Comparison of Surgical Time and Efficiency of Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare the surgical efficiency of TruMatch® Personalized Solutions surgical technique compared to conventional surgical technique. Specifically, the purpose of this study is to collect time data to enhance the existing economic model.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The study is designed as a prospective, multi-center, controlled, non-randomized, clinical investigation to compare the efficiency of TruMatch® Personalized Solutions surgical technique compared to conventional surgical technique.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions (Custom Patient Instrumentation) |
Other: Custom Patient Instrumentation
TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation (CPI). TruMatch™ is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patient's distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Total Knee Replacement Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments |
Other: Conventional Instruments
Total Knee Arthroplasty implanted using conventional instruments (non-CPI) and surgical technique.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Surgical Procedure Time to Compare Skin-to-Skin Time for Conventional Versus TruMatch® Primary Total Knee Replacements [Intraoperative (Time from first incision to first stitch)]
Skin-to skin time for conventional versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements (recorded by Investigator on Operative case report forms).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Operating Room Setup - Operating Room Cleaned up From Previous Case to Surgical Draping Complete [Intraoperative (Operating Room cleaned up from previous case to surgical draping complete)]
Operating Room setup time for conventional versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements as recorded by video time analysis [minutes]
- Turnover Time (Time to Clean Operating Room After Surgery is Completed) [Intraoperative (Time to clean Operating Room after surgery is completed)]
Turnover Time for conventional versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements as recorded by video time analysis [minutes].
- Costs Associated With Conventional Versus TruMatch® Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgical Procedures [Intraoperative (Total duration of procedure)]
Compare costs associated with surgery using conventional surgical technique versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements .
- To Compare the Differences in Operating Room Efficiency as a Function of Institution Type and Geographical Location [Intraoperative]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subject is male or female and between the ages of 18 and 80 years old, inclusive.
-
Subject requires a primary total knee replacement and is considered by the Investigator to be suitable for the specific knee prosthesis identified in the protocol.
-
Subject has given voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and has authorized the transfer of his/her information to DePuy
-
Subject, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, is able to understand this clinical investigation, and co-operate with investigational procedures.
-
Subject, who, in the opinion of the Clinical Investigator, are suitable for implantation using TruMatch™ instrumentation. For example, no femoral nails/bone plates that extend into the knee, ie. within 8cm of joint line; no metal device that could cause CT scatter about the knee and no deformities greater than 15 degrees of fixed varus, valgus, or flexion contracture are consistent with TruMatch™ instrumentation.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
The Subject is a woman who is pregnant or lactating.
-
The Subject has participated in a clinical investigation with an investigational product in the last 3 months.
-
The Subject is currently involved in any personal injury litigation, medical-legal or worker's compensations claims.
-
The Subject has previously had a prosthetic knee replacement device (any type) of the affected knee.
-
The Subject requires simultaneous bilateral total knee replacements.
-
The Subject had a contralateral TKA and that knee was previously entered in the study.
-
Subject in whom the surgeon intends to implant a knee prosthesis that is not in the PFC Sigma primary knee system.
-
Subject who has inflammatory arthritis.
-
Subject who has a Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥ 40. (Please see Table 2-1: Definition of Terms, for BMI definition and calculation formulas).
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Center for Hip and Knee Surgery | Mooresville | Indiana | United States | 46158 |
2 | Pinnacle Orthopaedics | Bartlesville | Oklahoma | United States | 74006 |
3 | Commonwealth Orthopaedics | Reston | Virginia | United States | 20190 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- DePuy Orthopaedics
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carl Painter, Pinnacle Orthopaedics
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 08004
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | TruMatch® Personalized Solutions |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (P.F.C. Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions. Instrument: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch® is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patients' distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 15 | 15 |
COMPLETED | 15 | 14 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | TruMatch® Personalized Solutions | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions Instrument: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch® is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patient's distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 15 | 15 | 30 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
62.9
(12.9)
|
62.7
(9.1)
|
62.8
(10.9)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
6
40%
|
11
73.3%
|
17
56.7%
|
Male |
9
60%
|
4
26.7%
|
13
43.3%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
15
100%
|
15
100%
|
30
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Surgical Procedure Time to Compare Skin-to-Skin Time for Conventional Versus TruMatch® Primary Total Knee Replacements |
---|---|
Description | Skin-to skin time for conventional versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements (recorded by Investigator on Operative case report forms). |
Time Frame | Intraoperative (Time from first incision to first stitch) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | TruMatch® Personalized Solutions |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (P.F.C. Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions. Instrument: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch® is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patients' distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 14 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [minutes] |
65.8
(12.3)
|
67.3
(20.6)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Conventional Total Knee Replacement, TruMatch® Personalized Solutions |
---|---|---|
Comments | The null hypothesis was no difference in skin-to-skin time. The alternative hypothesis was that the TruMatch group time was less than the conventional group. Statistical power was anticipated to be 86% with 40 enrolled subjects based upon a Cohen's D effect size of 1. The Sponsor had difficulty identifying and recruiting sites suitable for participation. The statistically required sample size (N=40) was therefore not obtained, causing the group comparison to be statistically underpowered. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.54 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments |
Title | Operating Room Setup - Operating Room Cleaned up From Previous Case to Surgical Draping Complete |
---|---|
Description | Operating Room setup time for conventional versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements as recorded by video time analysis [minutes] |
Time Frame | Intraoperative (Operating Room cleaned up from previous case to surgical draping complete) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | TruMatch® Personalized Solutions |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (P.F.C. Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions. Instrument: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch® is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patients' distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon. |
Measure Participants | 15 | 14 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [minutes] |
28.9
(15.0)
|
28.8
(14.4)
|
Title | Turnover Time (Time to Clean Operating Room After Surgery is Completed) |
---|---|
Description | Turnover Time for conventional versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements as recorded by video time analysis [minutes]. |
Time Frame | Intraoperative (Time to clean Operating Room after surgery is completed) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
1 site (9 subjects) was excluded from Turnover Time analysis as this substep could not be accurately assessed due to unexpected difficulties during video collection. |
Arm/Group Title | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | TruMatch® Personalized Solutions |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (P.F.C. Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions. Instrument: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch® is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patients' distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [minutes] |
10.1
(4.8)
|
11.4
(2.8)
|
Title | Costs Associated With Conventional Versus TruMatch® Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgical Procedures |
---|---|
Description | Compare costs associated with surgery using conventional surgical technique versus TruMatch® primary total knee replacements . |
Time Frame | Intraoperative (Total duration of procedure) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No cost data were collected, resulting in a sample size of 0. |
Arm/Group Title | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | TruMatch® Personalized Solutions |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (P.F.C. Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions. Instrument: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch® is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patients' distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Title | To Compare the Differences in Operating Room Efficiency as a Function of Institution Type and Geographical Location |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Intraoperative |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
No operating room efficiency data was analyzed as a function of geography and institution, resulting in a sample size of 0. |
Arm/Group Title | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | TruMatch® Personalized Solutions |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (P.F.C. Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch® Personalized Solutions. Instrument: TruMatch® Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch® is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patients' distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon. |
Measure Participants | 0 | 0 |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Intraoperative | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | ||
Arm/Group Description | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions Instrument: TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions is the brand name of DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. custom patient instrumentation. TruMatch™ is a pair of custom-made cutting blocks that allow distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts to be made according to a predefined surgical plan. The inner surface of the femoral block is manufactured to match the geometry of the patient's distal femur. The inner surface of the tibial block is manufactured to match the patient's proximal tibia. The geometric data is obtained from a CT scan and a preoperative plan approved by the surgeon | Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Fixed-Bearing or Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty (PFC Sigma System) implanted using conventional instruments | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/14 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
TruMatch™ Personalized Solutions | Conventional Total Knee Replacement | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/14 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Sam Himden, Clinical Portfolio Leader |
---|---|
Organization | DePuy Synthes |
Phone | 574-372-7231 |
shimden@its.jnj.com |
- 08004