Trial Comparing Metal Versus Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary Decompression
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
Compare the performance of full covered metal stents and plastic stents for preoperative biliary decompression
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Covered self expandable metal stents (CSEMS) are three times larger in diameter than 10 Fr plastic stents. When compared to plastic stents, randomized trials have shown longer patency and fewer stent-related complications for CSEMS. The investigators hypothesize that placement of CSEMS would be a better treatment option for preoperative biliary decompression in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Metal stent Patients randomized to one cohort will undergo placement of fully covered self expandable metal stents. The rates (%) of stent dysfunction and complications will be evaluated. |
Procedure: Stent Dysfunction
Rate of stent dysfunction (%) which includes persistent hyperbilirubinemia or cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by another ERCP.
Procedure: Complications
Rates of procedural complications (%) such as pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage during stent placement will be assessed.
|
Active Comparator: Plastic Stent At ERCP, a 10Fr plastic stent will be placed in the bile duct. The rates (%) of stent dysfunction and complications will be evaluated. |
Procedure: Stent Dysfunction
Rate of stent dysfunction (%) which includes persistent hyperbilirubinemia or cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by another ERCP.
Procedure: Complications
Rates of procedural complications (%) such as pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage during stent placement will be assessed.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Complications related to stent dysfunction [30 days]
Evaluate the rates of complications (%) related to stent dysfunction which include persistent hyperbilirubinemia and cholangitis that warrant stent exchange by a repeat ERCP.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Procedural complications [30 days]
This will be measured as proportion of patients who encounter a procedural complication (%) during ERCP that includes pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
-
Patients with pancreatic cancer and mass in the head of pancreas causing jaundice.
-
Patients 19 yrs of age and older
-
Serum bilirubin > 2mg/dl
-
CT: No evidence of distant metastasis or local vascular invasion (tumor surrounding portal or mesenteric vessels for more than 180 degrees of their circumference or an irregular vessel margin).
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
-
Karnofsky score < 60
-
Prior (ERCP or PTC) attempts at biliary decompression for the same indication
-
Tumor-related gastric outlet obstruction (vomiting and oral intake of < 1L/day)
-
Ongoing or planned neoadjuvant therapy
-
Cholangitis at presentation or coagulopathy needing reversal medication
-
Post-surgical anatomy
-
Multiple extra-hepatic biliary strictures or concomitant stricture in liver hilum
-
Failed ERCP's (Definition: Inability to deploy a biliary stent thereby requiring a PTC or surgery).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Florida Hospital | Orlando | Florida | United States | 32814 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- AdventHealth
- Vanderbilt University
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: shyam varadarajulu, MD, Florida Hospital Center for Interventional Endoscopy
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 356090