Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder IDE Study

Sponsor
Zimmer Biomet (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01878253
Collaborator
(none)
95
11
1
66
8.6
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if Sidus stem-free shoulder system is safe and effective when used in total shoulder replacement.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System
N/A

Detailed Description

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy (defined as follows) of the Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System in unilateral primary total shoulder arthroplasty.

Safety: Will be evaluated by monitoring the frequency and incidence of device related adverse events or unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs) in investigational subjects as well as analyzing survivorship using revision or intended revision as an endpoint.

Efficacy: Will be determined by comparing the overall pain and functional performance, survivorship and radiographic success of investigational subjects with those subjects who received the control devices.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
95 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Multicenter Trial of the Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder Arthroplasty System
Study Start Date :
Jul 1, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Investigational

This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System.

Device: Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain and Function as Measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Questionnaire [Two years]

    Pain and function as measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. ASES consists of 3 subcomponent scores including pain, instability and activities of daily living. The pain score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The instability score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no instability and 10 being the worst instability imaginable. The activities of daily living consists of 10 questions with ordinal responses of 0, 1, 2, and 3. 3 involves no limitation and 0 is unable to do. The 3 subcomponents combine to make the overall ASES score which can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible score and 100 being the best.

  2. Absence of Radiographic Evidence of Failure or Pending Failure Based on Radiographic Assessment [Two years]

    absence of radiographic evidence of pending failure of the humeral components, assessed at 2 years which may include the following: implant fracture progressive implant migration or subsidence ≥ 5 mm

  3. The Number of Device Related Serious Adverse Events. [Two years]

    This outcome will measure the frequency of device related serious adverse events.

  4. Survivorship [Up to Two years]

    The Kaplan-Meier method was used for this study. This outcome measures survivorship of the implanted devices from the date of implantation to the date of revision or intended revision up to 2 years post-operative (whichever came first).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. ASES Functional and Pain Scores at Intervals Other Than 2 Years as Measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Questionnaire [6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year]

    Pain and function as measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. ASES consists of 3 subcomponent scores including pain, instability and activities of daily living. The pain score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The instability score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no instability and 10 being the worst instability imaginable. The activities of daily living consists of 10 questions with ordinal responses of 0, 1, 2, and 3. 3 involves no limitation and 0 is unable to do. The 3 subcomponents combine to make the overall ASES score which can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible score and 100 being the best.

  2. SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores as Measured by the SF-12 Scoring Questionnaire. [Pre-Op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years]

    SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores. SF-12 is a validated health survey that uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well being from the patient's point of view. The SF-12 is calculated on a scale of 0 to 100, where a 0 is the worst level of health and 100 is the best level of health. The scores are then normalized with a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, so that scores greater than 50 represent a health level better than average, and scores less than 50 represent a level lower than average.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
22 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient must be 22 years of age or older.

  • Patient is skeletally mature.

  • Patient must have signed the IRB/EC approved informed consent.

  • Patient is a candidate for a total shoulder arthroplasty (replacement of humeral head and glenoid).

  • Patient has a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of the shoulder of grade III or higher.

  • Patient has experienced symptoms of shoulder pain and/or loss of function for at least 6 months and has a maximum ASES score of 40.

  • Patient has no findings to indicate an etiology of acute trauma, infection, avascular necrosis or inflammatory arthropathy of the operative shoulder.

  • Patient has undergone no previous reconstructive shoulder surgery. Acceptable previous shoulder surgeries include arthroscopy, soft tissue repair, or pinning/screw fixation due to a historic fracture.

  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the required post-operative therapy as defined in the protocol.

  • Patient is willing and able to comply with the required follow-up schedule as defined in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient is a prisoner.

  • Patient is a known current alcohol or drug abuser.

  • Patient has a psychiatric illness or cognitive deficit that precluded informed consent.

  • Patient has a chronic renal impairment or failure.

  • Patient sensitivity to implant materials.

  • Patient has a vascular insufficiency due to large or small vessel disease which could inhibit postoperative healing.

  • Patient is currently receiving or has received within the last 3 months chronic systemic or inhaled steroids. This exclusion does not apply to those patients with occasional inhaler use due to seasonal allergies.

  • Local rash or skin infection around the intended operative site.

  • Patients with ongoing Worker's Compensation or third party liability claims related to the operative shoulder.

  • Pre-existing contra-lateral shoulder replacement less than 6 months ago.

  • Patient who will require a contra-lateral shoulder replacement less than 6 months from the current planned shoulder replacement.

  • Patient has evidence of major joint trauma, infection, avascular necrosis, cuff tear arthropathy, chronic dislocation, massive rotator cuff tear, inflammatory arthropathy, or previous shoulder surgery (other than arthroscopy, soft tissue repair, or pinning/screw fixation due to historic fracture).

  • Patient has significant muscle paralysis.

  • Patient has Charcot arthropathy.

  • Patient has metaphyseal bony defects at the bone/implant interface which could inhibit prosthesis fixation.

  • Patient has a preoperative computed tomography scans or other radiographic images of the shoulder that showed insufficient glenoid or humeral bone stock to allow for implantation of the prosthesis.

  • Insufficient bone stock exists in the presence of metabolic bone disease (i.e. osteoporosis or severe osteopenia), cancer and radiation.

  • Patient with severe glenoid deficiency.

  • Prior fracture of the operative shoulder with the presence of malunion or non-union.

  • Prior tuberosity fracture with the presence of malunion or non-union.

  • Patient has an active joint or systemic infection.

  • Patient has a life expectancy of less than two years.

  • Patient with unacceptably high operative risk.

  • Patient unwilling to sign protocol required informed consent.

  • Patient is unwilling to complete the protocol required radiographic imaging.

  • Patient is unwilling to complete the protocol required follow-up of two years.

  • Patient is known to be pregnant.

  • Intraoperative findings which indicate insufficient bone stock or local deformities which could inhibit prosthesis fixation. Final assessment of bone quality will be completed intraoperatively upon resection of the humeral head and prior to insertion of the anchor as described in the surgical technique. If there is any doubt regarding bone quality affecting the stable fixation of the anchor, the surgeon must use a stemmed prosthesis.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Stanford University Redwood City California United States 94063
2 University of California San Francisco - Orthopaedics Institute San Francisco California United States 94158
3 St. Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta Atlanta Georgia United States 30342
4 Norton Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Louisville Kentucky United States 40241
5 MedStar Health Baltimore Maryland United States 21218
6 Washington University Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
7 Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania United States 17033
8 Rothman Institute Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19107
9 University of Calgary Sports Medicine Clinic Calgary Alberta Canada T2N 1N4
10 Kingston General Hospital Kingston Ontario Canada K7L 2V7
11 St. Joseph's Health Care London - Hand and Upper Limb Centre London Ontario Canada N6A 4L6

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Zimmer Biomet

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Zimmer Biomet
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01878253
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CIU2012-12E
  • G130026
First Posted:
Jun 14, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Jul 15, 2019
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2019
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Keywords provided by Zimmer Biomet
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 95
Pre-Operative 95
6 Weeks 95
6 Months 90
1 Year 88
2 Year 86
COMPLETED 86
NOT COMPLETED 9

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System
Overall Participants 95
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
66
69.5%
>=65 years
29
30.5%
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years]
61
(9.3)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
40
42.1%
Male
55
57.9%
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number]
White Non-Hispanic
87
91.6%
African American
4
4.2%
Asian
1
1.1%
Hispanic or Latino
1
1.1%
Patient Unwilling to Answer
2
2.1%
BMI (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2]
30.8
(6.9)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Pain and Function as Measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Questionnaire
Description Pain and function as measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. ASES consists of 3 subcomponent scores including pain, instability and activities of daily living. The pain score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The instability score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no instability and 10 being the worst instability imaginable. The activities of daily living consists of 10 questions with ordinal responses of 0, 1, 2, and 3. 3 involves no limitation and 0 is unable to do. The 3 subcomponents combine to make the overall ASES score which can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible score and 100 being the best.
Time Frame Two years

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
All participants received the implant as treatment. ASES Functional Score Summary and Pain Scores.
Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. ASES Functional and Pain Summary scores
Measure Participants 86
ASES Functional Score
89.4
(13.3)
ASES Pain Score
0.7
(1.5)
2. Primary Outcome
Title Absence of Radiographic Evidence of Failure or Pending Failure Based on Radiographic Assessment
Description absence of radiographic evidence of pending failure of the humeral components, assessed at 2 years which may include the following: implant fracture progressive implant migration or subsidence ≥ 5 mm
Time Frame Two years

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
Participants who had received the implant. 85 subjects had radiographic images available at the 2 year time point.. Radiographies were assessed at 2 years for implant fracture, failure of humeral components and progressive implant migration or subsidence greater or equal to 5 mm.
Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description Absence of radiographic evidence of pending failure of the humeral components, assessed at 2 years which may include the following: implant fracture progressive implant migration or subsidence ≥ 5 mm
Measure Participants 85
Subjects with Evidence of Radiographic Failure
2
2.1%
Subjects with Radiographic Success
83
87.4%
3. Primary Outcome
Title The Number of Device Related Serious Adverse Events.
Description This outcome will measure the frequency of device related serious adverse events.
Time Frame Two years

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
This outcome will measure the frequency of device related serious adverse events. At the two year endpoint of the study there were a total of 86 participants with available data.
Arm/Group Title Investigational
Arm/Group Description Frequency of device related serious adverse events
Measure Participants 86
Number [Device Related Serious Adverse Events]
0
4. Primary Outcome
Title Survivorship
Description The Kaplan-Meier method was used for this study. This outcome measures survivorship of the implanted devices from the date of implantation to the date of revision or intended revision up to 2 years post-operative (whichever came first).
Time Frame Up to Two years

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
At the two year study endpoint there were 86 subjects that had data available at the two year time point.
Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System
Measure Participants 86
Subject devices that survived
83
87.4%
Subject devices revised
3
3.2%
5. Secondary Outcome
Title ASES Functional and Pain Scores at Intervals Other Than 2 Years as Measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Questionnaire
Description Pain and function as measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire. ASES consists of 3 subcomponent scores including pain, instability and activities of daily living. The pain score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The instability score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no instability and 10 being the worst instability imaginable. The activities of daily living consists of 10 questions with ordinal responses of 0, 1, 2, and 3. 3 involves no limitation and 0 is unable to do. The 3 subcomponents combine to make the overall ASES score which can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible score and 100 being the best.
Time Frame 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
ASES Functional Score Summary and Pain Scores. 95 Participants had ASES data at 6 weeks, 90 at 6 months and 88 at 1 year. At 6 weeks 1 subject was missing data required to calculate the ASES functional score, had pain score data present.
Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. ASES Functional Summary scores
Measure Participants 95
ASES Functional Score 6 Weeks
59.8
(18.2)
ASES Functional Score 6 Months
80.3
(20.1)
ASES Functional Score 1 Year
88.1
(14.5)
ASES Pain Score 6 weeks
2
(2.4)
ASES Pain Score 6 months
1.3
(2.2)
ASES Pain Score 1 year
0.7
(1.5)
6. Secondary Outcome
Title SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores as Measured by the SF-12 Scoring Questionnaire.
Description SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores. SF-12 is a validated health survey that uses 12 questions to measure functional health and well being from the patient's point of view. The SF-12 is calculated on a scale of 0 to 100, where a 0 is the worst level of health and 100 is the best level of health. The scores are then normalized with a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, so that scores greater than 50 represent a health level better than average, and scores less than 50 represent a level lower than average.
Time Frame Pre-Op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores. 95 subjects had data Pre-operatively, 94 at 6 weeks, 90 at 6 months, 88 at 1 year and 86 at 2 years. One subject at the 6 weeks interval had completed the physical portion of the SF-12 but did not complete all requirements to calculate the SF-12 Mental Score.
Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System SF-12 Mental Health and Physical Composite Scores
Measure Participants 95
SF-12 Mental Health Scores Pre-Op
50
(13.5)
SF-12 Mental Health Scores 6 Weeks
55.1
(10.5)
SF-12 Mental Health Scores 6 Months
55.5
(8.4)
SF-12 Mental Health Scores 1 Year
54.3
(9.1)
SF-12 Mental Health Scores 2 Year
54.3
(8.3)
SF-12 Physical Composite Scores Pre-Op
32.7
(6.9)
SF-12 Physical Composite Scores 6 weeks
36.5
(8.3)
SF-12 Physical Composite Scores 6 months
44.2
(10.6)
SF-12 Physical Composite Scores 1 year
46.2
(10.3)
SF-12 Physical Composite Scores 2 year
47.6
(8.7)

Adverse Events

Time Frame Reported Adverse Events (AEs) include events from the date each subject was implanted until the date of study closure or date of revision (if applicable).
Adverse Event Reporting Description If a subject experienced more than 1 of a given AE, the subjects are counted only once for that AE. If a subject experienced more than one AE in a system organ class (SOC), the subject is counted only once in that SOC.
Arm/Group Title Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Arm/Group Description This arm will include all subjects who are implanted with the investigational Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System. Sidus Stem-Free Total Shoulder Arthroplasty System
All Cause Mortality
Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/95 (1.1%)
Serious Adverse Events
Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/95 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 28/95 (29.5%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Other General Non-Shoulder Complication 5/95 (5.3%) 11
Fracture of Proximal Humerus 1/95 (1.1%) 1
Glenoid Implant Loosening 3/95 (3.2%) 3
Other Shoulder Related Complication 21/95 (22.1%) 29
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatological 1/95 (1.1%) 1

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

The Investigator must provide the Sponsor at least 30 days to review publications for legal and regulatory compliance and will include in publications a statement that the study was supported by the Sponsor. Sponsor confidential information will not be submitted for publication without Sponsor consent. Sponsor may request delay of publication for 60 days to allow for patent application filing.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Clinical Operation Director
Organization Zimmer Biomet Inc
Phone 574-371-9823
Email Bill.Bourdeau@zimmerbiomet.com
Responsible Party:
Zimmer Biomet
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01878253
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CIU2012-12E
  • G130026
First Posted:
Jun 14, 2013
Last Update Posted:
Jul 15, 2019
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2019