Pilot Study of Lidocaine 5% Patch Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee

Sponsor
Endo Pharmaceuticals (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00904462
Collaborator
(none)
224
24
2
9.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
224 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine 5% Patch With Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2004
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2005

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine 5% patch

Lidocaine 5% patch (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours

Drug: Lidoderm
Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine 5% patch
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo patch

    Matching placebo patch, 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours

    Drug: Placebo patch
    Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    2. Pain intensity and pain relief (BPI Questions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8) [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    3. Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    4. Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Impression of Change in OA pain (categorical scale) [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    5. Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (categorical scale) [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. QoL: Pain interference on activities of daily living using Question 9 of the BPI [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    2. QoL: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    3. Quality of Sleep (QOS) [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    4. Safety assessments included AEs, dermal assessments, clinical laboratory tests (including urinalysis), vital sign measurements, physical examination results, and plasma lidocaine concentrations [Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Key Inclusion Criteria:
    1. Had unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria based on clinical and radiographic evidence (presence of osteophytes on x-ray and written evaluation) of OA

    2. Had functional capacity class rating of I, II, or III according to ACR classification

    3. Had normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction

    4. Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter [OTC] analgesics) prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for non study pain

    5. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had an average pain intensity rating for the index joint of 6 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the BPI and recorded in a diary

    6. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had, at the baseline visit, an OA severity score for the index joint of 7 or greater on a composite scale of 0 to 24 as measured by the Index of Severity for Osteoarthrosis of the Knee

    Key Exclusion Criteria:
    1. Had been diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis, gout, pseudo-gout or Paget's disease that in the investigator's opinion would have interfered with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA

    2. Had serious medical conditions requiring daily medications, such as anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants, that could have confounded study results

    3. Had any other clinically significant joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint

    4. Had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min)

    5. Had moderate or greater hepatic impairment

    6. Were taking analgesic medications, glucosamine, or chondroitin that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.

    7. Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the placebo run-in period.

    8. Were using lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued during the study

    9. Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for OA

    10. Had recently received either a corticosteroid injection (within 8 weeks) or hyaluronic acid (within 6 months) of study entry

    11. Were unable to discontinue use of topical drugs applied to the knee

    12. Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Birmingham Alabama United States
    2 Hueytown Alabama United States
    3 Tallassee Alabama United States
    4 Phoenix Arizona United States
    5 Boulder Colorado United States
    6 Deland Florida United States
    7 Largo Florida United States
    8 Palm Harbor Florida United States
    9 St. Petersburg Florida United States
    10 Chicago Illinois United States
    11 Springfield Illinois United States
    12 Wheaton Maryland United States
    13 Peabody Massachusetts United States
    14 Bingham Farms Michigan United States
    15 Reno Nevada United States
    16 Berlin New Jersey United States
    17 Dayton Ohio United States
    18 Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States
    19 Duncansville Pennsylvania United States
    20 Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States
    21 Charleston South Carolina United States
    22 Bartlett Tennessee United States
    23 Cordova Tennessee United States
    24 Memphis Tennessee United States

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Endo Pharmaceuticals

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Study Director, Endo Pharmaceuticals

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00904462
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • EN3260-001
    First Posted:
    May 19, 2009
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 10, 2010