Avastin +/- Erlotinib Consolidation Chemotherapy After Carboplatin, Paclitaxel, and Avastin (CTA) Induction Therapy for Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Primary Peritoneal Cancer & Papillary Serous or Clear Cell Mullerian Tumors
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate how patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal cancer and papillary serous or clear cell mullerian tumors respond to consolidation therapy with Avastin and erlotinib or Avastin alone over 1 year. These drugs have been used in the treatment of other types of cancers and information from those studies suggests that these agents may help to treat the cancers studied here.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 2 |
Detailed Description
Objectives:
Primary To examine the progression free survival (PFS) of Avastin and Erlotinib (AE) or Avastin (A) as consolidation therapy.
Secondary To examine the toxicity between the two consolidative regimens AE vs. A. To assess the response rate of CTA.
STATISTICAL DESIGN This study uses a randomized selection design. Both consolidation treatment arms are deemed experimental and are compared against a historical control [McGuire WP et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. NEJM 1996: 334:1-6. PMID:7494563]. With 30 patients in a given arm and 6 months of follow-up, there was 80% power to detect a 61.5% increase in median PFS from 13 months to 21 months assuming 1-sided 10% significance.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. |
Drug: bevacizumab
Other Names:
Drug: paclitaxel
Other Names:
Drug: carboplatin
Other Names:
|
Experimental: carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab then bevacizumab/erlotinib Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. |
Drug: bevacizumab
Other Names:
Drug: erlotinib
Other Names:
Drug: paclitaxel
Other Names:
Drug: carboplatin
Other Names:
|
Experimental: carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation: None |
Drug: bevacizumab
Other Names:
Drug: paclitaxel
Other Names:
Drug: carboplatin
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Consolidation Progression-Free Survival [Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year and upon treatment discontinuation were followed for another year.]
Consolidation PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time from the first day of consolidation therapy to documented disease progression (PD) or disease-specific death. Based on RECIST 1.1, radiographic PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since beginning consolidation, the appearence of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Based on Rustin criteria, serlogic PD was a rise in CA125 since beginning of consolidation or previously normal CA125 that rises to >/= 2xULN with either event documented on 2 occasions. Patients who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation.
- Consolidation Treatment-related Toxicity Rate [Assessed every cycle during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year.]
Consolidation treatment-related toxicity rates based on CTCAEv3 were defined as rates of maximum grade 3 or higher toxicity events with attribution possible, probable or definite occurring during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Consolidation Objective Response Rate [Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year.]
Consolidation objective response (OR) was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria with OR defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. For CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. If CA125 disease then OR based on Rustin criteria is a 50% decrease in serum CA125 level from two initially elevated samples confirmed by a 4th sample.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
18 years of age and older
-
Histological diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or papillary serous mullerian carcinoma
-
Previous attempted surgical debulking
-
Stage III or IV
-
Willing and able to undergo second look laparoscopy
-
Performance status 0-1 by ECOG scale
-
Peripheral neuropathy < grade 2
-
Life expectancy of 6 months or greater
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease as outlined in the protocol
-
Neutrophil count < 1,500/mm3; platelet count <100,000/m3
-
Alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN, SGOT > 5 x ULN
-
Calculated creatinine clearance < 50ml/min
-
Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for other malignancy except for the treatment for localized breast cancer greater than five years prior to diagnosis
-
No more than one cycle of first line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel
-
Inadequate surgical cytoreduction such that interval cytoreductive surgery could materially improve prognosis
-
Concurrent invasive malignancy
-
Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
-
Evidence of tumor involving major blood vessels on any prior CT scans
-
Surgical wound that has failed to close
-
Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to Day 0, or anticipation of need for major surgical procedure during the course of this study
-
Core biopsy or other minor surgical procedure, excluding placement of a vascular access device, within 7 days prior to study enrollment
-
History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within 6 months prior to day 0
-
Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
-
Prior treatment with an anti-angiogenic agent
-
Any active bleeding
-
Active psychiatric disease or neurologic symptoms requiring treatment
-
Presence of central nervous system brain metastases
-
Proteinuria at screening as demonstrated by criteria in protocol
-
Dementia or significantly altered mental status that would prohibit the understanding and/or giving of informed consent
-
Known hypersensitivity to Cremophor EL or any component of Avastin
-
Active bacterial, viral, or fungal infections
-
Receiving any other investigational agent
-
History of gastrointestinal perforation
-
Prior therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor
-
Symptoms of bowel obstruction
-
Dependence on TPN or IV hydration
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02114 |
2 | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 |
3 | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Genentech, Inc.
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Massachusetts General Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Susana Campos, MD, MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 07-039
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Sixty patients were enrolled between Aug 3, 2007 and Jan 6, 2010. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. |
Arm/Group Title | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation: None |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
STARTED | 23 | 25 | 11 |
Treated | 23 | 25 | 11 |
COMPLETED | 11 | 10 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 12 | 15 | 11 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. bevacizumab paclitaxel carboplatin | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. bevacizumab erlotinib paclitaxel carboplatin | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation: None bevacizumab paclitaxel carboplatin | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 23 | 25 | 11 | 59 |
Age (years) [Median (Inter-Quartile Range) ] | ||||
Median (Inter-Quartile Range) [years] |
58
|
56
|
54
|
57
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
23
100%
|
25
100%
|
11
100%
|
59
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | ||||
United States |
23
100%
|
25
100%
|
11
100%
|
59
100%
|
Cancer Type (participants) [Number] | ||||
Primary peritoneal |
4
17.4%
|
1
4%
|
1
9.1%
|
6
10.2%
|
Fallopian tube |
5
21.7%
|
4
16%
|
1
9.1%
|
10
16.9%
|
Epithelial ovarian |
10
43.5%
|
17
68%
|
8
72.7%
|
35
59.3%
|
Uterine papillary serous |
2
8.7%
|
1
4%
|
1
9.1%
|
4
6.8%
|
Other (mixed, carcinosarcoma) |
2
8.7%
|
2
8%
|
0
0%
|
4
6.8%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Consolidation Progression-Free Survival |
---|---|
Description | Consolidation PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method was defined as the time from the first day of consolidation therapy to documented disease progression (PD) or disease-specific death. Based on RECIST 1.1, radiographic PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since beginning consolidation, the appearence of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Based on Rustin criteria, serlogic PD was a rise in CA125 since beginning of consolidation or previously normal CA125 that rises to >/= 2xULN with either event documented on 2 occasions. Patients who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation. |
Time Frame | Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year and upon treatment discontinuation were followed for another year. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The analysis dataset is comprised of patients randomized to consolidation treatment. |
Arm/Group Title | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. |
Measure Participants | 23 | 25 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [months] |
13.3
|
18.9
|
Title | Consolidation Treatment-related Toxicity Rate |
---|---|
Description | Consolidation treatment-related toxicity rates based on CTCAEv3 were defined as rates of maximum grade 3 or higher toxicity events with attribution possible, probable or definite occurring during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment. |
Time Frame | Assessed every cycle during consolidation treatment and up to 30 days post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The analysis dataset is comprised of patients who were randomized to consolidation treatment. |
Arm/Group Title | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. |
Measure Participants | 23 | 25 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of participants] |
30.4
132.2%
|
72.0
288%
|
Title | Consolidation Objective Response Rate |
---|---|
Description | Consolidation objective response (OR) was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria with OR defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. For CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. If CA125 disease then OR based on Rustin criteria is a 50% decrease in serum CA125 level from two initially elevated samples confirmed by a 4th sample. |
Time Frame | Assessments occurred every cycle (serologic) and every 3 cycles (radiologic) on consolidation treatment. Pts were allowed on consolidation therapy for up to 1 year. |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The analysis dataset is comprised of all patient who started consolidation treatment. |
Arm/Group Title | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. |
Measure Participants | 23 | 25 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [proportion of patients] |
0.65
|
.60
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | Assessed each cycle throughout consolidation treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Per protocol, consolidation treatment was a fixed duration of 1 year. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | Serious and other AE data is only available for consolidation treatment reflecting the primary and secondary study objectives centered on the evaluation of consolidative regimens AE vs A. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib | ||
Arm/Group Description | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (A): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 1 year. | Induction (CTA): Patients received carboplatin IV AUC 5, paclitaxel IV 175 mg/m2 and bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle for 6 cycles. Bevacizumab started with cycle 2. Patients with disease progression based on radiographic evaluation after induction could not advance to the randomized consolidation phase. Consolidation (AE): Patients received bevacizumab IV 15 mg/kg on day 1 (+/- 3d) of a 21 day cycle and oral erlotinib 150mg daily for 1 year. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 7/23 (30.4%) | 18/25 (72%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Hemoglobin | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Colitis | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Diarrhea w/o prior colostomy | 0/23 (0%) | 5/25 (20%) | ||
Enteritis | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Fatigue | 1/23 (4.3%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Infection-other | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Wound - non-infectious | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Hyponatremia | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Extremity-limb, pain | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Joint, pain | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Muscle, pain | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Irregular menses | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Nail changes | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Rash/desquamation | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Rash: acne/acneiform | 0/23 (0%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 6/23 (26.1%) | 4/25 (16%) | ||
Hemorrhage-other | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab | Carboplatin/Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab Then Bevacizumab/Erlotinib | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 23/23 (100%) | 25/25 (100%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Hemoglobin | 8/23 (34.8%) | 8/25 (32%) | ||
Lymphatics-other | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
C-P arrest, non-fatal, cause unk | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Ear and labyrinth disorders | ||||
Tinnitus | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Vision-blurred | 2/23 (8.7%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdomen, pain | 3/23 (13%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Constipation | 5/23 (21.7%) | 6/25 (24%) | ||
Dental/teeth/peridontal | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Diarrhea w/o prior colostomy | 5/23 (21.7%) | 18/25 (72%) | ||
Dry mouth | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Dyspepsia | 3/23 (13%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Esophagitis | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
GI-other | 0/23 (0%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Hemorrhoids | 0/23 (0%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Intestine, pain | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Lip, pain | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Muco/stomatitis (symptom) oral cavity | 1/23 (4.3%) | 4/25 (16%) | ||
Muco/stomatitis (symptom) stomach | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Muco/stomatitis by exam, oral cavity | 0/23 (0%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Nausea | 5/23 (21.7%) | 9/25 (36%) | ||
Oral cavity, hemorrhage | 3/23 (13%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Oral cavity, pain | 0/23 (0%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Oral gums, pain | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Rectum, hemorrhage | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Salivary | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Vomiting | 2/23 (8.7%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Chest/thoracic pain NOS | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Constitutional, other | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Edema limb | 1/23 (4.3%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Face, pain | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Fatigue | 18/23 (78.3%) | 21/25 (84%) | ||
Fever w/o neutropenia | 0/23 (0%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Pain-other | 2/23 (8.7%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Rigors/chills | 0/23 (0%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Infection Gr0-2 neut, lip/perioral | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infection Gr0-2 neut, meninges | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infection Gr0-2 neut, skin | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infection Gr0-2 neut, urinary tract | 1/23 (4.3%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infection Gr0-2 neut, wound | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infection w/ gr3-4 neut, anal/perianal | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infection w/ gr3-4 neut, skin | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Infection w/ unk ANC ungual (nails) | 0/23 (0%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Infection-other | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Chemoradiation dermatitis | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Alkaline phosphatase | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
ALT, SGPT | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
AST, SGOT | 0/23 (0%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Bilirubin | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Leukocytes | 3/23 (13%) | 5/25 (20%) | ||
Metabolic/Laboratory-other | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Neutrophils | 1/23 (4.3%) | 5/25 (20%) | ||
Platelets | 5/23 (21.7%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Weight loss | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Anorexia | 2/23 (8.7%) | 5/25 (20%) | ||
Bicarbonate | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Dehydration | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Hyperglycemia | 4/23 (17.4%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Hyperkalemia | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Hypermagnesemia | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Hypernatremia | 1/23 (4.3%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Hypoalbuminemia | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Hypoglycemia | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Hypokalemia | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Hypomagnesemia | 7/23 (30.4%) | 8/25 (32%) | ||
Hyponatremia | 2/23 (8.7%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthritis | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Bone, pain | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Extremity-limb, pain | 2/23 (8.7%) | 5/25 (20%) | ||
Joint, pain | 12/23 (52.2%) | 7/25 (28%) | ||
Joint-function | 0/23 (0%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Muscle, pain | 6/23 (26.1%) | 4/25 (16%) | ||
Musculoskeletal/soft tissue-other | 0/23 (0%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Neck, pain | 2/23 (8.7%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Nonneuropathic generalized weakness | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Nonneuropathic upper extr muscle weak | 0/23 (0%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Dizziness | 1/23 (4.3%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Head/headache | 6/23 (26.1%) | 4/25 (16%) | ||
Neurologic-other | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Neuropathy-motor | 2/23 (8.7%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Neuropathy-sensory | 14/23 (60.9%) | 12/25 (48%) | ||
Sinus, pain | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Taste disturbance | 1/23 (4.3%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Anxiety | 5/23 (21.7%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Confusion | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Depression | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Insomnia | 2/23 (8.7%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Libido | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Bladder, pain | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Proteinuria | 4/23 (17.4%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Renal/GU-other | 1/23 (4.3%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Urinary frequency/urgency | 1/23 (4.3%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Urinary hemorrhage NOS | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Vagina, hemorrhage | 2/23 (8.7%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Allergic rhinitis | 1/23 (4.3%) | 2/25 (8%) | ||
Cough | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Dyspnea | 2/23 (8.7%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Nose, hemorrhage | 13/23 (56.5%) | 7/25 (28%) | ||
Pulmonary/Upper Respiratory-other | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Throat/pharynx/larynax, pain | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Voice changes/dysarthria | 2/23 (8.7%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Alopecia | 12/23 (52.2%) | 11/25 (44%) | ||
Dry skin | 1/23 (4.3%) | 11/25 (44%) | ||
Erythema multiforme | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Hand-foot reaction | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Nail changes | 0/23 (0%) | 3/25 (12%) | ||
Photosensitivity | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Pruritus/itching | 1/23 (4.3%) | 5/25 (20%) | ||
Rash/desquamation | 1/23 (4.3%) | 8/25 (32%) | ||
Rash: acne/acneiform | 1/23 (4.3%) | 16/25 (64%) | ||
Skin breakdown/decubitus ulcer | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Skin, pain | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) | ||
Skin-other | 0/23 (0%) | 4/25 (16%) | ||
Urticaria | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hemorrhage-other | 1/23 (4.3%) | 0/25 (0%) | ||
Hypertension | 9/23 (39.1%) | 9/25 (36%) | ||
Hypotension | 0/23 (0%) | 1/25 (4%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Susana M. Campos, MD, MPH |
---|---|
Organization | Dana-Farber Cancer Institute |
Phone | 617-632-5269 |
susana_campos@dfci.harvard.edu |
- 07-039