Pharmacodynamics of Tafluprost 0.0015% Eye Drops: a Comparison Between the Preserved and Unpreserved Formulation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the pharmacodynamics (as expressed in intraocular pressure [IOP]) of two formulations of tafluprost 0.0015% eyedrops (preserved and unpreserved) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
The primary aim of this study is to show that IOP reduction between the two formulations is equivalent at the end of the 4 week treatment period.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tafluprost 0.0015% preserved formulation
|
Drug: Tafluprost 0.0015%
Eye drops, 0.015 mg/ml, once daily to affected eye(s)
|
Experimental: Tafluprost 0.0015% unpreserved formulation
|
Drug: Tafluprost 0.0015%
Eye drops, 0.015 mg/ml, once daily to affected eye(s)
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline [Baseline]
IOPs at baseline: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)
- Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 1 [Week 1]
IOPs at week 1: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)
- Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 4 [Week 4]
IOPs at week 4: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye)
- Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Intention to Treat Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye) [Baseline - Week 4]
Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurements analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model.
- Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Per Protocol Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye) [Baseline - Week 4]
Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurments analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Overall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1 [Baseline - Week 1]
The overall and time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 1 (diurnal IOP and IOP value at given timepoint at 1 week minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model.
- Change From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4 [Baseline - Week 4]
The time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 4 (IOP value at given timepoint at 4 weeks minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age 18 years or more
-
A diagnosis of open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
-
Prior use of prostaglandin(s)
-
Intra ocular pressure of 22-34 mmHg in at least one eye
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Females who are pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy, or females of childbearing potential who are not using a reliable method of contraception
-
Previous participation in any clinical trial in which tafluprost was an investigational drug or use of contact lenses at screening or during the study
-
Presence of any abnormality or significant illness that could be expected to interfere with the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Oulu University Hospital | Oulu | Finland | 90029 | |
2 | Ulrich Richter's surgery | Regensburg | Germany | 93059 | |
3 | Praxis Dr. Hamacher | Starnberg | Germany | 82319 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Santen Oy
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Juhani Airaksinen, Prof., University Hospital of Oulu
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 77550
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | At 2 centers in Germany, 1 center in Finland: 14 September 2005 first patient screened 08 November 2005 first patient randomized 05 April 2006 last patient completed |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | A total of 45 patients screened and 43 patients randomized. 2 screening failure patients: 1 withdrawn consent and 1 too low IOP (inclusion criterion 4). |
Arm/Group Title | Preserved Formulation First, Then Unpreserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation First, Then Preserved Formulation |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Tafluprost 0.0015% preserved formulation once daily for first 4 weeks, then unpreserved formulation (after washout) | Tafluprost 0.0015% unpreserved formulation once daily for first 4 weeks, then preserved formulation (after washout) |
Period Title: First Treatment Period (4 Weeks) | ||
STARTED | 21 | 22 |
COMPLETED | 21 | 21 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 1 |
Period Title: First Treatment Period (4 Weeks) | ||
STARTED | 21 | 21 |
COMPLETED | 21 | 21 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: First Treatment Period (4 Weeks) | ||
STARTED | 21 | 21 |
COMPLETED | 21 | 21 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: First Treatment Period (4 Weeks) | ||
STARTED | 21 | 21 |
COMPLETED | 21 | 21 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Entire Study Population |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Includes all 43 randomized patients (86 eyes) |
Overall Participants | 43 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
65.3
(10.1)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
27
62.8%
|
Male |
16
37.2%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |
Caucasian |
43
100%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Germany |
32
74.4%
|
Finland |
11
25.6%
|
Diagnosis - worse eyes (eyes) [Number] | |
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma |
28
|
Capsular Glaucoma |
3
|
Ocular Hypertension |
12
|
Central corneal thickness (micrometer) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Right eye |
548.7
(42.8)
|
Left eye |
547.0
(45.4)
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Baseline |
---|---|
Description | IOPs at baseline: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye) |
Time Frame | Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
IOPs of all subjects who received preserved/unpreserved formulation |
Arm/Group Title | Preserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tafluprost 0.0015% preserved formulation | tafluprost 0.0015% unpreserved formulation |
Measure Participants | 42 | 43 |
8 o'clock |
22.57
(3.04)
|
22.98
(3.18)
|
12 o'clock |
20.86
(2.79)
|
21.78
(2.68)
|
16 o'clock |
21.73
(3.19)
|
21.51
(2.49)
|
20 o'clock |
21.77
(3.02)
|
21.81
(2.61)
|
Title | Overall and Time-wise Comparisons of IOP at Week 1 |
---|---|
Description | The overall and time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 1 (diurnal IOP and IOP value at given timepoint at 1 week minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model. |
Time Frame | Baseline - Week 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT: randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one pharmacodynamic (IOP) measurement available. |
Arm/Group Title | RM ANCOVA: ITT Efficacy Dataset |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | randomized and received study medication |
Measure Participants | 43 |
Overall |
-0.27
|
Timepoint 8:00 |
-0.32
|
Timepoint 12:00 |
-0.25
|
Timepoint 16:00 |
-0.39
|
Timepoint 20:00 |
-0.13
|
Title | Change From Baseline in Time-wise IOPs at Week 4 |
---|---|
Description | The time-wise, i.e. at 8:00, 12:00, 16:00 and 20:00, comparisons of IOP at week 4 (IOP value at given timepoint at 4 weeks minus corresponding value at baseline: unpreserved-preserved) were done using the RM ANCOVA model. |
Time Frame | Baseline - Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT: randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one pharmacodynamic (IOP) measurement available. |
Arm/Group Title | RM ANCOVA: ITT Efficacy Dataset |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | randomized and received study medication |
Measure Participants | 43 |
Timepoint 8:00 |
0.24
|
Timepoint 12:00 |
0.11
|
Timepoint 16:00 |
0.00
|
Timepoint 20:00 |
-0.30
|
Title | Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 1 |
---|---|
Description | IOPs at week 1: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye) |
Time Frame | Week 1 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
IOPs of all subjects who received preserved/unpreserved formulation |
Arm/Group Title | Preserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tafluprost 0.0015% preserved formulation | tafluprost 0.0015% unpreserved formulation |
Measure Participants | 42 | 43 |
8 o'clock |
16.43
(2.11)
|
16.21
(2.70)
|
12 o'clock |
15.77
(1.60)
|
15.72
(1.92)
|
16 o'clock |
16.23
(1.73)
|
15.83
(1.99)
|
20 o'clock |
16.26
(2.20)
|
16.16
(2.08)
|
Title | Intraocular Pressures (IOPs) at Week 4 |
---|---|
Description | IOPs at week 4: mean IOP values at four timepoints (worse eye) |
Time Frame | Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
IOPs of all subjects who received preserved/unpreserved formulation |
Arm/Group Title | Preserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | tafluprost 0.0015% preserved formulation | tafluprost 0.0015% unpreserved formulation |
Measure Participants | 42 | 43 |
8 o'clock |
16.39
(2.43)
|
16.80
(3.00)
|
12 o'clock |
16.30
(2.46)
|
16.67
(2.54)
|
16 o'clock |
16.64
(2.37)
|
16.71
(2.53)
|
20 o'clock |
17.21
(1.91)
|
17.01
(2.44)
|
Title | Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Intention to Treat Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye) |
---|---|
Description | Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurements analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model. |
Time Frame | Baseline - Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intention To Treat (ITT): randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one pharmacodynamic (IOP) measurement available. |
Arm/Group Title | RM ANCOVA: ITT Efficacy Dataset |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | randomized who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one IOP measurement |
Measure Participants | 43 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [mmHg] |
0.01
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Preserved Formulation |
---|---|---|
Comments | H1 (the alternative hypothesis aimed to be proven): the unpreserved formulation is equivalent with the preserved formulation | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | The equivalence limit was set to 1.5 mmHg. Equivalence was shown if the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference (unpreserved-preserved) lay entirely within the equivalence range (-1.5 mmHg, 1.5 mmHg). Target sample size was 34 evaluable patients (40 randomized), assuming a standard deviation of 3.0 mmHg change in IOP, a power of 80%, an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.60 and a twosided type 1 error rate of 5%. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.96 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Baseline IOP a covariate | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | 0.01 | |
Confidence Interval |
() 95% -0.46 to 0.49 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Analysis model used IOP measurements at four timepoints (at 8, 12, 16 and 20 o'clock) on Baseline and Week 4. |
Title | Primary Pharmacodynamic Variable Per Protocol Efficacy Dataset: Change From Baseline in the Overall Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 4 (Worse Eye) |
---|---|
Description | Overall treatment difference at 4 weeks (unpreserved-preserved) evaluated using a repeated measurments analysis of covariance (RM ANCOVA) model. |
Time Frame | Baseline - Week 4 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Per Protocol (PP): randomized patients who completed the study per protocol (i.e. excluded from PP is the discontinued patient and a patient with major protocol violation) |
Arm/Group Title | RM ANCOVA: PP Efficacy Dataset |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | randomized patients who completed the study per protocol (PP) |
Measure Participants | 41 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [mmHg] |
-0.05
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Preserved Formulation |
---|---|---|
Comments | H1 (the alternative hypothesis aimed to be proven): the unpreserved formulation is equivalent with the preserved formulation | |
Type of Statistical Test | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | |
Comments | The equivalence limit was set to 1.5 mmHg. Equivalence was shown if the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the difference (unpreserved-preserved) lay entirely within the equivalence range (-1.5 mmHg, 1.5 mmHg). Target sample size was 34 evaluable patients (40 randomized), assuming a standard deviation of 3.0 mmHg change in IOP, a power of 80%, an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.60 and a twosided type I error rate of 5%. | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.83 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANCOVA | |
Comments | Baseline IOP a covariate | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Median Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.05 | |
Confidence Interval |
() 95% -0.52 to 0.42 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | Analysis model used IOP measurements at four timepoints (at 8, 12, 16 and 20 o'clock) on Baseline and Week 4 |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Adverse event data was collected at Week 1 and Week 4 visits of treatment period I and II, as well as on last Post-study visit. Additionally, baseline symptoms were queried on Day 0 (=Baseline) visit of the two treatment periods. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Patients were asked about ocular or non-ocular symptoms with a non-leading question, or they volunteered the information during a study visit. Also, any clinically significant signs observed by the investigator could be recorded as adverse events. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Preserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation | ||
Arm/Group Description | Tafluprost 0.0015% preserved formulation once daily for 4 weeks | Tafluprost 0.0015% unpreserved formulation once daily for first 4 weeks | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Preserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Preserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/42 (0%) | 0/43 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Preserved Formulation | Unpreserved Formulation | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 7/42 (16.7%) | 11/43 (25.6%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Conjunctival hyperemia | 2/42 (4.8%) | 2 | 6/43 (14%) | 6 |
Ocular hyperemia | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 2/43 (4.7%) | 2 |
Erythema of eyelid | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Eye pruritus | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Foreign body sensation | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Anterior chamber cell | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Blepharitis | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Eye pain | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Lacrimation increased | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Punctate keratitis | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Vision blurred | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 0/43 (0%) | 0 |
Asthenopia | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Conjunctival haemorrhage | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Dry eye | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Nausea | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 0/43 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Superficial injury of eye | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 0/43 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Pain in extremity | 0/42 (0%) | 0 | 1/43 (2.3%) | 1 |
Osteoporosis | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 0/43 (0%) | 0 |
Tendonitis | 1/42 (2.4%) | 1 | 0/43 (0%) | 0 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The sponsor respects the investigators' wish to publish results of the study, and will not unnecessarily restrict the spreading of information of scientific interest. However, the study may involve confidential information affecting the company's business, such as aspects related to patent application. Therefore, the investigators agree to allow the sponsor to review any manuscripts and to negotiate timing and forum of publication.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Auli Ropo |
---|---|
Organization | Santen Oy |
Phone | +358405012416 |
auli.ropo@santen.fi |
- 77550