BADDAP: Efficacy of Repeated Locoregional Anesthetics Blocks With Bupivacaine in Patients Suffering of Chronic Dentoalveolar Pain.

Sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04207411
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
2
37.2
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of anesthetic blocks repeated with bupivacaine in the management of patients with persistent dentoalveolar pain. Goals are to improve the understanding of the physiopathological mechanisms of persistent dentoalveolar pain and to highlight predictive criteria for the effectiveness of anesthetic blocks.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2

Detailed Description

This is a proof of concept, randomized, controlled prospective pharmacological trial, single blind, with two parallel arms.

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of repeated locoregional anesthetic blocks with bupivacaine in patient's persistent dentoalveolar pain compared to a control group receives a simulated anesthesia (local anesthesia with lidocaine).

The secondary objectives are :
  • to evaluate the tolerance of repeated locoregional anesthetic blocks to bupivacaine patients with persistent dentoalveolar pain compared to control receiving simulated anesthesia (local anesthesia with lidocaine).

  • to evaluate demographic and nosological predictive factors (age of symptoms, Quantitative Sensory Testing results) and psychometric (anxiety, depression, dramatization) of the effectiveness of anesthetic blocks.

After signing the informed consent, the patients participate will be randomized to anesthetic block treatment with bupivacaine or lidocaine.

During the 1st step of the study patients will participate at 6 visits (day -7, day 0, day 7, day 14, day 21 and M2) and will receive either a series of 4 locoregional anesthetic blocks with bupivacaine or a series of 4 local anesthesia with lidocaine ("simulated" control group) at day 0, day 7, day 14 and day 21. The main criterion is raised 2 months after the end of the series.

During the 2nd step

  • The patients from experimental group will be followed until month 6 (2 visits: month 3 month 6).

  • The patients from control group :

  • will received in open (if they want) a series of 4 locoregional anesthetic blocks with bupivacaine (day56, day,63, day 70, day 77) and will be followed during 6 months after the first injection (7 visits: day 63, day 70, day 77, month 3, month 4, month 5, month

  • will be followed until month 6 ((2 visits: month 3 month 6).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
bupivacaine or lidocaine randomized treatment.bupivacaine or lidocaine randomized treatment.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The dentist will prepare the product in another room, so the patient will not know the type of product used.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of Repeated Locoregional Anesthetics Blocks With Bupivacaine in Patients Suffering of Chronic Dentoalveolar Pain. (BADDAP)
Actual Study Start Date :
Aug 25, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Bupivacaine

The dose received at each injection will be 5 mg. One injection per week will be carried out over 4 consecutive weeks

Drug: Bupivacaine
Injection of anesthetics blocks once a week during 4 weeks.

Sham Comparator: Lidocaine

The dose received at each injection will be 1.25mg. An injection unique per week will be carried out over 4 consecutive weeks.

Drug: Bupivacaine
Injection of anesthetics blocks once a week during 4 weeks.

Drug: Lidocaine
Injection of anesthetics blocks once a week during 4 weeks.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Proportion of patients (with persistent dentoalveolar pain). with at least 30% pain reduction [difference compared to the basal value at day 0 (visit 1) to value at Month 2 (visit 6)]

    Mean numerical scale on journal of pain (last 7 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Brief Pain Inventory [The questionnaire will be completed at day-7, and month 2 for all patients and then "month 3 and month 6" for patient of experimental group or visit month 4, month 5, month 8 for control group.]

    This self-questionnaire will assess the pain intensity and impact of pain on the patient's life. He understands : a body image ; the maximum pain, the weakest pain, the usual pain of the last 15 days (numerical scale 0 to 10); the description of the current analgesic treatment; a assessment of relief by a percentage scale (0 to 100%); the study of the impact of pain on mood, relationships with other people, walking, sleep, work, joy of life, leisure, activities in general (scales numeric, rating from 0 (normal) to 10 (activity impossible).

  2. Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) [The questionnaire will be completed at month 2 for all patients and then "month 3 and month 6" for patient of experimental group or visit month 4, month 5, month 8 for control group.]

    Its purpose is to evaluate in a general way the effectiveness of a treatment felt by the patient. This scale consists of 7 levels of descriptors answering the question "Since start of treatment, how would you describe the change (if any) in your limitations of activities, your symptoms, your emotions and your quality of life in general, related to your affection painful? ", Divided according to 3 modalities: improvement: (7) very, (6) medium, (5) slightly, unchanged( 4), worsen (3) slightly, (2) medium, (1) very.

  3. Neuropathic Pain Assessment Questionnaire (QEDN) [The questionnaire will be completed at day-7, and month 2 for all patients and then "month 3 and month 6" for patient of experimental group or visit month 4, month 5, month 8 for control group.]

    The Neuropathic Pain Assessment Questionnaire is a self-questionnaire that has been specifically validated to assess and monitor the different aspects of neuropathic pain and is sensitive to change. This questionnaire consists of twelve questions, ten of which relate to the description of pain by measuring its intensity using a numerical scale, that is, by grading the pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain imaginable). The remaining two questions each offer five answers about the duration of spontaneous pain over 24 hours (from "1 to 3 hours per day" to "continuously") and the number of painful seizures (paroxysms) over 24 hours (from "no painful crisis" to "more than 20"). The ten descriptive questions can be grouped into 5 dimensions. The sum of the 10 questions gives the total score scored on 100 and each dimension gives a sub-score.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patient, male or female, over 18, with persistent dentoalveolar pain defined according to the criteria:

  • daily presence (> 2 hours / day and for more than 3 months) and continues pain;

  • located at one or more teeth or at the level of the alveolar bone;

  • not following a nervous path;

  • clinical, radiological and neurological examinations showing no cause organic visible;

  • dental causes excluded by appropriate tests;

  • local or systemic pathologies related to pain apart.

  • Pain intensity greater than or equal to 4/10 on numerical scale

  • Patient informed of the constraints of the study and having given his written consent. Benefiting of a social security scheme.

  • Mastering correctly French.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Pregnant women, breastfeeding, or likely to be pregnant.

  • Oral pain of known origin (cancerous, infectious, traumatic).

  • Patient having modified (stopped, started or modified dosage) in the last 2 month local or systemic medication that may interfere with the study results (for example, patients taking long-range psychotropic drugs will not be excluded).

  • All medical pathology judged by the investigator as not compatible with the study.

  • Known hypersensitivity to local amide-bound anesthetics or to any of the excipients

  • Treatment anticoagulant or known disorder of blood

  • Porphyria.

  • Atrioventricular conduction requiring training permanent electrosystol not yet realized.

  • Epilepsy not controlled by a treatment.

  • Patient non-cooperating, not speaking or not reading fluently French or in the impossibility of understanding the principle of a pain scale or understanding the study or to sign an informed consent.

  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship, or deprived of liberties.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 CHU de Clermont-Ferrand Clermont-Ferrand France 63000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: CĂ©line Melin, BDS, PhD, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04207411
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • RBHP 2018 MELIN (BADDAP)
  • 2018-002825-49
First Posted:
Dec 20, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Aug 31, 2020
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2019
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 31, 2020