Comparing the Pain Experience Between Patients Who Have and Who Have Not Undergone Dermatologic Procedures
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the pain experience of patients who have not had dermatologic procedures (previously "unexposed") using energy devices (lasers, radiofrequency, ultrasound, etc.) with patients who have previously had procedures (previously "exposed") using energy devices. Based on previous clinical encounters, individuals with no prior experience with cosmetic procedures appear to experience more pain. However, no study to date has thoroughly examined this observation. As a result, this study has been designed to find a possible difference in pain perception between previously exposed and unexposed patients undergoing cosmetic procedures using energy devices.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Twenty subjects will be enrolled in the study: 10 subjects who have had cosmetic procedures in the past and 10 subjects who have not had such procedures. For each subject, pain tolerance in three areas will be assessed: temple, midface/cheek, and abdomen. In two areas of the face (temple and midface/cheek), a small sterile needle will be inserted into the skin along with three applications of the following devices that are FDA approved for use on the face: an ultrasound device (Ulthera), a pulsed dye laser (VBeam), and a radiofrequency (Thermage) device. Additionally, the abdomen will receive three of these four devices in a randomized order: small sterile needle insertion, a pulsed dye laser (VBeam) pulse, and a radiofrequency (Thermage) exposure (the ultrasound device, Ulthera, will not be used on the abdomen because it is currently not FDA approved for this indication). Subjects will then be asked to rate their pain after each application at each individual site using a pain scale. In addition, subjects will complete a questionnaire regarding their pain experiences and other possibly related factors before and after the procedures.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Naive Subjects Subjects who have not previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. |
Device: Thermage
Radiofrequency Device - specific setting will be determined by the location and thickness of skin. Periorbital: 58-140 J/cm2 Midface: 81-124 J/cm2 Abdomen: 95-181 J/cm
Other: Needle Application
30-gauge needle insertion into skin
Device: VBeam Laser
Pulsed Dye Laser at the following settings: 7.5 J, 0.6ms, 10mm, DCD 30/20
Device: Ulthera
Ultrasound Device at the following settings:
Transducer Frequency Depth Image Depth DS 7-3.0 7 MHz 3.0mm 0-8mm DS 4-4.5 4 MHz 4.5mm 0-8mm DS 7-4.5 7 MHz 4.5mm 0-8mm
|
Other: Non-Naive Subjects Subjects who have previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. |
Device: Thermage
Radiofrequency Device - specific setting will be determined by the location and thickness of skin. Periorbital: 58-140 J/cm2 Midface: 81-124 J/cm2 Abdomen: 95-181 J/cm
Other: Needle Application
30-gauge needle insertion into skin
Device: VBeam Laser
Pulsed Dye Laser at the following settings: 7.5 J, 0.6ms, 10mm, DCD 30/20
Device: Ulthera
Ultrasound Device at the following settings:
Transducer Frequency Depth Image Depth DS 7-3.0 7 MHz 3.0mm 0-8mm DS 4-4.5 4 MHz 4.5mm 0-8mm DS 7-4.5 7 MHz 4.5mm 0-8mm
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Pain Rated by Subjects [3 hours for all treatments in one visit]
The mean pain scores will be compared between naïve subjects and non-naïve subjects averaged over the anatomical sites: periocular (temple), midface/cheek, and abdomen and over all the different treatments. Pain scores were recorded along a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 (no pain- better) to 10 (maximal pain-worst). This is a 10 cm long line in which the subject was asked to draw a line on the scale with 0 (no pain- better) at one end to 10 (maximal pain-worst) at the other end. The drawn line was measured on the 10 cm line using a ruler to obtain the score.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
-
Subjects of both genders, 18 to 65 years of age.
-
Subjects who are in good health.
-
Non-naïve (patients who have not had cosmetic procedures using energy devices): Subjects who have had three or more non-ablative laser procedures or any skin tightening procedure using an energy device.
-
Subjects who understand and are willing to provide informed consent for participation in the study and are able to communicate with the investigator.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Subjects who have an active skin disease or skin infection in or around the treatment.
-
Subjects who are unable to understand the protocol or give informed consent.
-
Subjects with photophobia or who are unable to tolerate the treatments.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Northwestern University Department of Dermatology | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60611 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Northwestern University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Murad Alam, MD, Northwestern University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- STU 40788
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Naive Subjects | Non-Naive Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects who have not previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. | Subjects who have previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 10 | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Naive Subjects | Non-Naive Subjects | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects who have not previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. | Subjects who have previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 10 | 10 | 20 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |||
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
Male |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |||
United States |
10
100%
|
10
100%
|
20
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Pain Rated by Subjects |
---|---|
Description | The mean pain scores will be compared between naïve subjects and non-naïve subjects averaged over the anatomical sites: periocular (temple), midface/cheek, and abdomen and over all the different treatments. Pain scores were recorded along a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 (no pain- better) to 10 (maximal pain-worst). This is a 10 cm long line in which the subject was asked to draw a line on the scale with 0 (no pain- better) at one end to 10 (maximal pain-worst) at the other end. The drawn line was measured on the 10 cm line using a ruler to obtain the score. |
Time Frame | 3 hours for all treatments in one visit |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
[Not Specified] |
Arm/Group Title | Naive Subjects | Non-Naive Subjects |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects who have not previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. | Subjects who have previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Units on a scale] |
2.3
(1)
|
2.2
(1.4)
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Naive Subjects | Non-Naive Subjects | ||
Arm/Group Description | Subjects who have not previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. | Subjects who have previously undergone energy-based dermatologic procedures in the past. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Naive Subjects | Non-Naive Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Naive Subjects | Non-Naive Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Naive Subjects | Non-Naive Subjects | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
All Principal Investigators ARE employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Dr. Murad Alam |
---|---|
Organization | Northwestern University |
Phone | 312-695-4761 |
m-alam@northwestern.edu |
- STU 40788