Efficacy and Safety of APP13007 for Treatment of Inflammation and Pain After Cataract Surgery Including a Corneal Endothelial Cell Sub-study

Sponsor
Formosa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04810962
Collaborator
(none)
370
32
2
15.5
11.6
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This Phase 3 study will evaluate APP13007 in comparison to the matching vehicle placebo in a randomized, parallel-group, double-masked fashion. The subjects will have undergone routine cataract surgery on Day 0 of the study and will be assessed the next day (Post-operative Day; POD1) after uncomplicated surgery for eligibility for randomization to study treatment. The study comprises the Main Study and the Endothelial Cell Sub-study.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: APP13007, 0.05%
  • Drug: Matching Vehicle Placebo for APP13007, 0.05%
Phase 3

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
370 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of APP13007 for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain After Cataract Surgery, Including a Corneal Endothelial Cell Sub-study
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 16, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: APP13007 0.05% BID

1 drop APP13007 0.05% twice daily for 14 days to study (operated) eye

Drug: APP13007, 0.05%
APP13007 eye drop, 0.05%

Placebo Comparator: Matching Vehicle Placebo

1 drop matching vehicle placebo twice daily for 14 days to study (operated) eye

Drug: Matching Vehicle Placebo for APP13007, 0.05%
Matching vehicle placebo eye drop

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy as Assessed by Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Count [Postoperative Day 8 through Postoperative Day 15]

    Proportion of subjects with ACC count = 0 (0 = 0 ACC, 2 = 1-5 ACC, 3 = 6-15 ACC, 4 = 16-30 ACC, 5 = >30 ACC)

  2. Efficacy as Assessed by Ocular Pain Grade [Postoperative Day 4 through Postoperative Day 15]

    Proportion of subjects with Ocular Pain Grade = 0 (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain)

  3. Safety as Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs) [Screening through Postoperative Day 22]

    Incidence of ocular and systemic AEs

  4. Safety as Assessed by Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) [Screening through Postoperative Day 22]

    The visual acuity in each eye is corrected using the pinhole method and the acuity is quantified on a logMAR (minimal angle of resolution) scale using the 'Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study' [ETDRS] charts for right and left eyes.

  5. Safety as Assessed by Ocular Anatomy [Screening through Postoperative Day 22]

    Ocular anatomy is routinely assessed using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy. Ocular tissues are examined at each study visit and any anatomical abnormalities are recorded using standard medical descriptive terminology.

  6. Safety as Assessed by Corneal Endothelial Cell Measurements [Screening through Postoperative Day 85]

    Mean changes in corneal endothelial cell density (units: cells/mm2), percent hexagonality (units: % of cells with hexagonal shape) and coefficient of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells (units: % variation in size between endothelial cells) will be measured from the images obtained using a specular microscope.

  7. Safety as Assessed by Intraocular Pressure (IOP) [Screening through Postoperative Day 22]

    Change from baseline in IOP using the Goldman applanation tonometer to each visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy as Assessed by Anterior Chamber Cell (ACC) Count [Through Postoperative Day15]

    Proportion of subjects with ACC count = 0 (0 = 0 ACC, 2 = 1-5 ACC, 3 = 6-15 ACC, 4 = 16-30 ACC, 5 = >30 ACC)

  2. Efficacy as Assessed by Ocular Pain Grade [Through Postoperative Day 15]

    Proportion of subjects with Ocular Pain Grade = 0 (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain)

  3. Efficacy as Assessed by Anterior Chamber Flare (ACF) [Through Postoperative Day 15]

    Proportion of subjects with ACF Grade = 0 (0 = none; 4 = intense)

  4. Efficacy as Assessed by Anterior Chamber Flare (ACF) [Postoperative Day 8 through Postoperative Day 15]

    Proportion of subjects with ACF Grade = 0 (0 = none; 4 = intense)

  5. Efficacy as Assessed by Anterior Chamber Cell Count (ACC) [Through Postoperative Day 15]

    Mean change in baseline in ACC Grade. Measurement of ACC grade using a slit lamp biomicroscope and a 5 point grading scale (0 = 0 ACC, 2 = 1-5 ACC, 3 = 6-15 ACC, 4 = 16-30 ACC, 5 = >30 ACC)

  6. Efficacy as Assessed by Ocular Pain Grade [Through Postoperative Day 15]

    Mean change in baseline in Ocular Pain Grade. Measurement of Ocular Pain Grade using a slit lamp biomicroscope and a 5 point grading scale (0 = no pain; 4 = severe pain)

  7. Efficacy as Assessed by Anterior Chamber Flare (ACF) [Through Postoperative Day 15]

    Mean change in baseline in ACF Grade. Measurement of ACF using a slit lamp biomicroscope and a 5 point rating scale (0 = none; 4 = intense)

  8. Efficacy as Assessed by Number of Subjects Rescued [Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 22]

    Number of subjects rescued on or prior to each visit and overall

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients 18 years of age or older expected to undergo unilateral uncomplicated cataract extraction via phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in one eye.

  • Have a pin-hole corrected visual acuity without other correction of ≤ 1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the study eye to be operated and contralateral eye as measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at Visit 1.

  • Willing and able to comply with study requirements and visit schedule.

  • Provide signed and dated informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Have a known sensitivity or allergy to clobetasol propionate, corticosteroids, or any of the study medication's components including benzalkonium chloride and soybean lecithin or any routine medication required during cataract surgery or for the conduct of study procedures

  • Have an ACC count > 0 or any evidence of intraocular inflammation (e.g., flare) in either eye at the Screening visit

  • Have a Grade > 0 on the Ocular Pain Assessment in either eye at the Screening visit

Note: Other inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Carrot Eye Center Mesa Arizona United States 85202
2 Cornea and Cataract Consultants of Arizona Phoenix Arizona United States 85032
3 Orange County Ophthalmology Medical Group Garden Grove California United States 92843
4 Premiere Practice Management, LLC Los Angeles California United States 90013
5 LoBue Laser and Eye Medical Center Inc Murrieta California United States 92562
6 Visionary Research Institute Newport Beach California United States 92663
7 North Bay Eye Associates Petaluma California United States 94954
8 Sierra Clinical Trials Research Organization Santa Ana California United States 92705
9 Wolstan and Goldberg Eye Associates Torrance California United States 90505
10 Michael K. Tran, MD, Inc. Westminster California United States 92683
11 Rand Eye Institute Deerfield Beach Florida United States 33064
12 Eye Associates for Fort Myers Fort Myers Florida United States 33901
13 Levenson Eye Associates Jacksonville Florida United States 32204
14 International Research Center Tampa Florida United States 33603
15 Dixon Eye Care Albany Georgia United States 31701
16 Clayton Eye Clinical Research LLC Morrow Georgia United States 30260
17 Chicago Cornea Consultants Hoffman Estates Illinois United States 60169
18 Stiles Eyecare Excellence and Glaucoma Institute, PA Overland Park Kansas United States 66213
19 The Eye Care Center Louisville Kentucky United States 40206
20 Fraser Eye Center Fraser Michigan United States 48026
21 Tauber Eye Center Kansas City Missouri United States 64111
22 Ophthalmology Associates Saint Louis Missouri United States 63131
23 Wellish Vision Institute Las Vegas Nevada United States 89119
24 Metropolitan Eye Research and Surgery Institute Palisades Park New Jersey United States 07650
25 Alterman, Modi and Wolter Poughkeepsie New York United States 12603
26 Cincinnati Eye Institute Cincinnati Ohio United States 45242
27 Eye Care Specialists Kingston Pennsylvania United States 18704
28 Carolina Cataract and Laser Center Ladson South Carolina United States 29456
29 Black Hills Regional Eye Institute Rapid City South Dakota United States 57701
30 Houston Eye Associates Houston Texas United States 77025
31 DCT-Shah Research Institute LLC dba Discovery Clinical Trials Mission Texas United States 78572
32 Round Rock Eye Consultants Round Rock Texas United States 78681

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Formosa Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Formosa Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04810962
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CPN-302
First Posted:
Mar 23, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Mar 16, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 16, 2022