ACAROS: Efficacy of Potassium Citrate in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteopenia

Sponsor
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02731820
Collaborator
(none)
40
1
2
25
1.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the use of alkali compounds, i.e. potassium citrate (K3C6H5O7, hereinafter KCitr) is effective in preventing the progression of osteopenia.

A randomized clinical trial (RCT, placebo-controlled, double-blind) has been planned to evaluate the effect of the daily administration of KCitr (3 g/die, K 30 mEq).

The efficacy will be evaluated by comparing the circulating levels of bone turnover markers at the baseline and after the treatment (3, 6 months).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Dietary Supplement: Potassium citrate
  • Dietary Supplement: Placebo
  • Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3
  • Dietary Supplement: Calcium carbonate
N/A

Detailed Description

Bone tissue carries out some of the important metabolic functions, including the regulation of acid-base balance. In order to buffer the systemic acidosis, the skeleton acts as a "ion exchange column" modifying the composition of the mineral portion, i.e. the hydroxyapatite. There is a linear correlation between elimination of calcium and acidosis: the higher is the acidosis, the higher will be the loss of calcium from bones. In vitro experiments showed that acidosis also directly influences the cellular component of bone by increasing the osteoclast activity and inhibiting the production of the mineralized matrix by osteoblast. Since the low pH is a risk factor that accelerates the bone loss, the use of alkalizing compounds could prevent the osteopenia or support the conventional therapy of the osteoporosis.

KCitr is an alkaline compound which may be used in metabolic acidosis. Potassium is an alkaline metal that plays a pivotal role in the function of all living cells. Citric acid is a key molecule of the Krebs cycle, and it is abundant in bone where exhibits a stabilizing function. Although clinical data regarding the KCitr effectiveness on calcium metabolism are encouraging, it is still unclear whether the beneficial effects are due exclusively to the buffering function or whether KCitr may affect the bone cells activity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of KCitr on bone metabolism. We hypothesize that administration of potassium citrate to postmenopausal women with osteopenia will delay (or will prevent) the weakening of bone mass.

Postmenopausal women with osteopenia (T score between -1.0 and -2.5) and no history of fracture will be randomized to assume KCitr ate or placebo, daily for six months. Primary outcomes will be evaluated by measuring markers of bone turnover, which will be measured at baseline (before treatment), in the mid-term (3 months) and at the end (6 months).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
40 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Efficacy of Potassium Citrate in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteopenia. A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double Blind Investigation.
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 30, 2017
Actual Study Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Treatment group

Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3

Dietary Supplement: Potassium citrate
Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours)

Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3
400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth
Other Names:
  • Cholecalciferol
  • Dietary Supplement: Calcium carbonate
    500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth

    Placebo Comparator: Control group, Placebo

    Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo
    Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours)

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3
    400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth
    Other Names:
  • Cholecalciferol
  • Dietary Supplement: Calcium carbonate
    500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Changes in Serum Level of Carboxyterminal Cross-linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX); Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months. [Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)]

      Carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) is a degradation product of the type I collagen; it is considered as a marker of bone resorption. The concentration of CTX (µg/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.

    2. Changes in Serum Levels of "Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b Isoenzyme" (TRAcP5b) Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months. [Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)]

      Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b isoenzyme" (TRAcP5b) is a specific product of osteoclasts; it is considered as a marker of bone resorption. The concentration of TRAcP5B (U/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium Citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.

    3. Changes in Serum Levels of "N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen" (P1NP) Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months. [Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)]

      N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen" (P1NP) is a product of the conversion of procollagen to collagen; it is considered as a marker of bone formation. The concentration of P1NP (pg/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.

    4. Changes in Serum Levels of "Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase" (BAP) Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months. [Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)]

      Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) is a specific product of osteoblasts; it is considered as a marker of bone formation. The concentration of BAP (µg/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Postmenopausal women, more than 5 years post menopause

    • Osteopenia (T-score < -1 and > -2.5)

    • Low risk of fracture (FRAX: < 20 major osteoporotic; < 3 hip fracture)

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Hyperkalemia

    • Renal insufficiency

    • Nephrolithiasis

    • Use of potassium sparing diuretics

    • Use of potassium supplements

    • Use of therapies influencing bone metabolism (e.g. corticosteroids, thiazide diuretics, aromatase inhibitors, estrogens)

    • Use of protonic pump inhibitors

    • Current or recent use of bisphosphonates (stopped less than three years prior to the start of the study)

    • Gastrointestinal disorders that hamper nutrient absorption;

    • Mental or psychiatric disorders that preclude the possibility of correctly adhering to the protocol

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy 40136

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Nicola Baldini, MD, Prof., Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Nicola Baldini, MD, Professor, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02731820
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 6013_IOR
    • 1676
    First Posted:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 12, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Keywords provided by Nicola Baldini, MD, Professor, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Participants were recruited among the cohort of post-menopausal women attending to the Radiodiagnostic Unit of Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IOR) from September 2015 to February 2017 to perform the periodic measurements of lumbar (at L2-L4 level) and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate Control Group, Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Potassium citrate: Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Placebo: Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 20 20
    COMPLETED 17 18
    NOT COMPLETED 3 2

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate Control Group, Placebo Total
    Arm/Group Description Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Potassium citrate: Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Placebo: Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 20 20 40
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    60.8
    (4.67)
    58.2
    (4.95)
    59.5
    (4.93)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    20
    100%
    20
    100%
    40
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Asian
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    White
    20
    100%
    20
    100%
    40
    100%
    More than one race
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Count of Participants)
    Caucasian
    20
    100%
    20
    100%
    40
    100%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Italy
    20
    100%
    20
    100%
    40
    100%
    Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m^2) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [kg/m^2]
    23.6
    (4.4)
    22.9
    (3.8)
    23.3
    (4.1)
    T score (BMD femural neck) (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale]
    -1.6
    (0.4)
    -1.7
    (0.5)
    -1.6
    (0.5)
    T score (L2 - L4) (scores on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [scores on a scale]
    -1.7
    (0.5)
    -1.4
    (0.6)
    -1.6
    (0.6)
    Major osteoporotic risk (% (percentage probability)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [% (percentage probability)]
    5.7
    (3.4)
    4.8
    (1.5)
    5.2
    (2.6)
    Minor osteoporotic risk (% (percentage probability)) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [% (percentage probability)]
    1.1
    (0.8)
    1.0
    (0.5)
    1.0
    (0.6)
    pH (24h urine) (pH value) [Mean (Full Range) ]
    Mean (Full Range) [pH value]
    6.13
    6.03
    6.08
    pH (fasting-morning urine) (pH value) [Mean (Full Range) ]
    Mean (Full Range) [pH value]
    6.13
    5.87
    6.00
    Potassium (24h urine) (milliequivalent day-1) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [milliequivalent day-1]
    28.60
    (14.97)
    30.40
    (12.98)
    29.50
    (13.85)
    Citrate (24h urine) (mmol day-1) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mmol day-1]
    2.97
    (1.68)
    3.50
    (1.74)
    3.24
    (1.71)
    Citrate (fasting-morning urine) (mol mol-1) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [mol mol-1]
    2.77
    (1.39)
    3.40
    (2.39)
    3.09
    (1.96)

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Changes in Serum Level of Carboxyterminal Cross-linked Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX); Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months.
    Description Carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) is a degradation product of the type I collagen; it is considered as a marker of bone resorption. The concentration of CTX (µg/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.
    Time Frame Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    3/20 patients in the Treatment group did not complete the follow up (n= 1 re-evaluation of the inclusion criteria; n=1 gastritis; n=1 total hip arthroplasty). 2/20 patients in the Placebo group did not complete the follow up (n=2 persistent constipation)
    Arm/Group Title Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate Control Group, Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Potassium citrate: Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Placebo: Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth
    Measure Participants 20 20
    Baseline (T0)
    0.64
    (0.08)
    0.64
    (0.05)
    3 months (T3)
    0.63
    (0.08)
    0.56
    (0.05)
    6 months (T6)
    0.53
    (0.08)
    0.54
    (0.06)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.172
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.027
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.053
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.002
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.006
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.139
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.967
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.446
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T6
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.869
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Changes in Serum Levels of "Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b Isoenzyme" (TRAcP5b) Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months.
    Description Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b isoenzyme" (TRAcP5b) is a specific product of osteoclasts; it is considered as a marker of bone resorption. The concentration of TRAcP5B (U/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium Citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.
    Time Frame Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    3/20 patients in the Treatment group did not complete the follow up (n= 1 re-evaluation of the inclusion criteria; n=1 gastritis; n=1 total hip arthroplasty). 2/20 patients in the Placebo group did not complete the follow up (n=2 persistent constipation)
    Arm/Group Title Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate Control Group, Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Potassium citrate: Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Placebo: Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth
    Measure Participants 20 20
    Baseline (T0)
    2.35
    (0.20)
    2.64
    (0.22)
    3 months (T3)
    2.79
    (0.27)
    2.85
    (0.22)
    6 months (T6)
    2.69
    (0.29)
    2.25
    (0.14)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.954
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.798
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.377
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.886
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.040
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.017
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.343
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.859
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T6
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.172
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Changes in Serum Levels of "N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen" (P1NP) Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months.
    Description N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen" (P1NP) is a product of the conversion of procollagen to collagen; it is considered as a marker of bone formation. The concentration of P1NP (pg/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.
    Time Frame Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    3/20 patients in the Treatment group did not complete the follow up (n= 1 re-evaluation of the inclusion criteria; n=1 gastritis; n=1 total hip arthroplasty). 2/20 patients in the Placebo group did not complete the follow up (n=2 persistent constipation)
    Arm/Group Title Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate Control Group, Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Potassium citrate: Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Placebo: Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth
    Measure Participants 20 20
    Baseline (T0)
    17.45
    (1.48)
    18.82
    (1.73)
    3 months (T3)
    16.24
    (1.60)
    18.39
    (1.75)
    6 months (T6)
    14.97
    (1.51)
    16.77
    (1.89)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.213
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.191
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.234
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.370
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.176
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.139
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.551
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.371
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T6
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.466
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    4. Primary Outcome
    Title Changes in Serum Levels of "Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase" (BAP) Over Time, i.e. Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months.
    Description Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) is a specific product of osteoblasts; it is considered as a marker of bone formation. The concentration of BAP (µg/L) will be measured at T0, T3, and T6 on serum samples (fasting morning samples) using commercially available reagents and following the manufacturer's protocol. At the end of the study, the results will be aggregated as mean ± standard of the mean, median and min-max range. Data will be statistically analyzed in order to compare the activity of Potassium citrate versus Placebo (unpaired analysis) and to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate and Placebo over time (paired analysis). Differences will be considered to be statistically significant for p-value <0.05.
    Time Frame Baseline (T0), 3 months (T3) 6 months (T6)

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    3/20 patients in the Treatment group did not complete the follow up (n= 1 re-evaluation of the inclusion criteria; n=1 gastritis; n=1 total hip arthroplasty). 2/20 patients in the Placebo group did not complete the follow up (n=2 persistent constipation)
    Arm/Group Title Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate Control Group, Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Potassium citrate: Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Placebo: Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth
    Measure Participants 20 20
    Baseline (T0)
    21.89
    (1.67)
    20.36
    (1.17)
    3 months (T3)
    19.81
    (1.67)
    18.27
    (1.00)
    6 months (T6)
    16.83
    (1.37)
    15.79
    (1.09)
    Statistical Analysis 1
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.094
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 2
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0004
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 3
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.008
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 4
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Placebo: T3 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.002
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 5
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value <0.0001
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 6
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Paired analysis within the group to evaluate the effect of Potassium Citrate: T6 vs T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.0007
    Comments
    Method t-test, 1 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 7
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T0
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.458
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 8
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T3
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.434
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments
    Statistical Analysis 9
    Statistical Analysis Overview Comparison Group Selection Treatment Group, Potassium Citrate, Control Group, Placebo
    Comments Independent comparison (unpaired analysis) between Potassium Citrate and Placebo at T6
    Type of Statistical Test Other
    Comments
    Statistical Test of Hypothesis p-Value 0.555
    Comments
    Method t-test, 2 sided
    Comments

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Adverse events were recorded at 3 months and 6 months
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Gastrointestinal disorders
    Arm/Group Title Treatment Group Control Group, Placebo
    Arm/Group Description Potassium citrate Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Potassium citrate: Kcitr 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth Placebo (Excipients) Calcium carbonate Vitamin D3 Placebo: Excipients: 3.064 milligrams daily in two tablets by mouth (1.032 milligrams every 12 hours) Vitamin D3: 400 IU/die Vitamin D3 daily by mouth Calcium carbonate: 500 mg/die calcium carbonate daily by mouth
    All Cause Mortality
    Treatment Group Control Group, Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/20 (0%) 0/20 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Treatment Group Control Group, Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/20 (0%) 0/20 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Treatment Group Control Group, Placebo
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 1/20 (5%) 2/20 (10%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Gastritis 1/20 (5%) 1 0/20 (0%) 0
    Constipation 0/20 (0%) 0 2/20 (10%) 2

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Director of Clinical Trials
    Organization Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
    Phone +39 051.6366392
    Email ctc@ior.it
    Responsible Party:
    Nicola Baldini, MD, Professor, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT02731820
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 6013_IOR
    • 1676
    First Posted:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Last Update Posted:
    Nov 12, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2019