Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: CTN 0069
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of (1) Implementation Facilitation (IF) on rates of provision of Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) treatment with referral for ongoing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and the (2) effectiveness of IF on patient engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The study uses a Hybrid Type 3 Effectiveness-Implementation framework and a modified stepped wedge design. The study will be conducted at four EDs with a high prevalence of patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD). The four sites will receive the same sequence of evaluations and interventions: the baseline evaluation period after the standard dissemination practice, the IF phase, and continuation of facilitation into the IF evaluation period. The timing of initiation of the study activities at each site will be randomly offset by ~ 3 month increments to accommodate logistical constraints of simultaneous implementation at all sites. The study populations will include (1) ED providers and staff involved in the treatment of patients with OUD; (2) Community opioid treatment provider and program staff involved in providing care for patients with OUD referred from the ED; and (3) ED patients with moderate to severe OUD.
Exploratory analyses have been added to assess the impact of COVID-19 and social distancing guidance on drug use and drug supply; access to medications for opioid use disorder; and COVID19 disease from the perspectives of patient participants and ED leadership.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Evidenced-based Practice Dissemination Evaluating standard dissemination practice compared with implementation facilitation |
Other: Standard Dissemination Practice
Emergency department provider education using a grand rounds format. The content of the lecture will cover the scope of the opioid problem, ED specific facts related to the epidemic, potential models of intervention including the results of publications outlining the efficacy of ED-initiated BUP.
Other: Implementation Facilitation (IF)
IF involves a "formative evaluation" to identify the specific and dynamic needs of stakeholders and the context for implementation of evidence-based practices. This evaluation informs the initial tailoring and refinement of the IF, which includes a bundle of services tailored to meet site-specific needs, such as identifying and engaging local stakeholders, providing extensive ongoing education, tailoring program to the site and monitoring performance and offering feedback.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Implementation (Considered the Primary Outcome) [12 months]
The primary implementation outcome will be evaluated assessing the rate of ED-initiated BUP therapy with referral for ongoing MAT over the 12 month period.
- Effectiveness [30 Days Post Enrollment]
The primary effectiveness outcome is defined as the rates of patient engagement in formal addiction treatment on the 30th day post enrollment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Implementation: Fidelity [Baseline Period (Baseline)]
Fidelity will be measured using a critical action checklist relating to the provision of ED-initiated BUP with referral for ongoing MAT in eligible patients.
- Implementation: Fidelity [IF Evaluation Period (18 months)]
Fidelity will be measured using a critical action checklist relating to the provision of ED-initiated BUP with referral for ongoing MAT in eligible patients.
- Implementation: ED provider Readiness and Preparedness Ruler Score [Pre IF (Baseline)]
ED provider readiness and preparedness ruler score to initiate BUP and provide referral for ongoing MAT
- Implementation: ED provider Readiness and Preparedness Ruler Score [Post IF (6 months)]
ED provider readiness and preparedness ruler score to initiate BUP and provide referral for ongoing MAT
- Implementation: ED provider Readiness and Preparedness Ruler Score [post IF Evaluation Period (12 months)]
ED provider readiness and preparedness ruler score to initiate BUP and provide referral for ongoing MAT
- Implementation: ED Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) Score [Pre IF (Baseline)]
ED ORCA score relating to ED-initiated BUP with referral for ongoing MAT
- Implementation: ED Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) Score [Post IF (6 months)]
ED ORCA score relating to ED-initiated BUP with referral for ongoing MAT
- Implementation: ED Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) Score [Post IF Evaluation Period (12 months)]
ED ORCA score relating to ED-initiated BUP with referral for ongoing MAT
- Implementation: Community Readiness and Preparedness Ruler Score [Pre IF (Baseline)]
Community opioid treatment provider/program readiness and preparedness ruler score to continue MAT for patients with OUD who have received ED-initiated BUP
- Implementation: Community Readiness and Preparedness Ruler Score [Post IF (6 months)]
Community opioid treatment provider/program readiness and preparedness ruler score to continue MAT for patients with OUD who have received ED-initiated BUP
- Implementation: Community Readiness and Preparedness Ruler Score [post IF Evaluation Period (12 months)]
Community opioid treatment provider/program readiness and preparedness ruler score to continue MAT for patients with OUD who have received ED-initiated BUP
- Implementation: Community ORCA Score [Pre IF (Baseline)]
Community opioid treatment provider/program ORCA score relating to receiving patients with OUD who have received ED-initiated BUP
- Implementation: Community ORCA Score [Post IF (6 months)]
Community opioid treatment provider/program ORCA score relating to receiving patients with OUD who have received ED-initiated BUP
- Implementation: Community ORCA Score [post IF Evaluation Period (12 months)]
Community opioid treatment provider/program ORCA score relating to receiving patients with OUD who have received ED-initiated BUP
- Effectiveness: Opioid Use [30 days post enrollment]
Self-reported days of illicit opioid use (past 7 days) as measured by Time-Line Follow-Back methods at 30 days
- Effectiveness: Overdose Event [30 days post enrollment]
Overdose event (past 30 days) captured by participant self-report, state medical examiner records, National Death Index and review of medical records
- Effectiveness: HIV Risk [30 days post enrollment]
HIV risk taking behaviors (past 30 days) as measured by HIV Risk Taking Behavior Scale
- Effectiveness: Healthcare Service Utilization [30 days post enrollment]
All Healthcare Service Utilization Inpatient and Outpatient
- Effectiveness: Illicit Opioid Urine Toxicology [30 days post enrollment]
Rates of illicit opioid negative urines
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are treated in the ED during study screening hours with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD and provide an opioid positive urine sample will be eligible to participate.
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients who test positive for fentanyl only are not eligible due to lack of uniformly available rapid urine tests.
-
Patients will be excluded if they have a medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization at the index ED visit, are acutely suicidal or severely cognitively impaired precluding informed consent, present from an extended care facility, require continued prescription opioids for a pain condition, are a prisoner or in police custody at time of index ED visit, are currently (past 30 days) enrolled in formal addiction treatment including by court order, are unable to provide 2 contact numbers, are unwilling to follow study procedures, have been previously enrolled in the current study or do not speak English.
ED and Community Participants Inclusion Criteria:
- ED and community providers and administrators (i.e. physicians, residents, fellows, nursing, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, social workers, counselors, administrative directors, office-based physicians and opioid treatment program representatives) as well as ED patients with OUD.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | 21287 |
2 | The Mount Sinai Hospital | New York | New York | United States | 10029 |
3 | Weill Cornell Medical College | New York | New York | United States | 10065 |
4 | University of Cincinnati Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States | 45219 |
5 | Harborview Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98104 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Yale University
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- The Emmes Company, LLC
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gail D'Onofrio, MD, MS, Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
- Principal Investigator: David A Fiellin, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- 1611018631
- 5UG1DA015831-15