A Study to Test if TVB-009P is Effective in Relieving Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Sponsor
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA (Industry)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04729621
Collaborator
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. (Industry)
326
1
5
33.3
9.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety between TVB-009 and Prolia® (denosumab)

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Combination Product: TVB-009
  • Combination Product: Prolia®
Phase 3

Detailed Description

This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety of TVB-009 compared to Prolia® administered subcutaneously at doses of 60 mg every 26 weeks. Approximately 326 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis will be randomized to receive either TVB-009 or Prolia®. At week 52, patients in the Prolia® arm will be re-randomized 1:1 to either continue with a third dose of Prolia® or transition to TVB-009 and receive a single dose of TVB-009 in the transition period to assess immunogenicity and safety after a transition from Prolia® to TVB-009. The total treatment duration for each patient is 78 weeks.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
326 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multinational, Multicenter Study to Compare Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of TVB-009P and Denosumab (Prolia®) in Patients With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 22, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: TVB-009 main treatment period

TVB-009 (denosumab) pre-filled syringe, administered at weeks 1 and 26

Combination Product: TVB-009
TVB-009 Denosumab solution for injection 60 mg/mL (1 mL) prefilled syringe (PFS)

Active Comparator: PROLIA main treatment period

Prolia® (denosumab) pre-filled syringe, administered at weeks 1 and 26

Combination Product: Prolia®
Denosumab solution for injection 60 mg/mL (1 mL) prefilled syringe (PFS)

Experimental: TVB-009 main / TVB-009 transition period

TVB-009 (denosumab) pre-filled syringe, administered at week 52 in patients that were randomized to TVB-009 in the main treatment period

Combination Product: TVB-009
TVB-009 Denosumab solution for injection 60 mg/mL (1 mL) prefilled syringe (PFS)

Active Comparator: PROLIA main / PROLIA transition period

Prolia® (denosumab) pre-filled syringe, administered at week 52 in patients that were randomized to PROLIA in the main treatment period

Combination Product: Prolia®
Denosumab solution for injection 60 mg/mL (1 mL) prefilled syringe (PFS)

Experimental: PROLIA main / TVB-009 transition period

TVB-009 (denosumab) pre-filled syringe, administered at week 52 in patients that were randomized to PROLIA in the main treatment period

Combination Product: TVB-009
TVB-009 Denosumab solution for injection 60 mg/mL (1 mL) prefilled syringe (PFS)

Combination Product: Prolia®
Denosumab solution for injection 60 mg/mL (1 mL) prefilled syringe (PFS)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percent change from baseline in LS-BMD at week 52 [Baseline and week 52]

    Percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) based on centrally assessed dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percent change from baseline in sCTX-1 at week 26 [Baseline and week 26]

    Percent change from baseline in serum C-telopeptide cross-link of type 1 collagen at week 26

  2. Percent change from baseline in LS-BMD at week 26 [Baseline and week 26]

    Percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) based on centrally assessed dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at week 26

  3. Percent change from baseline in femoral neck BMD [Baseline, week 26, week 52]

    Percent change from baseline in femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) based on centrally assessed dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA)at week 26 and at week 52

  4. Percent change from baseline in total hip BMD [Baseline, week 26, week 52]

    Percent change from baseline in total hip bone mineral density (BMD) based on centrally assessed dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at week 26 and at week 52

  5. Percent change from baseline in sCTX-1 [Baseline through week 52]

    Percent change from baseline in serum C-telopeptide cross-link of type 1 collagen

  6. sCTX-1 suppression at week 4 [Week 4]

    Proportion of patients with suppression of serum C-telopeptide cross-link of type 1 collagen at week 4

  7. Percent change from baseline in P1NP [Baseline, week 26, week 52]

    Percent change from baseline in procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP) at week 26 and week 52

  8. Incidence of fractures up to week 52 [Up to week 52]

    Number of patients with fractures up to week 52

  9. Percent change from week 52 in LS-BMD by DXA at week 78 [Week 52 through week 78]

    Percent change from week 52 in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) based on centrally assessed dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at week 78

  10. Percent change from week 52 in femoral neck BMD by DXA at week 78 [Week 52 through week 78]

    Percent change from week 52 in femoral neck bone mineral density (LS BMD) based on centrally assessed dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at week 78

  11. Percent change from week 52 in total hip BMD by DXA at week 78 [Week 52 through week 78]

    Percent change from week 52 in total hip bone mineral density (LS BMD) based on centrally assessed dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at week 78

  12. Difference between percent change from baseline in sCTX-1 at weeks 52 and 78 [Week 52 through week 78]

    Difference between percent change from baseline in serum C-telopeptide cross-link of type 1 collagen at weeks 52 and 78

  13. Difference between percent change from baseline in P1NP at weeks 52 and 78 [Week 52 through week 78]

    Difference between percent change from baseline in procollagen type 1 N propeptide at weeks 52 and 78

  14. Incidence of fractures between week 52 and week 78 [Week 52 through week 78]

    Number of patients with fractures between week 52 and week 78

  15. Incidence of adverse event and withdrawals due to adverse events [Up to week 52]

    Number of patients reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event up to week 52

  16. Incidence of adverse events in the transition period [Week 52 through week 78]

    Number of patients reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event between weeks 52 and 78

  17. Incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in the main treatment period [Up to week 52]

    Number of patients with confirmed positive antidrug antibodies (ADAs) post-baseline up to week 52

  18. Incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in the transition period [Week 52 through week 78]

    Number of patients with confirmed positive antidrug antibodies (ADAs) between week 52 and 78

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
60 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Postmenopausal womeen (≥60 and ≤90 years) with a diagnosis of osteoporosis

  • Body weight ≥50 kg and ≤90 kg

  • Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measurement T score of less than 2.5 but not less than 4.0 by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine at screening

  • At least 3 vertebrae in the L1 L4 region that are evaluable by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Exclusion Criteria:
  • One severe or more than two moderate vertebral fractures

  • History and/or presence of hip fracture or atypical femur fracture

  • Any prior treatment with denosumab

  • Ongoing use of any bone active drugs which can affect Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

  • Vitamin D deficiency or hyper- or hypocalcemiacium at screening

  • Hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, hypoparathyroidism or hyperparathyroidism

  • Any medical condition that could jeopardize or would compromise the patient's safety or ability to participate in this study

Other Inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Site 10101 Port Saint Lucie Florida United States 34952

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA
  • Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Peter Bias, MD, Teva Branded Pharmaceuticals Products R&D, Inc.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04729621
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • TVB009-IMB-30085
First Posted:
Jan 28, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Dec 17, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 17, 2021