Study of the Effect of Once a Week Risedronate on the Microstructure of Tibia and Radius Using a New Scanning Method
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of the protocol is to evaluate the sensitivity of 3D-pQCT (3D-Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography) technology to detect minute changes in bone microarchitecture.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
The 3D-pQCT equipment allows the evaluation of changes occurring within the bone at "microarchitecture" level, without the need for invasive bone biopsies. The primary objective is to evaluate the sensitivity of the technology to detect a difference between those treated with risedronate 35mg OAW (once a week) or placebo. Early phase postmenopausal women with osteopenia have been chosen because they have a more rapid and higher level of bone loss during the first few years of the menopause.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Placebo dose |
Drug: Placebo comparator
oral weekly for one year
|
Experimental: Risedronate 35 mg risedronate, orally, once weekly |
Drug: risedronate
35 mg risedronate, once a week for one year
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Trabecular Bone Volume to Tissue Volume at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Average Bone Density at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Compact Bone Density at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Trabecular Bone Density at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Average Bone Density at Distal Tibia, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Compact Bone Density at Distal Tibia, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Trabecular Bone Density at Distal Tibia, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Lumbar Spine BMD, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Total Proximal Femur BMD (Bone Mineral Density), Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Femoral Neck BMD, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Greater Trochanter BMD, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
- Type I Collagen C-Telopeptides, Serum, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
ELISA / enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method by central lab
- Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
Electrochemiluminescence assay method by central lab
- Height, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 [Baseline and Month 12]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
cessation of menstruation (surgical or natural) between 6 and 36 months prior to study enrollment;
-
osteopenic
-
must have at least 1 evaluable radius and tibia, without history of fracture (traumatic or atraumatic)
-
BMI (body mass index) between 18 and 28 kg/m2 inclusive;
Exclusion Criteria:
-
history of any generalized bone disease, including hyperparathyroidism, Paget's disease of bone, renal osteodystrophy, or any other acquired or congenital bone disease; or any known condition that would interfere with the assessment of DXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) at either the lumbar spine (3 non-evaluable lumbar vertebrae at lumbar spine L1 - L4) or the femoral neck.
-
clinical or radiological evidence of osteoporosis, such as atraumatic vertebral compression fracture (* 20% reduction in anterior-to-posterior or middle-to-posterior height ratio; or 20% reduction of the anterior, middle, and/or posterior height as compared with the adjacent vertebrae) documented by spinal X ray or a history of osteoporosis-related atraumatic fracture of the hip or of the wrist;
-
glucocorticoid-induced osteopenia;
-
previous bisphosphonate therapy;
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Research Facility | Buenos Aires | Argentina | C1012AAR | |
2 | Research Facility | Heidelberg | Victoria | Australia | 3081 |
3 | Research Facility | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | M5G 2C4 |
4 | Research Facility | Lyon | France | ||
5 | Research Facility | Saint-Etienne | France | ||
6 | Research Facility | Toulouse | France | ||
7 | Research Facility | Berlin | Germany | ||
8 | Research Facility | Geneva | Switzerland | ||
9 | Research Facility | Cambridge | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Warner Chilcott
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gioacchino D'Alo, MD, P&G Pharmaceuticals, Clinical Development Europe
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 2005040
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Screening started 3 April 2006 |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 49 | 112 |
Intent to Treat Population (ITT) | 49 | 110 |
Primary Efficacy | 36 | 77 |
COMPLETED | 40 | 95 |
NOT COMPLETED | 9 | 17 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 49 | 112 | 161 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
52.5
(2.2)
|
52.6
(1.8)
|
52.6
(2.0)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
49
100%
|
112
100%
|
161
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number] | |||
Asian (Oriental) |
1
2%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.6%
|
Caucasian |
48
98%
|
107
95.5%
|
155
96.3%
|
Hispanic |
0
0%
|
2
1.8%
|
2
1.2%
|
Multi-Racial |
0
0%
|
1
0.9%
|
1
0.6%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
France |
9
18.4%
|
24
21.4%
|
33
20.5%
|
Germany |
23
46.9%
|
46
41.1%
|
69
42.9%
|
United Kingdom |
6
12.2%
|
12
10.7%
|
18
11.2%
|
Switzerland |
3
6.1%
|
7
6.3%
|
10
6.2%
|
Argentina |
6
12.2%
|
15
13.4%
|
21
13%
|
Australia |
0
0%
|
2
1.8%
|
2
1.2%
|
Canada |
2
4.1%
|
6
5.4%
|
8
5%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Trabecular Bone Volume to Tissue Volume at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Primary Efficacy Population - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations and had an evaluable distal radius BV/TV (trabecular bone volume to tissue volume) at baseline and Month 12. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 49 | 110 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-1.486
|
-1.255
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7096 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.231 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.995 to 1.458 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Average Bone Density at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Per Protocol (PP) Population - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-2.121
|
-1.578
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.2973 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.543 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.485 to 1.571 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Compact Bone Density at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-0.786
|
-0.301
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1275 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.485 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.141 to 1.110 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Trabecular Bone Density at Distal Radius, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-1.820
|
-1.156
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3360 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.664 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.697 to 2.025 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Average Bone Density at Distal Tibia, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-0.440
|
-0.106
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.4565 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.334 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.551 to 1.219 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Compact Bone Density at Distal Tibia, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-0.784
|
-0.173
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0614 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.611 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.030 to 1.252 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Trabecular Bone Density at Distal Tibia, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
0.785
|
0.725
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.9212 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -0.060 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.258 to 1.138 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Lumbar Spine BMD, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-1.797
|
1.473
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 3.270 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 2.231 to 4.310 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Total Proximal Femur BMD (Bone Mineral Density), Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-0.976
|
0.468
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 1.444 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.748 to 2.140 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Femoral Neck BMD, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-1.422
|
-0.014
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0036 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 1.408 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.469 to 2.348 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Greater Trochanter BMD, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-0.462
|
0.996
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0087 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 1.458 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.375 to 2.541 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Type I Collagen C-Telopeptides, Serum, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | ELISA / enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method by central lab |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
1.537
|
-38.002
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.0002 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -39.540 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -59.957 to -19.123 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Procollagen Type 1 N-Propeptide, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | Electrochemiluminescence assay method by central lab |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-5.762
|
-46.031
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | -40.269 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -51.300 to -29.238 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Height, Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 |
---|---|
Description | |
Time Frame | Baseline and Month 12 |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
PP - all patients in ITT population who had no major protocol violations. |
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day |
Measure Participants | 41 | 89 |
Least Squares Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [Percent Change] |
-0.163
|
-0.071
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Placebo, Risedronate |
---|---|---|
Comments | In Laib 1998, the mean and SD of the annual loss in distal radius BV/TV were reported to be 3.5% and 6.4%, respectively. Assuming the treatment difference and SD of the percent change in distal radius BV/TV for this study were the same, it required enrolling 52 patients for placebo and 104 for risedronate to ensure 80% power to achieve 0.05 level of significance. Sample size estimation based on 2-sided 2-sample t-test and assumed effective size of 0.54 and dropout rate of 20%. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1385 |
Comments | ||
Method | ANOVA | |
Comments | LS Means are least squares (adjusted) means from ANOVA model with fixed effects for treatment and pooled center. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | LS Mean Difference |
Estimated Value | 0.092 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -0.030 to 0.213 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Twelve Months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Risedronate | ||
Arm/Group Description | Placebo, 1 tablet weekly on the same day | 35 mg risedronate tablet, orally, once weekly on the same day | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Placebo | Risedronate | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Placebo | Risedronate | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 5/49 (10.2%) | 7/110 (6.4%) | ||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Vertigo Positional | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Gastrointestinal Disorder | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Appendicitis | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Cholera | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Vestibuar Neuronitis | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Radius Fracture | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Skeletal Injury | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Breast Cancer | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Cervical Root Pain | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Depression | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Panic Reaction | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Urinary Bladder Polyp | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Ovarian Cyst | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Placebo | Risedronate | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 38/49 (77.6%) | 76/110 (69.1%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 4 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Angina | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Tachycardia | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Ear Pain | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Vertigo | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Vertigo Positional | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal Pain Upper | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 4/110 (3.6%) | 4 |
Periodontitis | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 4/110 (3.6%) | 4 |
Constipation | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Dental Caries | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Dyspepsia | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 4 |
Abdominal Pain | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 2/110 (1.8%) | 2 |
Diarrhoea | 2/49 (4.1%) | 2 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 2 |
Gastritis | 2/49 (4.1%) | 2 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 2 |
Glossodynia | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||
Drug Intolerance | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Irritability | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Oedema Peripheral | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Sensation of Foreign Body | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Temperature Intolerance | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Nasopharyngitis | 5/49 (10.2%) | 5 | 10/110 (9.1%) | 11 |
Bronchitis | 3/49 (6.1%) | 3 | 7/110 (6.4%) | 7 |
Gastroenteritis | 2/49 (4.1%) | 2 | 4/110 (3.6%) | 4 |
Influenza | 4/49 (8.2%) | 4 | 4/110 (3.6%) | 4 |
Cholera | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Tonsillitis | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Vestibular Neuronitis | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Fall | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 4/110 (3.6%) | 4 |
Contusion | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Radius Fracture | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Back Injury | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Joint Sprain | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Limb Injury | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Investigations | ||||
Weight Decreased | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Weight Increased | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthralgia | 2/49 (4.1%) | 2 | 8/110 (7.3%) | 11 |
Back Pain | 5/49 (10.2%) | 5 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 4 |
Bone Pain | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Neck Pain | 0/49 (0%) | 0 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Osteoarthritis | 3/49 (6.1%) | 3 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Intervertebral Disc Protrusion | 2/49 (4.1%) | 2 | 2/110 (1.8%) | 2 |
Chondropathy | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Pain in Extremity | 1/49 (2%) | 2 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Bursitis | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Breast Cancer | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Headache | 2/49 (4.1%) | 2 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Cervicobrachial Syndrome | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Hypoaesthesia | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Paraesthesia | 1/49 (2%) | 2 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Depression | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 2/110 (1.8%) | 2 |
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Endometriosis | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Ovarian Cyst | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Vulvovaginal Dryness | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Cough | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 1/110 (0.9%) | 1 |
Asthma | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Alopecia | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Dermatitis | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Onchoclasis | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Rash | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 0/110 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 5/110 (4.5%) | 5 |
Hot Flush | 1/49 (2%) | 1 | 3/110 (2.7%) | 3 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Grexan Wulff, Manager Regulatory Affairs |
---|---|
Organization | Warner Chilcott |
Phone | 973-442-3376 |
gwulff@wcrx.com |
- 2005040