ITIC: A Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled X-Ray Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of SD-6010 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Sponsor
Pfizer (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00565812
Collaborator
(none)
1,457
183
3
48
8
0.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this 2-year study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and disease modifying efficacy of SD 6010, an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), in overweight and obese subjects with knee osteoarthritis. The efficacy of SD-6010 will be evaluated by radiography using joint space narrowing in the medial tibiofemoral compartment of the study knee as the primary endpoint.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
1457 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Long-Term, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Radiographic Study To Investigate The Safety And Efficacy Of Orally Administered SD-6010 In Subjects With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Of The Knee
Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2011
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: 200 mg

High dose active comparator

Drug: SD-6010
200 mg tablets once a day for 2 years

Active Comparator: 50 mg

Low dose active comparator

Drug: SD-6010
50 mg tablets once a day for 2 years

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Placebo comparator to be used for control purposes

Drug: Placebo
Placebo tablets once a day for 2 years

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing [Baseline up to Month 24]

    Rate of progression of joint space narrowing (JSN) was defined as narrowing in joint space width (JSW) over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in millimeter per year (mm/year) over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. Negative values indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.

  2. Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2 [Baseline up to Month 24]

    Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.

  3. Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3 [Baseline up to Month 24]

    Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Composite Index Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The WOMAC was a self-administered, disease-specific instrument which probed clinically important, participant relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness, and physical function in participants with OA of the knee. The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 [minimum] to 4 [maximum], higher score indicating worse knee condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.

  2. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The WOMAC pain subscale was comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse pain. An overall subscale score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more pain.

  3. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Stiffness Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease in which the participant moved the knee with OA. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.

  4. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The WOMAC physical function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

  5. Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritic Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    Pain VAS was a self-administered instrument, a 100 millimeter (mm) line marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 (mm) =no pain to 100 (mm) =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.

  6. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1 =very good, 2 =good, 3 =fair, 4 =poor and 5 =very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.

  7. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    Physician assessed the overall impact of arthritis on the participant's daily life. Participant's condition was rated by the physician using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1= very good, 2= good, 3= fair, 4= poor and 5= very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.

  8. Change From Baseline in Pain After a 50-foot Walk Using Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The pain VAS following a 50 foot walk was a single-item, self-administered instrument. Participants were asked to assess the pain due to OA in their study knee after a 50-foot walk. Participants responded on a VAS scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). Higher scores indicating more pain.

  9. Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Total Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The OA pain and assessment tool-knee joint is also known as the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) scale. The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint was an 11-item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was calculated by adding the 11 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health.

  10. Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Constant Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint constant pain subscale was a 5 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 5 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse constant pain.

  11. Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Intermittent Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint intermittent pain subscale score a 6 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 6 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse intermittent pain.

  12. Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Knee Function Survey Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The OARSI knee function survey was an 11-item scale with each item scored 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was the sum of the 11 items and ranged from 0 (minimum) to 44 (maximum), where higher scores indicating worse health condition.

  13. Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    The KOOS-PS was used to rate participant's opinions about the difficulties they experienced with activity due to problems with their knee. It was a 7-item scale, each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Total score was calculated by adding the responses to 7 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health condition.

  14. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.18 (minimum) to 57.11 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical functioning.

  15. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role - Physical Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 18.45 (minimum) to 56.62 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-physical.

  16. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 19.23 (minimum) to 60.88 (maximum), with higher scores indicating lower bodily pain.

  17. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 General Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.75 (minimum) to 63.72 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better general health.

  18. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Vitality Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.02 (minimum) to 69.92 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better vitality.

  19. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Social Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 13.38 (minimum) to 56.40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better social functioning.

  20. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role-Emotional Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 10.25 (minimum) to 55.68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-emotional.

  21. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 8.02 (minimum) to 63.43 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.

  22. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Physical Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.88 (minimum) to 58.69 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical health.

  23. Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24 [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 11.11 (minimum) to 61.67 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.

  24. Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) Mobility Domain Score [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D mobility domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problem), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (confined to bed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D mobility domain score were reported in this measure.

  25. Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Self-Care Domain Score [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D self-care domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems with self-care), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (unable to wash or dress). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D self-care domain score were reported in this measure.

  26. Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Usual Activity Domain Score [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D usual activity domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health state (unable to perform usual activities). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D usual activity domain score were reported in this measure.

  27. Number of Participants With EuroQo-5D Pain and Discomfort Domain Score [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no pain and discomfort), 2 =moderate health (moderate pain and discomfort) and 3 =worst health state (extreme pain and discomfort). Higher scores indicated worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score were reported in this measure.

  28. Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Anxiety and Depression Domain Score [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (not anxious, depressed), 2 =moderate health (moderately anxious, depressed) and 3 =worst health (extremely anxious, depressed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score were reported in this measure.

  29. EuroQoL-5D Visual Analog Scale Score [Baseline, Month 12, 24]

    The EQ-5D VAS score was a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. It was a visual analogue scale that ranged from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with higher scores indicating a better health condition.

  30. Number of Participants With Increase in Total Analgesic Medication Use [Month 12, 24]

    Increase in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of an increased and sustained use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.

  31. Number of Participants With Decrease in Total Analgesic Medication Use [Month 12, 24]

    Decrease in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of a decreased and irregular use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.

  32. Patient Global Impression of Change Score [Month 24]

    Patient global impression of change was a participant-rated instrument that measured change in participant's overall status on a 7-point scale ranging from: 1 =very much improved, 2 =much improved, 3 =minimally improved, 4 =no change, 5 =minimally worse, 6 =much worse and 7 =very much worse. Higher scores indicating worse condition.

  33. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index [Month 24]

    The OMERACT-OARSI responder index was used to determine whether participants may be considered responders to treatment. An OMERACT-OARSI responder was a participant who had a better response on the WOMAC pain subscale score, a better response on the WOMAC physical function subscale score or improvement on at least two of the three domains: WOMAC pain subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) and patient global assessment of arthritic condition score (overall score range of 1 [minimum] to 5 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse condition). Number of participants who were OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this measure.

  34. Number of Participants With Joint Space Narrowing Progression [Month 24]

    JSN progressor was defined as a participant with a decrease in joint space width that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference (0.199 mm).

  35. Number of Participants Applicable for Virtual Joint Replacement [Month 24]

    A virtual joint replacement candidate was defined as a participant whose last two WOMAC pain subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain) were at least 8, last two WOMAC physical function subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) were at least 28 and was a joint space narrowing progressor (a participant with a decrease in JSW that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference =0.199 mm).

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Baseline up to 7-10 days after last dose of study drug (Week 111)]

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 7-10 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Adverse events included both serious and non-serious adverse events.

  2. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities [Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24]

    Atrial (enlargement, fibrillation, premature beat), axis deviation, atrioventricular (accelerated conduction, first/second degree block), left anterior and posterior hemiblock, left atrial hypertrophy, left and right (complete/incomplete bundle branch block, ventricular hypertrophy), QRS (high/low voltage, nonspecific, prolongation greater than [>]140 milliseconds [msec]), junctional/paced rhythm, intraventricular conduction delay (>120 msec), early repolarization, ventricular premature contraction and beat, prolonged QTC, sinus (arrhythmia, bradycardia/tachycardia), supraventricular extra systole and premature beat, short PR syndrome. Abnormal Q-wave (>=30 msec), P-wave left/right atrial abnormality, T-wave flattened/inverted abnormality, U-wave abnormality, ST-T indeterminate abnormality, ST-T nonspecific changes, ST-T changes compatible with ischemia and pericarditis. ECG findings were judged by investigators for qualitative evaluation of abnormalities.

  3. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities [Baseline up to Week 111]

    Criteria for laboratory abnormalities: Hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (hct), red blood cell(RBC) count: less than(<)0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelet: <0.5*LLN or greater than (>)1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell (WBC): <0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN, lymphocyte, neutrophil:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophil, eosinophil, monocyte:>1.2*ULN; total bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gammaglutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase:> 3.0*ULN, total protein, albumin: <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:>1.3*ULN, uric acid >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate: <0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN, phosphate <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN, lipase >1.5*ULN; urine (specific gravity <1.003 or >1.030, pH <4.5 or >8, glucose, ketones, protein, blood/Hgb greater than or equal to [>=]1); pancreatic amylase >1.5*ULN.

  4. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96]

    Blood pressure (BP) was measured by sphygmomanometer while participant was in supine position. Conditions were kept constant from visit to visit including observer, participant's same arm, cuff size, supine position, location, temperature, noise level. The same size BP cuff which was properly sized and calibrated, was used to measure BP each time.

  5. Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96]

    BP was measured by sphygmomanometer while participant was in supine position. Conditions were kept constant from visit to visit including observer, participant's same arm, cuff size, supine position, location, temperature, noise level. The same size BP cuff which was properly sized and calibrated, was used to measure BP each time.

  6. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
40 Years to 99 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Subjects aged >= 40 years with a BMI >= 25 and <= 40 kg/m2

  • In the past, has been diagnosed with knee OA

  • Radiographic evidence of OA in the study knee

Exclusion Criteria:
  • A diagnosis of any other rheumatic disease

  • Current conditions in the study knee that would confound efficacy

  • Selected, traditional clinical safety and laboratory parameters

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Brookwood Internists, P.C. Birmingham Alabama United States 35209
2 Greystone Medical Center Birmingham Alabama United States 35242
3 Pivotal Research Centers Peoria Arizona United States 85381
4 Arizona Research Center Phoenix Arizona United States 85023
5 Pivotal Research Centers Phoenix Arizona United States 85027
6 University of Arizona Tucson Arizona United States 85724
7 Martin Bowen Hefley Orthopedics Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
8 Teton Research, LLC Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
9 Med Center Carmichael California United States 95608
10 College Hospital Costa Mesa Costa Mesa California United States 92627
11 NeuroNetwork Trials Costa Mesa California United States 92627
12 Med Investigations, Inc. Fair Oaks California United States 95628
13 Sierra Clinical Research Roseville California United States 95661
14 University of California Davis Health System Sacramento California United States 95817
15 University of California Davis Sacramento California United States 95817
16 Scripps Clinic-Clinical Research San Diego California United States 92128
17 Plaza Medical Imaging Santa Ana California United States 92704
18 Denver Internal Medicine Group Denver Colorado United States 80209
19 Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc. Denver Colorado United States 80209
20 New West Physicians Clinical Research Golden Colorado United States 80401
21 Advanced Radiology Consultants Fairfield Connecticut United States 06824
22 Advanced Radiology Consultants Stamford Connecticut United States 06902
23 Stamford Therapeutics Consortium Stamford Connecticut United States 06905
24 New England Research Associates, LLC Trumbull Connecticut United States 06611
25 Southeastern Arthritis Center Gainesville Florida United States 32607
26 Southeastern Imaging & Diagnostics Gainesville Florida United States 32607
27 Southeastern Integrated Medical, PL, d/b/a Florida Medical Research Institute Gainesville Florida United States 32607
28 Jacksonville Center for Clincal Research Jacksonville Florida United States 32216
29 Memorial Hospital Jacksonville Jacksonville Florida United States 32216
30 Gold Coast Research, LLC Plantation Florida United States 33317
31 Marin E. Hale, M.D., P.A. Plantation Florida United States 33317
32 Sabiha Khan, M.D. Plantation Florida United States 33324
33 Kanner, Mendelson, Shteinman, LLC West Palm Beach Florida United States 33407
34 Radiant Research West Palm Beach Florida United States 33407
35 Rheumatology and Endocrinology Specialists of the Palm Beaches, P.A. West Palm Beach Florida United States 33407
36 North Georgia Clinical Research Marietta Georgia United States 30060
37 North Georgia Clinical Research Woodstock Georgia United States 30189
38 East-West Medical Research Institute Honolulu Hawaii United States 96814
39 Preventive Medicine Chicago Illinois United States 60611
40 Rehabilitation Institue of Chicago Chicago Illinois United States 60611
41 NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston Illinois United States 60201
42 NorthShore University HealthSystem Glenview Illinois United States 60025
43 Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc. Gurnee Illinois United States 60031
44 Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, LLC Morton Grove Illinois United States 60053
45 The Arthritis Center Springfield Illinois United States 62704
46 NorthShore University HealthSystem Vernon Hills Illinois United States 60061
47 Ronald Keith Stegemoller, American Health Network Avon Indiana United States 46123
48 Floyd Memorial Hospital New Albany Indiana United States 47150
49 Heartland Research Associates, LLC Wichita Kansas United States 67205
50 Family Medicine East, Chartered/Radiology Wichita Kansas United States 67207
51 Heartland Research Associates, LLC Wichita Kansas United States 67207
52 Office of Manoj Kohli, M.D. Lexington Kentucky United States 40517
53 L-MARC Research Center Louisville Kentucky United States 40213
54 Commonwealth Biomedical Research, LLC Madisonville Kentucky United States 42431
55 TFD Research, LLC Shreveport Louisiana United States 71115
56 Rheumatology Associates Portland Maine United States 04102
57 The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research Rockville Maryland United States 20850
58 The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research Wheaton Maryland United States 20902
59 Miray Medical Center Brockton Massachusetts United States 02301
60 Phase III Clinical Research Fall River Massachusetts United States 02720
61 Fall River Clinical Research Fall River Massachusetts United States 02721
62 HCI Metromedic Walk-In New Bedford Massachusetts United States 02740
63 MedVadis Research Corporation Wellesley Hills Massachusetts United States 02481-2106
64 Fallon Clinic, Inc. (Drug Shipment) Worcester Massachusetts United States 01605
65 Fallon Clinic, Inc. Worcester Massachusetts United States 01605
66 Cadillac Clinical Research, LLC, located at Great Lakes Family Care Cadillac Michigan United States 49601
67 Arthritis and Osteoporosis Treatment and Research Center Flowood Mississippi United States 39232
68 Planters Clinic Port Gibson Mississippi United States 39150
69 North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc. Tupelo Mississippi United States 38801
70 Mercy Medical Group/Woodlake Research Clarkson Valley Missouri United States 63011
71 Dynamic Clinical Research, Inc. Kansas City Missouri United States 64114
72 Joan Prouty Moore, MD Kansas City Missouri United States 64114
73 Orthopaedic and Occupational Medicine Kansas City Missouri United States 64114
74 The Center for Pharmaceutical Research, P.C. Kansas City Missouri United States 64114
75 Affiliated Clinical Research, Inc. Las Vegas Nevada United States 89106
76 Office of Michael Mall, M.D. Las Vegas Nevada United States 89109
77 Nevada Imaging Centers Las Vegas Nevada United States 89117
78 Nevada Imaging Centers Las Vegas Nevada United States 89118
79 Office of Danka Michaels, MD Las Vegas Nevada United States 89128
80 Office of Stephen H. Miller, MD Las Vegas Nevada United States 89144
81 Regional Clinical Research, Inc. Endwell New York United States 13760
82 NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases New York New York United States 10003
83 VirtualScopics, Inc. Rochester New York United States 14625
84 Crouse Medical Practice, PLLC d/b/a Internist Associates of Central New York Syracuse New York United States 13210
85 Kernodle Clinic Inc. Burlington North Carolina United States 27215
86 Southeastern Radiology Greensboro North Carolina United States 27407
87 PharmQuest Greensboro North Carolina United States 27408
88 Research Institute of the Carolinas, PLLC Mooresville North Carolina United States 28117
89 PMG Research of Salisbury Salisbury North Carolina United States 28144
90 Piedmont Healthcare/Research Statesville North Carolina United States 28625
91 Carolina Arthritis Associates, PA Wilmington North Carolina United States 28401
92 PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC Wilmington North Carolina United States 28401
93 Internal Medicine Associates Fargo North Dakota United States 58103
94 Lillestol Research, LLC Fargo North Dakota United States 58103
95 Advantage Diagnostics Beachwood Ohio United States 44122
96 Rapid Medical Research, Inc. Cleveland Ohio United States 44122
97 Columbus Clinical Research, Inc. Columbus Ohio United States 43213
98 Optimed Research, LLC Columbus Ohio United States 43235
99 Lake Health Lyndhurst Clinic Lyndhurst Ohio United States 44124
100 East Penn Rheumatology Associates, PC Bethlehem Pennsylvania United States 18015
101 Altoona Center for Clinical Research Duncansville Pennsylvania United States 16635
102 BioImaging Technologies, Inc. Newtown Pennsylvania United States 18940
103 Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island Pawtucket Rhode Island United States 02860
104 Rheumatology Associates Charleston South Carolina United States 29407
105 Radiant Research, Inc. Greer South Carolina United States 29651
106 Parkway Medical Group Fayetteville Tennessee United States 37334
107 Holston Medical Group Kingsport Tennessee United States 37660
108 D. Matthew Sellers MD PC Knoxville Tennessee United States 37920
109 Southwind Medical Specialists Memphis Tennessee United States 38125
110 Baylor Research Institute Dallas Texas United States 75231
111 Metroplex Clinical Research Center Dallas Texas United States 75231
112 Radiant Research San Antonio Northeast San Antonio Texas United States 78217
113 South Texas Radiology Imaging Center San Antonio Texas United States 78217
114 Oakwell Clinical Research, LLC San Antonio Texas United States 78218
115 Pivotal Research Centers Midvale Utah United States 84047
116 National Clinical Research - Norfolk, Inc. Norfolk Virginia United States 23502
117 National Clinical Research, Incorporated Richmond Virginia United States 23294
118 Advanced Pain Management Virginia Beach Virginia United States 23454
119 Tacoma Center for Arthritis Research, PS Tacoma Washington United States 98405
120 Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc. Kenosha Wisconsin United States 53142
121 OMI - Organización Médica de Investigación Buenos Aires Argentina C1013AAR
122 Saint Dennis Medical Group S.A. Buenos Aires Argentina C1034ACO
123 Investigaciones Reumatológicas y Osteológicas S.R.L. Buenos Aires Argentina C1114AAH
124 Instituto Médico Especializado (IME) Buenos Aires Argentina C1405BCH
125 IMAI Research Buenos Aires Argentina C1425AWC
126 Menzies Research Institute Hobart Tasmania Australia 7000
127 Cliniques Universitaires St Luc Bruxelles Belgium 1200
128 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg / Rheumatology Leuven Belgium 3000
129 Rheumatology Research Associates Ltd. Edmonton Alberta Canada T5M 0H4
130 Nexus Clinic Research St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada A1A 5E8
131 The Arthritis Program Research Group Inc. Newmarket Ontario Canada L3Y 3R7
132 Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis Sainte-Foy Quebec Canada G1W 4R4
133 Revmacentrum MUDr. Mostera, s.r.o. Brno - Zidenice Czech Republic 615 00
134 Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne Brno Czech Republic 656 91
135 MEDIPONT Plus, s.r.o. Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic 370 01
136 MEDIPONT, s.r.o. Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic 370 01
137 ARTMEDI UPD s r.o. Hostivice Czech Republic 253 01
138 DC Mediscan Praha 11 - Chodov Czech Republic 148 00
139 MediCentrum Praha, a.s. Praha 11 - Chodov Czech Republic 148 00
140 Nemocnice Na Frantisku s poliklinikou Praha 1 Czech Republic 11000
141 Revmatologicky ustav Praha 2 Czech Republic 128 50
142 Centrum pro zdravotnicke zabezpeceni sportovni reprezentace Praha 6 Czech Republic 162 00
143 Ustredni vojenska nemocnice Praha Praha 6 Czech Republic 162 00
144 MSI - Muskuloskeletalni institut Praha 6 Czech Republic 169 00
145 Nemocnice Atlas, a.s. Zlin Czech Republic 760 01
146 PV-Medical s.r.o. Zlin Czech Republic 760 01
147 Praxis fuer Orthopaedie, Chirotherapie und Akupunktur Bad Hersfeld Germany 36251
148 Praxis fuer Orthopaedie Berlin Germany 12247
149 Klinische Forschung Berlin-Buch Berlin Germany 13125
150 Praxis Dr. Thomas Jung Deggingen Germany 73326
151 Klinische Forschung Schwerin Schwerin Germany 19055
152 Orszagos Gerincgyogyaszati Kozpont Budapest Hungary 1126
153 Synexus Magyarorszag Kft. Budapest Hungary H-1036
154 Heves Megyei Onkormanyzat Markhot Ferenc Korhaz Eger Hungary 3300
155 Bekes Megyei Kepviselo-testulet Pandy Kalman Korhaz, Reumatologia Gyula Hungary 5700
156 Selye Janos Korhaz, Reumatologiai Szakrendelo Komarom Hungary 2900
157 MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet Szolnok Hungary H-5000
158 Veszprem Megyei Onkormanyzat Csolnoky Ferenc Korhaz-Rendelointezet Veszprem Hungary H-8200
159 Azienda Sanitaria Genovese, Ospedale La Colletta, Dipartimento Apparato Locomotore Arenzano Italy 16011
160 Presidio Ospedaliero Augusto Murri, Reparto di Reumatologia Jesi (Ancona) Italy 60035
161 Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Azienda Ospedaliera Polo Universitario Unita' Operativa di Reumatologia Milano Italy 20157
162 Centro Empresarial - Altavista Polo 4 Santiago de Surco Lima Peru Lima 33
163 Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproducción & Cirugia Minimamente Invasiva Santiago de Surco Lima Peru Lima 33
164 Hospital Nacional "Alberto Sabogal Sologuren" - Essalud Callao Peru Callao-02
165 Clínica San Felipe Lima Peru L-11
166 Hospital Nacional "Edgardo Rebagliati Martins" - Essalud Lima Peru L-11
167 Instituto Peruano del Hueso y la Articulación SAC. Lima Peru L-27
168 Hospital Maria Auxiliadora Lima Peru L-29
169 Centro Medico Corpac Lima Peru Lima-27
170 NSZOZ "MEDICUS II" S.C. Irena Klimczak, Malgorzata Klimczak, Jerzy Klimczak Cieszyn Poland 43-400
171 "SYNEXUS SCM" Sp. z o.o. Wroclaw Poland 50-088
172 Katedra i Klinika Ortopedii i Traumatologii Narzadu Ruchu Wroclaw Poland 50-556
173 Russian State Medical University, Moscow Faculty, City Clinical Hospital #4 Moscow Russian Federation 115093
174 Institute of Rheumatology Moscow Russian Federation 115522
175 City Alexandrovskaya Hospital St. Petersburg Russian Federation 193312
176 L.G. Sokolov Clinical Hospital #122 of Federal Medical-Biology Agency of Russia, Central Polyclinic St. Petersburg Russian Federation 194291
177 Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedy Named After R. R. Vredena St. Petersburg Russian Federation 195427
178 V. Interna klinika FN a LF UK Bratislava Slovakia 826 06
179 Ivan Ujvari Bratislava Slovakia
180 Narodny ustav reumatickych chorob Piestany Slovakia 921 12
181 Hospital Ntra. Sra. de La Esperanza Santiago de Compostela A Coruña Spain 15705
182 Hospital General Universitario de Guadalajara Guadalajara Spain 19002
183 Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme Sevilla Spain 41014

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Pfizer

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00565812
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • A6171016
  • 2007-001457-26
  • ITIC
First Posted:
Nov 30, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Dec 30, 2016
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2016
Keywords provided by Pfizer
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail A total of 5077 participants were screened in the study, out of which only 1457 participants were randomized.
Arm/Group Title SD-6010 50 Milligram (mg) SD-6010 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 485 486 486
COMPLETED 341 351 356
NOT COMPLETED 144 135 130

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title SD-6010 50 Milligram (mg) SD-6010 200 mg Placebo Total
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 485 486 486 1457
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
61.0
(8.7)
60.8
(8.6)
61.3
(9.1)
61.0
(8.8)
Gender (Count of Participants)
Female
383
79%
367
75.5%
364
74.9%
1114
76.5%
Male
102
21%
119
24.5%
122
25.1%
343
23.5%

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing
Description Rate of progression of joint space narrowing (JSN) was defined as narrowing in joint space width (JSW) over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in millimeter per year (mm/year) over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. Negative values indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Time Frame Baseline up to Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'number of participants analyzed' (N) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 422 428 434
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm/year]
-0.101
(0.346)
-0.125
(0.298)
-0.109
(0.261)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Slopes, 95 percent confidence interval (CI), P-values: Random coefficients mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with random intercept and slope for each participant,fixed effects for treatment group,time (years),treatment group*time interaction,(collapsed)Kellgren and Lawrence Grades (KLG), KLG*time interaction,geographic region,gender,age,body mass index with unstructured covariance matrix for random effects. Statistical hypothesis used Hochberg procedure with 2-sided alpha =0.0499.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.508770
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in Slopes
Estimated Value 0.012
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.023 to 0.046
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.018
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Slopes, 95 percent CI, P-values: MMRM with random intercept and slope for each participant, fixed effects for treatment group, time (years), treatment group*time interaction, (collapsed) KLG, KLG*time interaction, geographic region, gender, age, body mass index with unstructured covariance matrix for random effects. Statistical hypothesis used Hochberg procedure with 2-sided alpha=0.0499.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.754074
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in Slopes
Estimated Value 0.005
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.029 to 0.040
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.017
Estimation Comments
2. Primary Outcome
Title Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2
Description Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Time Frame Baseline up to Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants with KLG <=2 and evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 184 172 194
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm/year]
-0.061
(0.335)
-0.069
(0.254)
-0.075
(0.221)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Slopes, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a random coefficients MMRM with random intercept and slope for each participant, and fixed effects for treatment group, time (years), a treatment group*time (years) interaction, geographic region, gender, age, and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix for the random effects.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.312
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in slopes
Estimated Value 0.023
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.022 to 0.067
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.023
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Slopes, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a random coefficients MMRM with random intercept and slope for each participant, and fixed effects for treatment group, time (years), a treatment group*time (years) interaction, geographic region, gender, age, and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix for the random effects.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.327
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in slopes
Estimated Value 0.022
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.022 to 0.067
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.023
Estimation Comments
3. Primary Outcome
Title Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3
Description Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Time Frame Baseline up to Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants with KLG =3 and evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 238 256 240
Mean (Standard Deviation) [mm/year]
-0.133
(0.352)
-0.162
(0.319)
-0.136
(0.286)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Slopes, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a random coefficients MMRM with random intercept and slope for each participant, and fixed effects for treatment group, time (years), a treatment group*time (years) interaction, geographic region, gender, age, and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix for the random effects.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.881
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in slopes
Estimated Value 0.004
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.046 to 0.054
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.026
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Slopes, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a random coefficients MMRM with random intercept and slope for each participant, and fixed effects for treatment group, time (years), a treatment group*time (years) interaction, geographic region, gender, age, and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix for the random effects.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.780
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Difference in slopes
Estimated Value -0.007
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.056 to 0.042
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.025
Estimation Comments
4. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Composite Index Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The WOMAC was a self-administered, disease-specific instrument which probed clinically important, participant relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness, and physical function in participants with OA of the knee. The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 [minimum] to 4 [maximum], higher score indicating worse knee condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 481)
39.07
(18.85)
37.29
(17.98)
38.45
(18.91)
Change at Month 3 (n =449, 450, 455)
-5.35
(14.73)
-5.08
(13.14)
-5.50
(13.59)
Change at Month 6 (n =424, 426, 433)
-7.20
(15.99)
-5.84
(15.15)
-7.07
(15.62)
Change at Month 12 (n =370, 388, 397)
-9.17
(18.19)
-9.25
(15.82)
-9.84
(15.75)
Change at Month 18 (n =344, 361, 357)
-9.91
(17.98)
-8.35
(16.87)
-8.82
(18.00)
Change at Month 24 (n =336, 339, 349)
-10.85
(18.49)
-10.98
(17.62)
-10.49
(17.26)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.639
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.40
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.26 to 2.05
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.84
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.957
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.61 to 1.70
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.84
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.893
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.76 to 2.01
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.96
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.365
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.01 to 2.76
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.96
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.678
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.44
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.63 to 2.51
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.05
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.902
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.18 to 1.93
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.05
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.577
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.64
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.89 to 1.61
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.15
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.980
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.26 to 2.21
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.14
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.950
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.37 to 2.23
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.17
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.292
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.53 to 1.06
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.17
Estimation Comments
5. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The WOMAC pain subscale was comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse pain. An overall subscale score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =482, 484, 483)
7.96
(3.94)
7.44
(3.87)
7.59
(4.03)
Change at Month 3 (n =451, 453, 458)
-1.32
(3.41)
-1.23
(3.19)
-1.25
(3.15)
Change at Month 6 (n =426, 429, 435)
-1.73
(3.73)
-1.42
(3.58)
-1.59
(3.45)
Change at Month 12 (n =372, 389, 398)
-2.17
(4.25)
-2.10
(3.66)
-2.08
(3.47)
Change at Month 18 (n =347, 363, 359)
-2.24
(4.16)
-2.00
(3.93)
-1.86
(3.88)
Change at Month 24 (n =337, 342, 351)
-2.48
(4.02)
-2.23
(4.16)
-2.19
(3.79)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group* visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.683
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.30 to 0.46
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.19
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.853
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.42 to 0.35
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.19
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group* visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.938
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.41 to 0.44
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.22
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.648
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.32 to 0.52
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.22
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.916
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.49 to 0.44
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.24
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.528
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.15
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.60 to 0.31
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.23
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.365
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.73 to 0.27
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.25
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.328
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.25
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.74 to 0.25
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.25
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.540
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.16
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.66 to 0.35
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.26
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.423
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.21
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.71 to 0.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.26
Estimation Comments
6. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Stiffness Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease in which the participant moved the knee with OA. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 484, 482)
3.48
(1.80)
3.33
(1.78)
3.44
(1.77)
Change at Month 3 (n =449, 455, 456)
-0.52
(1.67)
-0.51
(1.58)
-0.51
(1.58)
Change at Month 6 (n =425, 429, 434)
-0.67
(1.70)
-0.56
(1.78)
-0.62
(1.73)
Change at Month 12 (n =371, 389, 397)
-0.89
(1.89)
-0.79
(1.83)
-0.95
(1.78)
Change at Month 18 (n =346, 363, 358)
-0.88
(1.86)
-0.87
(1.88)
-0.82
(1.82)
Change at Month 24 (n =336, 342, 349)
-0.94
(1.95)
-1.10
(1.95)
-0.95
(1.92)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.904
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.17 to 0.20
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.09
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.582
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.24 to 0.13
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.09
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.818
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.22 to 0.18
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.10
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group x visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG x visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.988
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.00
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.20 to 0.20
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.10
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.857
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.20 to 0.24
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.658
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.17 to 0.27
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.612
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.28 to 0.17
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.391
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.32 to 0.13
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 1.000
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.00
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.24 to 0.24
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.086
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.21
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.45 to 0.03
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.12
Estimation Comments
7. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The WOMAC physical function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 482)
27.63
(13.88)
26.49
(13.18)
27.39
(13.81)
Change at Month 3 (n =449, 452, 456)
-3.50
(10.77)
-3.24
(9.71)
-3.72
(9.99)
Change at Month 6 (n =424, 426, 434)
-4.78
(11.73)
-3.86
(10.81)
-4.82
(11.43)
Change at Month 12 (n =370, 388, 398)
-6.09
(13.21)
-6.37
(11.34)
-6.79
(11.55)
Change at Month 18 (n =344, 361, 358)
-6.74
(12.95)
-5.49
(12.05)
-6.12
(13.22)
Change at Month 24 (n =336, 339, 350)
-7.42
(13.47)
-7.65
(12.37)
-7.35
(12.54)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.586
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.88 to 1.55
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.789
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.17
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.05 to 1.38
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.821
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.16
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.21 to 1.52
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.69
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.294
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.73
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.63 to 2.09
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.69
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.532
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.48
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.02 to 1.97
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.76
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.938
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.55 to 1.43
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.76
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.680
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.97 to 1.29
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.83
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.730
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.33 to 1.90
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.82
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.901
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.55 to 1.76
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.84
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.333
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.81
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.45 to 0.83
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.84
Estimation Comments
8. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritic Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description Pain VAS was a self-administered instrument, a 100 millimeter (mm) line marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 (mm) =no pain to 100 (mm) =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =478, 479, 482)
40.19
(24.77)
37.59
(24.26)
39.37
(23.91)
Change at Month 3 (n =446, 448, 455)
-7.21
(25.49)
-7.02
(23.45)
-9.12
(21.72)
Change at Month 6 (n =422, 424, 435)
-10.13
(24.91)
-7.92
(24.90)
-10.17
(24.07)
Change at Month 12 (n =370, 384, 396)
-11.75
(30.38)
-10.98
(25.28)
-12.97
(24.26)
Change at Month 18 (n =342, 360, 360)
-13.99
(26.78)
-11.17
(25.60)
-12.86
(26.47)
Change at Month 24 (n =333, 338, 348)
-14.59
(28.36)
-13.36
(25.69)
-13.29
(23.97)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.086
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 2.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.33 to 5.01
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.36
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.415
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.56 to 3.78
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.36
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.569
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.80
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.97 to 3.57
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.41
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.374
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.26
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.51 to 4.02
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.41
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.288
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.63
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.38 to 4.64
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.53
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.440
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.81 to 4.17
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.52
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.896
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.21
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.30 to 2.88
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.58
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.464
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.14
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.92 to 4.20
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.56
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.901
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.27 to 2.88
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.57
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value,geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.800
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.39
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.45 to 2.66
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.56
Estimation Comments
9. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1 =very good, 2 =good, 3 =fair, 4 =poor and 5 =very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 483)
2.684
(0.904)
2.610
(0.883)
2.634
(0.883)
Change at Month 3 (n =449, 452, 455)
-0.232
(0.909)
-0.230
(0.816)
-0.202
(0.787)
Change at Month 6 (n =424, 427, 435)
-0.337
(0.876)
-0.319
(0.857)
-0.260
(0.879)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 385, 397)
-0.405
(0.908)
-0.371
(0.930)
-0.370
(0.848)
Change at Month 18 (n =344, 361, 358)
-0.442
(0.979)
-0.418
(0.934)
-0.388
(0.903)
Change at Month 24 (n =335, 340, 351)
-0.513
(0.950)
-0.488
(0.939)
-0.473
(0.934)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.984
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.001
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.093 to 0.095
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.048
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.330
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.046
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.140 to 0.047
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.048
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.308
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.050
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.146 to 0.046
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.049
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.089
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.083
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.180 to 0.013
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.049
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.508
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.035
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.137 to 0.068
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.052
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.490
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.036
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.137 to 0.066
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.052
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.739
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.019
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.132 to 0.094
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.057
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.376
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.050
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.162 to 0.061
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.057
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.883
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.008
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.121 to 0.104
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.057
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.690
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.023
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.135 to 0.089
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.057
Estimation Comments
10. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description Physician assessed the overall impact of arthritis on the participant's daily life. Participant's condition was rated by the physician using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1= very good, 2= good, 3= fair, 4= poor and 5= very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =480, 483, 480)
2.785
(0.679)
2.834
(0.689)
2.831
(0.655)
Change at Month 3 (n =449, 448, 453)
-0.379
(0.782)
-0.422
(0.756)
-0.415
(0.764)
Change at Month 6 (n =420, 426, 431)
-0.443
(0.823)
-0.561
(0.841)
-0.452
(0.791)
Change at Month 12 (n =367, 386, 396)
-0.548
(0.873)
-0.627
(0.859)
-0.535
(0.828)
Change at Month 18 (n =342, 359, 355)
-0.602
(0.906)
-0.643
(0.833)
-0.628
(0.862)
Change at Month 24 (n = 331, 340, 349)
-0.656
(0.906)
-0.662
(0.879)
-0.711
(0.867)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.849
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.008
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.078 to 0.095
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.044
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.837
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.009
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.096 to 0.078
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.044
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.776
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.013
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.105 to 0.078
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.047
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.033
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.100
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.191 to -0.008
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.047
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.201
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.064
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.163 to 0.034
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.050
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.038
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.103
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.201 to -0.006
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.050
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.848
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.010
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.114 to 0.094
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.053
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.714
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.019
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.122 to 0.084
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.052
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.652
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.025
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.082 to 0.131
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.054
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.700
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.021
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.085 to 0.127
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.054
Estimation Comments
11. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Pain After a 50-foot Walk Using Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The pain VAS following a 50 foot walk was a single-item, self-administered instrument. Participants were asked to assess the pain due to OA in their study knee after a 50-foot walk. Participants responded on a VAS scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). Higher scores indicating more pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =480, 483, 482)
38.03
(26.39)
35.13
(26.10)
38.00
(25.73)
Change at Month 3 (n =446, 453, 456)
-5.78
(25.30)
-5.71
(23.20)
-7.45
(23.15)
Change at Month 6 (n =424, 428, 436)
-8.13
(25.86)
-7.17
(25.42)
-8.78
(25.67)
Change at Month 12 (n =370, 382, 397)
-11.32
(27.42)
-10.07
(25.22)
-11.91
(24.04)
Change at Month 18 (n = 345, 360, 357)
-11.17
(27.51)
-8.91
(27.12)
-11.86
(26.04)
Change at Month 24 (n =336, 340, 351)
-12.31
(27.61)
-12.86
(26.73)
-13.77
(24.53)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.220
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.68
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.00 to 4.36
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.37
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.997
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.67 to 2.68
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.36
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.613
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.73
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.09 to 3.55
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.44
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.964
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.75 to 2.88
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.44
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.872
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.24
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.69 to 3.17
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.49
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.947
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.81 to 3.01
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.48
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.927
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.15
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.03 to 3.33
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.547
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.97
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.18 to 4.12
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.61
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.304
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.62
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.47 to 4.71
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.58
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.679
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.65
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.73 to 2.43
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.57
Estimation Comments
12. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Total Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The OA pain and assessment tool-knee joint is also known as the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) scale. The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint was an 11-item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was calculated by adding the 11 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =479, 480, 481)
39.35
(23.06)
36.55
(21.78)
38.79
(22.29)
Change at Month 3 (n =448, 450, 449)
-7.00
(19.95)
-6.68
(17.77)
-7.08
(18.15)
Change at Month 6 (n =422, 422, 430)
-9.09
(21.43)
-7.74
(19.36)
-8.27
(19.68)
Change at Month 12 (n = 365, 384, 397)
-13.00
(21.93)
-10.84
(20.58)
-12.26
(20.24)
Change at Month 18 (n =342, 359, 359)
-12.71
(22.64)
-9.59
(21.26)
-11.23
(22.13)
Change at Month 24 (n =330, 340, 349)
-13.02
(22.30)
-12.87
(21.53)
-13.79
(21.81)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.738
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.37
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.80 to 2.55
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.632
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.53
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.70 to 1.64
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.736
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.41
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.77 to 1.96
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.21
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.811
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.29
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.66 to 2.08
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.21
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.335
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.22
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.71 to 1.26
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.27
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.966
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.52 to 2.41
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.26
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.299
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.44
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4.16 to 1.28
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.38
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.925
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.56 to 2.82
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.37
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.676
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.58
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.14 to 3.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.39
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.732
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.47
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.18 to 2.23
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.38
Estimation Comments
13. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Constant Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint constant pain subscale was a 5 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 5 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse constant pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =479, 481, 484)
35.25
(24.83)
33.01
(24.09)
35.21
(24.45)
Change at Month 3 (n =448, 452, 454)
-6.61
(21.64)
-6.41
(19.44)
-6.55
(19.92)
Change at Month 6 (n =423, 426, 434)
-7.88
(23.11)
-7.47
(21.05)
-8.25
(20.55)
Change at Month 12 (n = 367, 384, 399)
-11.78
(23.21)
-10.83
(21.94)
-11.75
(21.85)
Change at Month 18 (n = 343, 360, 360)
-11.63
(23.68)
-9.88
(22.01)
-10.62
(23.82)
Change at Month 24 (n = 330, 340, 350)
-11.59
(23.68)
-12.51
(23.17)
-13.15
(23.37)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.911
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.13
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.22 to 2.49
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.20
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.500
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.81
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.16 to 1.54
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.20
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.596
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.67
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.81 to 3.15
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.26
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.979
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.51 to 2.44
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.26
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.659
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.59
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.20 to 2.03
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.33
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.823
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.30
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.89 to 2.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.32
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.387
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.24
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4.04 to 1.57
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.43
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.737
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.48
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.25 to 2.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.42
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.443
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.73 to 3.97
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.585
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.79
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.62 to 2.04
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.44
Estimation Comments
14. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Intermittent Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint intermittent pain subscale score a 6 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 6 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse intermittent pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =479, 480, 481)
42.76
(22.85)
39.44
(21.46)
41.73
(22.10)
Change at Month 3 (n =448, 450, 450)
-7.32
(20.68)
-6.93
(18.95)
-7.48
(19.28)
Change at Month 6 (n =422, 422, 430)
-10.18
(22.28)
-7.96
(20.34)
-8.31
(21.44)
Change at Month 12 (n =365, 385, 397)
-14.15
(22.93)
-10.93
(21.86)
-12.54
(21.64)
Change at Month 18 (n =342, 359, 359)
-13.56
(23.72)
-9.45
(23.07)
-11.69
(23.02)
Change at Month 24 (n =330, 340, 349)
-14.20
(23.11)
-13.17
(22.74)
-14.27
(22.66)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.613
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.58
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.68 to 2.85
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.670
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.49
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.76 to 1.78
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.16
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.296
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.82 to 1.16
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.27
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.604
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.66
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.15 to 1.83
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.27
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.163
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.86
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4.46 to 0.75
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.33
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.939
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.69 to 2.48
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.32
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.233
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.74
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-4.61 to 1.12
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.46
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.720
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.52
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.32 to 3.36
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.993
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.82 to 2.85
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.794
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.38
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-3.19 to 2.44
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.44
Estimation Comments
15. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Knee Function Survey Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The OARSI knee function survey was an 11-item scale with each item scored 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was the sum of the 11 items and ranged from 0 (minimum) to 44 (maximum), where higher scores indicating worse health condition.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =382, 376, 391)
22.19
(8.96)
21.49
(8.59)
21.80
(8.92)
Change at Month 3 (n = 309, 304, 315)
-2.20
(7.70)
-2.24
(6.57)
-2.99
(7.12)
Change at Month 6 (n =270, 283, 294)
-3.24
(8.42)
-3.29
(7.80)
-3.53
(8.26)
Change at Month 12 (n =240, 263, 266)
-4.57
(8.65)
-4.35
(7.76)
-4.46
(7.99)
Change at Month 18 (n =225, 239, 243)
-5.14
(9.37)
-4.61
(8.56)
-4.93
(9.22)
Change at Month 24(n = 227, 224, 237)
-5.31
(9.40)
-5.13
(8.36)
-5.62
(9.28)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.069
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.97
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.07 to 2.02
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.53
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.335
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.52
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.53 to 1.57
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.153
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.89
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.33 to 2.11
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.672
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.26
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.95 to 1.47
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.765
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.19
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.05 to 1.43
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.63
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.675
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.26
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.96 to 1.49
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.560
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.42
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.00 to 1.84
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.72
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.433
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.56
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.84 to 1.97
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.72
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.318
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.73
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.70 to 2.16
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.73
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.303
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.75
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.68 to 2.18
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.73
Estimation Comments
16. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description The KOOS-PS was used to rate participant's opinions about the difficulties they experienced with activity due to problems with their knee. It was a 7-item scale, each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Total score was calculated by adding the responses to 7 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health condition.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =432, 423, 428)
42.75
(14.69)
41.82
(13.85)
42.60
(14.76)
Change at Month 3 (n =376, 363, 370)
-3.50
(12.68)
-4.31
(11.38)
-5.23
(11.47)
Change at Month 6 (n =336, 335, 348)
-5.42
(13.70)
-5.41
(13.93)
-6.03
(14.02)
Change at Month 12 (n =288, 315, 320)
-7.01
(14.60)
-7.67
(13.26)
-7.32
(13.52)
Change at Month 18 (n =284, 284, 280)
-8.10
(16.00)
-7.44
(14.09)
-7.47
(15.00)
Change at Month 24 (n =272, 272, 278)
-8.49
(16.06)
-9.01
(14.74)
-9.60
(15.48)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLGU*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.039
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.67
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.08 to 3.26
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.81
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 3; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.395
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.70
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.91 to 2.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.82
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.160
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.54 to 3.25
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.96
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 6; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.638
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.46
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.44 to 2.35
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.97
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.537
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.61
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.32 to 2.54
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.98
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*(visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.988
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.90 to 1.93
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.98
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.962
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.12 to 2.22
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 18; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.856
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.97 to 2.37
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.11
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.237
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.90 to 3.63
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.15
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.475
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.82
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.44 to 3.09
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 1.15
Estimation Comments
17. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.18 (minimum) to 57.11 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical functioning.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 485)
35.67
(9.74)
36.84
(9.42)
36.32
(9.15)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 381, 397)
2.59
(8.80)
2.41
(8.66)
2.55
(8.84)
Change at Month 24 (n =332, 341, 352)
3.53
(9.50)
3.23
(9.66)
3.51
(9.54)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.938
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.07 to 1.16
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.57
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.906
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.04 to 1.17
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.56
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.726
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.50 to 1.04
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.65
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.681
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.26
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.52 to 1.00
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.64
Estimation Comments
18. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role - Physical Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 18.45 (minimum) to 56.62 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-physical.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 485)
39.99
(9.85)
40.37
(9.73)
40.14
(10.03)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 381, 397)
2.06
(9.55)
2.35
(8.75)
2.22
(8.85)
Change at Month 24 (n =333, 341, 352)
2.44
(9.53)
2.44
(9.34)
2.70
(9.35)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.900
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.07 to 1.21
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.58
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.528
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.36
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.77 to 1.50
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.58
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.647
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.29
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.51 to 0.94
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.841
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.12
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.34 to 1.09
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
19. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 19.23 (minimum) to 60.88 (maximum), with higher scores indicating lower bodily pain.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 485)
38.81
(8.63)
39.77
(8.34)
38.90
(8.22)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 381, 397)
4.07
(9.64)
3.72
(8.32)
4.06
(8.97)
Change at Month 24 (n =332, 341, 352)
4.25
(9.54)
4.65
(9.90)
4.46
(9.44)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.587
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.32
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.84 to 1.48
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.59
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.687
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.24
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.91 to 1.38
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.58
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.677
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.56 to 1.01
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.65
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.469
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.47
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.80 to 1.74
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.65
Estimation Comments
20. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 General Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.75 (minimum) to 63.72 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better general health.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 481, 484)
44.77
(10.15)
46.49
(9.79)
45.19
(9.63)
Change at Month 12 (n =367, 381, 395)
1.33
(7.52)
1.10
(7.64)
1.20
(6.93)
Change at Month 24 (n =331, 341, 352)
1.13
(8.43)
0.40
(7.76)
1.25
(7.77)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.632
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.71 to 1.17
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.48
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.308
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.49
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.45 to 1.42
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.48
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.615
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.33 to 0.79
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.425
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.43
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.48 to 0.62
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.53
Estimation Comments
21. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Vitality Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.02 (minimum) to 69.92 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better vitality.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 481, 484)
47.57
(9.44)
49.00
(9.20)
48.08
(9.53)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 381, 396)
1.52
(8.51)
0.48
(8.04)
1.04
(8.22)
Change at Month 24 (n =332, 340, 351)
1.53
(8.71)
0.78
(8.62)
1.42
(8.70)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.214
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.67
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.39 to 1.72
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.980
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.06 to 1.03
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.53
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.575
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.83 to 1.49
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.59
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.986
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.16 to 1.14
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.59
Estimation Comments
22. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Social Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 13.38 (minimum) to 56.40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better social functioning.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 485)
45.15
(11.06)
46.23
(10.19)
45.64
(10.36)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 381, 397)
1.11
(10.28)
-0.28
(9.16)
-0.15
(9.74)
Change at Month 24 (n =333, 341, 352)
1.31
(10.62)
0.88
(10.15)
0.12
(10.03)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.030
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.13 to 2.52
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.61
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.480
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.43
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.76 to 1.61
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.60
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.132
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.30 to 2.32
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.67
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.117
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.04
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.26 to 2.34
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.66
Estimation Comments
23. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role-Emotional Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 10.25 (minimum) to 55.68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-emotional.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 482, 485)
43.73
(12.79)
43.27
(12.09)
43.37
(12.35)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 381, 396)
0.05
(12.06)
-0.18
(10.55)
-0.25
(11.47)
Change at Month 24 (n =333, 341, 352)
-0.28
(12.77)
0.60
(11.69)
0.32
(11.98)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.133
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.06
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.32 to 2.44
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.71
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.524
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.44
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.93 to 1.82
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.70
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.743
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.26
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.27 to 1.78
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.78
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.310
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.78
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.73 to 2.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.77
Estimation Comments
24. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 8.02 (minimum) to 63.43 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 481, 484)
47.01
(10.80)
47.70
(10.73)
47.26
(11.15)
Change at Month 12 (n =368, 381, 396)
0.95
(10.08)
0.19
(9.10)
-0.31
(9.50)
Change at Month 24 (n =332, 340, 351)
1.12
(10.26)
0.26
(10.01)
-0.01
(9.81)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.058
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.17
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.04 to 2.38
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.213
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.76
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.44 to 1.96
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.61
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.143
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.98
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.33 to 2.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.67
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.450
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.50
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.80 to 1.81
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.67
Estimation Comments
25. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Physical Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.88 (minimum) to 58.69 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical health.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 480, 483)
37.38
(8.84)
38.69
(8.35)
37.84
(8.46)
Change at Month 12 (n =367, 381, 395)
3.26
(7.98)
3.31
(7.69)
3.58
(7.87)
Change at Month 24 (n =329, 340, 351)
3.77
(8.48)
3.66
(8.32)
4.18
(8.48)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.701
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.19 to 0.80
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.51
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.764
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value 0.15
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.84 to 1.14
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.50
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.228
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS Mean Difference
Estimated Value -0.68
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.80 to 0.43
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.57
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit,a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.514
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.37
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.47 to 0.74
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.56
Estimation Comments
26. Secondary Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24
Description The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 11.11 (minimum) to 61.67 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =481, 480, 483)
49.65
(11.79)
49.97
(11.11)
49.65
(11.62)
Change at Month 12 (n =367, 381, 395)
-0.13
(10.64)
-1.17
(9.48)
-1.27
(9.65)
Change at Month 24 (n =329, 340, 351)
-0.41
(11.24)
-0.70
(10.08)
-1.09
(10.18)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.023
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.42
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.19 to 2.65
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.391
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.53
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.68 to 1.75
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.62
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.142
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.34 to 2.37
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.69
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.204
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.47 to 2.21
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.68
Estimation Comments
27. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) Mobility Domain Score
Description EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D mobility domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problem), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (confined to bed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D mobility domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline: No problem (n =481, 481, 485)
132
27.2%
135
27.8%
163
33.5%
Baseline: Some problems (n =481, 481, 485)
348
71.8%
345
71%
322
66.3%
Baseline: Confined to bed (n =481, 481, 485)
1
0.2%
1
0.2%
0
0%
Month 12: No problem (n =371, 382, 399)
174
35.9%
186
38.3%
178
36.6%
Month 12: Some problems (n =371, 382, 399)
197
40.6%
196
40.3%
221
45.5%
Month 12: Confined to bed (n =371, 382, 399)
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Month 24: No problem (n =334, 341, 353)
167
34.4%
161
33.1%
178
36.6%
Month 24: Some problems (n =334, 341, 353)
165
34%
180
37%
175
36%
Month 24: Confined to bed (n =334, 341, 353)
2
0.4%
0
0%
0
0%
28. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Self-Care Domain Score
Description EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D self-care domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems with self-care), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (unable to wash or dress). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D self-care domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline: No problem (n =480, 481, 485)
383
79%
387
79.6%
386
79.4%
Baseline: Some problems (n =480, 481, 485)
92
19%
93
19.1%
97
20%
Baseline: Unable to wash/dress (n =480, 481, 485)
5
1%
1
0.2%
2
0.4%
Month 12: No problem (n =371, 382, 399)
305
62.9%
327
67.3%
331
68.1%
Month 12: Some problems (n =371, 382, 399)
66
13.6%
51
10.5%
67
13.8%
Month 12: Unable to wash/dress (n =371, 382, 399)
0
0%
4
0.8%
1
0.2%
Month 24: No problem (n =334, 341, 352)
280
57.7%
286
58.8%
299
61.5%
Month 24: Some problems (n =334, 341, 352)
54
11.1%
55
11.3%
51
10.5%
Month 24: Unable to wash/dress (n =334, 341, 352)
0
0%
0
0%
2
0.4%
29. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Usual Activity Domain Score
Description EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D usual activity domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health state (unable to perform usual activities). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D usual activity domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline: No problem (n =481, 481, 485)
186
38.4%
185
38.1%
190
39.1%
Baseline: Some problems (n =481, 481, 485)
285
58.8%
291
59.9%
289
59.5%
Baseline: Unable to do activities(n=481,481,485)
10
2.1%
5
1%
6
1.2%
Month 12: No problem (n =371, 382, 399)
192
39.6%
201
41.4%
193
39.7%
Month 12: Some problems (n =371, 382, 399)
176
36.3%
180
37%
204
42%
Month 12: Unable to do activities(n =371,382,399)
3
0.6%
1
0.2%
2
0.4%
Month 24: No problem (n =334, 340, 352)
187
38.6%
186
38.3%
205
42.2%
Month 24: Some problems (n =334, 340, 352)
140
28.9%
151
31.1%
144
29.6%
Month 24: Unable to do activities(n =334,340,352)
7
1.4%
3
0.6%
3
0.6%
30. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With EuroQo-5D Pain and Discomfort Domain Score
Description EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no pain and discomfort), 2 =moderate health (moderate pain and discomfort) and 3 =worst health state (extreme pain and discomfort). Higher scores indicated worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline: None (n =481, 481, 485)
42
8.7%
48
9.9%
38
7.8%
Baseline: Moderate (n =481, 481, 485)
383
79%
391
80.5%
403
82.9%
Baseline: Extreme (n =481, 481, 485)
56
11.5%
42
8.6%
44
9.1%
Month 12: None (n =371, 382, 399)
91
18.8%
89
18.3%
82
16.9%
Month 12: Moderate (n =371, 382, 399)
259
53.4%
280
57.6%
293
60.3%
Month 12: Extreme (n =371, 382, 399)
21
4.3%
13
2.7%
24
4.9%
Month 24: None (n =334, 341, 352)
92
19%
89
18.3%
98
20.2%
Month 24: Moderate (n =334, 341, 352)
226
46.6%
232
47.7%
240
49.4%
Month 24: Extreme (n =334, 341, 352)
16
3.3%
20
4.1%
14
2.9%
31. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Anxiety and Depression Domain Score
Description EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (not anxious, depressed), 2 =moderate health (moderately anxious, depressed) and 3 =worst health (extremely anxious, depressed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline: None (n =481, 481, 485)
297
61.2%
306
63%
303
62.3%
Baseline: Moderate (n =481, 481, 485)
166
34.2%
164
33.7%
168
34.6%
Baseline: Extreme (n =481, 481, 485)
18
3.7%
11
2.3%
14
2.9%
Month 12: None (n =371, 382, 399)
251
51.8%
256
52.7%
261
53.7%
Month 12: Moderate (n =371, 382, 399)
111
22.9%
116
23.9%
127
26.1%
Month12: Extreme (n =371, 382, 399)
9
1.9%
10
2.1%
11
2.3%
Month 24: None (n =334, 341, 352)
235
48.5%
244
50.2%
237
48.8%
Month 24: Moderate (n =334, 341, 352)
93
19.2%
89
18.3%
109
22.4%
Month 24: Extreme (n =334, 341, 352)
6
1.2%
8
1.6%
6
1.2%
32. Secondary Outcome
Title EuroQoL-5D Visual Analog Scale Score
Description The EQ-5D VAS score was a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. It was a visual analogue scale that ranged from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with higher scores indicating a better health condition.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Baseline (n =480, 479, 484)
66.75
(21.52)
68.59
(19.69)
67.86
(19.36)
Month 12 (n =369, 381, 399)
72.34
(19.01)
72.55
(19.48)
70.58
(19.91)
Month 24 (n =334, 341, 352)
73.18
(19.64)
73.95
(18.85)
72.36
(19.36)
33. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Increase in Total Analgesic Medication Use
Description Increase in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of an increased and sustained use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.
Time Frame Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Month 12 (n =372, 395, 408)
21
4.3%
29
6%
24
4.9%
Month 24 (n =344, 353, 354)
24
4.9%
34
7%
30
6.2%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; Odds ratio (OR), 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.875
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.952
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.516 to 1.756
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.406
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.273
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.721 to 2.247
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.406
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.787
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.448 to 1.384
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.591
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.154
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.685 to 1.942
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
34. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Decrease in Total Analgesic Medication Use
Description Decrease in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of a decreased and irregular use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.
Time Frame Month 12, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 485 486 486
Month 12 (n =372, 395, 408)
29
6%
38
7.8%
43
8.8%
Month 24 (n =344, 353, 354)
29
6%
38
7.8%
47
9.7%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 12; Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.168
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.704
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.428 to 1.160
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 12; Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.634
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.893
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.560 to 1.423
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Month 24; Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.032
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.583
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.356 to 0.955
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Month 24; Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.276
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.774
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.489 to 1.227
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
35. Secondary Outcome
Title Patient Global Impression of Change Score
Description Patient global impression of change was a participant-rated instrument that measured change in participant's overall status on a 7-point scale ranging from: 1 =very much improved, 2 =much improved, 3 =minimally improved, 4 =no change, 5 =minimally worse, 6 =much worse and 7 =very much worse. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Time Frame Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 434 426 434
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
2.97
(1.26)
3.02
(1.34)
3.00
(1.35)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments LS Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors and age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.709
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.21 to 0.14
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.09
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from an ANCOVA model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors and age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.798
Comments
Method ANCOVA
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.02
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.15 to 0.20
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.09
Estimation Comments
36. Secondary Outcome
Title Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index
Description The OMERACT-OARSI responder index was used to determine whether participants may be considered responders to treatment. An OMERACT-OARSI responder was a participant who had a better response on the WOMAC pain subscale score, a better response on the WOMAC physical function subscale score or improvement on at least two of the three domains: WOMAC pain subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) and patient global assessment of arthritic condition score (overall score range of 1 [minimum] to 5 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse condition). Number of participants who were OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this measure.
Time Frame Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 468 469 470
Number [participants]
222
45.8%
226
46.5%
219
45.1%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, baseline JSW, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.810
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.032
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.797 to 1.337
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, baseline JSW, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.620
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.068
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.824 to 1.383
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
37. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Joint Space Narrowing Progression
Description JSN progressor was defined as a participant with a decrease in joint space width that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference (0.199 mm).
Time Frame Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 419 423 429
Number [participants]
136
28%
153
31.5%
165
34%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.047
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.745
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.557 to 0.997
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.317
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 0.864
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.650 to 1.150
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
38. Secondary Outcome
Title Number of Participants Applicable for Virtual Joint Replacement
Description A virtual joint replacement candidate was defined as a participant whose last two WOMAC pain subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain) were at least 8, last two WOMAC physical function subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) were at least 28 and was a joint space narrowing progressor (a participant with a decrease in JSW that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference =0.199 mm).
Time Frame Month 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
FAS included all participants randomized to the study. Here, 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 405 411 425
Number [participants]
28
5.8%
34
7%
28
5.8%
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.881
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.043
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.602 to 1.806
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Odds ratio, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a logistic regression model, with treatment group, (collapsed) KLG, geographic region, and gender as factors, age and body mass index as covariates.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.525
Comments
Method Regression, Logistic
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter Odds Ratio (OR)
Estimated Value 1.186
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.701 to 2.009
Parameter Dispersion Type:
Value:
Estimation Comments
39. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 7-10 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Adverse events included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Time Frame Baseline up to 7-10 days after last dose of study drug (Week 111)

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The safety analysis set included all participants in the FAS who received at least 1 dose of the randomized study medication.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 482 485 485
Adverse events
371
76.5%
381
78.4%
364
74.9%
Serious adverse events
43
8.9%
61
12.6%
49
10.1%
40. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Description Atrial (enlargement, fibrillation, premature beat), axis deviation, atrioventricular (accelerated conduction, first/second degree block), left anterior and posterior hemiblock, left atrial hypertrophy, left and right (complete/incomplete bundle branch block, ventricular hypertrophy), QRS (high/low voltage, nonspecific, prolongation greater than [>]140 milliseconds [msec]), junctional/paced rhythm, intraventricular conduction delay (>120 msec), early repolarization, ventricular premature contraction and beat, prolonged QTC, sinus (arrhythmia, bradycardia/tachycardia), supraventricular extra systole and premature beat, short PR syndrome. Abnormal Q-wave (>=30 msec), P-wave left/right atrial abnormality, T-wave flattened/inverted abnormality, U-wave abnormality, ST-T indeterminate abnormality, ST-T nonspecific changes, ST-T changes compatible with ischemia and pericarditis. ECG findings were judged by investigators for qualitative evaluation of abnormalities.
Time Frame Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The safety analysis set included all participants in the FAS who received at least 1 dose of the randomized study medication. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 482 485 485
Baseline (n =481, 484, 485)
0
0%
0
0%
1
0.2%
Month 6 (n =414, 427, 427)
3
0.6%
0
0%
1
0.2%
Month 12 (n =373 , 397, 403)
4
0.8%
1
0.2%
2
0.4%
Month 18 (n =351, 366, 362)
2
0.4%
2
0.4%
6
1.2%
Month 24 (n =338, 344, 351)
3
0.6%
1
0.2%
6
1.2%
41. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Description Criteria for laboratory abnormalities: Hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (hct), red blood cell(RBC) count: less than(<)0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelet: <0.5*LLN or greater than (>)1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell (WBC): <0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN, lymphocyte, neutrophil:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophil, eosinophil, monocyte:>1.2*ULN; total bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gammaglutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase:> 3.0*ULN, total protein, albumin: <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:>1.3*ULN, uric acid >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate: <0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN, phosphate <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN, lipase >1.5*ULN; urine (specific gravity <1.003 or >1.030, pH <4.5 or >8, glucose, ketones, protein, blood/Hgb greater than or equal to [>=]1); pancreatic amylase >1.5*ULN.
Time Frame Baseline up to Week 111

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The safety analysis set included all participants in the FAS who received at least 1 dose of the randomized study medication. Here, 'N' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 479 480 481
Number [participants]
289
59.6%
297
61.1%
288
59.3%
42. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Description Blood pressure (BP) was measured by sphygmomanometer while participant was in supine position. Conditions were kept constant from visit to visit including observer, participant's same arm, cuff size, supine position, location, temperature, noise level. The same size BP cuff which was properly sized and calibrated, was used to measure BP each time.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The safety analysis set included all participants in the FAS who received at least 1 dose of the study medication. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 482 485 485
Baseline (n =482, 485, 485)
127.04
(12.42)
127.45
(12.18)
127.45
(12.32)
Change at Week 2 (n =459, 466, 462)
-0.06
(9.76)
0.82
(10.66)
-0.01
(10.71)
Change at Week 4 (n =467, 467, 465)
-1.08
(11.37)
0.99
(11.12)
-0.94
(10.73)
Change at Week 12 (n =450, 455, 461)
-0.11
(11.59)
1.74
(12.09)
-0.76
(12.33)
Change at Week 24 (n =425, 432, 439)
-0.47
(12.07)
0.97
(12.14)
-0.73
(11.46)
Change at Week 36 (n =385, 415, 418)
-0.11
(11.98)
-0.80
(12.02)
-1.58
(12.99)
Change at Week 48 (n =377, 400, 410)
-0.83
(12.36)
-0.22
(11.39)
-0.28
(12.01)
Change at Week 60 (n =360, 377, 384)
-1.02
(12.38)
0.33
(12.02)
-1.36
(12.24)
Change at Week 72 (n =357, 374, 370)
-0.82
(12.94)
-0.15
(13.00)
-0.20
(13.00)
Change at Week 84 (n =346, 366, 362)
-1.43
(13.45)
-0.77
(12.98)
-1.15
(13.08)
Change at Week 96 (n =344, 353, 356)
-0.55
(12.84)
0.02
(12.52)
-0.71
(12.79)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 2; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.668
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.50 to 0.96
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.63
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 2; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.326
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.62
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.61 to 1.85
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.63
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 4; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.679
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.27
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.56 to 1.01
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.66
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 4; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.005
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.86
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.57 to 3.14
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.66
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.399
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.60
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.80 to 2.01
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.72
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 2.52
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
1.12 to 3.92
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.71
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.668
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.30
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.08 to 1.68
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.70
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.012
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.76
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.39 to 3.13
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.70
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 36; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group x visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.109
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.27 to 2.67
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.75
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 36; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.163
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.03
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.42 to 2.48
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.74
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 48; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.424
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.58
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.02 to 0.85
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.73
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 48; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.635
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.34
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.07 to 1.76
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.72
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 60; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.855
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.14
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.34 to 1.61
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.75
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 60; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.013
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.84
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.38 to 3.30
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.74
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 72; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.292
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.85
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.44 to 0.73
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.81
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 72; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.897
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.47 to 1.68
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.80
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 84; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.390
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.72
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.36 to 0.92
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.84
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 84; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.659
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.37
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.26 to 1.99
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.83
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 19
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 96; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.847
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.16
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.73 to 1.42
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.80
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 20
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 96; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.333
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.77
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.79 to 2.34
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.80
Estimation Comments
43. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Description BP was measured by sphygmomanometer while participant was in supine position. Conditions were kept constant from visit to visit including observer, participant's same arm, cuff size, supine position, location, temperature, noise level. The same size BP cuff which was properly sized and calibrated, was used to measure BP each time.
Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The safety analysis set included all participants in the FAS who received at least 1 dose of the study medication. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 482 485 485
Baseline (n =482, 485, 485)
76.46
(7.68)
77.06
(7.53)
76.85
(7.71)
Change at Week 2 (n =459, 466, 462)
0.13
(6.63)
0.58
(6.61)
0.37
(7.07)
Change at Week 4 (n =467, 467, 465)
0.07
(7.04)
0.78
(7.33)
-0.41
(7.11)
Change at Week 12 (n =450, 455, 461)
0.02
(7.29)
1.21
(7.56)
0.05
(7.58)
Change at Week 24 (n =425, 432, 439)
0.02
(7.46)
0.53
(7.80)
-0.33
(7.52)
Change at Week 36 (n =385, 415, 418)
-0.21
(7.86)
-0.31
(7.58)
-1.18
(7.86)
Change at Week 48 (n =377, 400, 410)
-0.16
(8.28)
-0.19
(7.99)
-0.07
(7.67)
Change at Week 60 (n =360, 377, 384)
-0.69
(7.56)
0.10
(7.91)
-0.84
(8.32)
Change at Week 72 (n =357, 374, 370)
-0.49
(8.06)
0.30
(8.81)
-0.77
(8.14)
Change at Week 84 (n= 346, 366, 362)
-0.39
(8.03)
-0.28
(7.93)
-0.78
(8.60)
Change at Week 96 (n =344, 353, 356)
-0.21
(8.02)
-0.20
(8.82)
-0.70
(8.47)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 2; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.238
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.49
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.31 to 0.32
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.42
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 2; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.815
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.10
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.72 to 0.91
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.41
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 4; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.508
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.28
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.54 to 1.10
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.42
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 4; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.004
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.20
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.38 to 2.02
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.42
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.683
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.07 to 0.70
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.007
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.21
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.33 to 2.09
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.687
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.71 to 1.07
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.050
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.89
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.00 to 1.78
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.45
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 36; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.215
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.60
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.35 to 1.54
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.48
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 36; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.042
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.96
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.03 to 1.89
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.47
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 48; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.401
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.42
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.41 to 0.56
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.50
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 48; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.980
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.01
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.96 to 0.99
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.50
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 60; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.632
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.24
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.25 to 0.76
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.51
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 60; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.032
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.08
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.09 to 2.07
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.51
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 72; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.668
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.23
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.29 to 0.83
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 72; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.038
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 1.11
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
0.06 to 2.16
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 84; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.868
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.09
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.13 to 0.95
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.53
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 84; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.257
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.59
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.43 to 1.62
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.52
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 19
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 96; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.895
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.07
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.00 to 1.15
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.55
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 20
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 96; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.268
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.60
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.46 to 1.67
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
44. Other Pre-specified Outcome
Title Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Description
Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
The safety analysis set included all participants in the FAS who received at least 1 dose of the study medication. Here, 'n' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at given time points for each group.
Arm/Group Title SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg) SD-0610 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
Measure Participants 482 485 485
Baseline (n =482, 485, 485)
69.74
(9.11)
69.12
(8.72)
69.34
(8.26)
Change at Week 2 (n =459, 466, 461)
0.58
(7.35)
-0.29
(6.68)
0.71
(7.55)
Change at Week 4 (n =467, 466, 465)
0.24
(7.53)
0.23
(7.46)
0.78
(7.77)
Change at Week 12 (n =450, 455, 461)
0.13
(7.70)
-0.17
(7.61)
0.05
(8.24)
Change at Week 24 (n =425, 432, 439)
0.45
(8.30)
-0.42
(7.46)
0.06
(8.37)
Change at Week 36 (n =384, 415, 418)
-0.08
(8.58)
-0.07
(7.80)
0.76
(8.41)
Change at Week 48 (n =377, 399, 410)
-0.82
(8.45)
-1.37
(8.23)
-0.11
(8.59)
Change at Week 60 (n =360, 377, 384)
-0.42
(8.37)
0.04
(7.56)
0.47
(8.90)
Change at Week 72 (n =357, 374, 370)
-0.95
(8.75)
-0.99
(7.91)
0.85
(9.56)
Change at Week 84 (n =346, 366, 362)
-0.31
(8.65)
-0.15
(7.88)
0.57
(8.64)
Change at Week 96 (n =344, 353, 356)
-1.09
(8.91)
-0.61
(8.53)
0.36
(8.61)
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 2; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.908
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.05
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.92 to 0.82
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.44
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 2; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.008
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.05 to -0.31
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.44
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 4; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.440
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.35
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.25 to 0.54
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.46
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 4
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 4; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.140
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.67
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.57 to 0.22
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.46
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 5
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.474
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.58 to 1.24
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.46
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 6
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 12; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.376
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.41
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.32 to 0.50
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.46
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 7
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.186
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value 0.66
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-0.32 to 1.64
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.50
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 8
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 24; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.185
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.66
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.63 to 0.32
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.50
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 9
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 36; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.334
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.51
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.53 to 0.52
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.52
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 10
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 36; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.055
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.99
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.00 to 0.02
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.52
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 11
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 48; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.539
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.33
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.38 to 0.72
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 12
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 48; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.018
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.26
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.30 to -0.22
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.53
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 13
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 60; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.365
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.48
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.52 to 0.56
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.53
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 14
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 60; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.403
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.44
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.47 to 0.59
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.52
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 15
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 72; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.020
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.32
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.43 to -0.21
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.57
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 16
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 72; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.001
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.98 to -0.77
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.56
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 17
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 84; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.269
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.60
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.66 to 0.46
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 18
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 84; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.104
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -0.87
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-1.92 to 0.18
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.54
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 19
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 50 Milligram (mg), Placebo
Comments Week 96; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.038
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.18
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.30 to -0.06
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.57
Estimation Comments
Statistical Analysis 20
Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection SD-0610 200 mg, Placebo
Comments Week 96; LS-Mean, 95 percent CI and P-values were obtained from a discrete time MMRM model with fixed effects for treatment group, visit, a treatment group*visit interaction, (collapsed) KLG, a (collapsed) KLG*visit interaction, baseline value, geographic region, gender, age and body mass index with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Type of Statistical Test Superiority or Other
Comments
Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.041
Comments
Method Mixed Models Analysis
Comments
Method of Estimation Estimation Parameter LS mean difference
Estimated Value -1.16
Confidence Interval (2-Sided) 95%
-2.28 to -0.05
Parameter Dispersion Type: Standard Error of the Mean
Value: 0.57
Estimation Comments

Adverse Events

Time Frame Baseline up to Week 111
Adverse Event Reporting Description The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non serious event during the study.
Arm/Group Title SD-6010 50 Milligram (mg) SD-6010 200 mg Placebo
Arm/Group Description Participants with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of knee, received 50 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received 200 mg tablet of SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months. Participants with symptomatic OA of knee, received placebo matched to SD-6010 orally, once daily for 24 months.
All Cause Mortality
SD-6010 50 Milligram (mg) SD-6010 200 mg Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
Serious Adverse Events
SD-6010 50 Milligram (mg) SD-6010 200 mg Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 43/482 (8.9%) 61/485 (12.6%) 49/485 (10.1%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Coagulopathy 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thrombocytopenia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Angina unstable 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Arrhythmia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Atrial fibrillation 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Bradyarrhythmia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Bradycardia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cardiac arrest 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cardiac disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Cardiac failure 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Cardiac failure chronic 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cardiac failure congestive 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Coronary artery disease 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Coronary artery occlusion 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Coronary artery stenosis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Myocardial infarction 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Prinzmetal angina 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ventricular tachycardia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Colonic polyp 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Constipation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Diverticulum 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Duodenal ulcer 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastric disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastric ulcer 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastritis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastritis erosive 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hernial eventration 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hiatus hernia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Internal hernia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Pancreatitis acute 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Small intestinal obstruction 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Umbilical hernia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Vomiting 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
General disorders
Chest pain 4/482 (0.8%) 3/485 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Device dislocation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Fatigue 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Medical device complication 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Non-cardiac chest pain 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pyrexia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Cholelithiasis 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Gallbladder polyp 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Infections and infestations
Abdominal abscess 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Abdominal wall abscess 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Abscess limb 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Appendicitis 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Clostridium difficile colitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Diverticulitis 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Enterocolitis infectious 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastric ulcer helicobacter 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastroenteritis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Helicobacter infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Infectious peritonitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Meningitis bacterial 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Osteomyelitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pneumonia 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Pseudomembranous colitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pyelonephritis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Sepsis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Septic shock 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Tonsillitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Urinary tract infection 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Viral infection 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Wound infection 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Anastomotic ulcer 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Ankle fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Arthropod bite 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Clavicle fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Comminuted fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Concussion 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Contusion 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Craniocerebral injury 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Deep vein thrombosis postoperative 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Fall 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Femoral neck fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Femur fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Laceration 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ligament injury 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Limb injury 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Meniscus lesion 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Operative haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Radius fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Rib fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Skull fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Splenic rupture 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tendon rupture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Ulna fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Investigations
Blood pressure increased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Borrelia test positive 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Diabetic ketoacidosis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 2/482 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Intervertebral disc protrusion 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Limb discomfort 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Musculoskeletal chest pain 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Osteoarthritis 6/482 (1.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Osteonecrosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rhabdomyolysis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Spinal column stenosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Systemic lupus erythematosus 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Basal cell carcinoma 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Breast cancer 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Endometrial cancer 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Lung neoplasm malignant 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Malignant melanoma 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Malignant melanoma in situ 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Nasal cavity cancer 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Neoplasm malignant 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Ovarian cancer stage III 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Prostate cancer recurrent 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Squamous cell carcinoma 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thyroid cancer 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Uterine cancer 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Uterine leiomyoma 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Facial paresis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Haemorrhagic stroke 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Lacunar infarction 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Loss of consciousness 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Orthostatic intolerance 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Presyncope 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Sciatica 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Spinal cord compression 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Spinal vascular disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Subarachnoid haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Transient ischaemic attack 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Tremor 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Psychiatric disorders
Depression 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Mental status changes 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Suicide attempt 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder perforation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Haematuria 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Renal failure 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Urinary incontinence 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Urinary retention 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Urogenital disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cystocele 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%)
Endometrial disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Metrorrhagia 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Uterine haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Uterine prolapse 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Dyspnoea 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Lung disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypertension 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypertensive crisis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
SD-6010 50 Milligram (mg) SD-6010 200 mg Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 365/482 (75.7%) 371/485 (76.5%) 360/485 (74.2%)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 9/485 (1.9%)
Eosinophilia 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Hypochromasia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hypochromic anaemia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Iron deficiency anaemia 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Leukocytosis 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Lymphadenopathy 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Lymphocytosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Neutropenia 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thrombocytopenia 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thrombocytosis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Aortic valve incompetence 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Arrhythmia supraventricular 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Atrial fibrillation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Atrial flutter 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Atrioventricular block first degree 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Bradycardia 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%)
Bundle branch block left 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Bundle branch block right 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Cardiac failure 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cardiac flutter 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Cardiomegaly 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Extrasystoles 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Mitral valve incompetence 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Palpitations 3/482 (0.6%) 7/485 (1.4%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Pericardial effusion 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Sick sinus syndrome 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Sinus arrhythmia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Sinus bradycardia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Supraventricular extrasystoles 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Supraventricular tachycardia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Tachycardia 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tricuspid valve incompetence 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ventricular extrasystoles 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Brain malformation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Vascular anomaly 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Cerumen impaction 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Ear disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Ear pain 1/482 (0.2%) 4/485 (0.8%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Ear pruritus 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypoacusis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Inner ear inflammation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Tinnitus 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Tympanic membrane perforation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vertigo 7/482 (1.5%) 4/485 (0.8%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Vertigo positional 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Endocrine disorders
Goitre 4/482 (0.8%) 1/485 (0.2%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Hypogonadism 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hypoparathyroidism 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thyroid cyst 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thyroiditis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypothyroidism 6/482 (1.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Eye disorders
Abnormal sensation in eye 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Age-related macular degeneration 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Arcus lipoides 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Blepharitis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cataract 5/482 (1%) 7/485 (1.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Cataract subcapsular 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Conjunctival haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Conjunctivitis 2/482 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Dry eye 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Erythema of eyelid 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Eye allergy 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Eye inflammation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Eye pain 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Eye pruritus 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Eyelid irritation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Eyelid ptosis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Glaucoma 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Maculopathy 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Ocular hyperaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Ocular hypertension 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Papilloedema 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Retinal detachment 3/482 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Retinal disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Retinal haemorrhage 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Vision blurred 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Visual acuity reduced 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort 5/482 (1%) 4/485 (0.8%) 8/485 (1.6%)
Abdominal distension 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Abdominal pain 8/482 (1.7%) 11/485 (2.3%) 14/485 (2.9%)
Abdominal pain lower 2/482 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Abdominal pain upper 9/482 (1.9%) 13/485 (2.7%) 12/485 (2.5%)
Abdominal tenderness 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Anal polyp 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Breath odour 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Change of bowel habit 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Cheilitis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Colitis 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Colitis microscopic 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Colitis ulcerative 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Colonic polyp 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Constipation 8/482 (1.7%) 9/485 (1.9%) 8/485 (1.6%)
Dental caries 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Diarrhoea 22/482 (4.6%) 27/485 (5.6%) 29/485 (6%)
Diverticulum 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Diverticulum intestinal 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Dry mouth 5/482 (1%) 0/485 (0%) 6/485 (1.2%)
Dyspepsia 10/482 (2.1%) 14/485 (2.9%) 14/485 (2.9%)
Dysphagia 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Enteritis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Eructation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Femoral hernia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Flatulence 5/482 (1%) 2/485 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Food poisoning 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Frequent bowel movements 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastric disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastric polyps 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastric ulcer 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastritis 4/482 (0.8%) 11/485 (2.3%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Gastritis erosive 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 10/482 (2.1%) 12/485 (2.5%) 9/485 (1.9%)
Gingival bleeding 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gingival disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gingival recession 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gingivitis 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Haematemesis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Haematochezia 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Haemorrhoids 6/482 (1.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hiatus hernia 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Hyperchlorhydria 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Irritable bowel syndrome 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Lip swelling 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Mouth ulceration 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Nausea 20/482 (4.1%) 15/485 (3.1%) 14/485 (2.9%)
Oesophageal disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Oesophageal stenosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Oesophagitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Omental infarction 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Oral disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pancreatic cyst 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Pancreatic disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Pancreatitis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Pancreatitis acute 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Pancreatitis chronic 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Paraesthesia oral 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Peptic ulcer 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Periodontitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Rectal haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rectal polyp 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Steatorrhoea 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Stomatitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Swollen tongue 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Tooth impacted 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Toothache 5/482 (1%) 2/485 (0.4%) 8/485 (1.6%)
Umbilical hernia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vomiting 9/482 (1.9%) 12/485 (2.5%) 3/485 (0.6%)
General disorders
Application site dermatitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Asthenia 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Chest discomfort 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Chest pain 6/482 (1.2%) 8/485 (1.6%) 8/485 (1.6%)
Chills 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cyst 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Facial pain 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Fatigue 10/482 (2.1%) 12/485 (2.5%) 13/485 (2.7%)
Feeling cold 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gait disturbance 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Inflammation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Influenza like illness 2/482 (0.4%) 6/485 (1.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Injection site erythema 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Injection site inflammation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Injection site pruritus 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Irritability 4/482 (0.8%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Malaise 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Medical device pain 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Medical device site reaction 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Non-cardiac chest pain 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Oedema 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Oedema peripheral 15/482 (3.1%) 15/485 (3.1%) 19/485 (3.9%)
Pain 4/482 (0.8%) 6/485 (1.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Polyp 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Pyrexia 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Soft tissue inflammation 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tenderness 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Thirst 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Ulcer 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Ulcer haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary colic 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Biliary tract disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Cholecystitis chronic 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cholelithiasis 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Gallbladder polyp 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hepatic function abnormal 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hepatic steatosis 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Hydrocholecystis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Liver disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Immune system disorders
Allergy to arthropod sting 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Drug hypersensitivity 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Food allergy 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypersensitivity 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Sarcoidosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Seasonal allergy 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Infections and infestations
Abscess 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Abscess limb 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Acariasis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Acute sinusitis 5/482 (1%) 6/485 (1.2%) 5/485 (1%)
Appendicitis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Arthritis infective 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Beta haemolytic streptococcal infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Body tinea 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Borrelia infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Bronchitis 25/482 (5.2%) 30/485 (6.2%) 20/485 (4.1%)
Bronchitis viral 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Candidiasis 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Carbuncle 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Cellulitis 3/482 (0.6%) 8/485 (1.6%) 6/485 (1.2%)
Cystitis 3/482 (0.6%) 6/485 (1.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Device related infection 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Diarrhoea infectious 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Diverticulitis 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Ear infection 8/482 (1.7%) 8/485 (1.6%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Erysipelas 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Erythema migrans 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Escherichia urinary tract infection 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Eye infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Folliculitis 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Fungal infection 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Fungal skin infection 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Gastroenteritis 9/482 (1.9%) 9/485 (1.9%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Gastroenteritis viral 5/482 (1%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gastrointestinal infection 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Gastrointestinal viral infection 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Genital infection fungal 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Giardiasis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Gingival infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Helicobacter infection 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Herpes ophthalmic 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Herpes simplex 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Herpes virus infection 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Herpes zoster 9/482 (1.9%) 5/485 (1%) 5/485 (1%)
Hordeolum 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Impetigo 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Infected cyst 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Infection parasitic 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Influenza 13/482 (2.7%) 12/485 (2.5%) 14/485 (2.9%)
Labyrinthitis 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Laryngitis 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Laryngitis viral 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Localised infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Lower respiratory tract infection 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Lyme disease 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Mastitis bacterial 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Nasopharyngitis 33/482 (6.8%) 41/485 (8.5%) 25/485 (5.2%)
Onychomycosis 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Oral candidiasis 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Oral herpes 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Osteomyelitis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Otitis externa 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Otitis media 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Otitis media acute 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Paronychia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Pharyngitis 7/482 (1.5%) 16/485 (3.3%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Pharyngitis bacterial 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pharyngitis streptococcal 4/482 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Pharyngotonsillitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pilonidal cyst 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Pneumonia 4/482 (0.8%) 6/485 (1.2%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Post procedural infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Postoperative wound infection 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pyelonephritis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Renal abscess 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Respiratory tract infection 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Respiratory tract infection viral 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rhinitis 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Sinusitis 18/482 (3.7%) 18/485 (3.7%) 14/485 (2.9%)
Skin infection 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Staphylococcal infection 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Subcutaneous abscess 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Tinea pedis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Tonsillitis 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tooth abscess 6/482 (1.2%) 4/485 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Tracheitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Typhus 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Upper respiratory tract infection 40/482 (8.3%) 31/485 (6.4%) 30/485 (6.2%)
Upper respiratory tract infection bacterial 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Urinary tract infection 24/482 (5%) 21/485 (4.3%) 26/485 (5.4%)
Vaginal infection 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Viral infection 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Viral pharyngitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Viral tonsillitis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Viral upper respiratory tract infection 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Vulvovaginitis 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Wound infection 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tooth infection 4/482 (0.8%) 4/485 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Animal bite 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Ankle fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Arthropod bite 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Back injury 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Bone fragmentation 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Burns first degree 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Burns second degree 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Chest injury 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Clavicle fracture 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Concussion 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Contusion 12/482 (2.5%) 12/485 (2.5%) 10/485 (2.1%)
Corneal abrasion 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Craniocerebral injury 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Epicondylitis 2/482 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Eschar 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Excoriation 4/482 (0.8%) 4/485 (0.8%) 5/485 (1%)
Fall 26/482 (5.4%) 41/485 (8.5%) 28/485 (5.8%)
Fibula fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Foot fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 4/485 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Forearm fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Foreign body in eye 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hand fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Head injury 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Heat exhaustion 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Joint dislocation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Joint injury 2/482 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Laceration 3/482 (0.6%) 4/485 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Ligament injury 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Ligament rupture 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ligament sprain 8/482 (1.7%) 11/485 (2.3%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Limb injury 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Meniscus lesion 6/482 (1.2%) 6/485 (1.2%) 9/485 (1.9%)
Muscle rupture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Muscle strain 8/482 (1.7%) 5/485 (1%) 6/485 (1.2%)
Periorbital haematoma 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Periorbital haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Post procedural complication 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Post-traumatic neck syndrome 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Procedural pain 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Radius fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Rib fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Road traffic accident 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Scratch 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Skeletal injury 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Soft tissue injury 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Stab wound 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Stress fracture 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tendon injury 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Tendon rupture 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Thermal burn 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tooth fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Traumatic haematoma 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Ulna fracture 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Upper limb fracture 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Wound 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Wrist fracture 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased 1/482 (0.2%) 5/485 (1%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Aspartate aminotransferase increased 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Blood amylase increased 3/482 (0.6%) 6/485 (1.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Blood bicarbonate decreased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood bilirubin increased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood calcium increased 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood cholesterol abnormal 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood cholesterol increased 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Blood creatine increased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood creatinine increased 2/482 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Blood glucose increased 2/482 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Blood potassium decreased 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood pressure decreased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood pressure increased 13/482 (2.7%) 24/485 (4.9%) 21/485 (4.3%)
Blood testosterone decreased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood triglycerides increased 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Blood urea increased 4/482 (0.8%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Blood uric acid increased 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Blood urine present 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Body temperature increased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Cardiac murmur 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ceruloplasmin increased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
ECG signs of myocardial ischaemia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Electrocardiogram T wave abnormal 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Eosinophil count increased 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Femoral bruit 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased 0/482 (0%) 10/485 (2.1%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Haematocrit decreased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Haematology test abnormal 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Haemoglobin decreased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Heart rate increased 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Heart rate irregular 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Helicobacter test positive 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hepatic enzyme abnormal 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hepatic enzyme increased 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Lipase increased 7/482 (1.5%) 8/485 (1.6%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Liver function test abnormal 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Low density lipoprotein increased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Monocyte count decreased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Neutrophil count decreased 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Neutrophil count increased 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Pancreatic enzymes increased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Prostatic specific antigen increased 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Protein urine present 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Red blood cell burr cells present 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Serum ferritin increased 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tandem gait test abnormal 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Transaminases increased 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Ultrasound kidney abnormal 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Vitamin B12 decreased 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vitamin D decreased 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Waist circumference increased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Weight decreased 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Weight increased 1/482 (0.2%) 7/485 (1.4%) 5/485 (1%)
White blood cell count abnormal 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
White blood cell count decreased 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Cholesterosis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Decreased appetite 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Dehydration 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Diabetes mellitus 3/482 (0.6%) 4/485 (0.8%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Dyslipidaemia 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 5/485 (1%)
Fluid retention 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Glucose tolerance impaired 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Gout 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypercalcaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Hypercholesterolaemia 9/482 (1.9%) 3/485 (0.6%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Hyperglycaemia 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%)
Hyperkalaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Hyperlipidaemia 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Hypertriglyceridaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Hyperuricaemia 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypocalcaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypoglycaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypokalaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 6/485 (1.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypomagnesaemia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hyponatraemia 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Increased appetite 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Iron deficiency 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Lactose intolerance 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Obesity 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus 4/482 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%) 5/485 (1%)
Vitamin B12 deficiency 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Vitamin D deficiency 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia 69/482 (14.3%) 65/485 (13.4%) 65/485 (13.4%)
Arthritis 1/482 (0.2%) 8/485 (1.6%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Arthrofibrosis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Arthropathy 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Articular calcification 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Back pain 31/482 (6.4%) 32/485 (6.6%) 43/485 (8.9%)
Bone loss 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Bone pain 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Bone swelling 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Bunion 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Bursitis 12/482 (2.5%) 2/485 (0.4%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Chondrocalcinosis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Chondrocalcinosis pyrophosphate 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Chondromalacia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Chondropathy 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Connective tissue disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Connective tissue inflammation 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Exostosis 4/482 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Facet joint syndrome 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Fasciitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Fibromyalgia 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Flank pain 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Foot deformity 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Groin pain 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Haemarthrosis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Intervertebral disc compression 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Intervertebral disc degeneration 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Intervertebral disc protrusion 2/482 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Joint crepitation 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Joint effusion 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 5/485 (1%)
Joint instability 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Joint lock 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Joint range of motion decreased 5/482 (1%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Joint stiffness 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Joint swelling 14/482 (2.9%) 8/485 (1.6%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Joint warmth 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Lordosis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Lumbar spinal stenosis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Meniscal degeneration 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Metatarsalgia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Muscle contracture 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Muscle disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Muscle spasms 12/482 (2.5%) 9/485 (1.9%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Muscle twitching 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Muscular weakness 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Musculoskeletal chest pain 1/482 (0.2%) 5/485 (1%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Musculoskeletal discomfort 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Musculoskeletal pain 12/482 (2.5%) 13/485 (2.7%) 17/485 (3.5%)
Musculoskeletal stiffness 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Myalgia 5/482 (1%) 6/485 (1.2%) 5/485 (1%)
Myofascial pain syndrome 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Neck mass 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Neck pain 6/482 (1.2%) 12/485 (2.5%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Nodal osteoarthritis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Osteitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Osteoarthritis 21/482 (4.4%) 23/485 (4.7%) 14/485 (2.9%)
Osteonecrosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Osteopenia 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Osteoporosis 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Pain in extremity 13/482 (2.7%) 19/485 (3.9%) 21/485 (4.3%)
Pain in jaw 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Periarthritis 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Plantar fasciitis 6/482 (1.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 9/485 (1.9%)
Polyarthritis 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Polymyalgia rheumatica 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Resorption bone increased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rotator cuff syndrome 2/482 (0.4%) 6/485 (1.2%) 5/485 (1%)
Sjogren's syndrome 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Soft tissue mass 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Spinal column stenosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Spinal disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Spinal osteoarthritis 6/482 (1.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Spondylitis 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Spondylolysis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Synovial cyst 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Synovitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Tendon disorder 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tendonitis 9/482 (1.9%) 14/485 (2.9%) 11/485 (2.3%)
Tenosynovitis stenosans 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Trigger finger 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Acrochordon 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Basal cell carcinoma 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Benign breast neoplasm 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Benign neoplasm of skin 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Breast cancer 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Lip neoplasm malignant stage unspecified 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Lipoma 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Lung neoplasm 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Melanocytic naevus 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Morton's neuroma 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Myelodysplastic syndrome 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Neoplasm of appendix 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Neuroma 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ovarian adenoma 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Paranasal sinus benign neoplasm 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Seborrhoeic keratosis 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Squamous cell carcinoma 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Squamous cell carcinoma of skin 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thyroid neoplasm 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Uterine leiomyoma 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Nervous system disorders
Amnesia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Balance disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Burning sensation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Carotid artery disease 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Carotid artery stenosis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Carpal tunnel syndrome 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 6/485 (1.2%)
Cerebral microangiopathy 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Cervicobrachial syndrome 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Cluster headache 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Cognitive disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Decreased vibratory sense 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Diabetic neuropathy 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Disturbance in attention 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Dizziness 17/482 (3.5%) 22/485 (4.5%) 11/485 (2.3%)
Dysgeusia 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Headache 32/482 (6.6%) 27/485 (5.6%) 18/485 (3.7%)
Hemiparesis 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypertonia 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypoaesthesia 4/482 (0.8%) 5/485 (1%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Hyporeflexia 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Lethargy 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Loss of consciousness 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Lumbar radiculopathy 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Memory impairment 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Meralgia paraesthetica 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Migraine 6/482 (1.2%) 7/485 (1.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Migraine with aura 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Multiple sclerosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Muscle contractions involuntary 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Nerve compression 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Neuralgia 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Neuritis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Neuropathy peripheral 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Paraesthesia 5/482 (1%) 3/485 (0.6%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Parkinson's disease 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Presyncope 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Radicular syndrome 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Radiculitis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Radiculitis cervical 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Restless legs syndrome 3/482 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Sciatic nerve neuropathy 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Sciatica 4/482 (0.8%) 10/485 (2.1%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Sinus headache 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Sleep phase rhythm disturbance 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Somnolence 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Syncope 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tension headache 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Tremor 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
VIIth nerve paralysis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vascular encephalopathy 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety 6/482 (1.2%) 7/485 (1.4%) 5/485 (1%)
Confusional state 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Depressed mood 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Depression 12/482 (2.5%) 12/485 (2.5%) 6/485 (1.2%)
Disorientation 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Emotional distress 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Euphoric mood 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Insomnia 9/482 (1.9%) 5/485 (1%) 7/485 (1.4%)
Mood swings 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Nervousness 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Panic attack 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Sleep disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Substance abuse 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Bladder spasm 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Calculus bladder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Dysuria 5/482 (1%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Haematuria 5/482 (1%) 2/485 (0.4%) 6/485 (1.2%)
Haemorrhage urinary tract 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Hypertonic bladder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Incontinence 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Micturition urgency 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Nephrolithiasis 2/482 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Nocturia 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pollakiuria 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Proteinuria 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Renal colic 0/482 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%)
Renal cyst 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Renal failure 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Renal failure chronic 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Stress urinary incontinence 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Urethral disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Urinary incontinence 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Urinary retention 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Urinary tract inflammation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Urine flow decreased 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Atrophic vulvovaginitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Benign prostatic hyperplasia 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Breast cyst 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Breast disorder 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Breast pain 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Cervical polyp 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cystocele 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Endometrial hypertrophy 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Erectile dysfunction 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Erection increased 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Fallopian tube cyst 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Menopausal disorder 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Menstrual disorder 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Metrorrhagia 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Nipple pain 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Ovarian cyst 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Pelvic pain 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Postmenopausal haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Prostatitis 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Prostatomegaly 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Rectocele 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Sexual dysfunction 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Uterine enlargement 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Uterine polyp 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Uterine prolapse 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Vaginal discharge 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Vaginal haemorrhage 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vaginal prolapse 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Vulvovaginal dryness 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vulvovaginal pain 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Vulvovaginal pruritus 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Allergic bronchitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Asthma 4/482 (0.8%) 7/485 (1.4%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Asthma exercise induced 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Bronchitis chronic 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Bronchospasm 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Cough 10/482 (2.1%) 9/485 (1.9%) 8/485 (1.6%)
Dry throat 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Dysphonia 2/482 (0.4%) 2/485 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Dyspnoea 2/482 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Dyspnoea exertional 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Emphysema 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Epistaxis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Hypoventilation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Interstitial lung disease 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Nasal congestion 5/482 (1%) 4/485 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Nasal polyps 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Nasal septum deviation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Nasal turbinate hypertrophy 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Nocturnal dyspnoea 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Oropharyngeal discomfort 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Oropharyngeal pain 7/482 (1.5%) 7/485 (1.4%) 5/485 (1%)
Paranasal sinus hypersecretion 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pleural effusion 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Pleurisy 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pleuritic pain 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Productive cough 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Pulmonary embolism 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Pulmonary hypertension 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Rales 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Respiratory disorder 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Respiratory tract congestion 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%)
Rhinitis allergic 5/482 (1%) 1/485 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Rhinitis perennial 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rhinorrhoea 1/482 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rhonchi 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Sinus congestion 6/482 (1.2%) 5/485 (1%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Sleep apnoea syndrome 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Throat irritation 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Upper respiratory tract inflammation 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Upper-airway cough syndrome 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Vasomotor rhinitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Wheezing 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Actinic keratosis 4/482 (0.8%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Alopecia 2/482 (0.4%) 3/485 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cold sweat 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Cutis laxa 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Dermal cyst 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Dermatitis 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Dermatitis allergic 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Dermatitis atopic 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Dermatitis contact 3/482 (0.6%) 3/485 (0.6%) 8/485 (1.6%)
Drug eruption 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Dry skin 2/482 (0.4%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Eczema 0/482 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Erythema 4/482 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Haemorrhage subcutaneous 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hyperhidrosis 4/482 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Hyperkeratosis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hypertrichosis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Idiopathic urticaria 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Increased tendency to bruise 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Ingrowing nail 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Ingrown hair 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Mechanical urticaria 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Nail dystrophy 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Night sweats 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Onycholysis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Papule 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Photodermatosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Pruritus 1/482 (0.2%) 5/485 (1%) 5/485 (1%)
Psoriasis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rash 13/482 (2.7%) 12/485 (2.5%) 8/485 (1.6%)
Rash erythematous 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Rash generalised 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Rash papular 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Rosacea 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Scab 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Seborrhoea 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Seborrhoeic dermatitis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Skin lesion 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Skin ulcer 1/482 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Subcutaneous nodule 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Urticaria 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Vascular disorders
Aortic aneurysm 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Arteriosclerosis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Bleeding varicose vein 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Deep vein thrombosis 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Diastolic hypertension 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Flushing 3/482 (0.6%) 1/485 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%)
Haematoma 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 2/485 (0.4%)
Haemorrhage 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Hot flush 2/482 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%) 4/485 (0.8%)
Hypertension 34/482 (7.1%) 27/485 (5.6%) 19/485 (3.9%)
Hypertensive crisis 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Hypotension 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Phlebitis 3/482 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%) 3/485 (0.6%)
Phlebitis deep 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Phlebitis superficial 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Systolic hypertension 0/482 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thrombophlebitis 0/482 (0%) 0/485 (0%) 1/485 (0.2%)
Thrombophlebitis superficial 1/482 (0.2%) 0/485 (0%) 0/485 (0%)
Varicose vein 1/482 (0.2%) 3/485 (0.6%) 0/485 (0%)
Venous insufficiency 4/482 (0.8%) 2/485 (0.4%) 1/485 (0.2%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization Pfizer, Inc.
Phone 1-800-718-1021
Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
Responsible Party:
Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00565812
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • A6171016
  • 2007-001457-26
  • ITIC
First Posted:
Nov 30, 2007
Last Update Posted:
Dec 30, 2016
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2016