Effectiveness of Patient-centered Community Health Worker Support to Help Patients Control Chronic Disease

Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01900470
Collaborator
(none)
302
1
2
43.1
7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this proposal is to compare the effectiveness of community health worker (CHW) support vs. usual primary care for helping chronically-ill, low-SES patients to improve control of chronic conditions. Upon enrollment each patient will select one of their multiple chronic conditions as a focus for the trial and work with his/her PCP to set a chronic disease management goal. Patients are then randomized to receive usual primary care vs. CHW support for moving towards that goal.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: CHW Goal Support
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
302 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Health Services Research
Official Title:
Community Health Worker Support to Help Patients Control Chronic Disease
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 1, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: CHW Goal Support

IMPaCT CHWs will perform the following functions, depending on the needs of the participants: 1) Deconstructing Distal Goals into Proximal Goals: IMPaCT CHWs will help patients to deconstruct collaborative distal clinical goals into patient driven proximal goals and develop strategies for achieving each proximal goal.2) Creating Roadmaps: Roadmaps are individualized strategies for achieving each proximal goal identified by patients. 3) IMPaCT CHWs conduct weekly follow-up with patients through either telephone or home visit in order to support the achievement of proximal goals. As part of these followup encounters, CHWs ask patients to measure their chronic disease control during their weekly followup calls/visits. 4) Group: CHWs and their Project Manager run a group session for patients in the IMPaCT arm. This group meets weekly and is a forum for patients to discuss common issues around chronic disease management and form a social support network.

Behavioral: CHW Goal Support
IMPaCT CHWs will perform the following functions, depending on the needs of the participants: 1) Deconstructing Distal Goals into Proximal Goals: IMPaCT CHWs will help patients to deconstruct collaborative distal clinical goals into patient driven proximal goals and develop strategies for achieving each proximal goal.2) Creating Roadmaps: Roadmaps are individualized strategies for achieving each proximal goal identified by patients. 3) IMPaCT Partners conduct weekly follow-up with patients through either telephone or home visit in order to support the achievement of proximal goals. As part of these followup encounters, CHWs ask patients to measure their chronic disease control during their weekly followup calls/visits. 4) Group: CHWs and their Project Manager run a group session for patients in the IMPaCT arm. This group meets weekly and is a forum for patients to discuss common issues around chronic disease management and form a social support network.
Other Names:
  • IMPaCT
  • No Intervention: Usual Primary Care

    Patients will be encouraged to make follow-up appointments as needed with their primary care clinic for support towards their health goals. During these appointments, clinicians will help patients determine progress made on existing proximal goals, adjust goals based on self-efficacy, and help patients to create new proximal goals as needed. They will also work with PCPs to adjust medications when appropriate, provide health behavior education and make referrals to community-based services based on patient need.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in standardized score [Six months after enrollment]

      Six months after enrollment, the IMPaCT arm will have a higher (more negative) mean change in standardized score for chronic disease outcome of interest compared with usual care

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Goal achievement [Six months after enrollment]

      Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT group will have higher proportion of patients who achieve their individualized chronic disease management goal compared with usual care

    2. SF-12 [Six months after enrollment,]

      Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT group will greater improvements in their self-rated health (as measured by mean change in MCS and PCS of the SF-12) than patients receiving usual care.

    3. CAHPS PCMH (Communication, Self-Management Support, Comprehensiveness of Care) [Six months after enrollment]

      Six months after enrollment, the IMPaCT arm will have higher perceived quality of patient-centered medical care (as measured by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Patient-Centered Medical Home (CAHPS PCMH) survey) than the usual care arm. Specifically, we will measure the CAHPS PCMH domains pertaining to Self-Management Support and Comprehensiveness of Care.

    4. Hospitalization [6 months after enrollment]

      Patients in the IMpaCT arm with have a lower rate of hospitalizations than the usual care arm at 6 months after enrollment.

    5. Patient Activation [Six months after enrollment]

      Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT arm will have greater improvements in their activation (as measured by mean change in PAM score) compared with patients in the usual care arm.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Hospitalizations at 12 months [12 months after enrollment]

      Patients in the IMpaCT arm with have a lower rate of hospitalizations than the usual care arm at 12 months after enrollment.

    2. Medical Adherence [Six months after enrollment]

      Six months after enrollment, patients in the IMPaCT arm will have higher levels of adherence to medical recommendations than the usual care arm, as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Measures of Patient Adherence.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patient of target practices for at least 1 yr defined as having one office visit within preceding 12 month

    • Home ZIP code including ANY of the following: 1. 19104 2. 19131 3. 19139 4. 19143 5. 19146

    • 2 or more of the following conditions: 1. Obesity (BMI greater than 30), 2. HTN (ICD9 relating to HTN in EMR), 3. DM (ICD9 relating to DM in EMR), 4. Asthma/COPD and tobacco dependence (ICD9 for asthma or COPD in EMR AND documentation of tobacco use)

    • Uninsured, insured by Medicaid or dually eligible for Medicaid/Managed Medicare

    • Patients who have scheduled appointments in the future.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Will not provide informed consent for this study.

    • Does not have the capacity to provide informed consent for this study.

    • Previously enrolled in this study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Pennsylvania

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Shreya Kangovi, University of Pennsylvania

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    University of Pennsylvania
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT01900470
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • IRB 817488
    First Posted:
    Jul 16, 2013
    Last Update Posted:
    May 3, 2017
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2017
    Keywords provided by University of Pennsylvania
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 3, 2017