Avastin +/- Erlotinib Consolidation Chemotherapy After Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Avastin (CTA) Induction Therapy for Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Primary Peritoneal Cancer & Papillary Serous or Clear Cell Mullerian Tumors

Sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00520013
Collaborator
Genentech, Inc. (Industry), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Other), Brigham and Women's Hospital (Other), Massachusetts General Hospital (Other)
60
3
3
75
20
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate how patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal cancer and papillary serous or clear cell mullerian tumors respond to consolidation therapy with Avastin and erlotinib or Avastin alone over 1 year. These drugs have been used in the treatment of other types of cancers and information from those studies suggests that these agents may help to treat the cancers studied here.

Detailed Description

Objectives:

Primary To examine the progression free survival (PFS) of Avastin and Erlotinib (AE) or Avastin (A) as consolidation therapy.

Secondary To examine the toxicity between the two consolidative regimens AE vs. A. To assess the response rate of CTA.

STATISTICAL DESIGN This study uses a randomized selection design. Both consolidation treatment arms are deemed experimental and are compared against a historical control [McGuire WP et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. NEJM 1996: 334:1-6. PMID:7494563]. With 30 patients in a given arm and 6 months of follow-up, there was 80% power to detect a 61.5% increase in median PFS from 13 months to 21 months assuming 1-sided 10% significance.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Avastin (A) or Avastin and Erlotinib (AE) as First Line Consolidation Chemotherapy After Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Avastin (CTA) Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Primary Peritoneal Cancer & Papillary Serous or Clear Cell Mullerian Tumors
Study Start Date :
Aug 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2013

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab

Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year.

Drug: bevacizumab
Other Names:
  • Avastin
  • rhuMAB VEGF
  • Drug: paclitaxel
    Other Names:
  • Taxol
  • Drug: carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • Paraplatin
  • Experimental: carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib

    Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year.

    Drug: bevacizumab
    Other Names:
  • Avastin
  • rhuMAB VEGF
  • Drug: erlotinib
    Other Names:
  • Tarceeva
  • Drug: paclitaxel
    Other Names:
  • Taxol
  • Drug: carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • Paraplatin
  • Experimental: carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab

    Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation: None

    Drug: bevacizumab
    Other Names:
  • Avastin
  • rhuMAB VEGF
  • Drug: paclitaxel
    Other Names:
  • Taxol
  • Drug: carboplatin
    Other Names:
  • Paraplatin
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Consolidation Progression-Free Survival [Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year and upon treatment discontinuation were followed for another year.]

      Consolidation PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time from the first day of consolidation therapy to documented disease progression (PD) or disease-specific death. Based on RECIST 1.1, radiographic PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since beginning consolidation, the appearence of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Based on Rustin criteria, serlogic PD was a rise in CA125 since beginning of consolidation or previously normal CA125 that rises to >/= 2xULN with either event documented on 2 occasions. Patients who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.

    2. Consolidation Treatment-related Toxicity Rate [Assessed every cycle during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year.]

      Consolidation treatment-related toxicity rates based on CTCAEv3 were defined as rates of maximum grade 3 or higher toxicity events with attribution possible, probable or definite occurring during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Consolidation Objective Response Rate [Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year.]

      Consolidation objective response (OR) was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria with OR defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. For CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. If CA125 disease then OR based on Rustin criteria is a 50% decrease in serum CA125 level from two initially elevated samples confirmed by a 4th sample.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • 18 years of age and older

    • Histological diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or papillary serous mullerian carcinoma

    • Previous attempted surgical debulking

    • Stage III or IV

    • Willing and able to undergo second look laparoscopy

    • Performance status 0-1 by ECOG scale

    • Peripheral neuropathy < grade 2

    • Life expectancy of 6 months or greater

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease as outlined in the protocol

    • Neutrophil count < 1,500/mm3; platelet count <100,000/m3

    • Alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, SGOT > 5 x ULN

    • Calculated creatinine clearance < 50ml/min

    • Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for other malignancy except for the treatment for localized breast cancer greater than five years prior to diagnosis

    • No more than one cycle of first line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel

    • Inadequate surgical cytoreduction such that interval cytoreductive surgery could materially improve prognosis

    • Concurrent invasive malignancy

    • Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy

    • Evidence of tumor involving major blood vessels on any prior CT scans

    • Surgical wound that has failed to close

    • Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to Day 0, or anticipation of need for major surgical procedure during the course of this study

    • Core biopsy or other minor surgical procedure, excluding placement of a vascular access device, within 7 days prior to study enrollment

    • History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within 6 months prior to day 0

    • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture

    • Prior treatment with an anti-angiogenic agent

    • Any active bleeding

    • Active psychiatric disease or neurologic symptoms requiring treatment

    • Presence of central nervous system brain metastases

    • Proteinuria at screening as demonstrated by criteria in protocol

    • Dementia or significantly altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding and/or giving of informed consent

    • Known hypersensitivity to Cremophor EL or any component of Avastin

    • Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infections

    • Receiving any other investigational agent

    • History of gastrointestinal perforation

    • Prior therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor

    • Symptoms of bowel obstruction

    • Dependence on TPN or IV hydration

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States 02114
    2 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts United States 02115
    3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts United States 02115

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    • Genentech, Inc.
    • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Susana Campos, MD, MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Susana M. Campos, MD, Medical Oncologist., Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00520013
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 07-039
    First Posted:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 27, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2018

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Sixty patients were enrolled between Aug 3, 2007 and Jan 6, 2010.
    Pre-assignment Detail Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase.
    Arm/Group Title Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab
    Arm/Group Description Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation: None
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 23 25 11
    Treated 23 25 11
    COMPLETED 11 10 0
    NOT COMPLETED 12 15 11

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Total
    Arm/Group Description Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. bevacizumab paclitaxel carboplatin Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. bevacizumab erlotinib paclitaxel carboplatin Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation: None bevacizumab paclitaxel carboplatin Total of all reporting groups
    Overall Participants 23 25 11 59
    Age (years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ]
    Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [years]
    58
    56
    54
    57
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    23
    100%
    25
    100%
    11
    100%
    59
    100%
    Male
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    0
    0%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    23
    100%
    25
    100%
    11
    100%
    59
    100%
    Cancer Type (participants) [Number]
    Primary peritoneal
    4
    17.4%
    1
    4%
    1
    9.1%
    6
    10.2%
    Fallopian tube
    5
    21.7%
    4
    16%
    1
    9.1%
    10
    16.9%
    Epithelial ovarian
    10
    43.5%
    17
    68%
    8
    72.7%
    35
    59.3%
    Uterine papillary serous
    2
    8.7%
    1
    4%
    1
    9.1%
    4
    6.8%
    Other (mixed, carcinosarcoma)
    2
    8.7%
    2
    8%
    0
    0%
    4
    6.8%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Consolidation Progression-Free Survival
    Description Consolidation PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time from the first day of consolidation therapy to documented disease progression (PD) or disease-specific death. Based on RECIST 1.1, radiographic PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since beginning consolidation, the appearence of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Based on Rustin criteria, serlogic PD was a rise in CA125 since beginning of consolidation or previously normal CA125 that rises to >/= 2xULN with either event documented on 2 occasions. Patients who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.
    Time Frame Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year and upon treatment discontinuation were followed for another year.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of patients randomized to consolidation treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib
    Arm/Group Description Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year.
    Measure Participants 23 25
    Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months]
    13.3
    18.9
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Consolidation Treatment-related Toxicity Rate
    Description Consolidation treatment-related toxicity rates based on CTCAEv3 were defined as rates of maximum grade 3 or higher toxicity events with attribution possible, probable or definite occurring during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment.
    Time Frame Assessed every cycle during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of patients who were randomized to consolidation treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib
    Arm/Group Description Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year.
    Measure Participants 23 25
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants]
    30.4
    132.2%
    72.0
    288%
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Consolidation Objective Response Rate
    Description Consolidation objective response (OR) was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria with OR defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. For CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. If CA125 disease then OR based on Rustin criteria is a 50% decrease in serum CA125 level from two initially elevated samples confirmed by a 4th sample.
    Time Frame Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year.

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The analysis dataset is comprised of all patient who started consolidation treatment.
    Arm/Group Title Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib
    Arm/Group Description Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year.
    Measure Participants 23 25
    Number (95% Confidence Interval) [proportion of patients]
    0.65
    .60

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame Assessed each cycle throughout consolidation treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description Serious and other AE data is only available for consolidation treatment reflecting the primary and secondary study objectives centered on the evaluation of consolidative regimens AE vs A.
    Arm/Group Title Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib
    Arm/Group Description Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year.
    All Cause Mortality
    Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 7/23 (30.4%) 18/25 (72%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Hemoglobin 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Colitis 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Diarrhea w/o prior colostomy 0/23 (0%) 5/25 (20%)
    Enteritis 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    General disorders
    Fatigue 1/23 (4.3%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infections and infestations
    Infection-other 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Wound - non-infectious 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hyponatremia 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Extremity-limb, pain 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Joint, pain 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Muscle, pain 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Irregular menses 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Nail changes 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Rash/desquamation 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Rash: acne/acneiform 0/23 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 6/23 (26.1%) 4/25 (16%)
    Hemorrhage-other 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 23/23 (100%) 25/25 (100%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Hemoglobin 8/23 (34.8%) 8/25 (32%)
    Lymphatics-other 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Cardiac disorders
    C-P arrest, non-fatal, cause unk 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Tinnitus 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Eye disorders
    Vision-blurred 2/23 (8.7%) 0/25 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdomen, pain 3/23 (13%) 1/25 (4%)
    Constipation 5/23 (21.7%) 6/25 (24%)
    Dental/teeth/peridontal 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Diarrhea w/o prior colostomy 5/23 (21.7%) 18/25 (72%)
    Dry mouth 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Dyspepsia 3/23 (13%) 0/25 (0%)
    Esophagitis 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    GI-other 0/23 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
    Hemorrhoids 0/23 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
    Intestine, pain 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Lip, pain 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Muco/stomatitis (symptom) oral cavity 1/23 (4.3%) 4/25 (16%)
    Muco/stomatitis (symptom) stomach 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Muco/stomatitis by exam, oral cavity 0/23 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
    Nausea 5/23 (21.7%) 9/25 (36%)
    Oral cavity, hemorrhage 3/23 (13%) 1/25 (4%)
    Oral cavity, pain 0/23 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
    Oral gums, pain 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Rectum, hemorrhage 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Salivary 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Vomiting 2/23 (8.7%) 1/25 (4%)
    General disorders
    Chest/thoracic pain NOS 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Constitutional, other 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Edema limb 1/23 (4.3%) 3/25 (12%)
    Face, pain 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Fatigue 18/23 (78.3%) 21/25 (84%)
    Fever w/o neutropenia 0/23 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
    Pain-other 2/23 (8.7%) 1/25 (4%)
    Rigors/chills 0/23 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
    Infections and infestations
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, lip/perioral 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, meninges 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, skin 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, urinary tract 1/23 (4.3%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infection Gr0-2 neut, wound 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infection w/ gr3-4 neut, anal/perianal 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infection w/ gr3-4 neut, skin 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Infection w/ unk ANC ungual (nails) 0/23 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
    Infection-other 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Chemoradiation dermatitis 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Investigations
    Alkaline phosphatase 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    ALT, SGPT 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    AST, SGOT 0/23 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
    Bilirubin 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Leukocytes 3/23 (13%) 5/25 (20%)
    Metabolic/Laboratory-other 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Neutrophils 1/23 (4.3%) 5/25 (20%)
    Platelets 5/23 (21.7%) 1/25 (4%)
    Weight loss 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Anorexia 2/23 (8.7%) 5/25 (20%)
    Bicarbonate 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Dehydration 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Hyperglycemia 4/23 (17.4%) 2/25 (8%)
    Hyperkalemia 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Hypermagnesemia 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Hypernatremia 1/23 (4.3%) 1/25 (4%)
    Hypoalbuminemia 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Hypoglycemia 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Hypokalemia 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Hypomagnesemia 7/23 (30.4%) 8/25 (32%)
    Hyponatremia 2/23 (8.7%) 3/25 (12%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthritis 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Bone, pain 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Extremity-limb, pain 2/23 (8.7%) 5/25 (20%)
    Joint, pain 12/23 (52.2%) 7/25 (28%)
    Joint-function 0/23 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
    Muscle, pain 6/23 (26.1%) 4/25 (16%)
    Musculoskeletal/soft tissue-other 0/23 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
    Neck, pain 2/23 (8.7%) 0/25 (0%)
    Nonneuropathic generalized weakness 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Nonneuropathic upper extr muscle weak 0/23 (0%) 2/25 (8%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 1/23 (4.3%) 1/25 (4%)
    Head/headache 6/23 (26.1%) 4/25 (16%)
    Neurologic-other 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Neuropathy-motor 2/23 (8.7%) 3/25 (12%)
    Neuropathy-sensory 14/23 (60.9%) 12/25 (48%)
    Sinus, pain 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Taste disturbance 1/23 (4.3%) 3/25 (12%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety 5/23 (21.7%) 2/25 (8%)
    Confusion 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Depression 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Insomnia 2/23 (8.7%) 1/25 (4%)
    Libido 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Bladder, pain 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Proteinuria 4/23 (17.4%) 2/25 (8%)
    Renal/GU-other 1/23 (4.3%) 1/25 (4%)
    Urinary frequency/urgency 1/23 (4.3%) 1/25 (4%)
    Urinary hemorrhage NOS 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Vagina, hemorrhage 2/23 (8.7%) 1/25 (4%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Allergic rhinitis 1/23 (4.3%) 2/25 (8%)
    Cough 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Dyspnea 2/23 (8.7%) 0/25 (0%)
    Nose, hemorrhage 13/23 (56.5%) 7/25 (28%)
    Pulmonary/Upper Respiratory-other 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Throat/pharynx/larynax, pain 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Voice changes/dysarthria 2/23 (8.7%) 3/25 (12%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Alopecia 12/23 (52.2%) 11/25 (44%)
    Dry skin 1/23 (4.3%) 11/25 (44%)
    Erythema multiforme 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Hand-foot reaction 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Nail changes 0/23 (0%) 3/25 (12%)
    Photosensitivity 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Pruritus/itching 1/23 (4.3%) 5/25 (20%)
    Rash/desquamation 1/23 (4.3%) 8/25 (32%)
    Rash: acne/acneiform 1/23 (4.3%) 16/25 (64%)
    Skin breakdown/decubitus ulcer 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Skin, pain 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)
    Skin-other 0/23 (0%) 4/25 (16%)
    Urticaria 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hemorrhage-other 1/23 (4.3%) 0/25 (0%)
    Hypertension 9/23 (39.1%) 9/25 (36%)
    Hypotension 0/23 (0%) 1/25 (4%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Susana M. Campos, MD, MPH
    Organization Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Phone 617-632-5269
    Email susana_campos@dfci.harvard.edu
    Responsible Party:
    Susana M. Campos, MD, Medical Oncologist., Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00520013
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 07-039
    First Posted:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 27, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2018