OvM: Olanzapine Versus Midazolam for Agitation

Sponsor
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT03899506
Collaborator
(none)
206
1
28
223.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this research investigation is to conduct a prospective observation of the comparative efficacy of midazolam versus olanzapine for the treatment of acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase

Detailed Description

The goal of this research investigation is to conduct a prospective observation of the comparative efficacy of midazolam versus olanzapine for the treatment of acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department.

In the summer of 2017, the ED implemented a treatment protocol as a quality improvement initiative. The investigators performed observational research on this protocol and identified that haloperidol and ziprasidone were inferior to midazolam and olanzapine for treating agitation in our Department.

The comparison between olanzapine and midazolam, however, was inconclusive. It is possible that this is due to inadequate power, so the question of whether olanzapine or midazolam is superior is still unknown.

Because the department continues to strive to achieve the best care for this patient population, in the Summer of 2018 the ED is going to initiate a second ED treatment protocol of olanzapine and midazolam, based on the results of our 2017 protocol.

All patients requiring chemical sedation for will receive olanzapine as the initial treatment for agitation for 6 weeks, followed by midazolam as the initial treatment for agitation for 6 weeks. These patients will be observed by research staff.

This is a clinical care quality improvement protocol. The clinical protocol is not research. The research component is the observation of this clinical care protocol.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
206 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Prospective Observational Investigation of Olanzapine Versus Midazolam for the Treatment of Acute Undifferentiated Agitation in the Emergency Department
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 18, 2018
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 16, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 16, 2018

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Olanzapine

Patients receiving 10 mg IM Olanzapine per the ED protocol

Drug: Olanzapine
Patients receiving Olanzapine per the ED protocol

Midazolam

Patients receiving 5 mg IM Midazolam per the ED protocol

Drug: Midazolam
Patients receiving Midazolam per the ED protocol

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 15 minutes [15 minutes]

    Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of < 1 at 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 30 minutes [30 minutes]

    Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of < 1 at 30 minutes

  2. Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 60 minutes [60 minutes]

    Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of < 1 at 60 minutes

  3. Proportion of Patients Adequately Sedated at 120 minutes [120 minutes]

    Proportion of patients who achieve an AMSS score of < 1 at 120 minutes

  4. Safety Events [120 minutes]

    Proportion of patients who experience respiratory depression, hypotension, extrapyramidal side effects

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Emergency Department patients

  • Patients 18 years and older

  • Patients with acute undifferentiated agitation requiring chemical sedation at the discretion of the attending emergency physician will be observed.

Patients meeting these criteria who receive medications in the ED will be observed by research staff, evaluating efficacy and safety of the administered medication.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • There are no exclusion criteria per se as this is only observational research. The decision to administer the medication is at the discretion of the physician. Research protocols are only such that we are observing the efficacy and safety, which coincides the quality improvement purposes of this clinical protocol. Patients will be provided an Information Sheet and can opt to have their data removed.

Patients who are prisoners, children, will NOT have their data collected

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55415

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauren Klein, MD, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Lauren Klein, Principal Investigator, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03899506
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HSR #18-4521
First Posted:
Apr 2, 2019
Last Update Posted:
May 13, 2019
Last Verified:
May 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 13, 2019