ICEBERG 3: Dose-finding Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of a PARP Inhibitor Against Doxil in BRCA+ve Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of drug AZD2281 against liposomal doxorubicin to see which is effective and well tolerated in treating patients with measurable BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive advanced ovarian cancer and who have failed previous platinum therapy.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 2 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1 AZD2281 Oral 200 mg BID |
Drug: AZD2281
200mg oral twice daily
|
Active Comparator: 2 Liposomal Doxorubicin |
Drug: Liposomal Doxorubicin
50mg/m2 Monthly Intravenous
Other Names:
|
Experimental: 3 AZD2281 Oral 400 mg BID |
Drug: AZD2281
400mg Oral twice daily
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Progression Free Survival (PFS) [Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
PFS was defined as the time to progression from the date of randomisation until the date of radiological assessment of progression per RECIST criteria or death (by any cause in the absence of progression)
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
ORR was defined according to RECIST. Complete response (CR) or partial response - (PR)- 30% decrease Patients with a best RECIST response of CR or PR had to have a confirmed response at least 28 days later.
- Disease Control Rate [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
The number of patients with confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions ) or SD ( small changes ) >4 months, divided by the number of randomised patients
- Overall Duration of Response [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
The duration of response was defined as time (months) from initial assessment of PR/CR until earliest date of objective progression or death. (Values may be underestimated as some patients had not progressed at final analysis so true duration is likely to be greater than that in database.)
- Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
The percentage change (reduction) from baseline in the sum of the lengths of the longest diameter (LD) of the RECIST target lesions were objectively documented, regardless of whether the patient was still taking study medication
- Best Percentage Change From Baseline in CA-125 Levels [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
Best percentage change in cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels
- Confirmed RECIST Response and/or CA-125 Response [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
The percentage of patients reporting a RECIST confirmed response and/or a CA-125 response (in the absence of progression). A CA-125 response was defined as a confirmed greater or equal to 50% reduction in CA-125.
- Overall Survival (OS) [At the time of the cut-off for the final analysis of overall survival (30 April 2010)]
OS was defined as time from randomisation to date of death from any cause. Patients who had not died at time of analysis were censored at last date they were known to be alive. Median OS was not calculable for olaparib groups due to an insufficient number of deaths so the percentage of participants who died are shown along with 95% confidence intervals
- Best Quality of Life (QoL) Response for Trial Outcome Index (TOI) [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
Best HRQoL response using the TOI endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +7. The TOI score ranges from 0-100.
- Best QoL Response for Total Functional Analysis of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian (FACT-O) [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
Best HRQoL response using the total FACT-O endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +9.
- Best QoL Response for FACT-O Symptom Index (FOSI) [At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009)]
Best HRQoL response using the FOSI endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +3.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Advanced ovarian cancer with positive BRCA1 or BRCA2 status
-
Progressive or recurrent disease after platinum-based chemotherapy
-
Measurable disease by RECIST
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Previous anthracycline treatment
-
Brain metastases
-
Less than 28 days since last treatment used to treat the disease
-
Considered a poor medical risk due to a serious uncontrolled disorder
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Research Site | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90048 |
2 | Research Site | San Francisco | California | United States | 94115 |
3 | Research Site | Boca Raton | Florida | United States | 33428 |
4 | Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 |
5 | Research Site | New York | New York | United States | 10065 |
6 | Research Site | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
7 | Research Site | East Melbourne | Australia | 3002 | |
8 | Research Site | Melbourne, Parkville | Australia | VIC 3050 | |
9 | Research Site | Randwick | Australia | 2031 | |
10 | Research Site | Leuven | Belgium | 3000 | |
11 | Research Site | Köln | Germany | 50937 | |
12 | Research Site | München | Germany | 81377 | |
13 | Research Site | Haifa | Israel | 31096 | |
14 | Research Site | Ramat Gan | Israel | 52621 | |
15 | Research Site | Tel Aviv | Israel | 6423906 | |
16 | Research Site | Szczecin | Poland | 70-111 | |
17 | Research Site | Barcelona | Spain | 08035 | |
18 | Research Site | Hospitalet deLlobregat | Spain | 08907 | |
19 | Research Site | Lund | Sweden | 22185 | |
20 | Research Site | Cambridge | United Kingdom | CB2 0QQ | |
21 | Research Site | Edinburgh | United Kingdom | EH4 2XR | |
22 | Research Site | London | United Kingdom | SE1 9RT | |
23 | Research Site | Manchester | United Kingdom | M20 4BX | |
24 | Research Site | Sutton | United Kingdom | SM2 5PT |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
Investigators
- Study Director: Jane Robertson, BSc, MBCHB, MD, AstraZeneca
- Principal Investigator: Stan Kaye, BSc, MB, FRCP, FRCR, SMedSCi, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- D0810C00012
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | First patient enrolled on 30 July 2008 and last patient on 3 March 2009 at 25 centres in 9 countries |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | 97 of 125 screened women with advanced BRCA 1/2 ovarian cancer who had chemotherapy were randomized |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Period Title: Randomised Part | |||
STARTED | 32 | 32 | 33 |
COMPLETED | 32 | 32 | 32 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period Title: Randomised Part | |||
STARTED | 32 | 32 | 32 |
Discontinued Initial Study Treatment | 22 | 20 | 25 |
Crossover to Olaparib | 0 | 0 | 14 |
Ongoing Crossover at DCO | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Discontinued Crossover | 0 | 0 | 9 |
COMPLETED | 10 | 12 | 7 |
NOT COMPLETED | 22 | 20 | 25 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 | 97 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | ||||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
57.2
(8.53)
|
53.8
(8.77)
|
54.3
(9.32)
|
55.5
(8.92)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | ||||
Female |
32
100%
|
32
100%
|
33
100%
|
97
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (Number) [Number] | ||||
African-Caribbean |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
1
3%
|
1
1%
|
Ashkenazi Jewish |
8
25%
|
10
31.3%
|
11
33.3%
|
29
29.9%
|
Sephardic Jewish |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
2
6.1%
|
2
2.1%
|
Not applicable |
20
62.5%
|
21
65.6%
|
19
57.6%
|
60
61.9%
|
Other |
4
12.5%
|
1
3.1%
|
0
0%
|
5
5.2%
|
BRCA status (Number) [Number] | ||||
Deleterious BRCA1 mutation |
26
81.3%
|
28
87.5%
|
27
81.8%
|
81
83.5%
|
Deleterious BRCA2 mutation |
6
18.8%
|
4
12.5%
|
6
18.2%
|
16
16.5%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Progression Free Survival (PFS) |
---|---|
Description | PFS was defined as the time to progression from the date of randomisation until the date of radiological assessment of progression per RECIST criteria or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) |
Time Frame | Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
19
59.4%
|
20
62.5%
|
20
60.6%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 200 mg bd, Olaparib 400 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 200 or 400 mg bd (n=64) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). A hazard ratio < 1 favours olaparib. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.6604 |
Comments | If the observed p-value for the combined olaparib groups is <0.02 (1-sided) then the result will be regarded as statistically significant. | |
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | Cox proportional hazards model with factors for treatment, BRCA (1 or 2) and platinum sensitivity (sensitive=1 or resistant/refractory=0). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.88 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.51 to 1.56 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 200 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 200 (n=32) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). A hazard ratio < 1 favours olaparib. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.7794 |
Comments | An observed p-value of <0.005 (1-sided) will be regarded as statistically significant for a given pairwise comparison. | |
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | Cox proportional hazards model with factors for treatment, BRCA (1 or 2) and platinum sensitivity (sensitive=1 or resistant/refractory=0). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.91 | |
Confidence Interval |
() 95% 0.48 to 1.74 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 400 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 400 (n=32) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). A hazard ratio < 1 favours olaparib. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.6604 |
Comments | An observed p-value of <0.005 (1-sided) will be regarded as statistically significant for a given pairwise comparison. | |
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | Cox proportional hazards model with factors for treatment, BRCA (1 or 2) and platinum sensitivity (sensitive=1 or resistant/refractory=0). | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.86 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.45 to 1.62 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Title | Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
---|---|
Description | ORR was defined according to RECIST. Complete response (CR) or partial response - (PR)- 30% decrease Patients with a best RECIST response of CR or PR had to have a confirmed response at least 28 days later. |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Complete response |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Number of Partial responders |
8
25%
|
10
31.3%
|
6
18.2%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 200 mg bd, Olaparib 400 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 200 or 400 (n=64) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1291 |
Comments | 2-sided p-value | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Analysis was performed using logistic regression with factors for treatment, BRCA status and platinum sensitivity. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 2.27 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.79 to 7.32 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | An odds ratio >1 favoured olaparib |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 200 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 200 (n=32) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3131 |
Comments | 2-sided p-value | |
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | Analysis was performed using logistic regression with factors for treatment, BRCA status and platinum sensitivity. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 1.90 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.55 to 7.01 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | An odds ratio >1 favoured olaparib. |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 400 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 400 (n=32) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.1079 |
Comments | ||
Method | Regression, Logistic | |
Comments | The analysis was performed using logistic regression with factors for treatment, BRCA status and platinum sensitivity. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Odds Ratio (OR) |
Estimated Value | 2.69 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.81 to 9.76 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | An odds ratio >1 favoured olaparib |
Title | Disease Control Rate |
---|---|
Description | The number of patients with confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions ) or SD ( small changes ) >4 months, divided by the number of randomised patients |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
21
65.6%
|
21
65.6%
|
19
57.6%
|
Title | Overall Duration of Response |
---|---|
Description | The duration of response was defined as time (months) from initial assessment of PR/CR until earliest date of objective progression or death. (Values may be underestimated as some patients had not progressed at final analysis so true duration is likely to be greater than that in database.) |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Duration of response is analysed for patients experiencing a response. |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Olaparib 200 mg bd + Olaparib 400 mg bd, | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 or 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 8 | 10 | 18 | 6 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
5.95
|
6.80
|
6.24
|
5.49
|
Title | Best Percentage Change in Tumour Size |
---|---|
Description | The percentage change (reduction) from baseline in the sum of the lengths of the longest diameter (LD) of the RECIST target lesions were objectively documented, regardless of whether the patient was still taking study medication |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Median (Full Range) [Percent change] |
-15.90
|
-24.60
|
-14.3
|
Title | Best Percentage Change From Baseline in CA-125 Levels |
---|---|
Description | Best percentage change in cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 30 | 31 | 33 |
Median (Full Range) [Percent change] |
-37.42
|
-71.19
|
-55.8
|
Title | Confirmed RECIST Response and/or CA-125 Response |
---|---|
Description | The percentage of patients reporting a RECIST confirmed response and/or a CA-125 response (in the absence of progression). A CA-125 response was defined as a confirmed greater or equal to 50% reduction in CA-125. |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Number [Percentage of participants] |
37.5
117.2%
|
59.4
185.6%
|
39.4
119.4%
|
Title | Overall Survival (OS) |
---|---|
Description | OS was defined as time from randomisation to date of death from any cause. Patients who had not died at time of analysis were censored at last date they were known to be alive. Median OS was not calculable for olaparib groups due to an insufficient number of deaths so the percentage of participants who died are shown along with 95% confidence intervals |
Time Frame | At the time of the cut-off for the final analysis of overall survival (30 April 2010) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Count of Participants [Participants] |
9
28.1%
|
11
34.4%
|
13
39.4%
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 200 mg bd, Olaparib 400 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 200 or 400 (n=64) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.5781 |
Comments | 2-sided p-value | |
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | Analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model with factors for treatment, BRCA status and platinum sensitivity. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.82 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.41 to 1.70 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | A hazard ratio of <1 favoured olaparib. |
Statistical Analysis 2
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 200 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 200 (n=32) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.3417 |
Comments | 2-sided p-value | |
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | Analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model with factors for treatment, BRCA status and platinum sensitivity. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 0.66 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.27 to 1.55 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | A hazard ratio of <1 favoured olaparib. |
Statistical Analysis 3
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Olaparib 400 mg bd, Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|
Comments | Analysis of olaparib 400 (n=32) versus liposomal doxorubicin (n=33). | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other (legacy) | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | 0.9877 |
Comments | 2-sided p-value | |
Method | Regression, Cox | |
Comments | Analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model with factors for treatment, BRCA status and platinum sensitivity. | |
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Hazard Ratio (HR) |
Estimated Value | 1.01 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% 0.44 to 2.27 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments | A hazard ratio of <1 favoured olaparib. |
Title | Best Quality of Life (QoL) Response for Trial Outcome Index (TOI) |
---|---|
Description | Best HRQoL response using the TOI endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +7. The TOI score ranges from 0-100. |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Evaluable for TOI at baseline |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Improved |
7
21.9%
|
5
15.6%
|
3
9.1%
|
No change |
10
31.3%
|
10
31.3%
|
11
33.3%
|
Worsened |
3
9.4%
|
7
21.9%
|
6
18.2%
|
Non-evaluable |
5
15.6%
|
7
21.9%
|
7
21.2%
|
Title | Best QoL Response for Total Functional Analysis of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian (FACT-O) |
---|---|
Description | Best HRQoL response using the total FACT-O endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +9. |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Evaluable for FACT-O at baseline |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Improved |
3
9.4%
|
6
18.8%
|
1
3%
|
No Change |
14
43.8%
|
11
34.4%
|
11
33.3%
|
Worsened |
3
9.4%
|
5
15.6%
|
7
21.2%
|
Non-evaluable |
5
15.6%
|
7
21.9%
|
8
24.2%
|
Title | Best QoL Response for FACT-O Symptom Index (FOSI) |
---|---|
Description | Best HRQoL response using the FOSI endpoint. Improvement was defined as a change from baseline of greater than or equal to +3. |
Time Frame | At the time that 57 PFS events had occurred (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Evaluable for FOSI at baseline |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Improved |
5
15.6%
|
4
12.5%
|
3
9.1%
|
No change |
14
43.8%
|
9
28.1%
|
10
30.3%
|
Worsened |
1
3.1%
|
9
28.1%
|
7
21.2%
|
Non-evaluable |
5
15.6%
|
7
21.9%
|
7
21.2%
|
Title | Progression Free Survival (PFS) |
---|---|
Description | PFS was defined as the time to progression from the date of randomisation until the date of radiological assessment of progression per RECIST criteria or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) |
Time Frame | Tumour assessment was to be assessed at screening, every 8 weeks during the study and at the withdrawal visit, up to 56 weeks. (Data cut-off for primary analysis of PFS: 15 September 2009) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks |
Measure Participants | 32 | 32 | 33 |
Median (95% Confidence Interval) [Months] |
6.5
|
8.8
|
7.1
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | AEs reported = all events up to OS data cut-off. After PFS data cut-off, AEs only collected for olaparib and cross-over groups. The safety profile of these 2 groups at OS was consistent with that at time of PFS. One patient was recorded as crossing over to olaparib but not receiving cross-over treatment. | |||||
Arm/Group Title | Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin | |||
Arm/Group Description | Olaparib (AZD2281) 200 mg oral capsules twice daily | Olaparib (AZD2281) 400 mg oral capsules twice daily | Liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks | |||
All Cause Mortality |
||||||
Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | |||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||||
Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 5/32 (15.6%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Vomiting | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Abdominal Pain Lower | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Constipation | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Intestinal Obstruction | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Nausea | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Small Intestinal Obstruction | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Subileus | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Fatigue | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Pyrexia | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||||
Cholelithiasis | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Bacteraemia | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||||
Overdose | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Haemoglobin Decreased | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Hypokalaemia | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Hyponatraemia | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Back Pain | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||||
Myelodysplastic Syndrome | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Cerebrovascular Accident | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Syncope | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Dyspnoea | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Deep Vein Thrombosis | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||||
Olaparib 200 mg bd | Olaparib 400 mg bd | Liposomal Doxorubicin | ||||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 32/32 (100%) | 32/32 (100%) | 31/32 (96.9%) | |||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||||
Anaemia | 4/32 (12.5%) | 11/32 (34.4%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Neutropenia | 2/32 (6.3%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | |||
Leukopenia | 5/32 (15.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Thrombocytopenia | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Cardiac disorders | ||||||
Palpitations | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Eye disorders | ||||||
Dry Eye | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||||
Nausea | 19/32 (59.4%) | 25/32 (78.1%) | 18/32 (56.3%) | |||
Stomatitis | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 19/32 (59.4%) | |||
Vomiting | 11/32 (34.4%) | 16/32 (50%) | 10/32 (31.3%) | |||
Abdominal Pain | 12/32 (37.5%) | 8/32 (25%) | 12/32 (37.5%) | |||
Constipation | 9/32 (28.1%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | 12/32 (37.5%) | |||
Diarrhoea | 8/32 (25%) | 12/32 (37.5%) | 10/32 (31.3%) | |||
Dyspepsia | 5/32 (15.6%) | 7/32 (21.9%) | 7/32 (21.9%) | |||
Abdominal Distension | 3/32 (9.4%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | |||
Dry Mouth | 0/32 (0%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | |||
Flatulence | 2/32 (6.3%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease | 1/32 (3.1%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Haemorrhoids | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | |||
Abdominal Discomfort | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Abdominal Pain Upper | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Ascites | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Dysphagia | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Gastritis | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Intestinal Obstruction | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Mouth Ulceration | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Oral Pain | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Salivary Hypersecretion | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
General disorders | ||||||
Fatigue | 12/32 (37.5%) | 21/32 (65.6%) | 14/32 (43.8%) | |||
Asthenia | 6/32 (18.8%) | 11/32 (34.4%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | |||
Mucosal Inflammation | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 7/32 (21.9%) | |||
Pyrexia | 1/32 (3.1%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | |||
Chills | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | |||
Oedema Peripheral | 2/32 (6.3%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Pain | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Immune system disorders | ||||||
Drug Hypersensitivity | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Infections and infestations | ||||||
Urinary Tract Infection | 5/32 (15.6%) | 11/32 (34.4%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | |||
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | 5/32 (15.6%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Influenza | 3/32 (9.4%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Nasopharyngitis | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | |||
Bronchitis | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Gastroenteritis | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Intertrigo Candida | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Rhinitis | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Tinea Pedis | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Tonsillitis | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Viral Infection | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Body Temperature Increased | 1/32 (3.1%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Weight Decreased | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||||
Decreased Appetite | 5/32 (15.6%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | 8/32 (25%) | |||
Hypomagnesaemia | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||||
Back Pain | 3/32 (9.4%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | |||
Arthralgia | 3/32 (9.4%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Pain In Extremity | 1/32 (3.1%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | |||
Flank Pain | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Groin Pain | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Muscle Spasms | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Musculoskeletal Pain | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Myalgia | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Nervous system disorders | ||||||
Headache | 8/32 (25%) | 9/32 (28.1%) | 8/32 (25%) | |||
Dizziness | 2/32 (6.3%) | 7/32 (21.9%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | |||
Dysgeusia | 5/32 (15.6%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Neuropathy Peripheral | 2/32 (6.3%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Memory Impairment | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||||
Insomnia | 3/32 (9.4%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Anxiety | 2/32 (6.3%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||||
Pollakiuria | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||||
Cough | 6/32 (18.8%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | |||
Dyspnoea | 2/32 (6.3%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | |||
Oropharyngeal Pain | 4/32 (12.5%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Dyspnoea Exertional | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Productive Cough | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | |||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||||
Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysaesthesia Syndrome | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 20/32 (62.5%) | |||
Rash | 3/32 (9.4%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | 14/32 (43.8%) | |||
Alopecia | 3/32 (9.4%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | 7/32 (21.9%) | |||
Erythema | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 6/32 (18.8%) | |||
Pruritus | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 5/32 (15.6%) | |||
Blister | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | |||
Dry Skin | 1/32 (3.1%) | 0/32 (0%) | 4/32 (12.5%) | |||
Skin Hyperpigmentation | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 3/32 (9.4%) | |||
Exfoliative Rash | 0/32 (0%) | 0/32 (0%) | 2/32 (6.3%) | |||
Vascular disorders | ||||||
Hypertension | 0/32 (0%) | 7/32 (21.9%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Hot Flush | 4/32 (12.5%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | 1/32 (3.1%) | |||
Hypotension | 2/32 (6.3%) | 0/32 (0%) | 1/32 (3.1%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
No publication of the study results may be made until publication of the results of the multi-centre study or 2 years after study completion, whichever is the sooner
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Paula del Rosario |
---|---|
Organization | AstraZeneca |
Phone | +44 7884 735492 |
ClinicalTrialTransparency@astrazeneca.com |
- D0810C00012