Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Mouth Wash(Glister Mouth Wash): Pilot Study

Sponsor
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05644236
Collaborator
(none)
86
1
1
3.1
27.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to examine the efficacy of mouthwash containing 0.045% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) on oral health-related parameters] in [healthy conditions].

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
  • [ Trial 1: effect of immediate-use mouthwash containing CPC vs. non-CPC]

  • [Trial 2: effect of concentrated-use mouthwash containing CPC vs. non-CPC] Participants will be treated by mouth wash 3 times a day for 4-weeks If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare CPC containing mouthwash group and sham mouthwash groups treated with non CPC-containing mouthwash to see the effect of CPC on plaque index, mouth smell, gingival index and tongue coating index.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: mouthwash
N/A

Detailed Description

2.1. Participants In all, 100 subjects were recruited to this clinical study according to the following inclusion criteria: i) Healthy male or female; ii) presence of >20 existing teeth (the number of remaining teeth); iii) no severe pathological soft tissue conditions, periodontitis, or extensive dental plaque; iv) Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (PI) of over 1.5 and Loe & Silness Gingival Index (GI) of over 1.5; vi) able to perform oral care/hygiene tasks on his/her own; vii) voluntary participation; and viii) willing to comply with the test protocol. Participants were excluded if they had any kind of visible or known disease requiring prophylactic antibiotic use.

2.2. Study design This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial, and the intervention was gargling with the OR twice daily. The participants were randomly divided into four groups: control 1 (C1) (n=19), immediate-use CPC (IUC) (n=16), control 2 (C2) (n=19), and concentrated-use CPC (CUC) groups (n=19). Both C1 and C2 received ORs without CPC, whereas the experimental groups IUC and CUC received CPC ORs of different formulations (Amway Korea Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle and the per-protocol (PP) approach. ITT aims to assess the experimental design and PP analysis investigates the effect of receiving an assigned treatment. The participants underwent dental scaling before starting the intervention. Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Research Ethics Review Board, Yonsei University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (IRBN CR321058) 2.3. Intervention After obtaining baseline information and randomizing the participants into two groups, dental scaling was performed, followed by clinical treatment. The participants were instructed to gargle twice daily for 7 days. All the participants were instructed not to eat or drink anything for at least 4 hours before the experiment. Oral hygiene, such as gargling and tooth brushing, was prohibited for 8 hours before the visit.

2.4. Measurment of H2S and methyl mercaptan, Quigley-Hein plaque index, Gingival Index,Tongue Coating Index.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
86 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Masking Description:
Mouthwah solution was provided by sponsor who packed experimental and control solution in the bottle. Investigator and participants did not know the contents during treatment period.
Primary Purpose:
Screening
Official Title:
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Mouth Wash(Glister Mouth Wash): Pilot Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 27, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Nov 30, 2021
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: experimental group

CPC-containing mouthwash solution

Other: mouthwash
After obtaining baseline information and randomizing the participants into two groups, dental scaling was performed, followed by clinical treatment. The participants were instructed to gargle twice daily for 7 days. All the participants were instructed not to eat or drink anything for at least 4 hours before the experiment. Oral hygiene, such as gargling and tooth brushing, was prohibited for 8 hrs before the visit.
Other Names:
  • Glister mouthwash
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. hydrogen sulfide(H2S) and methyl mercaptan(CH3SH) [4 weeks]

      in the pretreatment versus post-treatment comparisons of the groups, levels of H2S (p < 0.01) and CH3SH (p < 0.01) were reduced significantly in cpc-containing mouthwash group (immediate-use and concentrated-use mouthwash) comparing non-CPC containing sham mouthwash.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Quigley-Hein plaque index [4 weeks]

      the PI had decreased in all groups (Figure 3A). However, the IUC group showed significant antiplaque effects compared with the C1 group (p < 0.05). Improvement in periodontal health was seen 14 days after treatment, which was not observed in the CUC group (Figure 3B). Since OR without CPC also improved periodontal health, we further examined the group on day 28 of the trial. In addition, after 28 days, the CUC group showed antiplaque effects (p < 0.05). Overall, the IUC showed superior antiplaque activity and faster periodontal health-promoting effects than the CUC and control formulations.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Gingival index [4 weeks]

      the highest increase in gingival health was observed 28 days after IUC administration (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). Similar to the results for the PI, we did not observe significant changes in the gingival health of the C1 and C2 groups. As expected, gingival health improved significantly in the CUC group compared to in the C2 group, which was observed on study days 14 and 28 (Figure 4B).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Healthy male or female;

    • presence of >20 existing teeth (the number of remaining teeth);

    • no severe pathological soft tissue conditions, periodontitis, or extensive dental plaque;

    • Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (PI) of over 1.5 and Loe & Silness Gingival Index (GI) of over 1.5; • able to perform oral care/hygiene tasks on his/her own;

    • voluntary participation; and viii) willing to comply with the test protocol.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • They excluded if they had any kind of visible or known disease requiring prophylactic antibiotic use.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Wonju Severance Christian Hospital Wonju Ganwon-do Korea, Republic of 26426

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Kyu-Jae Lee, Ph.D., Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Republic of Korea

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Kyu Jae Lee, Professor, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05644236
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EMB-2020-02
    • 2020-51-0447
    First Posted:
    Dec 9, 2022
    Last Update Posted:
    Dec 9, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Nov 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Kyu Jae Lee, Professor, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Dec 9, 2022