PFA/TKR: Study of Knee Replacements for Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a randomized comparison of PFA and TKR in treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis can be a disabling condition of the knee necessitating knee arthroplasty. It is debated whether total knee replacement or isolated patellofemoral replacement is the better treatment option. This randomized trial attempts to give a qualified answer to the debate by comparing clinical outcome (range of movement, stability, effusion, patellofemoral tracking, tenderness, stair climbing), patient self assessment scores (EQ-5D, Oxford Knee Score, KOOS, SF-36, AKS), complications (infections, revisions), longevity (survival analysis) and cost (direct and indirect) for the two implant types.
The Avon patellofemoral implant has been chosen, as this is the patellofemoral implant with the best documentation. The PFC Sigma CR total knee implant has been chosen as it a current standard implant and market leader.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Avon patellofemoral replacement Knee arthroplasty with insertion of patellofemoral joint replacement. |
Device: Knee arthroplasty
Comparison of patellofemoral arthroplasty versus conventional total knee arthroplasty in cases of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: PFC Sigma CR total knee replacement Knee arthroplasty with total (tricompartmental) knee replacement. |
Device: Knee arthroplasty
Comparison of patellofemoral arthroplasty versus conventional total knee arthroplasty in cases of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Patient-reported outcomes (disease-specific and generic QoL instruments) [10 years]
The physical functioning score of the Short Form (36) Health Survey is the primary outcome measure of the study. Disease-specific patient-reported outcomes (Oxford Knee Score, KOOS and Kujala) and a second generic quality of life measure (EQ5D).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Implant survival, clinician assessment and cost. [10 years]
Secondary outcome measures relate to implant survival, clinician assessment and cost. Implant survival will be assessed by 5- and 10-year implant survival rates and by analyzing causes for revision surgery. Clinician assessment includes Knee Society Score (stability, range of movement, effusion, tenderness etc.). Assessments of immediate and long-term costs are based on patient diaries, sick leave, use of medical services and drug prescriptions.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Isolated PF-OA
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medial or lateral OA
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aarhus University Hospital | Aarhus | Denmark |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- University of Aarhus
- Stryker Nordic
- DePuy Orthopaedics
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anders Odgaard, FRCS, DMSc, Dept. of Orthopaedics, Aarhus University Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 56789