A Study to Compare Meloxicam IM Once Daily and Meloxicam Administered Orally Once Daily in Patients With Osteoarthritis

Sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00239395
Collaborator
(none)
168
8
5
21
4.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of 7.5 mg meloxicam i.m. once daily compared with 7.5 mg meloxicam tablets once daily p.o. in patients with osteoarthritis over a time period of 7 days.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Meloxicam ampoule
  • Drug: Meloxicam tablet
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This was a randomized (1:1), open-label, multi-center, active-control, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of 7.5 mg meloxicam i.m. once daily compared with 7.5 mg meloxicam tablets once daily p.o. in patients with osteoarthritis over a time period of 7 days.

The primary endpoint: Pain on active movement,

The secondary endpoint:
  • Pain at rest

  • Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition assessed by the patient/investigator

  • Patient's assessment of arthritic condition

  • Onset of action

  • Time to maximum pain relief

  • Paracetamol consumption

  • Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy

  • Final global assessment of efficacy by the patient/investigator

Safety endpoints

  • Local tolerability assessment of the injections by the patient/investigator

  • Patient's /Investigator's assessment of overall tolerability

  • Number, nature and severity of adverse events

  • Laboratory investigations

  • Withdrawals due to safety reasons

Patients eligible for the trial who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and who gave their informed consent were randomized to one of two treatment groups (i.e. meloxicam ampoule or meloxicam tablet).

The study period totaled 8-14 days included screening, randomisation, study drug administration, and 7-day follow-up. The relevant assessment were performed on the day of randomisation and 7-day follow up.

Study Hypothesis:

The null hypothesis of interest is that the primary endpoint for meloxicam ampoule is inferior to oral meloxicam. The alternative is that meloxicam ampoule is noninferior to the oral meloxicam .

Comparison(s):

The primary endpoint of the study was to assess pain on active movement by VAS prior and after the treatment.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomised, Open-labelled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Meloxicam 7.5 mg IM Ampoules Once Daily and Meloxicam 7.5 mg Tablets Administered Orally Once Daily Over a Period of 7 Days in Patients With Osteoarthritis (OA)
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2004
Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2004

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain on active movement by VAS. [day 0, day 7]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain at rest [up to 7 days]

  2. Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition [up to 7 days]

  3. Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy [up to 7 days]

  4. Onset of Analgesic action [up to 7 days]

  5. Time to maximum pain relief [up to 7 days]

  6. Paracetamol consumption [up to 7 days]

  7. Final global assessment of efficacy by patient [up to 7 days]

  8. Final global assessment of efficacy by investigator [up to 7 days]

  9. Assessment of local tolerability [up to 7 days]

  10. Nature and severity of adverse events [up to 7 days]

  11. Change in other laboratory investigations [up to 7 days]

  12. Withdrawals due to safety reasons [up to 7 days]

  13. Patient's and investigator's assessment of overall tolerability [up to 7 days]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or female aged 18 years or above

  • Patients suffering from acute and painful exacerbation of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

The diagnosis must be based on

  • clinical signs and symptoms or

  • x-ray diagnosis plus clinical signs and symptoms

  • Assessment of pain on active movement (by the patient) must exceed 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)

  • Symptoms of OA requiring administration of NSAIDs

  • Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to the trial drugs or their excipients, analgesics, antipyretics or NSAIDs

  • Any clinical evidence of active peptic ulceration during the last six months

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding (precaution : attention should be drawn to reports that NSAIDs were reported to decrease the effectivity of intrauterine devices)

  • Asthma, nasal polyps, angioneurotic oedema or urticaria following the administration of aspirin or NSAIDs

  • Concomitant treatment with anti-coagulants (including heparin), lithium

  • Concomitant administration of other NSAIDs or analgesic agents (except paracetamol up to 4g/day)

  • Administration of any NSAID during the last 2 days (3 days for any oxicam) prior to the first administration of the trial drug

  • Concomitant treatment with an oral corticosteroid initiated or with an altered dose over the previous month

  • Parenteral or intraarticular administration of corticosteroids in the previous month

  • Any i.m. injection during the previous 7 days

  • Any contra-indication to i.m. injections

  • Clinical evidence of or known severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, metabolic, haematological disease, mental disturbance, ulcerative colitis

  • Any other rheumatological or non-rheumatological disease that could interfere with the evaluation of efficacy and safety

  • Serum creatinine 125 % of the upper limit of normal range ; aspartate transferase (AST/SGOT) and/or alkaline transferase (ALT/SGPT) 200 % of the upper limit of normal range

  • Platelet count < 100,000/mm3 ; leucocytes count < 3,000/mm3

  • Synovectomy in the previous month or during the trial

  • Participation in another clinical trial during this study or during the previous month

  • Previous participation in this trial

  • Patient unable to comply with the protocol

  • Concomitant therapy with specific symptomatic drug of OA, such as chondroitin sulphate, diacerhein, initiated or with an altered dose over the previous 3 months.

  • Intraarticular administration of hyaluronic acid in the previous month

  • Patients where physiotherapy will be changed throughout the study

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 People's Hospital, Beijing University Beijing China 100044
2 Beijing Xuan Wu Hospital Beijing China 100050
3 1st Affiliated, Anhui Medical University Hefei City, Anhui Province China 230022
4 Qilu Hospital, Shang Dong University Nan City China 250012
5 Shanghai Renji Hospital Shanghai China 200001
6 Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital Shanghai China 200032
7 Shanghai Guanghai Hospital Shanghai China 200052
8 Shanghai Changhai Hospital Shanghai China 200443

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Boehringer Ingelheim

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator, Boehringer Ingelheim Shanghai

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
, ,
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00239395
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 107.265
First Posted:
Oct 17, 2005
Last Update Posted:
Nov 1, 2013
Last Verified:
Oct 1, 2013
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 1, 2013