Efficacy and Safety of XEN® Gel Stent and Post-operative Management in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative management with 5-fluorouracil injections after XEN Gel Stent implantation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: stand-alone procedure of XEN implantation in phakic eyes
|
Drug: 5-fluorouracil
5-fluorouracil subconjunctival injections were a first-choice therapy for bleb failure and were administered according to predetermined criteria.
Procedure: Transconjunctival needling
Transconjunctival needling was administered according to predetermined criteria.
Procedure: Transconjunctival revision
Transconjunctival revision was administered according to predetermined criteria.
|
Active Comparator: stand-alone procedure of XEN implantation in pseudophakic eyes
|
Drug: 5-fluorouracil
5-fluorouracil subconjunctival injections were a first-choice therapy for bleb failure and were administered according to predetermined criteria.
Procedure: Transconjunctival needling
Transconjunctival needling was administered according to predetermined criteria.
Procedure: Transconjunctival revision
Transconjunctival revision was administered according to predetermined criteria.
|
Active Comparator: XEN implantation combined with cataract extraction
|
Drug: 5-fluorouracil
5-fluorouracil subconjunctival injections were a first-choice therapy for bleb failure and were administered according to predetermined criteria.
Procedure: Transconjunctival needling
Transconjunctival needling was administered according to predetermined criteria.
Procedure: Transconjunctival revision
Transconjunctival revision was administered according to predetermined criteria.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Unqualified success [5 years]
Unqualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP <18 mmHg and >20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved without use of any antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Qualified success score A [5 years]
Qualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP <21 mmHg and >20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.
- Qualified success score B [5 years]
Qualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP < 18 mmHg and >20% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.
- Qualified success score C [5 years]
Qualified success of glaucoma treatment, defined as a postoperative IOP ≤15 mmHg and >40% reduction compared with the baseline value, achieved with or without use of antiglaucoma medication and with no detected glaucoma progression as assessed at the final follow-up visit.
Other Outcome Measures
- Glaucoma Progression [5 years]
Glaucoma progression was evaluated with the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson Glaucoma Grading Scale (GGS). Staging according to the standards given in bibliography (Budenz et all in 2002)
- Change in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) [5 years]
Difference in thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer during the observation time frame.
- Change in thickness of ganglion cell complex (GCC) [5 years]
Difference in thickness of ganglion cell complex during the observation time frame.
- Short term changes in IOP after surgery [5 years]
Evaluated with the use of water drinking test.
- Refractive error [5 years]
Change in refractive error after glaucoma procedures
- Best-corrected visual acuity [5 years]
Evaluated on the fixed charts by trained optometrist
- Visual field (VF) [5 years]
Detection of the visual field abnormalities on the standard machine and during screening procedures
- Disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) [5 years]
Evaluation disc damage likelihood scale based on the fundus photographs
- Peripapillar and macular vessels density [5 years]
Measured on the custom-derived protocol and manufacturer software macular and peripapillar vessels density - Angio OCT (OCTA)
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma
-
trabecular meshwork visible in gonioscopy
-
medicated IOP of ≥ 15 mmHg and ≤ 35 mmHg
-
taking 1 to 5 IOP-lowering medications
-
area of healthy, free and mobile conjunctiva in the target quadrant (superior-nasal)
-
signed inform consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
angle closure glaucoma
-
secondary open angle glaucoma
-
previous glaucoma shunt/valve in the target quadrant
-
presence of conjunctival scarring, prior conjunctival surgery or other conjunctival pathologies (e.g., pterygium) in the target quadrant
-
active inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, uveitis)
-
active iris neovascularization or neovascularization of the iris within 6 months of the surgical date
-
anterior chamber intraocular lens
-
presence of intraocular silicone oil
-
vitreous present in the anterior chamber
-
impaired episcleral venous drainage (e.g., Sturge-Weber or nanophthalmos or other evidence of elevated venous pressure)
-
known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to drugs required for the surgical procedure or any of the device components (e.g., porcine products or glutaraldehyde)
-
history of dermatologic keloid formation
-
previous photorefractive keratectomy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Department of Ophthalmology | Wrocław | Poland | 54-622 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Wroclaw Medical University
- Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Investigators
- Study Chair: Marta Misiuk-Hojło, Professor, Medical University of Wrocław
- Principal Investigator: Ewa Wałek, Medical University of Wrocław
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;120(9):1136-41.
- Susanna R Jr, Vessani RM. Staging glaucoma patient: why and how? Open Ophthalmol J. 2009 Sep 17;3:59-64. doi: 10.2174/1874364100903020059.
- STM.C240.17.037