Efficacy of Acupuncture With Physical Therapy for Knee Osteo-Arthritis

Sponsor
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) (NIH)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00035399
Collaborator
(none)
300
3
60
100
1.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study will examine the efficacy of acupuncture in combination with exercise physical therapy for moderate osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Acupuncture
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Acupuncture is an ancient Chinese technique of using a fine needle to stimulate points along theoretical meridians of energy to correct imbalances thought to be responsible for specific disease states. In the United States, acupuncture is often used for the treatment of painful conditions. The 1997 NIH Consensus Conference concluded that there was adequate evidence of efficacy in an acute dental pain model and in nausea. In chronic pain, most studies were too small, poorly designed, poorly executed, or improperly controlled to adequately demonstrate that needle acupuncture worked better than sham acupuncture, placebo, standard medical therapy, or even no treatment. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee has been proposed as a good model to test the efficacy of acupuncture in a chronic pain condition because it is an extremely common, well defined, and disabling condition with well established outcome measures for symptoms and functional status. There is clinical trial evidence of efficacy for the standard treatments of acetaminophen and NSAIDs, and exercise physical therapy (EPT), which is usually added when the patient develops functional limitations. One high quality study of acupuncture for knee OA, demonstrated moderate benefit in an unblinded comparison to a usual care control group. As such, a major question remains about whether acupuncture, used in addition to exercise therapy, will provide a clinically meaningful improvement in pain and function. Since pain can be the primary limiting factor in improved exercise capacity, if acupuncture has any efficacy in reducing the pain of knee OA, then the combination with an EPT program should be substantially more effective than EPT alone. Another major concern is that the effect of the acupuncture may be predominantly mediated by non- specific placebo effects rather than the specific effects of the placement of a needle. Another important component of this proposal is our use of a validated blinded placebo needle instead of sham acupuncture points. Therefore, the primary goal of this proposal is to use a properly designed randomized blinded clinical trial, using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended outcome measures, to determine whether the addition of acupuncture to standard EPT provides an overall clinically important benefit to patients with symptomatic knee OA compared to placebo acupuncture. As a secondary goal, we will use the clinical trial data to develop prognostic and etiologic models for the patients that are most likely to respond to acupuncture. If a clinically important benefit for acupuncture is found, a broader application of this technique would be justified. However, if the results are negative, then the addition of acupuncture to EPT should be generally curtailed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
300 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of Acupuncture With Physical Therapy for Knee Osteo-Arthritis
Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2002
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2007
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2007

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    40 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No

    INCLUSION CRITERIA

    • X-ray proven osteoarthritis of the knee - Kellgren level 2 or greater

    • More than 3 months of moderate knee pain

    • Previous trial of NSAIDs or acetaminophen

    • Physician referral for at least 6 physical therapy treatments

    • Capacity to understand the requirements of the study and complete questionnaires

    • Average knee pain with movement, 4 or above, during the last week

    EXCLUSION CRITERIA

    • Average hip, back, ankle pain is greater than average knee pain (scale 1-10)

    • Back, hip or ankle pain substantially interferes with patient knee assessment

    • History of gout

    • Acupuncture in the last year

    • Moderate or greater hip or ankle pain greater than 3 daily

    • Local corticosteroid injection into the effected knee within the past 4 weeks

    • Hyaluronidase within the past 6 months

    • Bleeding disorder or current use of Coumadin or Heparin

    • Cardiac or pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance enough to limit the standard exercise physical therapy

    • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months

    • Unable to complete a six minute walk test

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Penn Therapy and Fitness Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104
    2 Veterans Administration Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19104
    3 Pennsylvania Hospital Sports Medicine/Rehabilitation Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: John T. Farrar, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    , ,
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00035399
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • R01AT000304-01A1
    First Posted:
    May 6, 2002
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2008

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 12, 2008