863
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1077724 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3272
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 2.320
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.412 to 13.07
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 12
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9630
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.984
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.491 to 1.972
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 13
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: A/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6003
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.227
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.567 to 2.656
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 14
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs919751 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6703
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.769
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.229 to 2.580
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 15
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8100
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.106
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.485 to 2.525
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 16
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: G/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8335
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.076
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.541 to 2.141
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 17
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2304058 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5980
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.758
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.268 to 2.141
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 18
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9287
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.035
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.487 to 2.199
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 19
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8842
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.053
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.526 to 2.106
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 20
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs1864972 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8501
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.129
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.316 to 4.028
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 21
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4118
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.229
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.749 to 2.017
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 22
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3733678 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1299
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.286
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.051 to 1.596
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 23
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1859
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.692
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.399 to 1.200
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 24
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs246396 Genotype: T/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0091
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 3.672
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.291 to 10.44
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 25
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs34586048 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8708
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.039
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.654 to 1.652
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 26
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9888
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.996
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.590 to 1.681
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 27
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs11740355 Genotype: T/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9702
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.020
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.360 to 2.891
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 28
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: C/C
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9419
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.973
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.466 to 2.032
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 29
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: C/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7677
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.112
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.549 to 2.252
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 30
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs740751 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.8501
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.129
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.316 to 4.028
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 31
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5233
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.758
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.322 to 1.782
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 32
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7500
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.123
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.549 to 2.297
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 33
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs4705415 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6614
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.232
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.483 to 3.142
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 34
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2552
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.779
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.652 to 4.855
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 35
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: T/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7931
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.088
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.577 to 2.052
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 36
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776075 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1365
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.449
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.152 to 1.331
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 37
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5544
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.854
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.504 to 1.447
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 38
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs17708574 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3132
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.721
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.590 to 5.021
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 39
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/T
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3698
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.263
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.755 to 2.113
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 40
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs10063714 Genotype: T/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1495
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.411
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.119 to 1.423
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 41
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1911
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.613
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.781 to 3.332
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 42
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: A/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5259
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.793
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.384 to 1.636
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 43
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs3776081 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0996
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.331
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.082 to 1.339
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 44
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2755
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.752
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.450 to 1.259
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 45
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2007637 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0120
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 4.850
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    1.253 to 18.78
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 46
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/G
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4663
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.274
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.661 to 2.457
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 47
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: G/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7097
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.867
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.406 to 1.848
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 48
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Locus: PDGFRB/rs2302273 Genotype: A/A
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5340
    Comments 2-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.607
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.117 to 3.158
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    51. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants by Tumor VEGFR Mutation
    Description Percentage of participants with VEGFR mutations in DNA from tumor samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Full Analysis - All Population; data were not analyzed
    Arm/Group Title All Participants
    Arm/Group Description All participants in all phases.
    Measure Participants 0
    52. Secondary Outcome
    Title Correlation of Polymorphisms in Stem Cell Factor Receptor (c-Kit), FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Receptor (FLT-3), and c-FMS With Blood Counts
    Description A blood sample (6 mL) was collected before on-study treatment and was used to isolate DNA. These samples were not anonymized. Correlation was investigated by the percentage of participants with anemia (based on hemoglobin count), neutropenia (based on neutrophil count) and thrombocytopenia (based on platelet count) endpoints and genetic variation as measured by c-KIT, FLT-3, and c-FMS was to be analyzed.
    Time Frame Baseline (Day 1, Cycle 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Blood samples were collected; however, because of the small sample size that resulted in a lack of power for statistical testing, no formal statistical analyses were performed.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 0 0
    53. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title VEGF-C Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint
    Description Plasma VEGF-C concentration at each time point divided by VEGF-C concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)
    Time Frame Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set; n equals number of participants with evaluable data at specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=41, 46)
    0.86
    1.02
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=36, 35)
    0.95
    0.95
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments VEGF-C Ratio to Baseline for Cycle 2, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2702
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments VEGF-C ratio to Baseline for Cycle 3, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7354
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    54. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants by Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Expression Profile
    Description Includes colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R), PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF C (VEGF-C), VEGF receptor 1 (VEGFR1), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR3), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), FLT-3, KIT (stem cell factor receptor), and RET (rearranged during transfection). Correlative analysis was conducted using tumor biopsy samples collected at the time of initial diagnosis (preferred) or at the time of most recent recurrence/progression, although any time was acceptable.
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    CSF-1R/High
    45
    346.2%
    44
    258.8%
    CSF-1R/Low
    52
    400%
    41
    241.2%
    CSF-1R/Indeterminate
    3
    23.1%
    15
    88.2%
    PDGFRalpha/High
    45
    346.2%
    48
    282.4%
    PDGFRalpha/Low
    52
    400%
    41
    241.2%
    PDGFRalpha/Indeterminate
    3
    23.1%
    11
    64.7%
    PDGFRbeta/High
    45
    346.2%
    44
    258.8%
    PDGFRbeta/Low
    48
    369.2%
    44
    258.8%
    PDGFRbeta/Indeterminate
    6
    46.2%
    11
    64.7%
    VEGF/High
    39
    300%
    41
    241.2%
    VEGF/Low
    39
    300%
    41
    241.2%
    VEGF/Indeterminate
    23
    176.9%
    19
    111.8%
    VEGF-C/High
    52
    400%
    41
    241.2%
    VEGF-C/Low
    45
    346.2%
    52
    305.9%
    VEGF-C/Indeterminate
    3
    23.1%
    7
    41.2%
    VEGFR1/High
    35
    269.2%
    44
    258.8%
    VEGFR1/Low
    48
    369.2%
    33
    194.1%
    VEGFR1/Indeterminate
    16
    123.1%
    22
    129.4%
    VEGFR2/High
    45
    346.2%
    48
    282.4%
    VEGFR2/Low
    52
    400%
    41
    241.2%
    VEGFR2/Indeterminate
    3
    23.1%
    11
    64.7%
    VEGFR3/High
    35
    269.2%
    48
    282.4%
    VEGFR3/Low
    55
    423.1%
    30
    176.5%
    VEGFR3/Indeterminate
    10
    76.9%
    22
    129.4%
    FGF/Detected
    10
    76.9%
    19
    111.8%
    FGF/Not Detected
    84
    646.2%
    67
    394.1%
    FGF/Indeterminate
    6
    46.2%
    15
    88.2%
    FLT3/Detected
    26
    200%
    19
    111.8%
    FLT3/Not Detected
    71
    546.2%
    78
    458.8%
    FLT3/Indeterminate
    3
    23.1%
    4
    23.5%
    KIT/Detected
    39
    300%
    30
    176.5%
    KIT/Not Detected
    58
    446.2%
    67
    394.1%
    KIT/Indeterminate
    3
    23.1%
    4
    23.5%
    RET/Detected
    10
    76.9%
    30
    176.5%
    RET/Not Detected
    84
    646.2%
    59
    347.1%
    RET/Indeterminate
    6
    46.2%
    11
    64.7%
    55. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title VEGFR-2 Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint
    Description Plasma VEGFR-2 concentration at each time point divided by VEGFR-2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)
    Time Frame Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set; n equals number of participants with evaluable data at specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=43, 46)
    0.71
    0.98
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=36, 36)
    0.67
    0.99
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments VEGFR-2 Ratio to Baseline for Cycle 2, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments VEGFR-2 Ratio to Baseline for Cycle 3, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    56. Secondary Outcome
    Title PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by RNA Expression Profile
    Description PFS, defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of PD or death on-study due to any cause, whichever occurred first, in subgroups that were defined by RNA Gene expression (CSF-1R, PDGFRalpha, PDGFRbeta, VEGF, VEGF-C, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, FGF, FLT-3, KIT, and RET). PFS was calculated as (first event date minus randomization date plus 1) divided by 7.02.
    Time Frame From randomization to Weeks 8 and 12, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death (up to Month 17)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    CSF-1R/High
    19.1
    10.9
    CSF-1R/Low
    12.3
    12.3
    CSF-1R/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    PDGFRalpha/High
    12.3
    52.0
    PDGFRalpha/Low
    16.0
    7.7
    PDGFRalpha/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    PDGFRbeta/High
    12.3
    11.7
    PDGFRbeta/Low
    16.0
    12.3
    PDGFRbeta/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    VEGF/High
    16.0
    10.1
    VEGF/Low
    19.1
    11.7
    VEGF/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    VEGF-C/High
    12.3
    12.1
    VEGF-C/Low
    16.0
    8.5
    VEGF-C/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    VEGFR1/High
    12.5
    11.2
    VEGFR1/Low
    19.1
    11.7
    VEGFR1/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    VEGFR2/High
    17.0
    12.3
    VEGFR2/Low
    16.0
    8.8
    VEGFR2/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    VEGFR3/High
    NA
    12.3
    VEGFR3/Low
    12.3
    8.8
    VEGFR3/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.0
    FGF/Detected
    11.7
    7.7
    FGF/Not Detected
    12.3
    12.3
    FGF/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    FLT3/Detected
    16.0
    12.1
    FLT3/Not Detected
    17.0
    8.5
    FLT3/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    KIT/Detected
    19.5
    10.1
    KIT/Not Detected
    16.0
    11.7
    KIT/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    RET/Detected
    10.4
    10.1
    RET/Not Detected
    12.3
    11.7
    RET/Indeterminate
    9.5
    8.1
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High CSF-1R expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1667
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.553
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.159 to 1.921
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low CSF-1R expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7688
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.451
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.534 to 3.944
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate CSF-1R expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3498
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.890
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.503 to 1.574
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High PDGFRalpha expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9497
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 2.687
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.790 to 9.143
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low PDGFRalpha expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0401
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.386
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.127 to 1.173
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate PDGFRalpha expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3128
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.862
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.487 to 1.524
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High PDGFRbeta expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3650
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.823
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.273 to 2.488
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low PDGFRbeta expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6105
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.192
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.408 to 3.480
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate PDGFRbeta expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3027
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.856
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.488 to 1.502
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 10
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High VEGF expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4436
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.914
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.262 to 3.184
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 11
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low VEGF expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4582
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.953
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.296 to 3.062
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 12
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate VEGF expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3720
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.911
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.536 to 1.548
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 13
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High VEGF-C expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5586
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.090
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.350 to 3.397
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 14
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low VEGF-C expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3652
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.842
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.313 to 2.266
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 15
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate VEGF-C expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3301
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.875
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.493 to 1.554
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 16
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High VEGFR1 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5605
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.097
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.331 to 3.636
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 17
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low VEGFR1 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2132
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.599
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.160 to 2.236
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 18
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate VEGFR1 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3605
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.902
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.530 to 1.537
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 19
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High VEGFR2 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4438
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.921
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.304 to 2.784
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 20
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low VEGFR2 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5699
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.122
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.403 to 3.125
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 21
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate VEGFR2 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3147
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.864
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.489 to 1.528
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 22
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments High VEGFR3 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5015
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.002
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.281 to 3.581
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 23
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Low VEGFR3 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.4887
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.005
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.334 to 3.025
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 24
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate VEGFR3 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2432
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.818
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.473 to 1.414
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 25
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Detected FGF expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2321
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.446
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.048 to 4.101
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 26
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments No detected FGF expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.7143
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.316
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.526 to 3.292
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 27
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate FGF expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.2812
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.844
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.486 to 1.465
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 28
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Detected FLT3 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6504
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.406
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.248 to 7.960
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 29
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments No detected FLT3 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3266
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.838
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.375 to 1.876
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 30
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate FLT3 expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3597
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.896
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.502 to 1.598
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 31
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Detected KIT expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.6907
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 1.342
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.419 to 4.297
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 32
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Participants with no detected KIT expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.1990
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.677
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.265 to 1.731
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 33
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate KIT expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3597
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.896
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.502 to 1.598
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 34
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Detected RET expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3757
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.693
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.071 to 6.765
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 35
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments No detected RET expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3723
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.874
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.358 to 2.130
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    Statistical Analysis 36
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments Indeterminate RET expression
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3263
    Comments 1-sided unstratified log-rank test
    Method Log Rank
    Comments
    Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Hazard Ratio (HR)
    Estimated Value 0.874
    Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
    0.501 to 1.523
    Parameter Dispersion Type:
    Value:
    Estimation Comments
    57. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title VEGFR-3 Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint
    Description Plasma VEGFR-3 concentration at each time point divided by VEGFR-3 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)
    Time Frame Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set; n equals number of participants with evaluable data at specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=43, 47)
    0.60
    0.98
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=36, 36)
    0.57
    0.92
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments VEGFR-3 Ratio to Baseline for Cycle 2, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments VEGFR-3 Ratio to Baseline for Cycle 3, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    58. Secondary Outcome
    Title Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Lung Cancer Related Symptoms as Assessed With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Score
    Description EORTC QLQ-C30: self-administered questionnaire assessing global health status/quality of life (QoL), functional domains (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales/items (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, and diarrhea), and financial difficulties. Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4); global/QoL range: very poor (1) to excellent (7). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher functional/global QoL score = better functioning and higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
    Time Frame Baseline (Cycle [C] 1, Day [D] 1) to Cycle 18, Day 1

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Analysis Set: participants from the FA Set who had at least 1 EORTC QLQ-C30 or EORTC QLQ Lung cancer (QLQ-LC13) module questionnaire assessment while on treatment; n is number of participants with an assessment at the specified time point.
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 49 54
    Global Health Status/QoL (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    66.49
    62.26
    Global Health Status/QoL (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    62.60
    57.43
    Global Health Status/QoL (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    61.73
    59.12
    Global Health Status/QoL (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    66.67
    60.98
    Global Health Status/QoL (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    69.05
    61.12
    Global Health Status/QoL (C6, D1) (n=8, 14)
    80.20
    67.27
    Global Health Status/QoL (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    71.41
    63.34
    Global Health Status/QoL (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    89.60
    59.51
    Global Health Status/QoL (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    79.18
    66.66
    Global Health Status/QoL (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    88.90
    56.25
    Global Health Status/QoL (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    86.10
    62.50
    Global Health Status/QoL (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    88.90
    58.33
    Global Health Status/QoL (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    80.57
    61.10
    Global Health Status/QoL (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    75.00
    55.53
    Global Health Status/QoL (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    66.65
    Global Health Status/QoL (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    66.65
    Global Health Status/QoL (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    58.30
    Global Health Status/QoL (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    66.65
    Physical Functioning (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    79.32
    74.81
    Physical Functioning (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    77.24
    72.03
    Physical Functioning (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    73.58
    72.28
    Physical Functioning (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    71.58
    74.23
    Physical Functioning (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    75.72
    68.89
    Physical Functioning (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    85.92
    75.24
    Physical Functioning (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    80.00
    71.99
    Physical Functioning (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    93.35
    74.29
    Physical Functioning (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    95.00
    73.32
    Physical Functioning (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    93.33
    70.00
    Physical Functioning (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    93.33
    71.68
    Physical Functioning (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    97.77
    71.68
    Physical Functioning (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    95.57
    73.30
    Physical Functioning (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    93.35
    68.90
    Physical Functioning (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    70.00
    Physical Functioning (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    66.70
    Physical Functioning (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    70.00
    Physical Functioning (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    73.30
    Role Functioning (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    80.95
    69.18
    Role Functioning (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    67.89
    64.13
    Role Functioning (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    72.63
    64.07
    Role Functioning (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    68.43
    67.43
    Role Functioning (C5, D1) (n=14, 17)
    69.06
    67.65
    Role Functioning (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    83.34
    69.05
    Role Functioning (C7, D1) (n=7,10)
    85.71
    73.34
    Role Functioning (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    91.68
    69.04
    Role Functioning (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    91.68
    66.66
    Role Functioning (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    50.00
    Role Functioning (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    62.50
    Role Functioning (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    100.00
    62.50
    Role Functioning (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    88.90
    72.23
    Role Functioning (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    83.35
    66.67
    Role Functioning (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    83.35
    Role Functioning (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    66.65
    Role Functioning (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    58.35
    Role Functioning (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    66.65
    Cognitive Functioning (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    85.03
    82.71
    Cognitive Functioning (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    86.99
    82.24
    Cognitive Functioning (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    87.04
    82.29
    Cognitive Functioning (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    89.47
    81.06
    Cognitive Functioning (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    82.14
    81.48
    Cognitive Functioning (C6, D1) (n=8, 14)
    85.40
    84.53
    Cognitive Functioning (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    85.71
    89.99
    Cognitive Functioning (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    91.65
    71.43
    Cognitive Functioning (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    91.65
    83.34
    Cognitive Functioning (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    79.18
    Cognitive Functioning (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    87.50
    Cognitive Functioning (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    79.15
    Cognitive Functioning (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    94.43
    83.33
    Cognitive Functioning (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    100.00
    83.33
    Cognitive Functioning (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    100.00
    Cognitive Functioning (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    91.65
    Cognitive Functioning (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    83.35
    Cognitive Functioning (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    100.00
    Emotional Functioning (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    74.65
    71.23
    Emotional Functioning (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    77.85
    71.37
    Emotional Functioning (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    76.86
    67.98
    Emotional Functioning (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    82.46
    71.21
    Emotional Functioning (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    79.18
    71.30
    Emotional Functioning (C6, D1) (n=8, 14)
    78.13
    79.76
    Emotional Functioning (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    79.77
    70.82
    Emotional Functioning (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    87.50
    61.90
    Emotional Functioning (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    91.68
    78.34
    Emotional Functioning (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    97.23
    66.68
    Emotional Functioning (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    97.23
    64.60
    Emotional Functioning (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    54.15
    Emotional Functioning (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    86.13
    69.43
    Emotional Functioning (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    83.35
    63.90
    Emotional Functioning (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    91.70
    75.00
    Emotional Functioning (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    91.70
    75.00
    Emotional Functioning (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    62.50
    Emotional Functioning (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    83.35
    Social Functioning (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    80.95
    80.19
    Social Functioning (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    80.09
    77.53
    Social Functioning (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    79.01
    81.26
    Social Functioning (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    81.58
    75.75
    Social Functioning (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    76.19
    75.93
    Social Functioning (C6, D1) (n=8, 14)
    89.58
    80.96
    Social Functioning (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    90.47
    85.00
    Social Functioning (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    91.68
    73.81
    Social Functioning (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    91.68
    83.34
    Social Functioning (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    88.90
    83.33
    Social Functioning (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    62.50
    Social Functioning (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    94.43
    66.68
    Social Functioning (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    88.90
    72.23
    Social Functioning (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    83.35
    72.20
    Social Functioning (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    91.65
    Social Functioning (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    91.65
    Social Functioning (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    83.35
    Social Functioning (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    91.65
    Fatigue (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    32.64
    33.11
    Fatigue (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    37.93
    39.85
    Fatigue (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    40.07
    37.49
    Fatigue (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    36.25
    33.84
    Fatigue (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    31.73
    44.44
    Fatigue (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    21.59
    33.32
    Fatigue (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    25.40
    33.32
    Fatigue (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    8.33
    39.69
    Fatigue (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    13.88
    28.90
    Fatigue (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    7.40
    36.10
    Fatigue (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    25.90
    30.55
    Fatigue (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    14.80
    27.78
    Fatigue (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    25.90
    Fatigue (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    40.73
    Fatigue (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Fatigue (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    38.90
    Fatigue (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    33.35
    Fatigue (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    33.35
    Nausea/Vomiting (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    7.49
    9.26
    Nausea/Vomiting (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    16.26
    14.13
    Nausea/Vomiting (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    16.67
    11.98
    Nausea/Vomiting (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    13.16
    6.82
    Nausea/Vomiting (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    16.66
    8.34
    Nausea/Vomiting (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    9.26
    2.39
    Nausea/Vomiting (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    16.67
    8.34
    Nausea/Vomiting (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    NA
    9.51
    Nausea/Vomiting (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    4.18
    6.66
    Nausea/Vomiting (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    11.10
    12.50
    Nausea/Vomiting (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    16.67
    8.35
    Nausea/Vomiting (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    5.57
    NA
    Nausea/Vomiting (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    8.35
    Pain (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    25.85
    30.25
    Pain (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    19.51
    31.52
    Pain (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    19.05
    28.65
    Pain (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    16.67
    28.80
    Pain (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    21.43
    33.34
    Pain (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    12.98
    25.00
    Pain (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    19.06
    23.34
    Pain (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    12.5
    19.04
    Pain (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    8.33
    20.00
    Pain (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    24.98
    Pain (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    24.98
    Pain (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    22.20
    Pain (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    22.20
    Pain (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Dyspnea (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    26.51
    25.91
    Dyspnea (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    30.07
    26.80
    Dyspnea (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    26.18
    24.99
    Dyspnea (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    36.83
    25.75
    Dyspnea (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    30.94
    29.62
    Dyspnea (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    25.91
    23.79
    Dyspnea (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    33.33
    19.98
    Dyspnea (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    16.65
    23.81
    Dyspnea (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    16.65
    6.66
    Dyspnea (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    16.68
    Dyspnea (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    33.33
    8.33
    Dyspnea (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    8.33
    Dyspnea (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    22.20
    Dyspnea (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    22.20
    Dyspnea (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    33.30
    16.65
    Dyspnea (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    33.30
    Dyspnea (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    33.35
    Dyspnea (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Insomnia (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    29.24
    27.78
    Insomnia (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    22.76
    29.71
    Insomnia (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    29.75
    38.54
    Insomnia (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    14.03
    25.76
    Insomnia (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    19.04
    33.33
    Insomnia (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    11.10
    23.81
    Insomnia (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    14.29
    19.99
    Insomnia (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    33.33
    38.09
    Insomnia (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    24.98
    33.32
    Insomnia (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    41.68
    Insomnia (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    33.33
    33.33
    Insomnia (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    33.33
    16.65
    Insomnia (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    22.20
    22.20
    Insomnia (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    33.30
    44.47
    Insomnia (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    33.30
    16.65
    Insomnia (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    33.30
    16.65
    Insomnia (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Insomnia (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Loss of Appetite (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    23.12
    20.99
    Loss of Appetite (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    33.33
    26.81
    Loss of Appetite (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    36.90
    26.04
    Loss of Appetite (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    28.06
    24.24
    Loss of Appetite (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    26.18
    24.08
    Loss of Appetite (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    22.21
    26.19
    Loss of Appetite (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    28.56
    30.00
    Loss of Appetite (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    16.65
    14.29
    Loss of Appetite (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    16.65
    20.00
    Loss of Appetite (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    25.00
    Loss of Appetite (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    33.33
    Loss of Appetite (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.20
    25.00
    Loss of Appetite (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    22.20
    11.10
    Loss of Appetite (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    11.10
    Loss of Appetite (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Constipation (C1, D1) (n=48, 54)
    12.49
    16.67
    Constipation (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    4.88
    13.77
    Constipation (C3, D1) (n=28, 32)
    13.10
    18.75
    Constipation (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    1.75
    10.60
    Constipation (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    7.14
    14.82
    Constipation (C6, D1) (n=8, 13)
    12.50
    12.82
    Constipation (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    4.76
    3.33
    Constipation (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    8.33
    NA
    Constipation (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    8.33
    13.34
    Constipation (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    8.33
    Constipation (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    8.33
    Constipation (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    11.10
    8.33
    Constipation (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    NA
    Constipation (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    NA
    Constipation (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Diarrhea (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    6.80
    2.47
    Diarrhea (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    38.21
    21.01
    Diarrhea (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    37.03
    17.69
    Diarrhea (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    38.59
    7.57
    Diarrhea (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    30.94
    14.81
    Diarrhea (C6, D1) (n=8, 14)
    24.99
    11.90
    Diarrhea (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    42.86
    6.66
    Diarrhea (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    33.30
    14.29
    Diarrhea (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    33.30
    6.66
    Diarrhea (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    33.33
    8.33
    Diarrhea (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    33.33
    16.65
    Diarrhea (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    66.67
    16.65
    Diarrhea (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    33.30
    11.10
    Diarrhea (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    50.00
    11.10
    Diarrhea (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Diarrhea (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Diarrhea (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Diarrhea (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Financial Difficulties (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    21.76
    13.84
    Financial Difficulties (C2, D1) (n=41, 45)
    17.07
    11.85
    Financial Difficulties (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    17.27
    16.66
    Financial Difficulties (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    8.77
    24.25
    Financial Difficulties (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    21.42
    16.67
    Financial Difficulties (C6, D1) (n=8, 14)
    24.99
    19.05
    Financial Difficulties (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    9.51
    13.33
    Financial Difficulties (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    41.65
    38.10
    Financial Difficulties (C9, D1) (n=4, 5)
    33.33
    26.66
    Financial Difficulties (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    44.43
    33.33
    Financial Difficulties (C11, D1) (n=3, 4)
    44.43
    33.33
    Financial Difficulties (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    44.43
    33.33
    Financial Difficulties (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    44.43
    33.33
    Financial Difficulties (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    66.65
    33.33
    Financial Difficulties (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100.00
    NA
    Financial Difficulties (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    100
    NA
    59. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title sKIT Ratio to Baseline at Each Timepoint
    Description Plasma sKIT concentration at each time point divided by sKIT concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline)
    Time Frame Baseline to Cycle 2 (Day 1) and Cycle 3 (Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set; n equals number of participants with evaluable data at specified cycle
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Cycle 2, Day 1 (n=43, 47)
    0.76
    1.00
    Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=36, 36)
    0.58
    0.95
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments sKIT Ratio to Baseline for Cycle 2, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments sKIT Ratio to Baseline for Cycle 3, Day 1
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    60. Secondary Outcome
    Title EORTC-QLQ-C30 Lung Cancer Module (LC13) Score
    Description The EORTC-QLQ-C30 LC13 is a self-administered questionnaire assessing specific lung cancer disease related symptoms (dyspnea, coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, pain in the chest, arm/shoulder or other parts of the body). Recall period: past week; response range: not at all (1) to very much (4). Scale score range: 0 to 100. Higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms.
    Time Frame Baseline (Cycle 1 [Day 1]) to Cycle 18 (Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    PRO Analysis Set; n is number of participants with an assessment at the specific time point
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 49 54
    Dyspnea Symptom (C1, D1) (n=48, 53)
    21.05
    25.56
    Dyspnea Symptom (C2, D1) (n=38, 46)
    25.71
    26.08
    Dyspnea Symptom (C3, D1) (n=26, 32)
    24.77
    26.03
    Dyspnea Symptom (C4, D1) (n=18, 22)
    27.16
    23.73
    Dyspnea Symptom (C5, D1) (n=12, 18)
    22.21
    32.71
    Dyspnea Symptom (C6, D1) (n=8, 14)
    18.04
    21.41
    Dyspnea Symptom (C7, D1) (n=6, 10)
    14.80
    29.99
    Dyspnea Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    8.33
    22.22
    Dyspnea Symptom (C9, D1) (n=4, 3)
    11.10
    22.20
    Dyspnea Symptom (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    11.10
    33.33
    Dyspnea Symptom (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    18.50
    29.60
    Dyspnea Symptom (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    14.80
    22.20
    Dyspnea Symptom (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    7.40
    22.20
    Dyspnea Symptom (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    25.90
    Dyspnea Symptom (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    22.20
    11.10
    Dyspnea Symptom (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    22.20
    Dyspnea Symptom (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    22.20
    Dyspnea Symptom (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Coughing Symptom (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    36.72
    37.10
    Coughing Symptom (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    31.70
    31.87
    Coughing Symptom (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    32.09
    30.20
    Coughing Symptom (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    29.81
    15.14
    Coughing Symptom (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    38.08
    29.62
    Coughing Symptom (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    33.31
    26.17
    Coughing Symptom (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    33.33
    16.67
    Coughing Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 7)
    24.98
    28.56
    Coughing Symptom (C9, D1) (n=4, 4)
    24.98
    8.33
    Coughing Symptom (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.20
    25.00
    Coughing Symptom (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    22.20
    33.33
    Coughing Symptom (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.20
    41.65
    Coughing Symptom (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    22.20
    33.33
    Coughing Symptom (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    11.10
    Coughing Symptom (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Coughing Symptom (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Coughing Symptom (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Coughing Symptom (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    33.35
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    2.04
    6.17
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    6.50
    4.34
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    2.47
    5.21
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    1.75
    1.51
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    2.38
    5.56
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    3.70
    2.38
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    4.76
    NA
    Haemoptysis Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    NA
    5.55
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    6.12
    1.23
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    19.50
    7.97
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    16.04
    6.25
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    12.27
    7.58
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    23.79
    12.96
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    11.10
    2.38
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    4.76
    6.67
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    NA
    5.55
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    8.33
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    NA
    11.10
    Sore Mouth Symptom (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    NA
    11.10
    Dysphagia Symptom (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    6.80
    6.17
    Dysphagia Symptom (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    13.00
    10.14
    Dysphagia Symptom (C3, D1) (n=26, 32)
    7.68
    14.58
    Dysphagia Symptom (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    7.01
    12.12
    Dysphagia Symptom (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    11.91
    11.11
    Dysphagia Symptom (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    3.70
    7.14
    Dysphagia Symptom (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    4.76
    10.00
    Dysphagia Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    8.33
    NA
    Dysphagia Symptom (C9, D1) (n=4, 3)
    8.33
    NA
    Dysphagia Symptom (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    16.65
    Dysphagia Symptom (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    NA
    Dysphagia Symptom (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    8.33
    Dysphagia Symptom (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    NA
    22.20
    Dysphagia Symptom (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    NA
    11.10
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    18.37
    17.28
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    14.63
    20.28
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    16.04
    34.37
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    22.81
    25.75
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    26.18
    22.22
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    18.51
    23.81
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    33.33
    23.33
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    24.98
    22.20
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C9, D1) (n=4, 3)
    16.65
    33.30
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    33.30
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    22.20
    44.43
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    22.23
    41.65
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    44.43
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    44.43
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    33.30
    Peripheral Neuropathy Symptom (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    33.30
    Alopecia Symptom (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    12.92
    12.96
    Alopecia Symptom (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    4.87
    5.79
    Alopecia Symptom (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    7.40
    5.20
    Alopecia Symptom (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    10.52
    13.63
    Alopecia Symptom (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    16.66
    22.22
    Alopecia Symptom (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    14.80
    19.04
    Alopecia Symptom (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    14.27
    16.67
    Alopecia Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    8.33
    11.10
    Alopecia Symptom (C9, D1) (n=4, 3)
    16.65
    22.23
    Alopecia Symptom (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    11.10
    25.00
    Alopecia Symptom (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    33.30
    NA
    Alopecia Symptom (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    33.33
    25.00
    Alopecia Symptom (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    33.30
    33.33
    Alopecia Symptom (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    33.35
    33.33
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C1, D1) (n=49, 53)
    19.72
    15.09
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    11.38
    14.48
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    8.64
    18.75
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C4, D1) (n=18, 22)
    11.11
    10.60
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    16.66
    20.37
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    11.10
    11.90
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    19.03
    16.66
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    8.33
    5.55
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C9, D1) (n=4, 3)
    8.33
    NA
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    NA
    11.10
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    8.33
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    22.20
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    11.10
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain in Chest Symptom (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C1, D1) (n=49, 54)
    21.08
    11.72
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C2, D1) (n=41, 46)
    10.56
    16.66
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C3, D1) (n=27, 32)
    14.81
    17.71
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C4, D1) (n=19, 22)
    12.27
    21.21
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C5, D1) (n=14, 18)
    19.04
    25.92
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    14.80
    26.19
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C7, D1) (n=7, 10)
    23.80
    23.33
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    16.65
    5.55
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C9, D1) (n=4, 3)
    16.65
    11.10
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    11.10
    8.33
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    11.10
    11.10
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    11.10
    8.33
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    22.20
    22.20
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    11.10
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C15, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C17, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain in Arm or Shoulder (C18, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C1, D1) (n=48, 51)
    26.38
    35.29
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C2, D1) (n=40, 43)
    14.17
    28.68
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C3, D1) (n=26, 31)
    16.67
    29.03
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C4, D1) (n=18, 20)
    14.81
    20.00
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C5, D1) (n=13, 18)
    35.90
    31.48
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C6, D1) (n=9, 14)
    18.51
    21.43
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C7, D1) (n=6, 10)
    16.67
    33.34
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C8, D1) (n=4, 6)
    NA
    27.77
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C9, D1) (n=4, 3)
    NA
    22.20
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C10, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    8.33
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C11, D1) (n=3, 3)
    NA
    11.10
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C12, D1) (n=3, 4)
    NA
    8.33
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C13, D1) (n=3, 3)
    NA
    22.20
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C14, D1) (n=2, 3)
    16.65
    NA
    Pain in Other Parts of Body (C16, D1) (n=1, 2)
    NA
    16.65
    61. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Blood Pressure (BP) Greater Than 150/100 Millimeters of Mercury (mmHg)
    Description Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.
    Time Frame Randomization up until Month 17

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per-Protocol Set: all participants in the Phase 2 portion (randomized) who received at least 1 dose of study medication (either erlotinib or blinded medication) with treatment assignments designated according to actual study medication received
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 64 64
    Number [Participants]
    10
    76.9%
    8
    47.1%
    62. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With BP Greater Than 200/110 mmHg
    Description Systolic/diastolic BP measured in triplicate (separated by approximately 2 minutes [min]) using validated electronic device (same device for all measurements), recorded to nearest mmHg. Dominant arm used (same one each time) with appropriate cuff size encircling at least 80% of arm. BP measured after 5 min rest and before invasive procedures, while seated in a chair with back supported, arms bared, supported at heart level. No smoking or caffeine use allowed during 30 min before measurement. Number of participants with systolic BP >150 mmHg/diastolic BP >100 mmHg at any timepoint postbaseline.
    Time Frame Randomization up until Month 17

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per-Protocol Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 64 64
    Number [Participants]
    1
    7.7%
    0
    0%
    63. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants on Anti-hypertensive Medications
    Description Number of participants with BP greater than 150/100 mmHg or 200/110 mmHg who were treated with anti-hypertensive medications.
    Time Frame Randomization to Day 28 of Cycle 18

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Per Protocol Set; data were not analyzed
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 0 0
    64. Secondary Outcome
    Title Plasma Concentration of VEGF-C at Baseline
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Median (Full Range) [picograms (pg)/mL]
    474.15
    502.10
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3681
    Comments 2-sided normal approximated p-value
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    65. Secondary Outcome
    Title Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-2 at Baseline
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Median (Full Range) [pg/mL]
    10904.50
    10027
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.5982
    Comments 2-sided normal approximated p-value
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    66. Secondary Outcome
    Title Plasma Concentration of Soluble VEGFR-3 at Baseline
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Median (Full Range) [pg/mL]
    23190
    23350
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.9807
    Comments 2-sided normal approximated p-value
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments
    67. Secondary Outcome
    Title Plasma Concentration of Soluble KIT (sKIT) at Baseline
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    FA Set
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets once daily (QD) in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    Measure Participants 65 67
    Median (Full Range) [pg/mL]
    49520
    47242.50
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Sunitinib + Erlotinib, Erlotinib + Placebo
    Comments
    Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.3945
    Comments 2-sided normal approximated p-value
    Method Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Total number (#) of participants affected/at risk = number of participants with data for summary/number of participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment
    Arm/Group Title Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-in) Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules once daily (QD) for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 2 (27 days) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle with exception of Cycle 1 (35 days). Sunitinib 37.5 mg oral capsules QD for 28 days each cycle (27 days in Cycle 1, Arm A or 13 days in Cycle 1, Arm B) and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD for 28 days each cycle (7 days in Cycle 1, Arm A or 26 days in Cycle 1, Arm B) Sunitinib oral capsules, 37.5 mg QD in a continuous regimen, expressed in 4-week cycles and Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles. Erlotinib 150 mg oral tablets QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles and Placebo oral capsules QD in a continuous regimen expressed in 4-week cycles.
    All Cause Mortality
    Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-in) Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-in) Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 5/13 (38.5%) 7/17 (41.2%) 29/64 (45.3%) 28/64 (43.8%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Thrombocytopenia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Congestive cardiomyopathy 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Cardiopulmonary failure 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Tachycardia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal distension 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Abdominal pain 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Anal fistula 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Ascites 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Constipation 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Diarrhoea 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 5/64 (7.8%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Dysphagia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Femoral hernia, obstructive 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Ileus 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Intestinal obstruction 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Nausea 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Oesophagitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pancreatitis acute 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Vomiting 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Oesophageal stenosis 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    General disorders
    Asthenia 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Disease progression 1/13 (7.7%) 2/17 (11.8%) 8/64 (12.5%) 8/64 (12.5%)
    Fatigue 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Mucosal inflammation 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pyrexia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Thrombosis in device 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Ulcer haemorrhage 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholecystitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Jaundice 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Bronchitis bacterial 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Bronchopneumonia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Gastroenteritis 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Infection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pneumonia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pneumonia fungal 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pneumonia staphylococcal 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Sepsis 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Urinary tract infection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Ankle fracture 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Dehydration 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 1/64 (1.6%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Failure to thrive 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypercalcaemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hyponatraemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Back pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Bone pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Musculoskeletal pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Depressed level of consciousness 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Diabetic hyperosmolar coma 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Haemorrhage intracranial 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypoglycaemic coma 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Nervous system disorder 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Completed suicide 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Mental status changes 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Haematuria 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Renal failure 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Dyspnoea 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Epistaxis 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Haemoptysis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pleural effusion 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pulmonary embolism 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Pulmonary oedema 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Respiratory failure 1/13 (7.7%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pleurisy 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Vascular disorders
    Ischaemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Thrombophlebitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Original Lead-In) Sunitinib + Erlotinib (Amended Lead-in) Sunitinib + Erlotinib Erlotinib + Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 13/13 (100%) 15/17 (88.2%) 60/64 (93.8%) 61/64 (95.3%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 3/13 (23.1%) 1/17 (5.9%) 7/64 (10.9%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Leukopenia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Neutropenia 3/13 (23.1%) 0/17 (0%) 6/64 (9.4%) 0/64 (0%)
    Thrombocytopenia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 8/64 (12.5%) 0/64 (0%)
    Leukocytosis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Lymphopenia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Atrial fibrillation 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Cyanosis 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Sinus bradycardia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Tachycardia 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 1/64 (1.6%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Bundle branch block left 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Bundle branch block right 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pericardial effusion 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pericarditis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Sinus tachycardia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Tinnitus 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Eye disorders
    Vision blurred 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Dry eye 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 4/64 (6.3%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Blepharitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Conjunctivitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Eye irritation 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Eye pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Eye pruritus 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Keratitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Lacrimation increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Periorbital oedema 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain 2/13 (15.4%) 1/17 (5.9%) 7/64 (10.9%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Abdominal pain upper 1/13 (7.7%) 3/17 (17.6%) 3/64 (4.7%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Constipation 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 9/64 (14.1%) 9/64 (14.1%)
    Diarrhoea 10/13 (76.9%) 9/17 (52.9%) 37/64 (57.8%) 22/64 (34.4%)
    Duodenogastric reflux 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Dyspepsia 1/13 (7.7%) 1/17 (5.9%) 4/64 (6.3%) 6/64 (9.4%)
    Flatulence 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Haemorrhoids 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Nausea 5/13 (38.5%) 1/17 (5.9%) 22/64 (34.4%) 15/64 (23.4%)
    Oral pain 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 6/64 (9.4%) 0/64 (0%)
    Stomatitis 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 5/64 (7.8%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Vomiting 3/13 (23.1%) 2/17 (11.8%) 13/64 (20.3%) 14/64 (21.9%)
    Abdominal discomfort 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Abdominal distension 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Abnormal faeces 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Anal haemorrhage 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Anorectal discomfort 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Ascites 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Dry mouth 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Dysphagia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Gastritis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Gingival bleeding 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Gingival disorder 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Glossodynia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Lip swelling 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Mouth cyst 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Oesophageal pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    General disorders
    Asthenia 3/13 (23.1%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Chest discomfort 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Chest pain 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 7/64 (10.9%)
    Chills 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Fatigue 8/13 (61.5%) 2/17 (11.8%) 29/64 (45.3%) 33/64 (51.6%)
    Mucosal inflammation 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 12/64 (18.8%) 7/64 (10.9%)
    Oedema peripheral 2/13 (15.4%) 1/17 (5.9%) 3/64 (4.7%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Pain 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pyrexia 4/13 (30.8%) 1/17 (5.9%) 3/64 (4.7%) 6/64 (9.4%)
    Suprapubic pain 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Early satiety 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Facial pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    General physical health deterioration 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Influenza like illness 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Localised oedema 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Malaise 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Mucous membrane disorder 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Oedema 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Thrombosis in device 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hyperbilirubinaemia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hypertransaminasaemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Immune system disorders
    Hypersensitivity 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Infections and infestations
    Infection 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Nasopharyngitis 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 1/64 (1.6%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Oral candidiasis 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Paronychia 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Pneumonia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Respiratory tract infection 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 2/64 (3.1%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Sinusitis 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Urinary tract infection 2/13 (15.4%) 1/17 (5.9%) 6/64 (9.4%) 0/64 (0%)
    Abscess 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Candidiasis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Clostridium difficile colitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Conjunctivitis infective 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Cystitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Fungal infection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Gastroenteritis viral 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Herpes simplex 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Herpes zoster 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Influenza 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Lip infection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Localised infection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Nail infection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Oral herpes 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Oral pustule 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pneumonia primary atypical 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pulmonary mycosis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Rash pustular 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Respiratory moniliasis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Superinfection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Upper respiratory tract infection 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Bronchitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Arthropod bite 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Contusion 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Eye injury 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Fall 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Heat stroke 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Rib fracture 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Investigations
    Alanine aminotransferase increased 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Aspartate aminotransferase increased 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Blood alkaline phosphatase increased 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Blood creatinine increased 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Haemoglobin decreased 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Platelet count decreased 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Vitamin B12 decreased 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Weight decreased 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 10/64 (15.6%) 6/64 (9.4%)
    White blood cell count decreased 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Blood bilirubin increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Blood pressure increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Blood thyroid stimulating hormone decreased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Electrocardiogram QT prolonged 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Granulocyte count decreased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    International normalised ratio increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Lipase increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Liver function test abnormal 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Neutrophil count decreased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Transaminases increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Weight increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    White blood cell count increased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite 7/13 (53.8%) 1/17 (5.9%) 24/64 (37.5%) 20/64 (31.3%)
    Dehydration 5/13 (38.5%) 2/17 (11.8%) 4/64 (6.3%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hyperglycaemia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypoglycaemia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypokalaemia 2/13 (15.4%) 1/17 (5.9%) 6/64 (9.4%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Hypomagnesaemia 3/13 (23.1%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypophosphataemia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypercalcaemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Hypercreatininaemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hypoalbuminaemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hypocalcaemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hyponatraemia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Hypophagia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Vitamin B12 deficiency 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 3/13 (23.1%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Arthritis 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Back pain 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 5/64 (7.8%) 9/64 (14.1%)
    Bone pain 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Groin pain 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Muscle atrophy 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal chest pain 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 5/64 (7.8%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Myalgia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pain in extremity 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 7/64 (10.9%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Arthropathy 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Bursitis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Fistula 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Flank pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Mobility decreased 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Muscle spasms 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Muscular weakness 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Musculoskeletal pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Neck pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 0/64 (0%)
    Trismus 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pain in jaw 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Tumour pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Ageusia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Dizziness 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Dysgeusia 4/13 (30.8%) 1/17 (5.9%) 12/64 (18.8%) 6/64 (9.4%)
    Headache 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Paraesthesia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Peripheral sensory neuropathy 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 2/64 (3.1%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Somnolence 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Aphasia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Balance disorder 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Dysarthria 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Dyskinesia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Facial paresis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hyperaesthesia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hypoaesthesia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Lethargy 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Memory impairment 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Neuralgia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Neuropathy peripheral 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Peripheral motor neuropathy 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Spinal cord oedema 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Syncope 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Tremor 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Vocal cord paralysis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety 1/13 (7.7%) 1/17 (5.9%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Depression 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Hallucination 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Insomnia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 5/64 (7.8%)
    Agitation 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Confusional state 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Nervousness 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Restlessness 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Sleep disorder 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Dysuria 1/13 (7.7%) 1/17 (5.9%) 3/64 (4.7%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Haematuria 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Haemoglobinuria 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Micturition urgency 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Nephrolithiasis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pollakiuria 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Proteinuria 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Renal failure 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Urinary hesitation 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Urinary retention 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Peyronie's disease 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Vulvovaginal dryness 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 6/13 (46.2%) 2/17 (11.8%) 13/64 (20.3%) 9/64 (14.1%)
    Dysphonia 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Dyspnoea 4/13 (30.8%) 3/17 (17.6%) 9/64 (14.1%) 17/64 (26.6%)
    Dyspnoea exertional 2/13 (15.4%) 1/17 (5.9%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Epistaxis 1/13 (7.7%) 1/17 (5.9%) 3/64 (4.7%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Haemoptysis 0/13 (0%) 2/17 (11.8%) 4/64 (6.3%) 3/64 (4.7%)
    Hypoxia 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Oropharyngeal pain 2/13 (15.4%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pleural effusion 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Productive cough 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pulmonary haemorrhage 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 5/64 (7.8%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Sinus disorder 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Alveolar proteinosis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hiccups 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Increased upper airway secretion 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Lung infiltration 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Pleuritic pain 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pneumothorax 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Respiratory tract haemorrhage 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Sinus congestion 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Acne 6/13 (46.2%) 0/17 (0%) 7/64 (10.9%) 8/64 (12.5%)
    Alopecia 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 6/64 (9.4%)
    Dermatitis acneiform 1/13 (7.7%) 3/17 (17.6%) 6/64 (9.4%) 12/64 (18.8%)
    Dry skin 1/13 (7.7%) 1/17 (5.9%) 20/64 (31.3%) 17/64 (26.6%)
    Exfoliative rash 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 7/64 (10.9%)
    Palmar erythema 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome 0/13 (0%) 1/17 (5.9%) 5/64 (7.8%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Plantar erythema 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Pruritus 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 9/64 (14.1%) 15/64 (23.4%)
    Rash 6/13 (46.2%) 7/17 (41.2%) 27/64 (42.2%) 19/64 (29.7%)
    Rash generalised 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Skin disorder 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Skin exfoliation 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 7/64 (10.9%) 4/64 (6.3%)
    Skin toxicity 0/13 (0%) 3/17 (17.6%) 0/64 (0%) 0/64 (0%)
    Blister 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Decubitus ulcer 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Erythema 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Hyperhidrosis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Hypertrichosis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Nail disorder 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Night sweats 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Petechiae 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Rash erythematous 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Rash macular 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Rash maculo-papular 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%) 0/64 (0%)
    Rash papular 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Rash pruritic 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Scab 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Skin fissures 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Skin lesion 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Yellow skin 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 1/13 (7.7%) 4/17 (23.5%) 5/64 (7.8%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Hypotension 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 3/64 (4.7%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Vena cava thrombosis 1/13 (7.7%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Circulatory collapse 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)
    Deep vein thrombosis 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%)
    Haematoma 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 0/64 (0%) 2/64 (3.1%)
    Peripheral coldness 0/13 (0%) 0/17 (0%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0/64 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Due to rounding some percentages will not equal 100%

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Pfizer Clinical Trials.gov Call Center
    Organization Pfizer, Inc.
    Phone 1-800-718-1021
    Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquires@Pfizer.com
    Responsible Party:
    Pfizer
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00265317
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • A6181058
    First Posted:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 6, 2013
    Last Verified:
    Jan 1, 2013