Clinical Effectiveness of S53P4 Bioactive Glass in Treatment of Long-bone Chronic Osteomyelitis

Sponsor
Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04945434
Collaborator
University Medical Center Groningen (Other)
78
1
117.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This clinical trial studies the clinical effectiveness of S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG) as a bacterial growth inhibiting bone graft substitute in a one-stage or two-stage surgical procedure for treatment of chronic long bone osteomyelitis.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: S53P4 bioactive glass (BonAlive)
N/A

Detailed Description

In this prospective multicenter study, patients from two different university hospitals in the Netherlands were included. Treatment consisted of debridement surgery, implantation of S53P4-BAG, if necessary wound closure by a plastic surgeon and additional culture based systemic antibiotics. Primary outcome was eradication of infection based on clinical presentation, radiographic imaging and laboratory tests. Secondary analysis was performed on probable risk factors for treatment failure after S53P4-BAG implantation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
78 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Single group cohort studySingle group cohort study
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Clinical Results of Chronic Cavitary Long-bone Osteomyelitis Treatment Using S53P4 Bioactive Glass; a Multi-center Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: S53P4 BAG intervention group

Patients recruited and enrolled in study for treatment with S53P4 BAG

Device: S53P4 bioactive glass (BonAlive)
Surgical implantation of S53P4 in a bone defect created during debridement for chronic osteomyelitis.
Other Names:
  • Bonalive bioactive glass
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Eradication of infection In clinical presentation [1-5 years follow-up]

      Based on the following Clinical Signs: - Absence of a draining fistula, redness, swelling, pain and fever (>38,5 degrees of celcius)

    2. Absence of signs of chronic osteomyelitis on radiographic imaging (1/2) [1 - 5 years follow-up]

      Radiographic analysis of X-ray or CT images of the affected bone Based on a combination of 2 different infection paramaters Parameter 1: - Bone destruction

    3. Absence of signs of chronic osteomyelitis on radiographic imaging (2/2) [1 - 5 years follow-up]

      Radiographic analysis of X-ray or CT images of the affected bone Based on a combination of 2 different infection paramaters Parameter 2: - Periostal reactions

    4. Eradication of infection in blood sample analysis (1/3) [1 - 5 years follow-up]

      Based on a combination of 3 different infection parameters; parameter 1 is C-Reactive protein (<10mg/L), collected from a venapuncture.

    5. Eradication of infection in blood sample analysis (2/3) [1 - 5 years follow-up]

      Based on a combination of 3 different infection parameters; parameter 2 is Leukocyte count (<11 x 10E9 cells/L); collected from a venapuncture.

    6. Eradication of infection in blood sample analysis (3/3) [1 - 5 years follow-up]

      Based on a combination of 3 different infection parameters; parameter 3 is Erythrocyte Sedimantation Rate (<22mm/hour) collected from a venapuncture.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Complication registration [1-5 years follow-up]

      Number of patients with adverse reactions or events related to S53P4 bioactive glass treatment

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (1/10) [Pre-operative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 1: - Age at sugery (Years)

    2. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (2/10) [Pre-operative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 2: - Gender (M/F)

    3. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (3/10) [Pre-operative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 3: - BMI (kg/m2)

    4. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (4/10) [1-5 years follow-up]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 4: - Smoking (Yes/No)

    5. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (5/10) [Pre-operative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 5: - Preoperative Cierny-Mader classification (1/2/3/4)

    6. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (6/10) [Pre-operative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 6: - Presence of a preoperative fistula (number of patients)

    7. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (7/10) [Postoperative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 7: - Mono- vs. Polybacterial peroperative culture (number of patients)

    8. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (8/10) [Per-operative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 8: - One stage vs. Two stage surgical procedure (number of patients)

    9. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (9/10) [Per-operative value (not time related)]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 9: - Closure of wound by a plastic surgeon (Yes/No)

    10. Identification of possible risk factors for failure (10/10) [1-5 years follow-up]

      We identified a subset of 10 parameters that might be associated with the possible risk of failure of treatment and will be analyzed. Parameter 10: - Complications (number of patients)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with a clinical, radiographic and/or laboratory study confirmed chronic osteomyelitis of long bones

    • Patients who are physically and mentally willing and able to comply with postoperative functional evaluation.

    • Patients that can read and understand the Dutch language.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with an diabetic ulcer related chronic osteomyelitis

    • Patients that are pregnant.

    • Patients who are unwilling to cooperate with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.

    • Patients who, as judged by the surgeon, are mentally incompetent or are likely to be non-compliant with the prescribed post-operative routine and follow-up evaluation schedule.

    • Patients with malignancy - active malignancy within last 1 year

    • Patients known with a diagnosed systemic disease that would affect the subject's welfare or overall outcome of the study (severe osteoporosis requiring medication, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy,hypercalcemia ) or is immunologically suppressed, or receiving steroids in excess of physiologic dose.

    • Patients with a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device or the patient has a neurological deficit which interferes with the patient's ability to limit weight bearing or places an extreme load on the implant during the healing period.

    • Patients with systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration

    • Patients with other concurrent illnesses that are likely to affect their outcome such as all autoimmune diseases (including RA), sickle cell anaemia, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, not controlled type 1/2 diabetes or renal disease requiring dialysis.

    • Patients with a known sensitivity to device materials

    • Patients that are an alcohol and/or drug abuser as defined by currently undergoing treatment for alcohol and/or drug abuse

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    No locations specified.

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
    • University Medical Center Groningen

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Chris Arts, PhD, Maastricht Univeristy Medical Centre (MUMC+)

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Tom van Vugt, Principal Investigator, Orthopedic Resident, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04945434
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • MUMC_METC174084
    First Posted:
    Jun 30, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 30, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2021
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Tom van Vugt, Principal Investigator, Orthopedic Resident, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 30, 2021