Prospective Double-blinded Randomised Comparison of Profix Mobile to Fixed Bearing Knee Replacements

Sponsor
The University of New South Wales (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02157220
Collaborator
(none)
77
1
2
108
0.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a randomised control trial comparing two different prosthetic designs used in total knee arthroplasty. Participants were randomised to receive either of the two prostheses and then were followed up of a period of 7 years, looking at pain, range of motion and impact on quality of life. The literature and joint registry of Australia shows that one of the prosthesis may be inferior to the other. Our research team hypothesised that this was not the case and that previous elicited differences were related to other factors.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Fixed bearing prosthesis
  • Device: Mobile bearing prosthesis
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
77 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Study Start Date :
May 1, 2005
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2012
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2014

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Randomised group 1

This study is looking at a group of patients with knee osteoarthritis or other pathology requiring total knee arthroplasty. This group of patients were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing prosthesis or a fixed bearing prosthesis.

Device: Fixed bearing prosthesis

Experimental: Randomised group 2

This study is looking at a group of patients with knee osteoarthritis or other pathology requiring total knee arthroplasty. This group of patients were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing prosthesis or a fixed bearing prosthesis.

Device: Mobile bearing prosthesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual pain analogue score [6 weeks]

    Participants asked to rate their level of pain on a scale

  2. Range of motion [6 weeks]

    The range of motion of the joint was assessed in both flexion and extension

  3. Activities of Daily Living [6 weeks]

    Questionnaire looking at how the intervention impacts of activities of daily living

  4. X-ray analysis of joint alignment [5-7 year]

    Using X-rays, the knee was assessed for mechanical and anatomical alignment

  5. Visual pain analogue score [6 months]

  6. visual pain analogue score [12 months]

  7. visual analogue pain score [5-7 years]

  8. range of motion [6 months]

  9. range of motion [1 year]

  10. range of motion [5-7 years]

  11. activities of daily living [6 months]

  12. activities of daily living [1 year]

  13. activities of daily living [5-7 years]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • patients presenting to a single orthopaedic surgeon with knee pathology, who were suitable candidates for total knee arthroplasty
Exclusion Criteria:
  • refusal to participate

  • other simultaneous surgery

  • post traumatic osteoarthritis

  • prior open knee surgery

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Dr Dean Pepper, orthopaedic surgeon private rooms Port Macquarie New South Wales Australia 2444

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • The University of New South Wales

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Cameron Handford, Dr Cameron Handford, The University of New South Wales
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02157220
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HC12098
First Posted:
Jun 5, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Jun 5, 2014
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2014
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 5, 2014