A Phase 2 Study of the IDO Inhibitor Epacadostat Versus Tamoxifen for Subjects With Biochemical-recurrent-only EOC, PPC or FTC Following Complete Remission With First-line Chemotherapy
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is an open-label, randomized, phase 2 study of an IDO inhibitor, INCB024360 (epacadostat) versus tamoxifen in biochemical recurrent only ovarian cancer patients following complete remission with first-line chemotherapy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Epacadostat Subjects randomized to Arm A (epacadostat) will take epacadostat tablets at a dose of 600 mg BID, beginning on Day 1. |
Drug: Epacadostat
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Tamoxifen Subjects randomized to Arm B (tamoxifen) will take tamoxifen tablets at a dose of 20 mg BID, beginning on Day 1. |
Drug: tamoxifen
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Progression free survival (PFS) using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 definition of progression as determined by the investigator. [PFS is defined as the number of days from randomization to the earlier of death or disease progression for up to 36 months.]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Safety and tolerability of epacadostat by adverse event assessment. [Adverse events assessed every 2 weeks during cycle 1, then every 28 days thereafter until each subject's death or disease progression or for up to 36 months, whichever is longest.]
- Cancer Antigen (CA) 125 response rate, using Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) criteria. [CA 125 response rate defined as at least 50% reduction on study as compared to pretreatment sample; pre-treatment sample must be at least 2x ULN and response must be sustained for at least 28 days.]
- Duration of overall survival. [Overall survival followed every 12 weeks until last date known to be alive, until subjects withdraw consent or up to 36 months, whichever is longest.]
- Progression-free survival using RECIST 1.1 definition of objective progression as determined by the central imaging laboratory. [Progression free survival defined by central imaging lab using RECIST 1.1 assessed at 8 week intervals, retrospectively, until disease progression, death, subject withdraw of consent or up to 36 months, whichever is longest.]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects who have received first-line chemotherapy, which must have been a platinum-containing regimen.
-
Subjects who received maintenance paclitaxel or, bevacizumab, or alternative maintenance therapy (e.g. vaccines) are eligible for enrollment provided they have discontinued therapy at least 4 weeks for prior taxane and, at least 8 weeks for bevacizumab, or received medical monitor approval for time lapse from alternative maintenance therapy prior to randomization and recovered from toxicities to less than Grade 2.
-
Subject must be currently in remission by clinical and radiological criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors [RECIST 1.1]).
- If a PET scan or high-resolution CT scan is performed and demonstrates new disease </= 1 cm, these subjects would be eligible.
-
Clinical remission is defined as: asymptomatic and a negative physical examination.
-
Scans are required post completion of platinum-containing therapy to document disease remission.
-
Prior to the first-line regimen, CA 125 must have been elevated at first diagnosis, must have normalized with the first-line therapy/regimen, and is currently elevated:
- CA 125 elevation is defined as 2 consecutive measurements that are both above the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at least 42 weeks apart, with the second measure showing further increases from the first measurement
-
If CA 125 is ≥ 2 × ULN the confirmatory value only needs to be 1 week apart.
-
CA 125 elevation is defined as a value that is at least 2 × ULN on 2 occasions at least 1 week apart (UK ONLY REQUIREMENT).
-
CA 125 elevation must be at least 3 months from completion of first-line platinum-containing regimen.
-
Documentation of at least 1 normal CA 125 level at approximately 3 months during or following first line therapy is required.
-
Subjects must have available archived tumor tissue.
-
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
-
Adequate renal, hepatic, and bone marrow function based on screening laboratory assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects with any evidence of new disease (> 1 cm) including new ascites as confirmed by imaging.
-
Any other prior antitumor systemic therapy except for first-line chemotherapy associated with previous CA 125 normalization or maintenance paclitaxel, bevacizumab, or alternative maintenance therapy as approved by the medical monitor.
-
Subjects with prior radiotherapy within 3 months of randomization and have not recovered from all radiotherapy-related toxicities, who have received radiation therapy to the chest within 3 months of randomization, or who have a history or radiation pneumonitis.
-
Subjects with protocol-specified active autoimmune processes except vitiligo or thyroiditis.
-
Subjects receiving investigational study drug for any indication, immunological-based treatment for any reason (except completed adjuvant therapy with medical monitor approval), or potent CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors.
-
Subjects receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) within the 21 days prior to screening; subjects who have ever had Serotonin Syndrome (SS) after receiving 1 or more serotonergic drugs.
-
Subjects for whom tamoxifen therapy is contraindicated.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | La Jolla | California | United States | ||
2 | Los Angeles | California | United States | ||
3 | San Francisco | California | United States | ||
4 | Evanston | Illinois | United States | ||
5 | Joliet | Illinois | United States | ||
6 | Iowa City | Iowa | United States | ||
7 | Covington | Louisiana | United States | ||
8 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States | ||
9 | Detroit | Michigan | United States | ||
10 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | ||
11 | Bridgewater | New York | United States | ||
12 | Buffalo | New York | United States | ||
13 | Mineola | New York | United States | ||
14 | Durham | North Carolina | United States | ||
15 | Abington | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
16 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | ||
17 | Greenville | South Carolina | United States | ||
18 | Bendigo | Australia | |||
19 | Heidelberg | Australia | |||
20 | Herston | Australia | |||
21 | Milton | Australia | |||
22 | Randwick | Australia | |||
23 | Calgary | Alberta | Canada | ||
24 | Toronto | Ontario | Canada | ||
25 | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | ||
26 | Ekaterinburg | Russian Federation | |||
27 | Izhevsk | Russian Federation | |||
28 | Krasnodar | Russian Federation | |||
29 | Kursk | Russian Federation | |||
30 | Moscow | Russian Federation | |||
31 | Orenburg | Russian Federation | |||
32 | St. Petersburg | Russian Federation | |||
33 | Ufa | Russian Federation | |||
34 | Chernivtsi | Ukraine | |||
35 | Dnepropetrovsk | Ukraine | |||
36 | Kharkiv | Ukraine | |||
37 | Lutsk | Ukraine | |||
38 | Bebington | United Kingdom | |||
39 | Cardiff | United Kingdom | |||
40 | Edinburgh | United Kingdom | |||
41 | Glasgow | United Kingdom | |||
42 | Keighley | United Kingdom | |||
43 | Leeds | United Kingdom | |||
44 | Liverpool | United Kingdom | |||
45 | London | United Kingdom | |||
46 | Manchester | United Kingdom | |||
47 | Nottingham | United Kingdom | |||
48 | Oxford | United Kingdom | |||
49 | West Midlands | United Kingdom |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Incyte Corporation
Investigators
- Study Director: Lance Leopold, M.D., Incyte Corporation
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- INCB 24360-210