Whole Body Diffusion MRI for Non-invasive Lesion Detection and Therapy Follow-up: Study With Patients With Ovarian Cancer and Peritoneal Metastasis

Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT01242436
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
47
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Ovarian cancer is a gynecological cancer with a high risk of mortality. This is because the diagnosis is often been made in an advanced cancer stage with metastases throughout the peritoneum.

An international study led by Prof. Dr. Ignace Vergote (Gynaecological Oncology) showed for the first time that patients in such an advanced stage of ovarian cancer who received first three neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy regimens followed by interval debulking surgery, and in turn followed by at least 3 treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy, had fewer complications than patients treated with primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. Moreover, the final survival rate in both groups seemed to be similar. The most important prognostic marker appeared to be whether patients with primary or interval surgery no longer had a visible residual tumor after the treatment. Patients who had only small metastases in the peritoneum, seemed to be better treated with primary surgery (neoadjuvant Vergote I, et al Chemotherapy or Primary Surgery in Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Crystallising, N Engl J Med 363 (1910): 943 - 953).

Each patient with suspected advanced ovarian cancer should undergo a preoperative evaluation where they assess which of the two treatments is the best option.

The aim of the study is to assess whole body diffusion weighted imaging (WB-DWI) as a non-invasive method, in patients with confirmed ovarian cancer in the presence of peritoneal metastases. This is to assess which of the two treatments (primary debulking surgery followed chemotherapy versus platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery, followed in turn by chemotherapy) is the best option for a particular type of patient.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: intravenous contrast administration
N/A

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Ovarian cancer is a gynecological cancer with a high risk of mortality. This is because the diagnosis is often been made in an advanced cancer stage with metastases throughout the peritoneum. The standard treatment for this condition till now consisted of primary debulking surgery where the tumor, the uterus and both the ovaries were removed, followed by a minimum of six treatments with platinum-based chemotherapy. This operation is often accompanied by serious complications such as for example bleedings, embolic events, infections and in extreme cases, even mortality. An international study led by Prof. Dr. Ignace Vergote (Gynaecological Oncology) showed for the first time that patients in such an advanced stage of ovarian cancer who received first three neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy regimens followed by interval debulking surgery, and in turn followed by at least 3 treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy, had fewer complications than patients treated with primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy. Moreover, the final survival rate in both groups seemed to be similar. The most important prognostic marker appeared to be whether patients with primary or interval surgery no longer had a visible residual tumor after the treatment. Patients who had only small metastases in the peritoneum, seemed to be better treated with primary surgery (neoadjuvant Vergote I, et al Chemotherapy or Primary Surgery in Stage IIIC or IV Ovarian Crystallising, N Engl J Med 363 (1910): 943 - 953).

Each patient with suspected advanced ovarian cancer should undergo a preoperative evaluation where they assess which of the two treatments is the best option. This should of course, for each individual patient, take into account comorbidity, cancer stage, number and location of the metastases etc. Currently,[18F] FDG-PET/CT, CT and conventional MRI are being used for staging, detecting recurrence and metastasis and for evaluating therapy response. These techniques have some disadvantages. A PET study takes a long time to perform and makes use of radioactive material. The addition of CT also gives rise to additional radiation. [18F] FDG accumulates in inflammatory cells in the tumor. This can explain the difficulties concerning early evaluation of treatment response. Although CT allows high resolution images of the entire body, sometimes the technology lacks sufficient sensitivity or specificity. Although conventional MRI has the highest sensitivity for detection of liver metastases, the lack of efficient whole-body imaging for staging a disadvantage when assessing systemic tumor spread and metastasis. Small peritoneal metastases are therefore often missed with this technique.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an emerging technology that is currently being uses in cancer imaging. Here the difference in movement of water molecules provides information about the integrity of cellular membranes. DWI has the advantage that no contrast material is required and there is also no need for exposure to ionizing radiation. Further developments in technology allowed for an acceptable time in whole body conducting research, so we should be able to image gastrointestinal tumors with this whole body technique.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of the study is to assess whole body diffusion weighted imaging (WB-DWI) as a non-invasive method, in patients with confirmed ovarian cancer in the presence of peritoneal metastases. This is to assess which of the two treatments (primary debulking surgery followed chemotherapy versus platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery, followed in turn by chemotherapy) is the best option for a particular type of patient.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Diagnostic
Official Title:
Whole Body Diffusion MRI for Non-invasive Lesion Detection and Therapy Follow-up: Study With Patients With Ovarian Cancer and Peritoneal Metastasis
Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2013
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2014

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Evaluation of WB-DWI as a noninvasive method to assess which kind of treatment fits best for a particular patient with ovarian cancer in the presence of peritoneal metastasis [2011-2015 continuously]

    The aim of the study is to assess whole body diffusion weighted imaging (WB-DWI)as a non-invasive method, in patients with confirmed ovarian cancer in the presence of peritoneal metastases. This is to evaluate which of the two treatments (primary debulking surgery followed chemotherapy versus platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery, followed in turn by chemotherapy) is the best option for a particular type of patient.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
N/A and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients diagnosed with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer in the presence of peritoneal metastasis are, on a voluntary basis, enrolled in the study. These are patients who 'll either underwent primary debulking surgery followed by at least six courses of platinum-based chemotherapy or patients who will be assigned to three courses of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery, followed in turn by at least three courses of platinum-based chemotherapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with known contra-indications for MRI (cardiac pacemakers, cochlear implants, claustrophobic patients) will be excluded from this study. And so are patients with contra-indications to Gadolinium-based contrast agents and patients with a known restricted renal function (GFR < 30 ml/min).

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium 3000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
katrijn Michielsen, PhD researcher Radiology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01242436
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • S52920
First Posted:
Nov 17, 2010
Last Update Posted:
Apr 10, 2015
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2015
Keywords provided by katrijn Michielsen, PhD researcher Radiology, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 10, 2015