A Long Term Study of the Safety of Tanezumab When Administered By Subcutaneous Injections

Sponsor
Pfizer (Industry)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT00994890
Collaborator
(none)
679
100
3
15.4
6.8
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will investigate the safety of three fixed dose levels of tanezumab (2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg) administered at an 8-week interval by subcutaneous injection multiple (7) times during the study treatment period.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Tanezumab 2.5 mg
  • Drug: Tanezumab 5 mg
  • Drug: Tanezumab 10 mg
Phase 2

Detailed Description

Safety study of tanezumab in relief of osteoarthritis pain This study was terminated on 6 December 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
679 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
A MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND,LONG TERM STUDY OF THE SAFETY OF SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE OR HIP
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 17, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 7, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2011

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Tanezumab 2.5 mg

Drug: Tanezumab 2.5 mg
Tanezumab 2.5 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for a total of 7 injections administered over approximately 1 year
Other Names:
  • Biological
  • Experimental: Tanezumab 5 mg

    Drug: Tanezumab 5 mg
    Tanezumab 5 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for a total of 7 injections administered over approximately 1 year
    Other Names:
  • Biological
  • Experimental: Tanezumab 10 mg

    Drug: Tanezumab 10 mg
    Tanezumab 10 mg administered by subcutaneous injection every 8 weeks for a total of 7 injections administered over approximately 1 year
    Other Names:
  • Biological
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Baseline up to 112 days after last dose of study medication (up to 345 days)]

      An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

    2. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities [Baseline to Week 50]

      Laboratory analysis included blood chemistry, hematology, urinalysis and pregnancy test.

    3. Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings [Baseline up to Week 50]

      All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula [QTcB], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed. Participants with abnormal ECG findings reported as adverse events were presented.

    4. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 2 [Baseline, Week 2]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    5. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4 [Baseline, Week 4]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    6. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8 [Baseline, Week 8]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    7. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 16 [Baseline, Week 16]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    8. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    9. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 32 [Baseline, Week 32]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    10. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 40 [Baseline, Week 40]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    11. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 48 [Baseline, Week 48]

      NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.

    12. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Physical Findings [Baseline to Week 50]

      Physical examination included examination of abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, head, heart, lungs, lymph nodes, neck, nose, skin, throat, thyroid, muscoskeletal, neurological and peripheral vascular system.

    13. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Day 1 [Day 1]

      Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

    14. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 8 [Week 8]

      Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative ELISA.

    15. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 24 [Week 24]

      Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative ELISA.

    16. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 50 [Week 50]

      Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative ELISA.

    17. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities [Baseline up to Week 50]

      Examination of vital signs included body temperature, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate and respiratory rate. Participants with abnormal vital sign findings reported as adverse events were presented.

    18. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Day 1 [Day 1]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    19. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 2 [Week 2]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    20. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 4 [Week 4]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    21. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 8 [Week 8]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    22. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 16 [Week 16]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    23. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 24 [Week 24]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    24. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 32 [Week 32]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    25. Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 40 [Week 40]

      Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    2. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint and index hip during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse function.

    3. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 2, 4, 8,16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee (or hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities) and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out normal activities).

    4. Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response [Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      OMERACT-OARSI response: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=2 units in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: >=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=1 unit in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).

    5. Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score [Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      Percentage of participants with at least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% reduction from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale score are reported. WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a 0 to 10 NRS, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    6. Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score [Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Participants with specified reduction (as percent) from baseline at Week 16 are reported.

    7. Percentage of Participants With Improvement of At Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis [Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee (or hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value.

    8. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee or hip.

    9. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56 [Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of knee or hip. Each item was scored on a 0 to 10 NRS scale, where higher scores indicated higher pain/stiffness or worse function. WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranged from 0 to 10, where higher score indicated worse response.

    10. Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.

    11. Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56 [Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56]

      Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.

    12. Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy [Baseline up to Week 50]

      Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    13. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy [Baseline up to Week 50]

    14. Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication [Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64]

      United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products and viscosupplementation (example, hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the Investigator.

    15. Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage [Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64]

      United States FDA-approved analgesics were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of OA. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, NSAIDs, capsaicin products and viscosupplementation (example, hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the Investigator.

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Number of Participants With Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication [Day 1 up to Week 24]

      Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of subcutaneous doses of study medication received.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip based on American College of Rheumatology criteria with a radiographic (X ray) confirmation (a Kellgren Lawrence x-ray grade of ≥2);
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Body mass index (BMI) of >39 kg/m2;

    • Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant

    • Planned surgical procedure during the duration of the study

    • History of clinically significant cardiovascular, central nervous system or psychiatric disease

    • Previous exposure to exogenous NGF or to an anti NGF antibody;

    • Use of biologics other than study medication, Live or live-attenuated intranasal vaccines (eg, Flumist), are allowable exceptions

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Mobile Diagnostic Center Mobile Alabama United States 36608
    2 Seton Medical Management, Inc. Mobile Alabama United States 36608
    3 Phoenix Rheumatology Specialists, Ltd. Phoenix Arizona United States 85006
    4 Radiant Research, Inc Scottsdale Arizona United States 85251
    5 Advanced Arthritis Care and Research Scottsdale Arizona United States 85258
    6 Catalina Pointe Clinical Research, Inc Tucson Arizona United States 85704
    7 Ft. Smith Rheumatology, PC Fort Smith Arkansas United States 72903
    8 Larry Watkins, MD Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
    9 Lynn Institute of the Ozarks Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
    10 OrthoArkansas, PA Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
    11 Radiology Consultants Little Rock Arkansas United States 72205
    12 Medvin Clinical Research Covina California United States 91723
    13 Pacific Arthritis Care Center Los Angeles California United States 90045
    14 Staywell Research Northridge California United States 91325
    15 University Imaging Centers Northridge California United States 91325
    16 C Michael Neuwelt, MD San Leandro California United States 94578
    17 Pacific Arthritis Center Medical Group Santa Maria California United States 93454
    18 Medvin Clinical Research Whittier California United States 90606
    19 RASF Clinical Research Center Boca Raton Florida United States 33486
    20 Sunrise Medical Research Lauderdale Lake Florida United States 33319
    21 Melbourne Internal Medicine Associates Melbourne Florida United States 32901
    22 MIMA Century Research Associate Melbourne Florida United States 32901
    23 Osler Medical, Inc. Melbourne Florida United States 32901
    24 Renstar Medical Research Ocala Florida United States 344471
    25 American Family Medical Ocala Florida United States 34471
    26 Renstar Medical Research Ocala Florida United States 34471
    27 Paddock Park Clinical Research Ocala Florida United States 34474
    28 Medical Research Group of Central Florida Orange City Florida United States 32763
    29 Pensacola Research Consultants, Inc. Pensacola Florida United States 32504
    30 Radiant Research, Inc Pinellas Park Florida United States 33781
    31 Jarred Frydman, DO Plantation Florida United States 33324
    32 Orthopaedic Center of South Flordia Plantation Florida United States 33324
    33 Advanced Medical Research Port Orange Florida United States 32127
    34 Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases South Miami Florida United States 33143
    35 Tampa Medical Group, P.A. Tampa Florida United States 33614
    36 Arthritis Center of North Georgia Gainesville Georgia United States 30501
    37 Radiant Research, Inc Chicago Illinois United States 60654
    38 Methodist Medical Group Rheumatology Peoria Illinois United States 61602
    39 Methodist Research Administration Office Peoria Illinois United States 61602
    40 Rockford Health Physicians Rockford Illinois United States 61103-3692
    41 Radiant Research, Inc Overland Park Kansas United States 66202
    42 Graves Gilbert Clinic Bowling Green Kentucky United States 42101
    43 Kentucky Medical Research Center Lexington Kentucky United States 40504
    44 Central Kentucky Research Associates Mount Sterling Kentucky United States 40353
    45 Mt. Sterling Clinic Mount Sterling Kentucky United States 40353
    46 Boston Clinical Trails, Inc. Boston Massachusetts United States 02135
    47 Woodrail Clinic Columbia Missouri United States 65203
    48 University Physicians Columbia Missouri United States 65212
    49 Kansas City Internal Medicine Lee's Summit Missouri United States 64086
    50 Clayton Medical Research Saint Louis Missouri United States 63117
    51 Advance Clinical Research Inc Saint Louis Missouri United States 63128
    52 St. Louis Center for Clinical Research Saint Louis Missouri United States 63128
    53 Barbara A. Caciolo Saint Louis Missouri United States 63139
    54 Montana Medical Research, Inc Missoula Montana United States 59808
    55 Internal Medical Associates of Grand Island, PC Grand Island Nebraska United States 68803
    56 Radiant Research, Inc Las Vegas Nevada United States 89146
    57 Buffalo Rheumatology Orchard Park New York United States 14127
    58 Upstate Clinical Research Associates Williamsville New York United States 14221
    59 Arthritis and Osteoporosis Consultants of the Carolinas Charlotte North Carolina United States 28207
    60 Robert A. Harrell, MD Durham North Carolina United States 27704
    61 Piedmont Imaging Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27103
    62 The Center for Clinical Research Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27103
    63 Radiant Research, Inc Columbus Ohio United States 43212
    64 Clinical Research Source, Inc. Perrysburg Ohio United States 43551
    65 Bone Joint & Spine Surgeons, Inc. Toledo Ohio United States 43623
    66 McBride Clinic Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73103
    67 Lynn Health Science Institute Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73112
    68 Healthcare Research Consultants Tulsa Oklahoma United States 74135
    69 Integrated Medical Group PC/Fleetwood Clinical Research Fleetwood Pennsylvania United States 19522
    70 Research Across America @ Oyster Point Family Health Center Lancaster Pennsylvania United States 17601
    71 Arthritis Group Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19152
    72 Allegheny North Arthritis Center Wexford Pennsylvania United States 15090
    73 Jeffry A. Lindenbaum D.O., P.C. Yardley Pennsylvania United States 19067
    74 Anderson Radiology Anderson South Carolina United States 29621
    75 Primary Care Associates Anderson South Carolina United States 29621
    76 Radiant Research, Inc. Anderson South Carolina United States 29621
    77 Carolina Health Specialists Myrtle Beach South Carolina United States 29572
    78 Sarah Cannon Research Institute, LLC Germantown Tennessee United States 38138
    79 Wolf River Medical Group. LLC Germantown Tennessee United States 38138
    80 The Jackson Clinic, PA Jackson Tennessee United States 38305
    81 Office of John M. Joseph, M.D. Carrollton Texas United States 75007
    82 Arthritis Care and Diagnostic Center Dallas Texas United States 75231
    83 Houston Medical Research Associates Houston Texas United States 77090
    84 Nothwest Diagonstic Clinic, PA Houston Texas United States 77090
    85 Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center of South Texas San Antonio Texas United States 78232
    86 Texas Research Center, LP Sugar Land Texas United States 77479
    87 Trinity Clinic, Office of Research Administration Tyler Texas United States 75701
    88 Trinity Clinic, Rheumatology Tyler Texas United States 75701
    89 Physicians' Research Options, LLC Draper Utah United States 84020
    90 Lone Peak Family Medicine Draper Utah United States 84070
    91 Granger Medical Clinic West Valley City Utah United States 84120
    92 Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease Associates, PC Burke Virginia United States 22015
    93 Alan E. Schulman, MD Richmond Virginia United States 23226
    94 Steven Maestrello, M.D. Richmond Virginia United States 23294
    95 Richard Neiman, MD Inc. Kirkland Washington United States 98034
    96 South Puget Sound Clinical Research Center Olympia Washington United States 98502
    97 Rainier Clinical Research Center, Inc. Renton Washington United States 98057
    98 Rheumatology and Pulmonary Clinic Beckley West Virginia United States 25801
    99 Aurora Advanced Healthcare Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53209
    100 Arthritis Clinic Racine Wisconsin United States 53406

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Pfizer

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Pfizer
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00994890
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • A4091043
    • SC OA SAFETY STUDY
    First Posted:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    May 13, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Pfizer
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail Due to United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) imposed clinical hold, study was terminated prematurely and a maximum of only 4 doses of the 7 planned doses of tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) subcutaneous injection were administered in the study.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 231 222 226
    Treated 230 222 226
    COMPLETED 0 0 0
    NOT COMPLETED 231 222 226

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg Total
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 230 222 226 678
    Age, Customized (Count of Participants)
    18 to 44 years
    11
    4.8%
    7
    3.2%
    4
    1.8%
    22
    3.2%
    45 to 64 years
    128
    55.7%
    124
    55.9%
    113
    50%
    365
    53.8%
    Greater than or equal to (>=) 65 years
    91
    39.6%
    91
    41%
    109
    48.2%
    291
    42.9%
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    152
    66.1%
    157
    70.7%
    161
    71.2%
    470
    69.3%
    Male
    78
    33.9%
    65
    29.3%
    65
    28.8%
    208
    30.7%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
    Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
    Time Frame Baseline up to 112 days after last dose of study medication (up to 345 days)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intent to treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    AEs
    158
    68.7%
    169
    76.1%
    181
    80.1%
    SAEs
    17
    7.4%
    12
    5.4%
    20
    8.8%
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
    Description Laboratory analysis included blood chemistry, hematology, urinalysis and pregnancy test.
    Time Frame Baseline to Week 50

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 221 220 220
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    136
    59.1%
    121
    54.5%
    130
    57.5%
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
    Description All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula [QTcB], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed. Participants with abnormal ECG findings reported as adverse events were presented.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 50

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    Atrioventricular block first degree
    0
    0%
    1
    0.5%
    0
    0%
    Bundle branch block right
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.4%
    Supraventricular extrasystoles
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.4%
    Supraventricular tachycardia
    0
    0%
    1
    0.5%
    0
    0%
    Tachycardia
    1
    0.4%
    1
    0.5%
    2
    0.9%
    ECG QRS complex prolonged
    1
    0.4%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    ECG T wave abnormal
    0
    0%
    1
    0.5%
    0
    0%
    ECG T wave inversion
    1
    0.4%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.4%
    4. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 2
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 2

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 229 222 225
    Baseline
    2.04
    (3.93)
    1.52
    (3.17)
    1.76
    (3.53)
    Change at Week 2
    -0.43
    (1.51)
    -0.36
    (2.04)
    -0.23
    (1.78)
    5. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 218 215 218
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -0.35
    (1.72)
    -0.15
    (2.12)
    -0.10
    (1.83)
    6. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 8
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 8

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 215 216 216
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -0.39
    (2.10)
    -0.08
    (2.30)
    -0.34
    (2.14)
    7. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 16
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 188 207 203
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -0.60
    (2.24)
    -0.17
    (2.66)
    -0.24
    (2.61)
    8. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 24
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 161 176 165
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -0.46
    (2.14)
    -0.38
    (2.53)
    -0.19
    (2.44)
    9. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 32
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 32

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 81 90 91
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -0.72
    (2.15)
    -0.11
    (2.26)
    -0.34
    (3.02)
    10. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 40
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 40

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 22 23 27
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -0.82
    (2.11)
    -0.39
    (1.41)
    0.00
    (3.98)
    11. Primary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 48
    Description NIS: 74-item, assess cranial nerves, muscle weakness, reflexes, sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each). Cranial nerves included 5 items (3rd nerve, 6th nerve, facial weakness, palate weakness, tongue weakness), muscle weakness included 19 items (respiratory,neck flexion, shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, brachioradialis,elbow extension, wrist flexion,wrist extension,finger flexion,finger spread,thumb abduction,hip flexion,hip extension,knee flexion,knee extension,ankle dorsiflexors,ankle plantar flexors,toe extensors,toe flexors), each item scored on scale 0=normal to 4=paralysis, higher score=greater weakness. Reflexes included 5 items (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, brachioradialis), sensation included 4 items each for great toe and index finger (touch pressure, pin prick, vibration, joint position), each item scored as 0=normal, 1=decreased, 2=absent. Total NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 48

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Results are not reported for Tanezumab 5 mg group because all participants in this group had discontinued the study before Week 48.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 1 0 1
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    -2.00
    (NA)
    0.00
    (NA)
    12. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Physical Findings
    Description Physical examination included examination of abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, head, heart, lungs, lymph nodes, neck, nose, skin, throat, thyroid, muscoskeletal, neurological and peripheral vascular system.
    Time Frame Baseline to Week 50

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    13
    5.7%
    13
    5.9%
    18
    8%
    13. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Day 1
    Description Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
    Time Frame Day 1

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at any time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 215 213 208
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    1
    0.4%
    1
    0.5%
    1
    0.4%
    14. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 8
    Description Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative ELISA.
    Time Frame Week 8

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at any time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 206 204 203
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    1
    0.4%
    2
    0.9%
    1
    0.4%
    15. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 24
    Description Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative ELISA.
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at any time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 78 93 82
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    0
    0%
    1
    0.5%
    0
    0%
    16. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) at Week 50
    Description Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative ELISA.
    Time Frame Week 50

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at any time point.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 171 176 172
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    3
    1.3%
    3
    1.4%
    1
    0.4%
    17. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities
    Description Examination of vital signs included body temperature, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate and respiratory rate. Participants with abnormal vital sign findings reported as adverse events were presented.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 50

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    Blood pressure increased
    0
    0%
    3
    1.4%
    1
    0.4%
    Hypertension
    8
    3.5%
    4
    1.8%
    5
    2.2%
    Hypotension
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.4%
    18. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Day 1
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Day 1

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    9
    3.9%
    12
    5.4%
    9
    4%
    19. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 2
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Week 2

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 221 218 219
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    7
    3%
    3
    1.4%
    4
    1.8%
    20. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 4
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Week 4

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 219 212 218
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    1
    0.4%
    1
    0.5%
    1
    0.4%
    21. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 8
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Week 8

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 186 191 192
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    4
    1.7%
    6
    2.7%
    7
    3.1%
    22. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 16
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Week 16

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 107 123 113
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    2
    0.9%
    1
    0.5%
    1
    0.4%
    23. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 24
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 54 67 64
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    1
    0.4%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    24. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 32
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Week 32

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 31 28 32
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    25. Primary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions at Week 40
    Description Assessment of the injection-site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
    Time Frame Week 40

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 11 11 12
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    26. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56
    Description WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 220 222
    Baseline
    6.35
    (1.48)
    6.48
    (1.56)
    6.30
    (1.48)
    Change at Week 2
    -2.01
    (2.02)
    -1.97
    (2.18)
    -1.61
    (2.00)
    Change at Week 4
    -2.43
    (2.11)
    -2.68
    (2.15)
    -2.50
    (2.02)
    Change at Week 8
    -2.20
    (2.14)
    -2.76
    (2.25)
    -2.71
    (2.14)
    Change at Week 16
    -2.18
    (2.25)
    -2.85
    (2.32)
    -2.71
    (2.15)
    Change at Week 24
    -2.16
    (2.29)
    -2.84
    (2.31)
    -2.69
    (2.17)
    Change at Week 32
    -2.15
    (2.26)
    -2.82
    (2.32)
    -2.66
    (2.14)
    27. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56
    Description WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint and index hip during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse function.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 220 223
    Baseline
    6.49
    (1.54)
    6.58
    (1.55)
    6.47
    (1.53)
    Change at Week 2
    -2.10
    (2.01)
    -2.13
    (2.15)
    -1.92
    (1.96)
    Change at Week 4
    -2.50
    (2.16)
    -2.70
    (2.22)
    -2.64
    (2.09)
    Change at Week 8
    -2.29
    (2.10)
    -2.83
    (2.26)
    -2.80
    (2.23)
    Change at Week 16
    -2.28
    (2.20)
    -2.89
    (2.35)
    -2.84
    (2.22)
    Change at Week 24
    -2.26
    (2.23)
    -2.89
    (2.37)
    -2.84
    (2.21)
    Change at Week 32
    -2.23
    (2.22)
    -2.90
    (2.36)
    -2.79
    (2.20)
    28. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 2, 4, 8,16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56
    Description Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee (or hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities) and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out normal activities).
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 228 222 225
    Baseline
    3.38
    (0.59)
    3.36
    (0.57)
    3.32
    (0.53)
    Change at Week 2
    -0.70
    (0.78)
    -0.64
    (0.85)
    -0.64
    (0.84)
    Change at Week 4
    -0.85
    (0.79)
    -0.86
    (0.86)
    -0.77
    (0.87)
    Change at Week 8
    -0.72
    (0.80)
    -0.83
    (0.83)
    -0.82
    (0.92)
    Change at Week 16
    -0.69
    (0.83)
    -0.84
    (0.86)
    -0.80
    (0.91)
    Change at Week 24
    -0.71
    (0.87)
    -0.82
    (0.88)
    -0.80
    (0.88)
    Change at Week 32
    -0.69
    (0.88)
    -0.82
    (0.88)
    -0.80
    (0.88)
    29. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response
    Description OMERACT-OARSI response: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=2 units in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale, or at least 2 of the following 3 being true: >=20% improvement from baseline and absolute change from baseline of >=1 unit in 1) WOMAC pain subscale, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected). WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score: 0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
    Time Frame Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 220 223
    Week 2
    57.8
    25.1%
    58.6
    26.4%
    49.3
    21.8%
    Week 4
    64.9
    28.2%
    70.5
    31.8%
    73.5
    32.5%
    Week 8
    61.8
    26.9%
    68.6
    30.9%
    70.9
    31.4%
    Week 16
    59.1
    25.7%
    68.6
    30.9%
    72.2
    31.9%
    Week 24
    58.7
    25.5%
    68.2
    30.7%
    71.7
    31.7%
    Week 32
    58.2
    25.3%
    68.2
    30.7%
    71.7
    31.7%
    30. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
    Description Percentage of participants with at least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% reduction from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale score are reported. WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a 0 to 10 NRS, where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated higher pain.
    Time Frame Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 220 222
    Week 2: at least 30% reduction
    48.9
    21.3%
    49.1
    22.1%
    41.4
    18.3%
    Week 2: at least 50% reduction
    28.4
    12.3%
    31.4
    14.1%
    23.9
    10.6%
    Week 2: at least 70% reduction
    13.8
    6%
    16.8
    7.6%
    14.0
    6.2%
    Week 2: at least 90% reduction
    4.9
    2.1%
    3.6
    1.6%
    3.6
    1.6%
    Week 4: at least 30% reduction
    57.3
    24.9%
    62.7
    28.2%
    60.4
    26.7%
    Week 4: at least 50% reduction
    39.1
    17%
    40.9
    18.4%
    41.0
    18.1%
    Week 4: at least 70% reduction
    21.3
    9.3%
    24.5
    11%
    22.5
    10%
    Week 4: at least 90% reduction
    7.6
    3.3%
    6.8
    3.1%
    6.3
    2.8%
    Week 8: at least 30% reduction
    50.7
    22%
    62.7
    28.2%
    66.2
    29.3%
    Week 8: at least 50% reduction
    35.1
    15.3%
    46.4
    20.9%
    46.4
    20.5%
    Week 8: at least 70% reduction
    18.2
    7.9%
    26.8
    12.1%
    27.0
    11.9%
    Week 8: at least 90% reduction
    7.6
    3.3%
    11.4
    5.1%
    10.8
    4.8%
    Week 16: at least 30% reduction
    52.4
    22.8%
    62.3
    28.1%
    65.3
    28.9%
    Week 16: at least 50% reduction
    37.3
    16.2%
    50.0
    22.5%
    45.5
    20.1%
    Week 16: at least 70% reduction
    20.4
    8.9%
    28.6
    12.9%
    28.4
    12.6%
    Week 16: at least 90% reduction
    6.2
    2.7%
    11.8
    5.3%
    12.2
    5.4%
    Week 24: at least 30% reduction
    50.2
    21.8%
    62.7
    28.2%
    65.3
    28.9%
    Week 24: at least 50% reduction
    37.3
    16.2%
    50.0
    22.5%
    45.5
    20.1%
    Week 24: at least 70% reduction
    20.4
    8.9%
    28.2
    12.7%
    28.8
    12.7%
    Week 24: at least 90% reduction
    7.1
    3.1%
    11.8
    5.3%
    11.7
    5.2%
    Week 32: at least 30% reduction
    51.1
    22.2%
    62.3
    28.1%
    64.9
    28.7%
    Week 32: at least 50% reduction
    36.9
    16%
    49.5
    22.3%
    44.1
    19.5%
    Week 32: at least 70% reduction
    20.4
    8.9%
    27.7
    12.5%
    27.9
    12.3%
    Week 32: at least 90% reduction
    6.7
    2.9%
    11.4
    5.1%
    11.3
    5%
    31. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
    Description WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. Participants with specified reduction (as percent) from baseline at Week 16 are reported.
    Time Frame Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 115 135 118
    Week 16: greater than (>) 0%
    82.6
    35.9%
    85.2
    38.4%
    89.0
    39.4%
    Week 16: >=10%
    74.8
    32.5%
    81.5
    36.7%
    82.2
    36.4%
    Week 16: >=20%
    65.2
    28.3%
    71.9
    32.4%
    73.7
    32.6%
    Week 16: >=30%
    58.3
    25.3%
    63.0
    28.4%
    67.8
    30%
    Week 16: >=40%
    47.0
    20.4%
    57.0
    25.7%
    60.2
    26.6%
    Week 16: >=50%
    43.5
    18.9%
    51.9
    23.4%
    50.0
    22.1%
    Week 16: >=60%
    33.0
    14.3%
    41.5
    18.7%
    41.5
    18.4%
    Week 16: >=70%
    28.7
    12.5%
    32.6
    14.7%
    33.9
    15%
    Week 16: >=80%
    18.3
    8%
    21.5
    9.7%
    22.9
    10.1%
    Week 16: >=90%
    9.6
    4.2%
    14.8
    6.7%
    14.4
    6.4%
    Week 16: 100%
    4.3
    1.9%
    3.7
    1.7%
    5.9
    2.6%
    32. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants With Improvement of At Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis
    Description Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee (or hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value.
    Time Frame Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 228 222 225
    Week 2
    14.5
    6.3%
    15.8
    7.1%
    13.3
    5.9%
    Week 4
    20.2
    8.8%
    20.3
    9.1%
    16.9
    7.5%
    Week 8
    15.8
    6.9%
    18.9
    8.5%
    24.9
    11%
    Week 16
    15.4
    6.7%
    18.0
    8.1%
    20.9
    9.2%
    Week 24
    16.7
    7.3%
    18.5
    8.3%
    20.0
    8.8%
    Week 32
    16.2
    7%
    18.5
    8.3%
    20.0
    8.8%
    33. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56
    Description WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or index hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee or hip.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 220 223
    Baseline
    6.78
    6.85
    6.73
    Change at Week 2
    -2.32
    -2.42
    -2.29
    Change at Week 4
    -2.73
    -3.01
    -2.99
    Change at Week 8
    -2.43
    -3.17
    -3.05
    Change at Week 16
    -2.43
    -3.20
    -3.15
    Change at Week 24
    -2.41
    -3.20
    -3.10
    Change at Week 32
    -2.36
    -3.21
    -3.05
    34. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56
    Description WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of knee or hip. Each item was scored on a 0 to 10 NRS scale, where higher scores indicated higher pain/stiffness or worse function. WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranged from 0 to 10, where higher score indicated worse response.
    Time Frame Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 220 223
    Baseline
    6.54
    (1.45)
    6.64
    (1.50)
    6.50
    (1.41)
    Change at Week 2
    -2.14
    (1.99)
    -2.18
    (2.13)
    -1.94
    (1.96)
    Change at Week 4
    -2.56
    (2.14)
    -2.80
    (2.18)
    -2.71
    (2.05)
    Change at Week 8
    -2.31
    (2.11)
    -2.92
    (2.24)
    -2.85
    (2.23)
    Change at Week 16
    -2.30
    (2.21)
    -2.98
    (2.29)
    -2.90
    (2.22)
    Change at Week 24
    -2.27
    (2.26)
    -2.97
    (2.32)
    -2.88
    (2.21)
    Change at Week 32
    -2.25
    (2.23)
    -2.98
    (2.31)
    -2.83
    (2.20)
    35. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56
    Description Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 220 222
    Baseline
    6.15
    (1.86)
    6.32
    (1.84)
    6.20
    (1.86)
    Change at Week 2
    -1.95
    (2.17)
    -1.94
    (2.38)
    -1.67
    (2.34)
    Change at Week 4
    -2.26
    (2.31)
    -2.59
    (2.34)
    -2.45
    (2.29)
    Change at Week 8
    -2.03
    (2.42)
    -2.65
    (2.50)
    -2.63
    (2.32)
    Change at Week 16
    -2.00
    (2.54)
    -2.66
    (2.48)
    -2.57
    (2.46)
    Change at Week 24
    -1.96
    (2.55)
    -2.65
    (2.51)
    -2.60
    (2.42)
    Change at Week 32
    -1.96
    (2.51)
    -2.63
    (2.51)
    -2.56
    (2.43)
    36. Secondary Outcome
    Title Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Down Stairs at Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48 and 56
    Description Participants answered: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain.
    Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Due to implementation of the FDA clinical hold, all ongoing participants were discontinued from treatment and did not have an opportunity to complete the 56-week treatment period and no efficacy data beyond the Week 32 visit (i.e., Weeks 40, 48 and 56) was collected.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 224 219 222
    Baseline
    7.52
    (1.64)
    7.64
    (1.68)
    7.54
    (1.72)
    Change at Week 2
    -2.34
    (2.28)
    -2.25
    (2.43)
    -1.99
    (2.30)
    Change at Week 4
    -2.86
    (2.58)
    -3.01
    (2.47)
    -2.77
    (2.45)
    Change at Week 8
    -2.60
    (2.48)
    -3.03
    (2.59)
    -3.01
    (2.53)
    Change at Week 16
    -2.51
    (2.63)
    -3.05
    (2.67)
    -3.01
    (2.62)
    Change at Week 24
    -2.47
    (2.66)
    -3.00
    (2.67)
    -2.98
    (2.55)
    Change at Week 32
    -2.46
    (2.63)
    -3.01
    (2.66)
    -2.94
    (2.54)
    37. Secondary Outcome
    Title Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
    Description Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 50

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    Median (Full Range) [days]
    NA
    NA
    NA
    38. Secondary Outcome
    Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
    Description
    Time Frame Baseline up to Week 50

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    Count of Participants [Participants]
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    1
    0.4%
    39. Secondary Outcome
    Title Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication
    Description United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products and viscosupplementation (example, hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the Investigator.
    Time Frame Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group. Data were not collected beyond Week 48 due to premature termination of the study in response to FDA clinical hold.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 219 221
    Week 2
    53.8
    23.4%
    49.8
    22.4%
    52.5
    23.2%
    Week 4
    52.9
    23%
    47.7
    21.5%
    51.6
    22.8%
    Week 8
    53.7
    23.3%
    47.9
    21.6%
    51.6
    22.8%
    Week 16
    50.6
    22%
    47.8
    21.5%
    50.5
    22.3%
    Week 24
    49.5
    21.5%
    49.0
    22.1%
    48.9
    21.6%
    Week 32
    33.3
    14.5%
    47.6
    21.4%
    52.2
    23.1%
    Week 40
    100
    43.5%
    0
    0%
    100
    44.2%
    Week 48
    0
    0%
    40. Secondary Outcome
    Title Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage
    Description United States FDA-approved analgesics were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of OA. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, NSAIDs, capsaicin products and viscosupplementation (example, hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the Investigator.
    Time Frame Week 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group. Data were not collected beyond Week 48 due to premature termination of the study in response to FDA clinical hold.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 225 219 221
    Week 2
    7.0
    0.0
    7.0
    Week 4
    7.0
    0.0
    7.0
    Week 8
    7.0
    0.0
    2.9
    Week 16
    2.5
    0.0
    0.4
    Week 24
    0.0
    0.0
    0.0
    Week 32
    0.0
    0.0
    7.0
    Week 40
    7.0
    0.0
    7.0
    Week 48
    0.0
    41. Other Pre-specified Outcome
    Title Number of Participants With Subcutaneous Doses of Study Medication
    Description Number of participants are reported based on the maximum number of subcutaneous doses of study medication received.
    Time Frame Day 1 up to Week 24

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    ITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of subcutaneous study medication.
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    Measure Participants 230 222 226
    1 dose
    48
    20.9%
    36
    16.2%
    38
    16.8%
    2 doses
    99
    43%
    89
    40.1%
    103
    45.6%
    3 doses
    64
    27.8%
    72
    32.4%
    61
    27%
    4 doses
    19
    8.3%
    25
    11.3%
    24
    10.6%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Cases of osteonecrosis (ON) reported in this and other A409 studies conducted up to 2010 were adjudicated post-hoc by an expert committee(2010-2012). Few of these events (2 of 87 reported ON cases), were confirmed as ON by the committee. Source: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39492
    Arm/Group Title Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Arm/Group Description Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 milligram (mg) injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks. Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg injection subcutaneously every 8 weeks up to 24 weeks.
    All Cause Mortality
    Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 17/230 (7.4%) 12/222 (5.4%) 20/226 (8.8%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute myocardial infarction 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Myocardial infarction 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Gastrooesophageal reflux disease 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Haemorrhoids 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Oesophageal spasm 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Small intestinal obstruction 0/230 (0%) 1/222 (0.5%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Vomiting 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    General disorders
    Chest pain 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Infections and infestations
    Cellulitis 1/230 (0.4%) 1/222 (0.5%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Lobar pneumonia 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Pneumonia 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Foot fracture 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Hip fracture 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Joint dislocation 0/230 (0%) 1/222 (0.5%) 0/226 (0%)
    Tibia fracture 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 4/230 (1.7%) 1/222 (0.5%) 3/226 (1.3%)
    Arthritis 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Back pain 1/230 (0.4%) 1/222 (0.5%) 0/226 (0%)
    Bunion 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Foot deformity 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Fracture malunion 0/230 (0%) 1/222 (0.5%) 0/226 (0%)
    Intervertebral disc protrusion 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Neck pain 0/230 (0%) 1/222 (0.5%) 0/226 (0%)
    Osteoarthritis 2/230 (0.9%) 1/222 (0.5%) 4/226 (1.8%)
    Osteonecrosis 1/230 (0.4%) 4/222 (1.8%) 4/226 (1.8%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Breast cancer 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Malignant melanoma 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Nephrolithiasis 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Lung disorder 1/230 (0.4%) 0/222 (0%) 0/226 (0%)
    Pneumonia aspiration 0/230 (0%) 0/222 (0%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis 0/230 (0%) 1/222 (0.5%) 0/226 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab 10 mg
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 132/230 (57.4%) 137/222 (61.7%) 153/226 (67.7%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea 2/230 (0.9%) 3/222 (1.4%) 6/226 (2.7%)
    Nausea 6/230 (2.6%) 6/222 (2.7%) 11/226 (4.9%)
    General disorders
    Fatigue 3/230 (1.3%) 0/222 (0%) 8/226 (3.5%)
    Injection site reaction 19/230 (8.3%) 21/222 (9.5%) 20/226 (8.8%)
    Oedema peripheral 9/230 (3.9%) 16/222 (7.2%) 22/226 (9.7%)
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis 6/230 (2.6%) 9/222 (4.1%) 7/226 (3.1%)
    Nasopharyngitis 3/230 (1.3%) 5/222 (2.3%) 6/226 (2.7%)
    Sinusitis 6/230 (2.6%) 9/222 (4.1%) 6/226 (2.7%)
    Upper respiratory tract infection 12/230 (5.2%) 9/222 (4.1%) 12/226 (5.3%)
    Urinary tract infection 11/230 (4.8%) 12/222 (5.4%) 20/226 (8.8%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion 4/230 (1.7%) 1/222 (0.5%) 5/226 (2.2%)
    Fall 7/230 (3%) 5/222 (2.3%) 12/226 (5.3%)
    Joint injury 3/230 (1.3%) 6/222 (2.7%) 6/226 (2.7%)
    Investigations
    Blood alkaline phosphatase increased 3/230 (1.3%) 3/222 (1.4%) 5/226 (2.2%)
    Blood creatine phosphokinase increased 6/230 (2.6%) 8/222 (3.6%) 9/226 (4%)
    Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased 1/230 (0.4%) 5/222 (2.3%) 3/226 (1.3%)
    Blood triglycerides increased 1/230 (0.4%) 5/222 (2.3%) 2/226 (0.9%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Vitamin D deficiency 2/230 (0.9%) 2/222 (0.9%) 5/226 (2.2%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia 35/230 (15.2%) 30/222 (13.5%) 26/226 (11.5%)
    Back pain 7/230 (3%) 8/222 (3.6%) 8/226 (3.5%)
    Bursitis 6/230 (2.6%) 3/222 (1.4%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Joint swelling 8/230 (3.5%) 10/222 (4.5%) 13/226 (5.8%)
    Muscle spasms 5/230 (2.2%) 6/222 (2.7%) 10/226 (4.4%)
    Musculoskeletal pain 8/230 (3.5%) 15/222 (6.8%) 12/226 (5.3%)
    Osteoarthritis 6/230 (2.6%) 11/222 (5%) 16/226 (7.1%)
    Pain in extremity 14/230 (6.1%) 12/222 (5.4%) 16/226 (7.1%)
    Rotator cuff syndrome 4/230 (1.7%) 0/222 (0%) 5/226 (2.2%)
    Synovial cyst 2/230 (0.9%) 1/222 (0.5%) 9/226 (4%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Burning sensation 1/230 (0.4%) 5/222 (2.3%) 2/226 (0.9%)
    Carpal tunnel syndrome 8/230 (3.5%) 3/222 (1.4%) 7/226 (3.1%)
    Dizziness 3/230 (1.3%) 5/222 (2.3%) 8/226 (3.5%)
    Headache 9/230 (3.9%) 6/222 (2.7%) 10/226 (4.4%)
    Hypoaesthesia 14/230 (6.1%) 6/222 (2.7%) 15/226 (6.6%)
    Paraesthesia 13/230 (5.7%) 17/222 (7.7%) 25/226 (11.1%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety 5/230 (2.2%) 2/222 (0.9%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 5/230 (2.2%) 3/222 (1.4%) 5/226 (2.2%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Rash 4/230 (1.7%) 6/222 (2.7%) 1/226 (0.4%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 8/230 (3.5%) 4/222 (1.8%) 5/226 (2.2%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Due to United States FDA imposed clinical hold, enrollment was stopped and study was terminated prematurely. Due to this, injection-site reaction data were not collected beyond Week 40 and NIS data were not collected beyond Week 48.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
    Organization Pfizer, Inc.
    Phone 1-800-718-1021
    Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Responsible Party:
    Pfizer
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00994890
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • A4091043
    • SC OA SAFETY STUDY
    First Posted:
    Oct 14, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    May 13, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2021