Safety and Efficacy of Canaloplasty and Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy With Phacoemulsification to Treat Glaucoma and Cataract

Sponsor
Military Institute of Medicine, Poland (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT01726543
Collaborator
(none)
80
1
2
46
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

It is a comparative study of Safety and Efficacy of Canaloplasty and Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined With Phacoemulsification to Treat Glaucoma and Cataract. It is a Randomised, Prospective Study.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Canaloplasty and phacoemulsification
  • Procedure: Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and phacoemulsification
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Canaloplasty and Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined With Phacoemulsification to Treat Glaucoma and Cataract. A Randomised, Prospective Study.
Study Start Date :
Feb 1, 2011
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Canaloplasty and phacoemulsification

Procedure: Canaloplasty and phacoemulsification
As soon as the two scleral flaps (deep and superficial -similar to deep sclerectomy) are dissected, the phacoemulsification is performed and a artificial lense is implanted. After excision of the deep flap the descemets window and ostia of Schlemm canal are created, the microcatheter is placed in the canal and is advanced 12 clock hours within the canal. Surgeon observes the location of beacon tip through sclera and injects the Healon GV. When the catheterisation of the canal is done, the distal tip is exposed and a 10-0 propylene suture is tied to the distal tip. Then the microcatheter is withdrawn and suture is pulled into the canal. As it appears at the other ostium of canal the microcatheter it separated from the suture. A loop is created, encircling the inner wall of Schlemm canal. Then suture loop is tightened to distend the trabecular meshwork inward, placing the tissues in tension, the locking nods are added. The superficial flap is sutured watertight to prevent bleb formation.

Active Comparator: Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and phacoemulsification

Procedure: Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and phacoemulsification
A fornix-based conjunctival flap is dissected superiorly, and the sclera is exposed. A 5 x 5 mm scleral flap is dissected anteriorly into clear cornea using a No. 69 Beaver blade. Then the phacoemulsification procedure is performed and a artificial lense is implanted. Afterwards second deep scleral flap is dissected and excised leaving only a thin layer of deep sclera over the choroid. Anteriorly, the dissection is made down to remove Schlemm's canal and juxtacanalicular trabeculum. Excision of the corneal stroma is performed more anteriorly down to Descemet's membrane. This allows aqueous humor to percolate through the thin trabecular-Descemet's membrane. The superficial scleral flap is then closed with two 10-0 monofilament nylon sutures.The conjunctiva is sutured down over the limbus with one interrupted 10-0 monofilament nylon suture at each corner.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. IOP [Change from Baseline at 24months]

    by Goldman tonometry Primary efficacy outcome-proportion of the population that achieves an IOP of >5 and ≤ 21 mmHg, irrespective of glaucoma medication use. Complete success is defined as achieving the target IOP without use of medications. A qualified success is defined as achieving the target IOP with either no change in medications or a reduction in medication as compared to that used preoperatively.

  2. number of antiglaucoma medications [Change from Baseline at 24months]

  3. visual acuity [Change from Baseline at 24months]

    ETDRS chart

  4. intraoperative complications [surgery day]

    Rates for surgical complications and adverse events

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Secondary procedures [within 24 months]

    Any additional ophtalmic surgical procedures that need to be done within the time frame.

  2. Early and late complications [within 24 months]

    complications and Adverse effects rate

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
21 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • co-existing glaucoma and cataract

  • glaucoma types ( open angle glaucoma,pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pigmentary glaucoma)

  • eye with characteristic glaucoma changes (biomicroscopic,visual field) with IOP

16mmHg on medication or without, or IOP<16mmHg on 2 or more medications.

  • uncontrolled IOP

  • patients not tolerating antiglaucoma medications,

  • patients with poor compliance

  • progression in visual field

Exclusion Criteria:
  • previous surgical glaucoma procedure

  • previous cataract surgery

  • visual function under 0,004

  • closed angle glaucoma

  • poorly controlled diabetes mellitus

  • advanced AMD

  • active inflammatory disease

  • pregnancy

  • mental disease or emotional instability, that could

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Military Institute of Medicine Warsaw Poland 04-141

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Military Institute of Medicine, Poland

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marek Rekas, MD,PhD,Professor, Military Institute of Medicine, Poland

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Marek Rekas, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, Poland
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01726543
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BW1 151/12
  • BW1151/12
First Posted:
Nov 15, 2012
Last Update Posted:
Nov 15, 2012
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2012
Keywords provided by Marek Rekas, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, Poland
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 15, 2012