Influence of Femoral Head Size During Total Hip Arthroplasty on Gait

Sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04521842
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
56
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Total hip replacement (THR) is being considered as one of the most effective medical procedures. Since its introduction, there was a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. The diameter of used femoral heads components grew throughout the years - from 22 mm in the 1960s to 32 mm in the 2000s, which is the most commonly used size nowadays. In recent years there was a visible use of large femoral heads (>=36mm) in several registers. In the USA there was a significant grow in use of this heads rising from 1% in early 200s to even 58% in 2009. There is a strong evidence data and many researchers concerning range of movement, risk of dislocation, functional results, pain and prosthesis wear depending of femoral head size.

In terms of gait characteristics there are several deviations reported concerning both patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and following THR. There is a lack of literature concerning influence of used implants on gait parameters and whether this goal of the surgery can be achieved.

The aim of this study was to assess potential differences of lower limb biomechanics during gait in patients following total hip replacement surgery depending on femoral head diameter and compare them to the normal gait of healthy volunteers. As a secondary outcome authors wanted to inspect correlation between gait parameters and patient-reported outcome.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Total hip replacement
N/A

Detailed Description

Total hip replacement (THR) is being considered as one of the most effective medical procedures. Since its introduction, there was a worldwide debate over proper implant selection in terms of size, bearing type and shape. The diameter of used femoral heads components grew throughout the years - from 22 mm in the 1960s to 32 mm in the 2000s, which is the most commonly used size nowadays. In recent years there was a visible use of large femoral heads (>=36mm) in several registers. In the USA there was a significant grow in use of this heads rising from 1% in early 200s to even 58% in 2009. There is a strong evidence data and many researchers concerning range of movement, risk of dislocation, functional results, pain and prosthesis wear depending of femoral head size.

In terms of gait characteristics there are several deviations reported concerning both patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and following THR. It is well-proven that those with hip OA have reduced stride length and reduced cadence, reduced gait velocity, and reduced joint excursion. Patients after THR walk with lower hip-abduction moments, sagittal-plane range of motion. It is believed that it might be a consequence of pain-avoidance mechanism developed as an adaptation for joint disease, which is still present after the surgery. What is more, there are publications, which underline that lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following THR.

However there is a lack of literature concerning influence of used implants on gait parameters and whether this goal of the surgery can be achieved.

According to authors best knowledge this study is the first to ever describe potential differences in gait parameters between THR performed with standard femoral heads (28-32mm) and large ones (>=36mm).

Aim of the study The aim of this study was to assess potential differences of lower limb biomechanics during gait in patients following total hip replacement surgery depending on femoral head diameter and compare them to the normal gait of healthy volunteers. As a secondary outcome authors wanted to inspect correlation between gait parameters and patient-reported outcome.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Patients qualified to undergo total hip arthroplasty due to the end-stage osteoarthritis will be randomly allocated to receive either standard femoral head size implants nor large ones. Pre- and postoperatively they will undergo gait analysis. To avoid risk of bias assessor will be blinded in terms of used implants in every participants case.Patients qualified to undergo total hip arthroplasty due to the end-stage osteoarthritis will be randomly allocated to receive either standard femoral head size implants nor large ones. Pre- and postoperatively they will undergo gait analysis. To avoid risk of bias assessor will be blinded in terms of used implants in every participants case.
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Influence of Large Head vs Standard Size During Total Hip Arthroplasty on Gait Analysis - Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Standard size femoral head implant

Participants qualified to undergo total hip replacement who will receive standard femoral head size implant

Procedure: Total hip replacement
Total hip replacement in treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis

Active Comparator: Large size femoral head

Participants qualified to undergo total hip replacement who will receive large femoral head size implant

Procedure: Total hip replacement
Total hip replacement in treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Time of swing phase [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline part of swing phase time during gait, measured in percentage

  2. Time of stance phase [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline part of stance phase time during gait, measured in percentage

  3. Time of double-stance phase [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline part of double-stance phase time during gait, measured in percentage

  4. Stride length [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline length of stride during gait, measured in meters

  5. Cadence [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline number of strides per minute of walking

  6. Mean gait velocity [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline mean values of gait speed, measured in meters per second

  7. Range of maximal hip extension for both limbs during ending part of mid-stance phase [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline range of maximal hip extension for both limbs during ending part of mid-stance phase, measured in degrees

  8. Range of pelvic drop in frontal plane on the opposite site of the bearing limb [at least 3,5 years after surgery]

    Change from baseline range of pelvic drop in frontal plane on the opposite site of the bearing limb, measured in degrees

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • BMI <35

  • Ability to walk for 10 meters

  • 60-80 years of age

  • Bilateral THR

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Revision surgeries before and after THR

  • Any other lower limbs surgeries

  • Secondary OA

  • Neurological disorders

  • Cardiac disorders

  • Severly impaired balance

  • Severe dizziness

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Medical University of Warsaw

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bartosz M. MaciÄ…g, MD, Medical University of Warsaw

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Medical University of Warsaw
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04521842
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • WarsawMU/Head
First Posted:
Aug 21, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Oct 14, 2021
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Medical University of Warsaw
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Oct 14, 2021