Effectiveness of Insignia ™ Versus Standard Orthodontic Treatment With Damon Q Brackets

Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01268852
Collaborator
(none)
180
1
2
53.9
3.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The hypotheses tested in this study are: There is a statistical significant difference, in treatment duration and result of treatment in cases treated using traditional Damon Q brackets or using Insignia.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Damon self ligating orthodontic bracket
  • Device: Insignia self ligating orthodontic bracket
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
180 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Compare treatment between two appliance systemsCompare treatment between two appliance systems
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Masking was done with generated cmputer randomisation and sealed opaque enveloppes
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effectiveness of Insignia ™ Versus Standard Orthodontic Treatment With Damon Q Brackets
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2015

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Damon

Standard self ligating orthodontic Damon brackets

Device: Damon self ligating orthodontic bracket
Orthodontic treatment with Damon self ligating bracket

Experimental: Insignia

Innovative self ligating orthodontic bracket

Device: Insignia self ligating orthodontic bracket
Orthodontic treatment with Insignia self ligating bracket

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Total treatment duration [treatment duration]

    duration assesed from start treatment to the removal of appliances

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Quality of treatment [at start of treatment wand when finished treatment]

    Using one quality grading system: PAR-index

  2. Difference between the planning and the outcome of treatment of the Insignia cases [at start of treatment]

    time in minutes with planning the treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
12 Years to 30 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Healthy subjects, both male and female

  • No cleft lip or palate or other craniofacial anomalies

  • Treatment with full fixed orthodontic appliances is indicated

  • Complete permanent dentition except for upper second and all third molars

  • Class I, Class II or Class III first molar relationship )1/2 pb or less off)

  • No previous orthodontic treatment

  • Age between 12 and 30 years of age

  • Study models and lateral cephalograms taken not more than 1 month before selection

  • Informed consent signed by patients and parents

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Cleft lip and palate and craniofacial anomalies

  • Syndromes affecting bone (formation) or teeth

  • Agenesis of teeth

  • Missing first molars

  • No bridges or implants

  • Orthognathic cases

  • History of periodontal disease

  • Intake of drugs affecting tooth movement and/or bone formation

  • Pregnancy

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology Nijmegen Gelderland Netherlands 6500HB

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Radboud University Medical Center

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hero Breuning, Radboud university Medical centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Radboud University Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01268852
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • Insignia versus Damon Q
First Posted:
Dec 31, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Feb 17, 2017
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2016

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 17, 2017