Ergonomics Training Program to Industrial Workers

Sponsor
Rosimeire Simprini Padula (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03926871
Collaborator
(none)
133
2
6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This quasi-experimental study was performed in poultry processing industry. The study aimed to evaluate the benefits of ergonomic training for novice and experienced workers. Sociodemographic and occupational questionnaires were evaluated, musculoskeletal complaints and pain intensity, perceived occupational effort, biomechanical exposure and perception in adopting the training. Complaints in the cervical, wrist and lumbar region were reduced with training, but the intensity of pain was only reduced in the wrist region. There was a reduction in the occupational biomechanical exposure from pre-training, to the post-immediate, and from pre-training to after 2 months for both beginners and experienced. The group of novice workers differed from those with the highest biomechanical exposure reduction in the cutting room tasks. All workers were benefited by ergonomic training in the short and medium term.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Ergonomic Training
N/A

Detailed Description

The research was submitted to the Local Research Ethics Committee and approved by the number 734.500.

Were included 51 employees from the packing and cutting room sectors. The workers were allocated to Novato and Experienced workers groups. The inclusion criteria for the Novato workers group were to be newly hired (1 to 2 days in the company) and not have previous experience in a poultry processing industry, or butcher's shop. It is to ensure that they did not have prior knowledge of the activity. In the case of the group of experienced workers.

The exclusion criteria were they worked on the task for more than six months and not be absent during the study period (scheduled vacations). Workers who had already received ergonomic training, such as general guidelines and postural adjustments, as well as pregnant women and people with disabilities were excluded.

Outcomes measure

  1. Musculoskeletal Complains and Pain Intensity The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was used to investigate the presence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the last month, using dichotomous responses (yes or no) The visual analogue pain scale evaluated the intensity of symptoms indicating "absence of pain" (0) on one side and the opposite side "unbearable pain" (10 cm) (Carlsson 1982). The QNSO and pain scale were applied in both groups at the baseline, and after 2 months of the ergonomic training program.

  2. Biomechanical Exposure Analysis The analysis of occupational biomechanical exposure occurred through a Poultry processing Check list (PPChecklist) created for the study. The PPChecklist evaluation criteria were based on observational methods for biomechanical exposure analysis, such as the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Strain Index and the Checklist for Musculoskeletal Risk Assessment (RARME).

The analyzes of the video tasks of each worker for the application of the PPChecklist was performed by two independent evaluators (MSD and DPV) with experience in Worker's Health and Ergonomics. The results obtained with the analysis of the biomechanical exposure of each segment (cervical, shoulder, forearm, wrist, hand and spine) were added to obtain a general task risk score for each worker with a variation of the score between 0 -19 points. The higher the score, the greater the biomechanical exposure of the workers.

  1. Perceived effort and Training Perception The effort perceived by workers in pre-training was evaluated by Borg scale ranges from zero (rest / effortless perceived) to ten (very, very heavy / too much, too much effort).

To evaluate the self-perception of the ease / difficulty of following the training guidelines was created a questionnaire.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
133 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Two independents groups (Novice and Experienced). Both groups received ergonomics training in workplace.Two independents groups (Novice and Experienced). Both groups received ergonomics training in workplace.
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The evaluators performed the biomechanical exposure analysis without knowing that the workers were from the novice and experienced group.
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Ergonomics Training Program to Novice and Experienced Workers in Poultry Processing Industry: A Quasi-experimental Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 20, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 17, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 20, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Novices

They received ergonomic training after 1-2 days of hiring to do the work in the cutting room, and packaging sectors. They did not have experience in the refrigerator or butchers, so they had the minimum of information about tasks and risks.

Other: Ergonomic Training
The ergonomic training consisted of an educational program in Ergonomics with a duration of 60 (sixty) minutes divided into a theoretical exposition and videos of the occupational tasks performed by the workers themselves. Theoretical lecture covered topics such as ergonomics, human anatomy, worker health, prevention measures to minimize the risks of musculoskeletal diseases. A better way of performing the work to protect the musculoskeletal system was demonstrated.
Other Names:
  • Postural and Occupational (tasks) training
  • Experimental: Experienced

    They received the same ergonomic training as the newbies, and should have been hired for more than 6 months in the company. In this period they had already acquired patterns of movement and self-protection to accomplish the tasks.

    Other: Ergonomic Training
    The ergonomic training consisted of an educational program in Ergonomics with a duration of 60 (sixty) minutes divided into a theoretical exposition and videos of the occupational tasks performed by the workers themselves. Theoretical lecture covered topics such as ergonomics, human anatomy, worker health, prevention measures to minimize the risks of musculoskeletal diseases. A better way of performing the work to protect the musculoskeletal system was demonstrated.
    Other Names:
  • Postural and Occupational (tasks) training
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change from Musculoskeletal Complains at 2 months [baseline, after two months]

      The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was used to investigate the presence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the last month with dichotomous responses (yes or no)

    2. Change from Pain Intensity at 2 months [baseline, after two months]

      The visual analogue pain scale evaluated the intensity of symptoms indicating "absence of pain" (0) on one side and the opposite side "unbearable pain" (10 cm).

    3. Change from Biomechanical Exposure immediately after the interventional training and after two months [baseline, after 1-2 days, after two months]

      Analysis of the biomechanical exposure of each segment (cervical, shoulder, forearm, wrist, hand and spine) by by an observational method developed for the study with score (0-19 points).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:

    To Novato workers

    • 1 to 2 days in the company

    • Not have previous experience in a frigorifico, or butcher's shop

    • Not have prior knowledge of the activity. To experienced workers

    • Work on the task for more than six months

    • Be present in company during the study period

    Exclusion Criteria:

    For all workers

    • Had already received ergonomic training (general guidelines and postural adjustments)

    • Pregnant women

    • People with disabilities.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Rosimeire Simprini Padula

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Rosimeire Simprini Padula, Adjunt professor, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03926871
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 734.500
    First Posted:
    Apr 25, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 25, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 25, 2019