Comparison Between a Standard Tube and the Ultra-thin Tritube for Intubation of the Trachea and for Maintaining Access to the Trachea After Anaesthesia, in Patients With an Expected Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy

Sponsor
Michael Seltz Kristensen (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03653039
Collaborator
(none)
48
1
2
5.6
8.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators compare the ease of intubation between a new ultra-thin endotracheal tube, "Tritube", and a standard endotracheal tube in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. Furthermore the investigators compare the acceptance of leaving the Tritube in trachea after end of anaesthesia, with the use of a tube exchange catheter.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Tritube
  • Device: Standard enditracheal tube
N/A

Detailed Description

In patients scheduled for surgery and anaesthesia in the Head-/neck/ear/nose/throat -region the investigators compare the ease of tracheal intubation between a new ultra-thin endotracheal tube, "Tritube", and a standard endotracheal tube in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy. The intubation is performed with an angulated video laryngoscope.

Furthermore the investigators compare the acceptance of leaving the Tritube in trachea after end of anaesthesia, with the use of a tube exchange catheter. The latter continues into the post-operative recovery-ward.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
48 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomised controlledRandomised controlled
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
Sammenligning Mellem Standard Tube og Den Ultra-tynde Tritube® Til Intubation, og Til Opretholdelse af Adgang Til Trachea Efter anæstesi, Hos Patienter Med Forventet Vanskelig Direkte Laryngoskopi
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 12, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2019
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Tritube

Device: Tritube
The ultra thin tribute is used used for the ventilation of the patients in this arm

Active Comparator: Standard endotracheal tube

Device: Standard enditracheal tube
A standard endotracheal tube is used used for the ventilation of the patients in this arm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of Excellent intubation conditions [2 hours]

    Rate of Excellent intubation conditions judged on the scale excellent/good/fair/poor

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. The rate of interruption by the tube of the view to the vocal cords at any time, to such a degree that it disturbs the intubation [2 hours]

  2. The Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS) [2 hours]

    The intubation difficulty scale , range 0 to 7, 0 indicates easy intubation, 1 - 5 indicates slight difficulty, 5< indicates moderate to major difficulty

  3. Time to intubated [2 hours]

    Time from the tube is advanced past the vocal cords until the cuff is inflated in the trachea

  4. Time to the patient becomes ventilated via the tube [2 hours]

    Time from the tube is advanced past the vocal cords until the cuff is inflated in the trachea and CO2 waveform is observed

  5. Number of intubation attempts [2 hours]

    one attempt is every-time the tube is advanced past the incisors

  6. The rate of succesful intubation with 60 seconds [1 minute]

  7. Number of remodellings of the stilette [2 hours]

  8. rate of use for "reverse loading" of the tube on the stylet [2 hours]

  9. the "percent of glottic opening" , (POGO), Before the tube is inserted [2 hours]

  10. the"percent of glottic opening" , POGO, with the tube in place [2 hors]

  11. Intubation conditions Strom scale [2 hours]

    Direction of the tube-stylet combination excellent/good/poor, easy/fair/difficult. Advancement of the tube-stylet combination excellent/good/poor easy/fair/difficult

  12. The surgeons score of the space and working conditions in the mouth/pharynx and larynx after intubation [2 hours]

  13. The difference between ET CO2 and arterial blood-gas CO2 after 15 minutes of surgery [20 minutes]

  14. the duration of the Tritube being in the trachea after return of spontaneous ventilation and deflation of the cuff /(Tritube group) [4 hours]

  15. The duration of the tube-exchange catheter being in the trachea after its placement / (Tube-exchange-catheter group) [4 hours]

  16. The ration of patients who still has the Tritube or the tube-exchange-catheter in place when arriving in the post-operative recovery unit [4 hours]

  17. The ration of patients who still has the Tritube or the tube-exchange-catheter in place one hour after arrival in the Post anaesthesia care unit the post-operative recovery unit [4 hours]

  18. The patient's satisfaction with having the Tritube or the tube-exchange-catheter in place when being awake in the Post anaesthesia care unit [4 hours]

    Visual analog scale from 1-10, 1= no nuisance, 10= unberable

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients for anaesthesia for surgery in the Head-/neck/ear/nose/throat

  • planned for oral intubation with video-laryngoscopy

  • with risk factors for difficult direct laryngoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient with increased secretions in the airway (Pneumonia, bronchitis, productive cough)

  • Patients planned for awake intubation

  • Patients where mask-ventilation is judged to could become impossible

  • Patients where access to the cricothyroid membrane is judged to be difficult or impossible

  • Patients in ASA (american Society of Anaesthesiologists) physical classification status >3

  • Patients who are scheduled for rapid sequence induction (RSI) due to risk of aspiration

  • Patients with stridor

  • Patients with hypoxemia (Saturation < 90 % in room air)

  • Operation duration planned to > 2.5 hours

  • Patients with the need for a nerve-stimulation-tube during surgery

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Rigshospitalet, section for anaesthesia for ENT and Maxillofacial surgery, section 3071 Copenhagen Denmark 2100

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Michael Seltz Kristensen

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Kristensen, MD, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen Denmark

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Michael Seltz Kristensen, Principal Investigator, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03653039
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • H-18023689 Tritube
First Posted:
Aug 31, 2018
Last Update Posted:
Jan 7, 2019
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2019
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 7, 2019